ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Books, Literature, and Writing»
  • Books & Novels»
  • Fiction»
  • Science Fiction & Fantasy Books

Dystopias in Asimov’s Foundation and Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451

Updated on June 2, 2012
By Patrick Swint from Knoxville, TN, United States (EMP-SFM (4)  Uploaded by Guitarpop) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
By Patrick Swint from Knoxville, TN, United States (EMP-SFM (4) Uploaded by Guitarpop) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons | Source


Foundation didn’t remind me so much of a dystopia as of the current state of America. The Patriot Act seems to give the executive branch about as much power as the rulers of the empire seem to have. The empire, as it exists at the beginning of the story, is corrupt and concerned more about surviving than it is about its people’s surviving. It had its own secret police (quite active ones that capture Gaal shortly after his arrival on Trantor), its own private judgments (when Hari is “convicted”), and its own near-police state. They are able to investigate Seldon, arrest people with Seldon, and finally exile Seldon (although that seems to have been what Seldon wanted). Regardless of the facts, the government thinks they are in complete control. Later, when the government of the empire comes out to visit them, they don’t “say one damned thing, and said it so you never noticed” (Asimov, Foundation, 83).

By the end of the five stories in Foundation, it seems that the foundation itself is becoming a dystopia -- once Mayor Hardin takes over, he basically rules it as an emperor and controls the rest of the area through the new nuclear religion. Slowly, the foundation is taken over by the merchant princes, and I’m not sure if it is still a dystopia at that point. No matter what, they aren’t in an ideal situation, but I’m not convinced that it was a dystopia. It just doesn’t seem bad enough to me. It is unpleasant, yes, but not truly as bad as it could be. In many ways, Van Vogt’s “Weapon Shop” is a far more extreme dystopia, with a lot more control given to a more repressive government.

Fahrenheit 451, on the other hand, is a total dystopia. The people aren’t allowed personal freedoms with which to be themselves in any way, shape, or form. They aren’t allowed to read, they aren’t allowed to question, and they aren’t really allowed to think. “’You think too many things,’said Montag, uneasily” (Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451, 9). The scariest part is that the people had done it to themselves.

The government is completely in control. For example, it can choose to execute for any crime -- there is no trial when Guy is accused of killing his chief. Since they can’t find him, however, they chose to go ahead and execute a random man. The government is always there, and it always knows everything. It is bad, it is evil, it is pervasive, getting into all the cracks and crevices. It is in complete control. On top of it, the people themselves are just bad people -- by our standards, anyway. They don’t care about each other; they care about their television families much more than their own families. They have no connection with each other, mostly because they don’t communicate with each others, so there are no connections. The people who die are just left behind and forgotten “Killed jumping off buildings, yes, like Gloria’s husband last week…” (Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451, 94).

It’s really a place that you can’t help hating if you enjoy reading. When I read it, I fear what America could become if it goes that far, but at the same time, I don’t know if it would ever be that bad. While reading Reading Lolita in Tehran, it seems clear to me that the majority of the repressed in such societies would be a lot more internally active. I’m not sure that the country could have become so controlled so quickly. In Bradbury’s world, it seems to have taken less than a generation. I find that hard to believe, but it still makes for a chilling read.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Eric Calderwood profile image

      Eric Calderwood 6 years ago from USA

      I agree with you that Bradbury's world in Fahrenheit 451 seems worse than the Asimov world. But in Bradbury's world there is still a way out. Run away and wait for the cities to be destroyed in a nuclear war while you build a living library of books. But what about George Orwell's world in 1984? It doesn't seem like there would be any way out of that one. Especially if the thought police really can read your mind. The Proletariat are just fodder for the bombs sent by their own government to simulate the war that they use to control the masses. They will never be organized into a revolt because the people who would organize them have no opportunity to do so. (Even thinking about it is enough to get them arrested). And if Winston is correct and the only hope is in the Proletariat, then they have no hope at all.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)