- Books, Literature, and Writing»
- English Literature
King Lear Storm Scene and Character Analysis Shows Shakespeare Was Atheist
The play King Lear, first performed around 1604, centers on Lear, King of Britain, as he draws up plans to divide his kingdom among his three daughters. He selfishly demands that each daughter profess her love to their portion. The first two daughters are quick to say everything the know their father wants to hear and are given their portion of land. His third daughter, Cordelia, refuses to say anything except that her love is too great to be put into words. This enrages Lear, who banishes her from his Kingdom. He is subsequently abused by the two supposedly loving daughters, weathers a storm, descends into madness, and reunites with his truly loving Cordelia before both die in the play's final scene.
Atheist backdrop of the play King Lear
for a deeper analysis of Humanism and Atheism at the time Shakespeare wrote King Lear, see my page entitled "Shakespeare religion and God: Was Shakespeare and Atheist or did Shakespeare believe in God"
Shakespeare's intimate knowledge of the human condition throughout the play King Lear echoes Historian Marvin Perry's description of the Humanist revolution, which began around the same time period Shakespeare wrote the play:
the Humanist Revolution "mark[ed] the birth of modernity...[where] individuals in all endeavors [were] not constrained by a destiny imposed by God from outside, but [were] free to make their own destiny guided.only by examples of the past, the forces of the present circumstances, and the drives of their own inner nature".
An analysis of King Lear, coupled with bible citations and evidence from the text, mimics this ideology.
Atheism in King Lear
The scene in which King Lear banishes Cordelia highlights a very un-Christian theme; Materialism. Jesus, Christendom's revered Messiah, preached exhaustively on these subject. For instance, in Luke 12:15 he said, "Take heed, and beware of covetousness", and in Mathew 19:16-26 he urges a rich young man to sell his possessions and live a pious life. Yet King Lear does not follow Jesus's teachings. The entirety of the argument between he and Cordelia is about his need for validation. He knows his daughter loves him and she says so, but he actually needs to hear it materialized in her words. She would not relent to him and speak lies but maintains that she loves him according to their bond. So in response, Lear takes away his symbol of love, his material goods. His attachment to materialismis evidenced by how he equates love and material things.
Other great works by Shakespeare
The storm scene
The storm scene is another example of an un-Christian theme. The storm symbolizes King Lear's transition to loving Cordelia. Although initially banishing Cordelia, after the storm and his bout of madness that coincides, he transforms and proclaims, "if you have poison for my, I will drink it...you have some cause [your sisters] do not"(4.7.74-76). He exhibits the remorse of a good human being. This is very Humanist. He appeals to the tangible realities of the past, present and future, with a strong emphasis on his human relation to Cordelia.
A critic may be quick to point out that King Lear's remorse shows Christian morals, but this would be a fallacy.
First, King Lear goes through a period of madness. This contrasts with a stat of epiphany found in religiously oriented writings. A religious writing would contain allusions to a higher power, like God and good deeds in the play Everyman, or the magical garments in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. But King Lear is diferent. His madness is not attributed to the supernatural. It is biological.
Second, Cordelia's consultation with a doctor, King Lear's numerous appeals to nature, and the imagery of the storm as a catalyst for his change are all evidence for an emphasis on nature rather than religion.
Theologian William Lane Craig often says, "an absence of evidence is not an evidence of absence", when defending himself against religious skeptics' assertions that there is no scientific evidence for God. Ironically, this can also apply to Shakespeare's atheism. The evidence for his atheism is based mainly on a lack of evidence to the contrary. The historical evidence of his religious affiliation is entire absent. In a time period as religiously ripe as 17th century England, this would be very conspicuous. Add with it the strong Humanist overtones in the play King Lear, and there is a very strong case to say that Shakespeare was an Atheist.
Please comment and check out my homepage (link below)
- RyanBuda on HubPages
I am currently an instructor at the Arc of Farmington Valley(FAVARH), a non-profit organization that supports teenagers and adults with...