9/11 Attacks | False Flag Operation on Twin Towers - Inside job or Terrorist Attacks?
9/11 - Over a Decade Later & There Are More Questions Than Ever!
With the US and its allies looking set to invade Iran and Syria, and in the midst of the recent events taking place across the world in Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, and Gaza, the question 'Who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks?' is being asked now more than ever. It has been the pretext for multiple wars and the mere mention of the term 9/11 will most often than not raise tensions. Can we really believe what the american government is telling us, when a cover up like 9/11 was forced so smoothly onto the people?...or should we question the news and make up our own minds?
September 11th: The Twin Towers Terror Attack
The subject of the 9/11 twin tower attacks is one that is sure to elicit emotions from people across the globe , especially due to the continued coverage on the media & with the numerous sources of video footage from September 11th 2001. Now, due to attempts by the States to get into Iran, & previous allegations surrounding the death of Osama bin Laden, we are once again hearing afresh about the September 11th attacks.
Having said this however, almost as soon as the official account of what happened to the three World Trade Centre (WTC) buildings on September 11th was released, there has been an alternate version of events that has been circulating over the internet and other independent media outlets for those who really want true information on September 11th, and no doubt an alternate version of events for this story will also emerge.
This alternate version has been consistently vilified on the mainstream media outlets, and the followers of this theory are publicly maligned and considered paranoid or mentally challenged to some extent.
Many have questioned who the real perpetrators of this hideous assault are, an attack that was launched not only on the american people, but on all of us throughout the world . We have all heard the blame for these vicious acts of aggression be laid at the feet of Osama bin Laden, and 'muslim terrorists', but considering the facts that have been unearthed through the investigations of dedicated truth-seekers, we really have to consider who the real culprits of such destroying acts of violence are & try to explore what the 'truth' really is.
We are urged to accept the American Governments official version of events, without asking any questions, but as intellectual beings, I feel that it is our duty to consider all evidence and start to really enquire about the discrepancies this version presents, and the omissions the official story contains.
Not everyone that questions the Governments version of events is a 'conspiracy nut' or 'is reading too much into it', most of us just want the plain, simple truth.
Considering the Evidence
Many feel that it is now an open secret, or even a well known fact, that the twin towers were demolished by controlled demolitions carried out by the American Government themselves. This is a hard thing for everyone to consider, and a lot of people successfully discard this possibility and consider it a wild theory.
Understandably so, it is hard to believe that the very people and institution charged with protecting its people, is responsible for causing the mass panic that ensued that day, and the hardest question to address arises; if they could do it once, what is to stop them from doing it again?
Denial that their own government could possibly have planned this all out is a coping mechanism for many that lost loved ones on that terrible day. By writing this Hub, my intentions are not to disrespect the family and friends of those that we lost on September 11th, it is instead to empower all of us - after all, the truth is what will set us free, right? If I hurt anyone's feelings during the course of this article, I apologise in advance, it was never my intention.
Below are a few facts that were not addressed satisfactorily, or completely ignored, in the official story. Pondering over these concepts may lead you to think twice about what has been drilled into us by those in power, but knowledge is never a negative thing, be it upsetting at times.
The Peculiar Presence of Thermate
Did you know that Thermate (a copyrighted patented brand of Thermite that is especially used in controlled demolitions), was found in copious amounts in the twin tower rubble? It was also found in Building 7, Larry Silverstein the owner actually said on mainstream media that he was told the building wasn't safe, so the only option was to 'pull it' or demolish it. It makes sense for Thermate to be present in that building, but why was Thermate found in all three buildings ?
Chances of a Controlled Demolition & the Larry Silverstein Link
Furthermore, a controlled demolition, like the one Larry Silverstein was told would be carried out on his 'unsafe building', has to be set up for days; all the materials have to be placed, the structural core columns and beams have to be precisely cut to enable the building to fall in on itself and not damage the surrounding buildings just feet away, so how could they arrange all that for Building 7 in a matter of hours? Unless they knew it was going to happen or they instigated it? This is a factor that many are not even aware of, but needs to be considered on a serious level - was this planned or unplanned?
In order for us to believe that this was a spontaneous event that the government did not have prior knowledge of, we have to also believe that these 'extremist terrorists' had the time and the opportunity to go into those buildings and plant the bombs and necessary materials (Thermate) and cut the support beams without anyone knowing. Could this actually happen considering the tight security present at the buildings?
An interesting point to reflect on is that Larry Silverstein also owned the other two towers that fell, recently acquired them for a ridiculously low value, insured each one separately for 'terrorist attacks', and coincidentally made a colossal profit from the horrific attacks.
Strange Survival of the Indestructible I.D.
Another thought provoking fact that we need to contemplate is that they identified one of the alleged 'bombers' from his passport which was found in the rubble of the twin towers. How can a passport (an object that is made from paper and plastic, and was supposed to be inside the plane that collided with the world trade buildings) survive the extreme heat & explosions when the planes black box was inescapably damaged beyond repair?
We are expected to believe that this attack on the towers destroyed the black box from the plane (the black box is designed to be indestructable as it carries the mechanical information of the plane & its route) but the paper passport survived? This is something that as a rational human being, I find hard to accept.
In addition, several of the named hijackers were found to be alive within weeks of the attacks, but this wasn’t broadcasted on the news like the initial story that these terrorists were responsible for hijacking the planes and smashing them into the towers.. So now we are to accept that they were in the plane, escaped the fireball explosion, jumped out of the side of the plane, landed safely on the ground hundreds of feet below and got away unscathed? This is another nugget of information that I personally and many that I discuss this with, find hard to understand, much less accept.
Atypical NORAD Activity
The story of what happened with NORAD (North American Air Defense teams) is another that is curious. NORAD is the air defense system monitoring North America. When an aircraft is off course and cannot be accounted for, the air dispatch teams contact NORAD if they cannot ascertain information about the off course plane within a minute. In the prevailing years before the attacks, NORAD had a 100% success rate (67 intercepts, 100% accuracy) and responded to the unaccounted aircraft within minutes.
This wasn’t the case on the day of the September 11th attacks.
On the day of the attacks it took them over 80 minutes to get to these planes. Even then they didn't get there on time. Why? This is a completely relevant, essential and valid question. The reason they missed their 100% accuracy mark 'coincidentally' was because they were carrying out 'exercises' that were designed to simulate possible attacks.
So when they received the 'blip' on their radar that these planes in particular were off-course, they had to ask 'is this real-world or exercise??' In other words, they were confounded.
Moreover, we have to ask who was in charge of dispatching and authorising NORADs response to these 'hijacked' planes. This is where things start getting chilling.
Three months prior to 9/11 Dick Cheney (a prominent official in the Bush administration) was *given control* over NORAD orders and sure enough, on the morning of 9/11 he was in charge of all orders from the command bunker under the white house. So the question we are forced to ask is 'how did he not know about the off course planes and why didn't he scramble the NORAD jets immediately?'
It is a mindboggling anomaly that not a single air defense aircraft turned towards the 'hijacked' planes until it was too late (there were 45 mins between the towers getting hit, they had ample time to get there) and this was because they couldn't separate war game exercises from the reality!!!
Do you still think this was perpetrated by 'muslim terrorists'?
Strange Simultaneous Explosions
Additionally, firefighters within the buildings heard simultaneous explosions from both above and below. How can we truly think the planes alone bought down the towers when the planes hit the top but explosions were present in the lobby on the bottom floor?
The heat generated by the planes impacts was not high enough to melt structural steel. This is a fact confirmed by the structural engineers and architects and the manager of the WTC building, who all state the towers were built to withstand multiple points of impact (as a similar attack was staged years ago), so how can we believe that the heat from the explosions caused all that damage?
Molten Steel Seen
Most people are unaware of this fact, but pockets of molten steel (flowing molten steel) were actually found weeks after the attack? Firefighters on scene described it as being 'like a foundry', this is a very specific eyewitness account, but this point was completely omitted, not addressed at all in the official report released by the Government. When in the worlds recorded history has that ever happened?
Perhaps the most damning piece of information is this: two planes hit such sound buildings, caused them to collapse in freefall speed (yes u read right, it took approx 10 seconds each for them to fall, the same amount of time it took for a billiard ball dropped from the top of the towers to hit the ground with no resistance!) and then resulted in molten steel flowing in the rubble for weeks after - how is that all possible?
After these facts came to light, people dedicated to discovering the truth arrived at the conclusion that the official account is indeed doubtful, and a real effort needs to be made on the part of the people of the world to unearth the real events that ensued on that fateful day, a day that has impacted all of our lives from the moment it happened.
- Iran, Russia; China vs. the US, UK & Israel | Will ...
In light of the US & Israel's recent attempts to invade Iran, and to 'disarm' it of its nuclear weapons (a claim that is vehemently refuted by the Iranians & of which no evidence exists), tensions between Russia & China and the US & I
© 2011 hinazille