Dr. Wakefield Vindicated?: Q/A Raises More Questions About Vaccinations and Its Link to Autism
Wakefield v Anderson Cooper Regarding Autism and Vaccine Link
An intense debate had aired between Anderson Cooper and Dr Andrew Wakefield regarding the declaration recently that Dr. Wakefield's report from 1998; linking the MMR vaccine to regressive autism was " an elaborate fraud". Mr Cooper did some background on Dr Wakefield's study of 12 children linking vaccines and autism and the British Medical Journal just recently stated it was fraudulent. Despite however, the huge uproar it may have caused in the scientific community; Wakefield's own peers. It didn't affect the dedicated people that support him.
Jenny McCarthy is an advocate that spreads information across the country citing Dr Wakefield's findings. She claims, as many others, that the MMR vaccine "triggered" her son's autism ( CDC on an interview on CNN the Chief herself states that their may be a definite link between predisposed genetic mitochondrial dysfunction and the vaccine acts a trigger. ) The multi-live viruses are also a trigger but Jenny McCarthy stands in her conviction that the vaccines play the largest role in "triggering" autism.
AUTISM SAVES LIVES; ALSO SOME VACCINES ARE SOMETIMESHARMFUL TO SOME CHILDREN
Lawmakers also latched onto Wakefield's findings as Congressman Dan Burton believes his grandson's autism was caused by vaccines. He had scientists from around the world speak in front of his committee saying that its a major cause due to the mercury content ( 2008 ).
Mr Cooper stated that the mercury was removed from MOST of the vaccines by 2001; yet the rates still climbed. ( They never took into account the registering of all cases of autism )
In 2004; 10 of the 12 co-authors removed their names from Wakefield's paper published in the Lancet. It was retracted by the BMJ because of the problems in its methods. A few months later Dr Wakefield lost his medical license to practice medicine in the UK. Editors of the BMJ calling it an "elaborate fraud" that's done lasting damage to both the United States and the UK due to parents refusing to vaccinate their children.
Now their have been measles outbreaks in states like California and Wisconsin.
The U.S. has seen the most cases of whooping cough since 1947. 10 infants died in California as a result.
Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey in February of 2010 stated:
It IS OUR MOST SINCERE BELIEF THAT DR WAKEFIELD AND PARENTS OF CHILDREN'S WITH AUTISM AROUND THE WORLD ARE BEING SUBJECTED TO A REMARKABLE MEDIA CAMPAIGN ENGINEERED BY VACCINE MANUFACTURERS. THAT DR WAKEFIELD IS BEING CRUCIFIED THROUGH A WELL ORCHESTRATED CAMPAIGN.
Republican Dan Burton of Indiana in June of 2002 stated:
DR WAKEFIELD - LIKE MANY SCIENTISTS WHO BLASE NEW TRAILS - HAS BEEN ATTACCKED BY HIS OWN PROFESSION. HE HAS BEEN FORCED OUT OF HIS POSITION AT ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL IN ENGLAND...
Deere, the investigative journalist that spent seven years investigating "bogus" data said that Wakefield altered patients facts on medical history and exploited a scared mothers for financial gain. Supported through the investigation, mind you, by British Pharmaceutical Industries "exclusively funded" which when Wakefield told Mr Cooper he yet again, cut him off so he couldn't say anything. Wakefield calls it a "ruthless pragmatic attempt to crush any investigation into valid vaccine safety concerns." Wakefield stated that the patients parents were indeed not interviewed and "if he is concerned of the truth he can read the truth in there."
Never was I so appalled at the display of Anderson Cooper as interrupting the answers to his own questions. Dr Wakefield was very agitated and was stuttering and did try to talk over Cooper but I don't attest the behavior to lying either; like I normally would due to the lack of unprofessional interviewing tactics of a much respect journalist. I like Anderson Cooper and I was really shocked at the display. I think that McCarthy may be right; the media is on some wierd campaign to fry Doctor Wakefield for this report. One that has been replicated, not by himself maybe, but by many different countries.
Dr Wakefield Autism Advocate
Interview with Parent 11 Regarding Deere Interview
When Deere introduced himself to request an interview with one of the parents on the 12 children panel of Dr Wakefield's study just recently retracted from the British Medical Journal; he gave his name as Brian Lawrence. A distrustful start as the parent didn't find out his true identity until days after the meeting. She described the interview as "distressing". Parents sent a letter and one emailed from out of the country that the allegations were false. They sent the letter to the GMC 22nd December 2008 and said they were referred in the proper manner for gastrointestinal problems.
Many parents had been to several different doctors but Wakefield's team was the first to do a comprehensive evaluation. They were always fully aware of what was being done and the children were never in distress. They greatly improved and are pain free.
They followed the GMC hearings very distressed because they never were given an opportunity to refute allegations and were excluded from giving evidence supporting Dr Wakefield.
Dr. Wakefield Advocating for More Research
Questions and Answers: Susan Hyman M.D; an Associate Professor Pediatrics Dvision of Neurodevelopmental and Behavioral Pediatrics
On January 6, 2011 the Washington Post online website discusses the study of Dr Wakefield's and that it was found to be a fraud. Hosting the live question and answer spot is Susan Hyman MD and the associate professor of pediatrics and division chief of neurodevelopmental and behavioral pediatrics at golisano children's hospital at the University of Rochester Medical Center.
Through Q and A Susan Hyman explained Brian Deer Is the person who wrote an editorial on their opinions of the multiple sources of information he obtained. It is very important for families of children with Autism to Examine Therapies based on Scientific evidence that is why the current controversy is so important.
Peer reviewed scientific literature (medical and scientific journals) depend on both editors and volunteer scientists to review the study's submitted for accurate interpretation and ethical conduct. About 10 % of autistic individuals have an underlying predisposed genetic trait for Autism that can not be identified using current test methods.
A very interesting fact that a question was asked had to do with whether gender and ethnicity accounted for a drastic rise in diagnosed cases of Autism. Another one asking if Vaccines are not linked to Autism; he isn't a believer it is either, then why such the drastic rise in cases diagnosed? Regurgitated information is given as the reason as it does on all vaccines are safe side. They repeated its primarily genetics but in the same interview she states they are only 10 percent that are predisposed for an underlying genetic trait. 20 years ago this person has the belief that ADHD was over-diagnosed and mostly in boys and with Autism it seemed that it was the same things. That gender and ethnicity labels were more of a factor than medical contributions.
To account for the 1000 percent increase in thirty years of autism diagnosis to 1 in 110/1-70 boys and 1 in 88 military dependents the extreme increase is due to improved awareness and awareness availability of services or a "POSSIBLE" prevalence is actually increasing.
I do agree with Susan Hyman that the DSM IV published distinct criteria for ADHD and ADD and Autism to prevent the accidental frequent misdiagnosis of the two disorders.
If a study is funded through the National Institute of Health some are required to make data available for outside analysis. Reasoning behind peer review by scientists they are unaware if the identities of them; and its supposed to validate accurate information. But that didn't explain WHY WE AS THE PUBLIC can access only one side of the argument but stand on the the CDC side. CDC is asking us to just think for us.
I have to interject on this issue asking my own question; that someone is more than welcome to send a comment or message to answer it. My question is Why not all the data has to be available for the public to access for analysis? Are we not intelligent enough? I understood a lot of the information in the studies and I have been to college and I have been rational, I have no preset notion of what I wanted to be the outcome, I have wanted to do articles in depth on both sides; but I refuse to sit and write the CDC says its safe because five scientists the CDC hired looked at data that none of us can see and then feel comfortable following them. They are asking to think for us...more like demanding as this issue is really huge. They are putting words into mouths of Jenny McCarthy, Dr Wakefield, the parents in the study, Jim Carrey and Robert F Kennedy. NONE OF THEM are anti-vaccine..."SOME kids are TRIGGERED BY Vaccinations."
Another thing is that whenever she is asked a question that is not on her "side of the fense" and I have seen the representatives from the CDC do the same thing as well , they talk around the question; they don't answer it in even a half informational way. So if you aren't going to provide all your data, and you aren't going to diretly answer the question then what are we supposed to think? CDC that is your cue; tell me what to think......
Wakefield Can Not Sue State of Texas for Defamation
Back in 2010 Wakefield had been discredited and they revoked his medical license over the study that showed a possible link to the MMR vaccine to gastrointestinal disease that was found in children with Autism. It was ruled in 2014 that he can't sue a British magazine for defamation where the editor and journalist resides in the state of Texas. The decision stated that he can't sue because the ties weren't strong enough to the state. They also lack jurisdiction because he doesn't have strong enough ties to have access to the Austin courts. The state has no jurisdiction over the magazine.
“The publications concerned Wakefield’s conduct and activities that occurred in England, and Texas is never mentioned in any of the articles,” Field wrote.
“We disagree with this decision, which denies Dr. Wakefield his day in court,” Parrish said. “It is important to note that this decision is on procedural and jurisdictional issues and in no ways addresses the merits of Dr. Wakefield’s claims.
- Court: Andrew Wakefield, autism researcher, cannot sue in Texas | www.statesman.com
Andrew Wakefield, who was stripped of his British medical license in 2010 after his autism research had been discredited, cannot sue a British magazine, editor and reporter for defamation in Texas, a state appeals court ruled Friday.
- Vaccines: HOME page for Vaccines and Immunizations site
CDC's Vaccines & Immunizations web site HOME PAGE
- HRSA - National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
Official Health Resources and Services Administration Web site of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
© 2011 Abby Rourk