A Circumcised Man is Best for a Woman's Health
San Francisco's Penis Ballot
It's true, overall. Not counting its more visual appeal, for women (or gay men) it is safer than males that are not.
Studies show that circumcision greatly diminishes the possibility of a woman from the exposure to the human papillomavirus that does cause cervical cancer and helps in the prevention of the woman in the transmission of the HIV virus that causes AIDS. In both cases, studies show that the cells on the inside of a male's penis foreskin somehow increase the percentage of getting HIV because the cells become infected with it. A man's penis that is circumcised removes the foreskin and eliminates this danger for transmission.
San Francisco, of all cities, has the opposite position on the ballot that would prohibit all males from being circumcised if 18 yrs. or under. regardless of religious customs etc. Those who are behind this ballot seem to ignore the fact that studies do show a 50% reduced risk in the transmission of HIV when the male is circumcised!
Makes you wonder who is behind this idiot ballot measure? How in the world would it even be enforced, at birth? Will there be "Penis Police" in the men's room? SF is one place to avoid if you are looking for sex.