ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel


Updated on March 14, 2013

By: Wayne Brown

Honey, would you mind calling the credit card company and asking them to raise our credit line just once more?” The wife asks as her husband walks to the door to head out for the daily grind at work. “We are just so out of money and all the bills are due and there is the dress that I just so have to have that is on sale and will only be there for a couple more days.” This might be a typical conversation that you would hear in a household in America if we ran our household like our politicians run our government today.

Some of you probably cannot grasp that it is just that simple. The reason you cannot is because those who populate elected office in Washington have complicated it to the point that no one can see anything. All we seem to really know is that we owe a lot of money, we are at our credit limit, and the bills are due. Oh, we have the Office of Management and Budget which tracks and accounts for government spending. But the key word here is “tracks”. It does nothing in terms of “qualifying” that spending or weighing whether or not we are wasting our money in the process. That comes back to the Congress…the folks who decided to spend it there in the first place. It seems that once we decide to spend money in Washington, we never contemplate as to when or where we will quit spending it. It seems like a logical consideration but it does not fly in WashingtonD.C.

So, our scenario above, of the housewife’s dilemma that the credit card is overspent does not seem so wasted on our pathetic situation in the nation’s capital. One faction says that we need to simply raise the debt ceiling as we have so many, many times in the past and keep right on spending as we have in the past and that money moving about in the economy will stimulate jobs, etc. which in turn will create more revenue for the government and tend to alleviate our problems. The other side of the aisle points out that immediate relief needs to come in the way of reduced spending and reduced deficit growth. In other words, maybe we need to pay off some bills and forget about that new dress that is on sale.

Certainly, we have varying opinions as to how to solve these issues which are rapidly reach a proportion that no longer allows us to leave them unaddressed and in the filing basket. Just like in the real world of business, “cash flow” is becoming king to a government that has too much debt, too many bills, too many dependents, and too little revenue stream. As complicated as it all seems to be in terms of the red tape of government, it really just comes down to the fact that there is too much month at the end of the money, plain and simple.

Now, let me ask you what you do at your house when there is too much month at the end of the money? Do you call the credit card companies and attempt to increase your credit limits so that you do not have to address the problem for a while? Do you look about and decide what it is in your household that you can do without and thus use that money to relieve the pressure in some other area? Do you ever stop to consider that the source of the whole dilemma is simply that your household spends more money than it takes in on a regular basis? Do you give rational thought to possibly setting up a budget, reducing spending, or attempting to make the best of the cash you have coming in to slow things down in terms of growth or do you simply put all your effort into getting a new credit card and continuing down the same path of behavior?

These may sound like silly, simple questions to some of you. But, honestly, are they not the same questions which we should be asking of our elected officials on a regular basis. Are they not the same questions our President would ask of Congress in confronting the issues and compiling a plan to eliminate them? Indeed they are exactly that. They are the exact questions we should be asking over and over and over until we get answers that start to make sense to us. This is not rocket science and beyond the scope of our comprehension. Hell, if a lawyer can understand it, so can we! But we have to understand it and we have to ask the questions, otherwise, we are not going to get any answers out of Washington.

Now some say that taxing the rich is the answer. Others point out quickly that there are really not enough rich people to make that a realistic alternative. Still, others argue that the rich should just pay more on principle that they have made money and accumulated assets therefore they need to pay more taxes. Amazing, many of the rich people tend to agree with them but they throw in a caveat to qualify the agreement that goes something like this, “I don’t mind paying more taxes but first I want to see you change your behavior about spending.” That’s right, the rich man is saying that he will ante up but we need to change our behavior first because there is this little gnawing sensation in his gut telling him that the extra money that he pays in under the present condition is simply going to be wasted like the rest of it was and the situation does not change as a result of his contribution.

That makes sense to me. It does not make sense to many in Washington. Spending cuts and reductions are things they don’t want to deal with at all. It robs them of power; takes away their international junkets and fact-finding tours; causes the lobbyist to spend their time with other people and the list goes on and on. If we cut spending and the government has surplus money, we might have to reduce taxes…..oh God! What a horrible thought! How will I buy votes for my re-election? How will I sway the unions? How will I show all those folks back home that I am the Daddy-Long-Legs when it comes to bringing home the bacon? Oh yeah…you can bet all of those considerations come to mind.

Solutions in this country no longer come about on the basis of how good they are. They come about on the basis of who benefits from what. Ultimately, they are compromises to say the least and in the end those compromises tend to either undermine the effectiveness of the solution or completely negate it. The elected officials want you to see them going “through the process” but not so much paying attention to “what the outcome and benefit might be.”

We saw a recent example of this behavior beginning with the campaign cycle for the 2010 midterm elections this past November. On the conservative side of the aisle, whether it be Republicans or Tea Party types, so many of the candidates were quite sure there was at least $100 billion dollars which could disappear from the 2011 budget once they were in office to do their magic. Given the opportunity, they came back with a reassessment that the real figure was about $ 60 odd billion dollars in reduced spending. Then, in the interest of getting the budget passed, and avoiding a potential government shutdown, the compromise yielded a paltry $ 38 billion dollars in cuts. Later, we find that the $38 billion was mostly pie-in-the-sky and according to the Central Budget Office amounted to less than a half billion dollars in real cuts at best. This is what I mean about “watch us go through the process” but don’t pay so much attention to “what we achieve”.

Personally, I think the conservative side of the aisle drank the Kool-Aid. I think they left their constituency with their mouths gaped open and saying, “we sent you up there to do this?” Their actions on this item undermined the conservative credibility for the 2012 election process and did it great harm. The conservatives drank the Kool-Aid, sang “Kumbaya” and repeated that often asked Rodney King question, “Why can’t we all just get along?” That’s the way I see it.

How do you reduce spending? If you do that will it not cost jobs? Isn’t that bad for our economy? No doubt, there are a lot of questions that come with real cuts in spending. They are not easy questions but they are questions which need to be addressed. Let me say this right here. I am conservative in my view point. I do want spending reduced. I do want the deficit reduced. I do want the national debt paid down to more manageable levels relatively to our GNP. At the same time, that does not make me a monster or a bad guy. I don’t want my 83 year old mother to have her Social Security taken away or her option for medical care assistance. In my mind, she had paid her dues and earned that privilege regardless of what our elected ones did with the money to fund it. And yes, I know that type of spending is a large portion of the problem and eventually must be addressed before it reaches total insolvency. I understand those things.

I also understand that people in many sectors gain their livelihood from a government job and they need their job to pay their bills and provide for their family. I understand all of that. I have seen jobs cut in the private sector and it’s not pretty but it is a reality of survival of the business. In many cases, the companies have held on as long as they could without letting any employees go because they do have a heart and they want to try to provide for those people as long as possible. But, there comes a time when the company has to choose to fail and cause everyone to lose their jobs or to cut some jobs in order to allow the others to survive. In the end, the latter becomes the more rational thing to do. Ultimately, jobs exist for one and only one reason…there is a business need for them.

So, on the basis of the above reasoning, I expect, as a citizen of the United States of America, that our elected ones will sit down and put their party differences and political leanings to rest and have a productive discussion on where the most immediate fat exists in the budget and spending process and start to eliminate some of it. Certainly there are cuts that can be made which will not affect jobs to a great degree early on. Certainly there are programs out there which have supported organizations for many, many years. Those programs have gone on long enough to either allow those organizations to stand on their own or to pass from existence. If a concept is not viable over a long term, it likely will never be viable. One does not have to read very long to realize that Planned Parenthood has long since gained enough viability to exist on its own without government assistance yet we continue to throw money their way as they build large buildings like the recent one erected in Houston. Maybe this organization would have a different face if it had to subsist on its own merits.

Beyond the scope of those initial cuts has to come some agreement to continue in that process to identify the fat and trim it out; to identify the waste and eliminate it. This is not something that can be done every now and then. It must be an on-going vigilance. The entire budget process must start from scratch each cycle and question, question, question, until we get to that point where we have eliminated wasteful spending and redundant effort within our government. Then, we can start working on those big ticket items. Maybe by then, with the changes that will occur in the budget, those items will not look quite as bleak and insurmountable as they do now.

At this point, we have officials on both sides of the aisle telling us that Social Security and Medicare represent 70% of the budget outlay by the government on an annual basis; therefore, there is little or no room for cuts. I say nay! I say we start small and work ourselves out to the larger items. We can gain agreement on the smaller stuff more quickly and accomplish it more rapidly. No, we don’t cut earth-shaking amounts of money but we do eliminate waste and redundancy. That is the basis of a good house-cleaning to start. Who knows, some of these folks might actually find out they can work together on the little items and find avenues that will help them to communicate on the big ones. The effort is what we call synergy and it is what a good leader attempts to achieve when he / she brings people together to move forward for the “common good”.

America is one country for a reason. It is one because at the basis of the simplest model which explains it we can claim that we are here for a “common purpose”. That purpose is certainly not to milk it for all its worth and feed our own greed. That purpose must be about the fact that we are a free people who want to remain free to expand and grow ourselves and our families in terms of knowledge, assets, safety, and positive experience in life. It says that we care about the welfare of ourselves and others to the realistic extent that we are capable. It says that we are still one nation that celebrates our birth, our principles, our flag, our allegiance, and our liberty but not at the expense of our fellow American. We have to look deep to find those things but we should all have them. If we do not, maybe we should cease to be a country and a people. It is our choice.

Think about it a bit. If you have to sit down and cut your spending in your household, your only real choice is to start small. Sure you have a house payment and a car payment but you are not likely going to risk the roof over your head and your only ride to work at the git-go. No, you are going to look at the small line items first and question their validity. As you do, your budget begins to make more and more sense and become less and less complicated. The same will hold true for our elected officials if indeed we can get them to sit down and actually do some work. It is our choice. Let’s pay some bills and not ask the credit card company to raise our limit.

© Copyright WBrown2011. All Rights Reserved.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Wayne Brown profile imageAUTHOR

      Wayne Brown 

      7 years ago from Texas

      @akirchner...Washington and politics in general is filled with hidden agendas. Things cannot be accomplished because too many folks owe too many people for their vote and they work to sway the system. We have to throw the bums out and keep throwing them out until someone starts to get it right...I think that could be you, Audrey! WB

    • akirchner profile image

      Audrey Kirchner 

      7 years ago from Washington

      We definitely need better people who know how to make better only worry is if we throw THESE bums out how will the next batch of bums do? God it's a nightmare! I think little old ladies (like myself) should be running the country - we'd whip those overspenders into shape dang fast!

    • Wayne Brown profile imageAUTHOR

      Wayne Brown 

      7 years ago from Texas

      @Ruchira...Thank you for your comments...we need another direction and soon. WB

    • Ruchira profile image


      7 years ago from United States

      yup agree with your reasoning Wayne Brown.

      Spending within our limits helps us maintain a good credit score and no debts and not to forget the PEACE of mind :)

    • Wayne Brown profile imageAUTHOR

      Wayne Brown 

      7 years ago from Texas

      @rkhyclak...When one deals in common sense, you always deal with what is practical. The Fed budget is no different from our world, its just more complicated by scope and volume. In the end, it comes down to how well we manage money. Sadly, these jerks we have elected have mismanaged our Social Security and Medicare dollars. At this point, I am assuming the story regarding the Fed is true although the insanity is beyond comprehension if it is indeed true. And...if it is true, we don't have a snowball's chance in hell of offsetting the impact of such stupidity. Thanks, Bekka. WB

    • rkhyclak profile image


      7 years ago from Ohio

      Awesome and useful hub, Wayne! This analogy is the exact conversation my husband and I had the other day regarding the national debt. I cannot figure out why it is so clear to all of us, yet lost upon those we elect to lead. I'm getting ready to read someonewhoknows' link right now. Given your reaction, I'm more than a little apprehensive. Tweeting and sharing this. Well done!

    • Wayne Brown profile imageAUTHOR

      Wayne Brown 

      7 years ago from Texas

      @WillStarr...I agree with you Will. It is the same force that drives the tax structure of this country. Congress really does not want to simplify it because it will reduce their power over the public. A good housecleaning always helps when you get ready to repaint! I suspect that it will fail because those currently in power are going to fly it right into the ground. That is the part that too few in America today see...when the rebuilding starts, they may not see some of the lumber they reognized in the old house..gone may be freedom, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness along with the right to bear arms and freedom of speech. Too many who write here on the hub absolutely think I am nuts to suggest that any such thing could happen because they don't want to think that something sinister might be going on in our own government. Sometimes, when the ship goes down, some folks drown....WB

    • WillStarr profile image


      7 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      Unfortunately, many people use the many different government agencies and will angrily fight any attempt to get rid of them.

      As someone said, "If you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on the full support of Paul."

      Career politicians want big government and so do the nation's dependent classes. It won't be easy to root them out. It may have to fail before it finally gets better.

    • Wayne Brown profile imageAUTHOR

      Wayne Brown 

      7 years ago from Texas

      @drbj...I think you are right. There has to be a major housecleaning in order to remove the obstacles of resistance. These people are not protecting liberals or conservatives, they are protecting self-interest and pork-barreling which should have ended long ago. Throw the bums out! WB

      @Pamela99...As a public, we are being duped by both sides of the aisle "going throug a process" to satisfy a demand that never seems to come to happen. They want us to be satisfied with the process and forget the outcome...which should be our focus. Yes, hard decisions need to be made but we first have to have someone capable of making them. Thanks, Pam. WB

      @dahoglund...I agree with you totally. The hardest part of it all is getting those in office to give up some of the things they put in place. Planned Parenthood is more than capable of functioning without government assistance but it will take the money as long as it is offered and beg for more. The American taxpayer has contributed more than enough to that particular effort. If it cannot sustain itself then there are too many other things wrong with the concept. As Bush initially pointed out, it is time for the taxpayer to start looking toward charities and local churches to help with some of these issues. Thanks DA. WB

      @breakfastpop...If it makes sense to me, it should work is the way that I look at it. We start small but we remain diligent in our focus...that's how David fought the giant. Thanks Poppy. WB

    • breakfastpop profile image


      7 years ago

      You are the master of common sense. Now if only the fools in Washington who honestly believe that it is possible to spend your way out of debt could learn a thing or two from you. Up, useful and oh so awesome.

    • dahoglund profile image

      Don A. Hoglund 

      7 years ago from Wisconsin Rapids

      I am becoming a back to basics guy.One reason for overspending in government is that government is doing things it was never intended to do. However I don't know how we can push it back. I know we should get rid of many agencies but that would go against too many vested interests.

    • Pamela99 profile image

      Pamela Oglesby 

      7 years ago from Sunny Florida

      I agree that your analogy is right on target. This is an excellent hub. It is so obvious we need to cut expenses. other countries, like Cuba, Venezuela, and so forth? Why are we giving money to I have little faith in things improving. I am not impressed with the slate of candidates that may be running against Obama and I think we need to look for the right person or we are in for 4 more years of misery.

    • drbj profile image

      drbj and sherry 

      7 years ago from south Florida

      Your analogy is spot on, Wayne, but nothing will happen until we throw the bums out. And the way things are going, I'm not too satisfied with the other side either.

    • Wayne Brown profile imageAUTHOR

      Wayne Brown 

      7 years ago from Texas

      @WillStarr...I agree on the government jobs side Will. Down-sizing government is a necessary step in this process and that means jobs must eventually go if any significant impact is to be made. Based on the recent situation, I would say that is going to put a real strain on the Air Traffic Control boys! LOL! Thanks, much. WB

    • WillStarr profile image


      7 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      Great analogy Wayne and one I was considering for a Hub.

      The US has maxed out its credit cards, but unlike ordinary Americans, it can raise its own credit limit and keep right on spending! But just like ordinary Americans, sooner or later, it will end in bankruptcy.

      Unlike the private sector, all government jobs are strictly overhead because they produce nothing, and burden the economy rather than produce the wealth needed for a healthy system. We need to eliminate as many government jobs as possible, because doing so will stimulate the economy and provide real, productive private sector jobs.

    • Wayne Brown profile imageAUTHOR

      Wayne Brown 

      7 years ago from Texas

      @someonewhoknows...I just checked out the link and read the piece. If indeed all that is present there is reasonably true...that will be the nails in the coffin of way out of that process short of just defaulting on all debts owed and that comes with consequences ad well. This is very troubling, very troubling. Thanks for sharing that. WB

      @barbergirl28...You are correct in that assessment. The federal government has either set the example or followed it. If this were perpetrated in the private sector, someone would go to jail for a long time. WB

      @Old Poolman...Having just read the piece on wealth distribution published by Immartin, I have my doubts that anything will help...if all presented there is true. The debt burden fallout from all that would be insurmountable. WB

    • profile image

      Old Poolman 

      7 years ago

      Wayne, unfortunately this hub makes way too much sense. I doubt your advice will be followed even though this would be the beginning of bailing us out of our pending disaster.

      Great job of writing my friend.

    • barbergirl28 profile image

      Stacy Harris 

      7 years ago from Hemet, Ca

      America has gotten fat. By that I mean we have gotten used to living a nice and cushy life by extending the credit. There are so many other countries out there that live with much less, but here in American we see people living in billion dollar houses and driving cars that cost more than I see in several years of employment. The government is no different. They need to learn how to trim the fat. If they can't figure it out, maybe they need to start paying for it out of their own pocket. Cut government spending... maybe if they are not doing the job intendend they should see a cut in their pay! Just a thought. I am part of the middle class that barely makes enough to be considered poverty levels, but still enough to be screwed over with the taxes. Give to the poor and take from the middle class. We are all struggling. But if I have to change things to make ends meet... everybody should. Not one of us is special.

      Very well written hub. I hope many people notice it and hopefully push for this to actually happen. We need to get rid of the waste and push for a better tomorrow without killing all the middle class people!

    • someonewhoknows profile image


      7 years ago from south and west of canada,north of ohio

    • Wayne Brown profile imageAUTHOR

      Wayne Brown 

      7 years ago from Texas

      @H P Roychoudhury...You are correct. No one ever spent their way out of debt...cannot work! Thanks. WB

      @gitrdun4444...Thank you and thanks for the read and comment! WB

    • gitrdun4444 profile image


      7 years ago from North Carolina

      You are so right HP! Amen to that. Great hub Wayne!

    • H P Roychoudhury profile image

      H P Roychoudhury 

      7 years ago from Guwahati, India

      Pleasure of life never lies on overspending rather on a disciplined spending. As if, it is like the saying- “Cut your coat according to your size”. Increase of credit card limit is the temptation for excess spending. Who will pay for it? It is the person himself. Will it not destroy his mental peace? If so, where is the pleasure of life?


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)