ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Two Types of Publishing Actions, part 1

Updated on August 18, 2016

This handy diagram shows you the differences between the various kinds of publishing you can do as an author

Getting Published

Every writer’s dream is to get published and have their books into print. Then later in bookstores and libraries, even in print. But after you write a book, edit it lots into its publish-ready. These days, you have two options to take. Query agents and/or editors of publishers to land an traditional pub deal with big publishers like Random House or Harper Collins, or small or indie press or even e-publishers. Or self-publish it yourself via various outlets like Lulu.com or Amazon.com for example.

Last fall and this past June, I went to two full local conferences that had a workshop class on the same subject matter: publishing. One was titled “What are your Publishing Options today” and the other was “Publishing Actions”. Both workshops explained the differences between traditional publishing vs. self-publishing. Each option had its pros and cons. Between the two conference workshops in this two-part series, these are my notes to help aspiring writers weigh the odds and let them decide for themselves on which route they wish they choose. This is part one from last fall on publishing actions, as I’ll follow it up with part two next week with publishing options from this past June.

Traditional Publishing

Most authors go through the submission process by querying to agents and/or editors, which could be grueling and a long process in itself. They would want quality products that’s well-edited and well-written. Some agencies have no charges, while some offer in-house editing services by experienced editors. Copy-editors would want it perfect as possible.

Traditional publishing offers you a contract to publish books to go into booksellers and retailers. You’ll get an advance and 8% royalty fees and a royalty statement and no other money. There’s no pay for art and production and bookkeeping. You would also get more credibility and purpose for your debut. They would give you guidance in the publishing industry. There’s also professional advice to buy it possible. You’re also taken seriously by the media.

On the flip side, it takes a lot of time from agent and/or editor to publisher. You would need a query letter (or cover letter, a synopsis, and a proposal for nonfiction. You’ll be awaiting for a response, since agents/editors have various responses times in their submission guidelines. And yes, you would get the standard form rejection letters, since each agent/editor is subjective of what they’re looking for. The production takes a long time to have it in print—it could range from 18 months to two years. If you write a series, it would have to be close together and concentrate on the first book. If you aim for a small press, you would also have a long wait.

You would have little say on the cover from the art director. A lot of decisions would be up to the publisher. You would need to establish a platform, like on your blog, via social media outlets, presentations. Write articles on the same topic. Also you would have to contact libraries.

Post-script side note

Side note: Last fall, after the conference administrator retired, they’ve changed route. Instead of paying a fee, it would now be local. Instead of the college, it would be held at the local library in the same town. I hope to go there next month. Stay tuned for part two next week…

Self-Publishing

Most authors choose to go to the self-publishing route. If you publish on demand with Amazon or other outlets, you’ll only get royalties for your payment and 100% of the money. It’s independent as you do it your own from independent companies and their imprints. As the author, you publish it.

One of the pros for self-publishing is credibility. A lot of traditional published authors have chosen to go this route. This won’t have affect on the media. As for time, it won’t take long to get it published—at least a few months. And you would have complete control over everything.

On the downside, there’s a big stigma about bad writing going out over there. And you would need money to hire an editor, your own publicist, and for marketing your own work, too.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • FlourishAnyway profile image

      FlourishAnyway 8 months ago from USA

      Traditional publishing is looking less and less attractive. I've purchased self-published print books on Amazon and was pleasantly surprised by the writing quality. Of course, I went by reviews and looked at a sample of the work. I'm a tough customer, too, as I usually see the ending coming and dislike tired, worn plots I've heard before. It gave me home for the self-publishing medium.

    • Kristen Howe profile image
      Author

      Kristen Howe 8 months ago from Northeast Ohio

      Good for you, Flourish. I'm proud of you. Thanks for stopping by.

    • billybuc profile image

      Bill Holland 7 months ago from Olympia, WA

      I've tried them both...not terribly successful with either. LOL But I keep trying because, well, that's what we writers do.

    • Kristen Howe profile image
      Author

      Kristen Howe 7 months ago from Northeast Ohio

      AWW. Don't give up Bill. Good for you. Congrats on Hub Award win.

    • Coffeequeeen profile image

      Louise Powles 2 months ago from Great Yarmouth

      I found your hub very useful and helpful to read. I hope one day I will get a book published!

    • Kristen Howe profile image
      Author

      Kristen Howe 2 months ago from Northeast Ohio

      Thanks Coffeequeen for stopping by one again! I hope so too for you and me both!

    Click to Rate This Article