9/11 Truth According To Me
The Price of Enduring Freedom
No Offense but Get Real
The thought of 19 fanatical terrorist pulling of the greatest arial precision strike known to mankind, by expertly using their hastily learned piloting skills and guiding their craft with precision and determination is hard for me to see. Then through sheer coincidence or the will of Allah they were able to turn their intended targets into huge piles of dust and twisted metal.
Let's face it folks those buildings were disintegrated before our very eyes. As those buildings came down the top floors were pulverized into fine particles, they were vaporized before they even hit the ground, not after.
The only people capable of executing an operation of this type were the only ones who did it. My belief is that they wanted to show the world that not only do we have the technology to vaporize buildings but we will use it. This was shown as a warning to their opposition to do as I say, or else.
Remember there is only one film of the first plane hitting the first building and was carefully released 12 hours later. There was much confusion concerning the second and even Dan Rather admits on 'live' TV that he didn't see a plane, just an explosion, watching the 'live' feed and had to be told it was a plane.
Many eyewitnesses said they had to be told it was a plane, because they only saw an explosion. Many eye witnesses initially said what they saw was flying to fast to be a commercial airliner.
Which leads me to explain one simple fact, that commercial airliners could not have flown at the speeds shown on TV before impacting with the World Trade Center Towers and the Pentagon, it is physically impossible.
According to experts Pilots For Truth 9/11 the planes that were shown on TV were flying too fast for commercial airliners at that altitude and hence what we all saw was special effects. Consider for a moment the last flight you were on how the plane began moving faster the higher altitude it gained and realize that commercial airliners are not designed to fly at the speeds seen on TV below 10,000 feet.
See my theory revolves around the premise that NO planes were used as missiles on that day, which most people can't wrap there minds around. By the end of this article 9/11 Truth According To Me I hope I can convince some of you, and if not at least plant a seed.
I've been looking for a forum in which to share my theory on what happened on September 11, 2001 but wasn't sure if,
1.) I was a good enough writer to give my theory wings and if
2.) My audience would give it the consideration it is due.
The important thing to remember while reading this article is that there was no planes.
That being said, when I first heard of the events of 9/11 I was at work and watched the first building collapse with a bunch of coworkers. Out of fifteen people in the room only me and one other person said that there was something wrong with that picture. I was skeptical from the get go, it just didn't seem right and I wasn't able to completely put my finger on it at the time. Research and an open mind has lead me to believe that the only way to completely remove the evidence (bodies) is for them to have never existed at all.
The perfect disguise for a missile is an airplane however the only people that you have to fool is those on the ground witnessing the event, everybody else will be watching video feeds where photo manipulation is easier.
The (AWACS) Airborne Warning and Control System is militarized Boeing 707-320B commercial jetliner. Among its many capabilities it uses a Data-link fighter control system which enables the AWAC to direct flight control and guide missiles and fighters to targets. It has a space age rotating dome look-down radar which enables it to have a 360-degree surveillance with a 200 mile range.
These planes were seen in the air above Washington (by secret service agents) and in the skies over New York and they were there to direct traffic, missile traffic with a twist.
Holographic technology has come in leaps and bounds during the computer age however the military has been working on Holographic technology since the sixties and has a head start on what is in the public domain in terms of technology. Most experts agree that military technology is at least 30 more years advanced than what the public sees.
Not only could an AWAC plane guide a missile into a building with its Data-link look-down tracking system it could also direct a holographic image of an airplane along the same flight path.
Remember when you hear a plane in the sky many times it takes a second or two to locate it, then for instance you're in a city and it may fly behind a building and all you heard is the noise, you don't really see it.
Some may say that holographic technology is not that advanced but let me remind you that it has been used in both Gulf Wars along with our latest conquest. It is used to create false images and can be picked up by radar. Projecting an holographic image over the incoming missile is child's play for an AWAC and just because the military doesn't admit it is capable of such a tactic doesn't mean it can't be done.
I propose what the eyewitness's really saw was a holographic image of a commercial airliner combined with the sound of the missile.
Of course the argument I always hear is, 'well then if no airplanes were used where are all the people that were supposedly on them?' . . .
. . . and my answer is always "What people?"
If you go by the Governments version of the events all those people were vaporized, so there really is no proof those folks ever existed.
Vaporized witnesses tell no tails.
My premise is that all the phone calls and all the supposed air traffic controller conversations could have been manipulated or prerecorded. There are thousands of secret workers in the United States whose identity we will never know, so making up three or four hundred people isn't that difficult, consider how the Witness Protection system works to give you an idea.
The technology exists (follow the link above to holographic image) and has been used to project holographic planes from other planes, every single film depicting 9/11 could have been tampered with. This whole event was scheduled like a precision strike even down to getting rid a vast majority of the eye witnesses. Everyone has heard the stories of firemen and civilians being told to go back in the buildings, the people that could described the interior conditions.
Stunning Evidence of CGI Video
Exposing the Fraud
Energy Weapons and Jumpers
One of the little talked about episodes during the 9/11 Event is that of all the jumpers, one paramedic described it as "It was raining people".
What would possess anyone on a burning building of voluntarily jumping to certain death, to avoid whatever was happening inside the buildings? Consider that many of these people jumped from floors that had no smoke or fire on them and were seen hanging out of the windows, with their clothes partially removed.
What is even more telling is the description many of the firefighters and paramedics described of the bodies when they hit of literally exploding like an overripe or cooked grape.
It is a known fact that humans do not splat upon impact from falling from high altitudes and even some parachutists have survived falls from planes much higher than the Trade Centers when their parachutes did not open. So why were the bodies disintegrating upon impact?
Unless what vaporized the buildings also cooked the insides as well. Ever put a grape in the microwave even for a few seconds and dropped it on the kitchen floor . . . Splat! Ever put a piece of drywall in a microwave and turned it on high, I'll give you one guess what happens to it.
Consider for a moment the recently publicly demonstrated Active Denial System ADS (microwave crowd control weapon), the microwave energy beam cannot be seen and causes humans to think they are on fire, any wet clothing only increases the sensation of burning. So if this type of technology could be used against people imagine what it can do to other substances, such as buildings.
Let me be frank when I say that the implications are that these people were quite literally being cooked alive and were choosing certain death as a better alternative than reality.
So where did this death ray come from, well the technology certainly exists for these kinds of weapons to be deployed from space. I know all this may sound a little Roger Moore 007 Moon Raker to the readers but it is not without precedence.
Anyway I digress, the main point is the technology certainly exist to have created the scenario exactly as I have outlined which is that Holographic airplanes were used to camouflage the missiles that caused the big explosions everyone saw on the ground but alternative images were created of plane's hitting the buildings, and that was shown to the masses that day on TV.
Look at how everything involved was either vaporized or hauled away the evidence either was not there or was removed quickly, even flight 93 was completely destroyed no bodies. The Pentagon was a drone missile moving way to fast for a commercial jet, even in the footage released by the government it is only a blur even when slowed way down.
Not Even A Drop Of Blood
There was nothing hi-tech about Building Seven that part of the made for TV drama was pure 21st century. Building Seven fell on it's imprint exactly as an implosion we have all seen on TV before. This was around five that evening and not well publicized, many people to this day are not even aware that three buildings were destroyed that fateful day in New York.
Building 7 was a 47 stories and had not been hit by a plane but suffered some fire damaged due to the collapse of the Twin Towers.
No matter what one believes about that day and there are many theories, the official government version doesn't hold water, where I currently live right now the folks have a saying
'That dawg don't hunt!'
and it doesn't there are to many holes in the story.
The new owner of the complex Larry Silverstein (bought for a mere down payment six months before) had both towers insured for destruction by terrorist and collected almost 2 billion in insurance money.
Did any of that money go to the victims families?
- Censorship Lives In 2012
Censorship Lives In 2012 and is the only power the elite rich have left to keep the awakening public from their doorstep. Knowing full well the deceit and betrayal they have committed against humanity they continue to spread disinformation and confus
- Truth Exists, Fiction is Created
In Truth Exists Fiction is Created the author takes a look at Full Disclosure and why he believes it is imminent. The date of December 21, 2012 and why it is important to the World population and ancient cultures, the Alien presence and UFO's.
- Does A One Wing Duck Fly In A Circle?
This hub introduces ideas and concepts that are ignored or simple suppressed and make very little sense. The public has a right to ask questions without being censored. It attempts to raise questions that seem to have no answers or do they?
One of the strangest incidents that took place that day among many is the fact that Hurricane Erin was located just seventy miles of the shore of Long Island on the morning of 9/11. This little known fact is interesting in itself because it didn't make the morning newscast anywhere locally or Nationally, except for a station in Ohio.
This was a monster hurricane on the doorstep of NYC and no one mentions it, c'mon people what gives. In Judy Wood's book Where Did The Towers Go ? She makes clear the connection with the storm, the Hutchinson Effect that happens naturally in Hurricanes and the energy weapon but leaves it at that.
Whether The Powers That Bewanted to keep it a secret or knew it wasn't a threat doesn't make any real difference the fact is that this hurricane stopped where is was supposed to and when the event was over moved out to sea. If you can control a Hurricane surely you can harness the energy from it.
It begs the question . . . why try to keep it a secret?
Do you believe that 19 terrorist flew commercial airliners into the twin towers and the pentagon?
Thinking about writing this article has taken some of the edge off it in terms of trying to prove any of it, it's just a theory however other writers have seemed reluctant to come forward. Rob Schneider wrote in response to my question is this topic writer suicide . . .
When I wrote my first 9/11 article, I was a little terrified. My daughter wondered why, saying, "Nobody I know believes the official version." She thought it was old news and nothing more. What most Americans don't get is that while 50% of Americans privately don't believe the lies, more like 90% of the rest of the world don't believe them.
When I began this article I asked my fellow hubbers what they thought of the topic and whether it was professional writer suicide, in the form of a question. I wondered what is my real goal in writing this article and is it worth it
Based on what I have read, the videos I have watched and using critical thinking while maintaining an open mind I believe the way in which the buildings disintegrated leads me to believe that an energy weapon delivered from space did the real damage.
But how can one make such wild claim with very little proof, and I say to that " There is a lot of evidence out there and if I can find it anyone can. "
One Book that I read that really helped lay-out the facts with out drawing conclusions is Where Did The Towers Go ? by Judy Wood.
No matter what you believe happened that day the 19 terrorist pulling off a caper of this magnitude is doubtful to say the least. In 9/11 Truth According To Me I ask the reader to imagine some interesting scenarios not without precedence and with enough truth to be plausible. Will we ever know the Truth of that day? Doubtful but we can still use critical thinking and an open mind to find the Truth, if we are willing to look beyond what we know and our limited perspective.