ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Citizen United vs. Fed. Elec.Comm. - the effect on the 2010 mid-term elections.

Updated on April 28, 2011

Karl Rove- American Crossroads

The money raising success of the Karl Rove inspired American Crossroads and the GOP - allied attack led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has stunned opponnents and it own authors. The estimated $3.5 million expected to be spent on this year's campaigning sets a record for midterm elections.

This funding comes from undisclosed donors helped by the new Supreme Court ruling: Citizen United v. Federal Election Commission.

The GOP plan Rove, Gillespie and Law created was ambitious. The conservative movements biggest donors would have to unite under one economic message. They would have to contribute $$ that were equal or that would exceed the last presidential election.

This election has emphasized the use of non-profit tax-exempt organizations in politics. This trend in not new, however, the size of the spending is! Because of the new Supreme court ruling they do not have to reveal their donors. The Democrats and Obama have objected to this secrecy.

Republican leaning groups have far outpaced Democratic leaning organizations. American Crossroads and its affiliate Crossroads Grassroot Policy Strategies surpassed their $65 million goal on October 25th 2010 and have spent $30 million on 14 Senate and 18 House races.The Chamber of Commerce has spent $34 million in 58 races. The American Action Network that shares the same 12th floor office space with American Crossroads in D.C., has spent $22.7 million.

from Associated Press : Big money : Outside groups spending for Republicans

UN Forum , Seattle
UN Forum , Seattle

Public Citizen reports

of the 176.1 million spent be outside groups using large, often undisclosed contributions only 10 groups are responsible for the bulk of the spending.

59.9 % of the money comes from undisclosed sources. While nearly two-thirds of the disclosed funds come from just 0.12% of the contributors.

This is the first election to be held in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Citizen United v. Federal Election Commission, which permitted corporations, unions and organizations they fund to spend unlimited money to influence elections.

The following facts are from Public Citizens Stealth PAC's database:

1. $176.1 million collected - $114.6 million or 65%, was spent by only 10 groups.

2. Money spent by the Republicans $79.4 million

Democrats $28.5 million

3. Five groups have spent money on more that 35 races each. Eleven groups have spent money on 20 races each.

4. Eighty groups have not disclosed any information about sources of their money. Only 70.7 million of the spending - just 40% - has come from disclosed sources.

Thirty groups have entered the fray for the first time in 2010 in the past two weeks. For the names of these groups and the amounts they have collected and are spending , please see www.

"Non-party groups that have dominated the mid-term campaign are about to surpass national parties in total reportable spending this Mid-term elections " according to the Federal Election Commission.

" The milestone would mark an end to the supremacy of political parties in campaign spending compared to outside groups, possibly for the first time in history."

Finally, U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the labor union American Federation of State and Municipal Employees have spent $205 million through October 22, 2010 nearly surpassing total spending by both parties in 2008.

Can an election law serve the good of all the citizens of our country by hiding the sources of campaign financing from the wealthiest sector of our society - our corporations and private interest groups?  Haven't these groups exerted enough power in the past with their exorbitant fees paid to their lobbyists and finance directors? Did anyone else get that sickening feeling in their gut when they first heard of this ruling?  Is the little man or the working class supported by this ruling?  Much more attention and outrage from the American public should be brought to this decision.  We have already had one presidential election swayed by the money of  the few. It looks to me like our country has just given up the integrity of their elections - where each man, or woman's vote is equal the the next man's vote , regardless of income or power . Will this equality continue when huge , private corporations with bottomless pits of money now influence each election ?

Do you believe America's freedom will suffer at the voting booth because of this Supreme Courts ruling?

See results


Submit a Comment

  • fetty profile imageAUTHOR


    7 years ago from South Jersey

    howcurecancer Thank you for stopping by. I hope more people realize the seriousness of this court case.

  • howcurecancer profile image


    7 years ago

    Awesome hub!

  • fetty profile imageAUTHOR


    7 years ago from South Jersey

    HSchneider I am wondering how many middle Americans are as concerned as I was as I was reading the United Case. It looks to me as if we are openly selling America to corporations. Talk about the influence of foreign companies taking over our country... I wonder how many voters realized what happened when Judge Scalia became so upset over President's Obama's jab during the first State of the Union Address. Scalia refused to show up to the second one. I will be visiting your site to read that hub. Thanks for stopping by.

  • profile image

    Howard Schneider 

    7 years ago from Parsippany, New Jersey

    Fetty, The Far Right and Corporate America engineered the navigation of the Citizens United case to have Justices Scalia and Thomas manuever it through the Supreme Court. They were alarmed at the election of President Obama and his fundraising strength. Now Republican Governors are organized to implement Democratic limiting measure such as repealing Public Union collective bargaining rights and limiting voter registration. I wrote a Political Chicanery Hub on this. They must be stopped in 2012. Great Hub.

  • fetty profile imageAUTHOR


    7 years ago from South Jersey

    junko, thank you for reading my hub. I agree wholeheartedly with you. This current standing Supreme Court is a scary lot, I might add. Glad to see you care, too.

  • junko profile image


    7 years ago

    fetty, I believe the Supreme Court's ruling was politically right leaning if not pure partisan politics. The ruling in time will be exposed, and overruled. It will be exposed like the Republican-Tea Party's agenda has been expose and is being rejected.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)