ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

English Language Pitfalls: Coulda/Shoulda/Woulda, or, Could of/Should of/Would of. Which is Correct?

Updated on January 24, 2017
DzyMsLizzy profile image

Words, wordplay, reading, and writing have been favorites of Liz's since early childhood. She enjoys exploring science and science fiction.

Does English Grammar trip you up?
Does English Grammar trip you up? | Source

The Correct Answer..

The answer is that none of the examples in the title are correct usage. However, they are all so commonly used by so many people that it almost goes unnoticed.

It also goes unchallenged too often. The explanation as to why these are incorrect follows.

Would You Do That? Could You Do That? Should You Do That?

If you could, or if you would or if you should, all is well. Sadly, there is a large percentage of people who do not understand the past tense of these. It is because of the contraction form, blending the two words.

If you 'would not' or 'could not' or 'should not' do a given action, you may very well and correctly shorten those phrases to 'wouldn't' or 'couldn't,' or 'shouldn't.' No one gets those wrong, or almost no one.

The Wrong Interpretation

The problem with the other end of this trio is under the "coulda/woulda/shoulda" umbrella. Nothing in that example is correct spelling or grammar, but it is understood as slang, or vernacular usage. It is not acceptable in formal writing, unless as dialogue spoken by a character in a story.

It's most often used in expressing regret for some opportunity passed by, with one person expressing the regret, and the person to whom they are speaking, replying with a sardonic, "Yeah, coulda/shoulda/woulda," as if to say, "Yes, but it's a little late now."

Ah, if time travel were possible, or do-overs were a real-life thing, then, yes, next time, the opportunity would be seized.

Whoops! Darn! I Knew That!!

The universally understood facepalm gesture
The universally understood facepalm gesture | Source

The Resulting Error

The problem arises with people misunderstanding, or mishearing the contraction for 'could have,' 'would have,' or 'should have.' They are correctly contracted and spelled as 'could've,' 'would've,' and 'should've.' The pronunciation is supposed to keep the 'v' sound from the original "have" in the non-contracted format.

The trouble is with the correct pronunciation of the word "of:" it sounds more like "uhv." So people hear the "uhv" for "of," which is a very similar sound to '...ve' in the contractions, (given that the trailing 'e' is silent), "could've," "would've," and "should've."

It sounds to them like "could of," so that is what they write; but that doesn't make it right.

If you want to keep two full words for emphasis, it's "could have," "should have," and "would have."

Of course, this is not a matter of national security; the only harm done is to the writer's credibility. It makes them appear uneducated, or at least under-educated.

The more precise your speech and writing, the better your chances of convincing people of your argument, or at least making them think things over.

Does this trio trip you up?

See results

© 2012 Liz Elias

Comments

Submit a Comment

  • DzyMsLizzy profile imageAUTHOR

    Liz Elias 

    6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, FullOfLoveSites

    Thank you for commenting; I'm pleased that you enjoyed the article.

  • FullOfLoveSites profile image

    FullOfLoveSites 

    6 years ago from United States

    Good hub...There are many errors you have suggested one of them.

  • DzyMsLizzy profile imageAUTHOR

    Liz Elias 

    6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, cookingrecipes--

    Thank you very much for the compliment, your input and the vote. Much appreciated.

  • cookingrecipes profile image

    Saidevan 

    6 years ago from Kerala

    These mistakes are seen often. Good well written hub,

    voted

  • Rebecca E. profile image

    Rebecca E. 

    6 years ago from Canada

    DzyMslizzy-- for each of your hubs? ha ha! I did enjoy this hub so much!

  • DzyMsLizzy profile imageAUTHOR

    Liz Elias 

    6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, AudreyHowitt--

    Unfortunately, I believe you are correct. Language is a fluid thing; usage, spelling and grammar have not remained constant over the centuries. Old fogies such as myself struggle against too much too fast in the way of change, lest we revert to the days before rules, when everyone spelled things as they saw fit, and there was no standard. The day may yet come when, (for example), "probably" becomes rendered as "prolly," thanks to internet and texting shorthand. I do not look forward to those times.

    Thanks very much for adding to the discussion!

  • AudreyHowitt profile image

    Audrey Howitt 

    6 years ago from California

    I am always bothered by mistakes like these. At this point, I think a certain amount of this is embedded in our slang and slang has a funny way of creeping into accepted usage.

  • DzyMsLizzy profile imageAUTHOR

    Liz Elias 

    6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hi there, Rebecca E.--

    Thanks for stopping by. Kick in the pants--free the first time. You're welcome. ;-)

  • Rebecca E. profile image

    Rebecca E. 

    6 years ago from Canada

    and I will admit I do this waayy too much. I could have worked ont hat long ago, but didn't thanks for teh kick in the pants!

  • DzyMsLizzy profile imageAUTHOR

    Liz Elias 

    6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, dilipchandra12,

    Thank you very much for the compliment and the vote.

  • dilipchandra12 profile image

    Dilip Chandra 

    6 years ago from India

    Good hub, well written VOTED UP :)

  • DzyMsLizzy profile imageAUTHOR

    Liz Elias 

    6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, vespawoolf--

    Thanks for stopping by today and leaving your insight. I'm pleased to know I'm not the only one annoyed by this. ;-)

  • vespawoolf profile image

    vespawoolf 

    6 years ago from Peru, South America

    This is a common spelling error I see often. Thanks for the reminders about could've/would've/should've.

  • DzyMsLizzy profile imageAUTHOR

    Liz Elias 

    6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, LisaHW

    Thanks for stopping by. It is indeed unfortunate that such clumsy and careless errors are made so commonly. You are correct--one would not think such mix-ups would happen, and yes, one would be wrong. ;-)

  • Lisa HW profile image

    Lisa HW 

    6 years ago from Massachusetts

    This is an error that shows up all over the place, and it's unfortunate that the mistake is so often the result of confusion with the contraction (and hearing it). One wouldn't think these two very different and simple words would ever be confused. One would be wrong, though. :/

working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)