ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

A Qualitative Study on Refractory Dyspnea

Updated on February 10, 2017

Introduction

Research into the treatment of refractory dyspnea is designed to improve quality of life. As such, research in this field is highly qualitative and relies on patient reports to determine effective intervention. For the purposes of scientific study, researchers will often use semi-quantitative methods to manage the qualitative data and attempt to draw correlations. Such methods can be asking patients to rate their level of discomfort or comparing what the patients report to visible signs of symptoms. The article by Currow et al. (2011) follows this method of data management for the qualitative research done in examining the benefits of opioids to patients with refractory dyspnea. This article shows sound scientific reasoning and use of qualitative methods that does not corrupt the quantitative data present or violate any rules about the treatment of such data.

Problem Statement

It is known that morphine is an effective treatment for refractory dyspnea. Morphine has certain drawbacks to its use due to its addictive nature and the harmfulness of the medication. Therefore, it is important to know the minimum dose of morphine that is still effective at reducing the symptoms of refractory dyspnea. Morphine is often given for dyspnea as a form of palliative care, however, if the medication causes harm to the patient, this can be seen as a violation of the hippocratic oath. Furthermore, not all patients on morphine for dyspnea are near death. Many patients still have a quality of life and are capable of functioning to some extent in society. The effects of morphine can make these patients less functional than they otherwise would be.

Currow et al. (2011) state clearly that refractory dyspnea is a distressing symptom and describe it as something that “threatens a person’s very existence.” This strong wording serves to show the audience of the research article why they should care about this issue and why it is worth studying. The field of palliative care is shown in this article to be one which addresses human suffering in an attempt to improve quality of life.

Purpose and Research Questions

The primary research question being asked in this study is: What is the minimum effective dose of sustained release morphine to treat refractory dyspnea? A secondary consideration would be the question: Is this minimum dose safe? The research is focused on limiting the negative effects of morphine for patients receiving regular morphine treatment for dyspnea. The researchers acknowledge that the minimum effective dose might still be found to be clinically unsafe for patients.

These questions of dosage and safety are clearly related to the problem this study addresses. This study’s purpose is clearly laid out by the authors as reducing risks to patients taking morphine by identifying the lowest dose necessary. Qualitative research methods play a large part in this study. Though the researchers employ quantitative means such as measuring dosages, the heart of the study involves getting feedback from patients about the effects of their condition and whether or not the dyspnea has improved. Without knowing the participants’ subjective responses, the researchers cannot know if a dosage is effective.

Literature Review

The authors cited a number of both qualitative and quantitative research as references to support their claims. Much of what is cited is not similar studies to their own work, but rather act as a groundwork from which they have based their research. These other articles serve to frame the work of Currow et al. (2011) in a larger scope. In addition to research pieces, the authors also cited published articles on the anatomy and physiology of the pulmonary system to provide backing for how morphine is able to have a positive effect on refractory dyspnea.

Most of the quantitative studies are current for the time this research was done. One piece by Abernathy et al. (2003) is older than five years from the time of publication. This piece seems to be justified in its inclusion as Currow was a major contributor to it, and therefore can vouch for its relevance to the current study. It is likely that the current research is an extension of this earlier work, and therefore it is only logical to include a reference to it within this piece. The qualitative studies on average, are older than the quantitative ones, with one such study dating from 1964.

The authors did not go into detail analyzing the merits of the research cited. The presence of most of these articles seems to be to provide theoretical backing for their own research. Additionally, many of the articles provide facts or data that is relevant to the research study. Together, this information does lay the groundwork for a logical argument.

Theoretical Framework

The researchers do not clearly state a specific perspective from which they developed this study. It is clear in their objectives that they believe that morphine is beneficial but dangerous and should be used in the lowest dose possible to get results. The researchers maintain a neutral tone through most of the paper, only adding in colorful language to demonstrate the suffering of individuals experiencing refractory dyspnea. For this reason, they do seem to be in favor of using palliative measures. Nothing more conclusive can be said about their initial perspectives or biases.

Diagrams were used to demonstrate certain facets of the research, however, these diagrams do not seem to represent the grounded theory method of qualitative research. As such, they are not discussed here.

Conclusion

The research by Currow et al. (2011) is a prime example of a qualitative study that shows academic rigor and proper management of the data acquired. The study creates a foundation using relevant literature and justifies itself by the importance of the problem at hand. The research is laid out clearly to be examined and scrutinized by peers, with research objectives and methods following a logical course and having a clear connection to the problem which they address.

References

Currow, D. C., Mcdonald, C., Oaten, S., Kenny, B., Allcroft, P., Frith, P., . . . Abernethy, A. P (2011). Once-Daily Opioids for Chronic Dyspnea: A Dose Increment and Pharmacovigilance Study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 42(3), 388-399.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)