ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • United States Politics

Agent Orange Blues: How Vietnam Navy Veterans Were Scuttled

Updated on January 17, 2013

This is the fifth in a series detailing the discovery, the military use, the legal battles over the damaging effects, and the massive ongoing cover-up of Monsanto's Agent Orange.


January 23, 1973 marked the end of the Vietnam War for American involvement, but it was just the beginning for veterans returning home from the war. Reunited with their wives, children, parents and friends, our returning heroes expected to settle down to pursuing the American Dream, but for many, plagued by illnesses and recurring mental health problems, the dream became a living nightmare.

Looking for answers to explain the presence of illnesses never suffered by members of their families, veterans began comparing notes. They came to believe that a chemical defoliant sprayed over the jungles of Vietnam was the reason for the rapidly increasing numbers of certain illnesses shared by veterans who had toured in Vietnam. They discovered increased numbers of miscarriages, stillbirths, and severe birth defects in themselves (the female veterans) or their wives and children when compared to the general public.

For better than twenty years after the first of the returning soldiers came home, their claims were denied by the Veterans Administration. Government and military officials held fast that there was no evidence of Agent Orange being linked to their myriad illnesses. They insisted it was a safe garden chemical, not likely to cause damages of the type being described. Manufacturers like Monsanto, Dow, and Uniroyal publicly maintained that their products were safe for humans.

Lawsuits arose, bringing media focus on the issue. Monsanto and Dow scrambled to throw together studies proving their cases. Government officials backed the chemical companies they had hired to make the deadly chemicals, but the tenacity of the veterans and their grass roots organizations gained nationwide attention and the pressure was on to prove or disprove their theories. The outcry became so loud that government regulatory agencies began demanding studies in order to make a determination that would serve both the veterans' and the public's interest.

After twenty years of battle, as the damaging evidence linking Agent Orange to the declining health of thousands of war veterans was prevailing, it became evident that there had been duplicity, deceit, and misrepresentation regarding the safety of the herbicide. The chemical industry, the military, and some government officials had been well aware of the hazardous nature of the chemicals found in Agent Orange, all along.

Finally, there was a small win for the ailing veterans. It wasn't much, in fact, if it weren't such a serious issue, it would have been a joke. Regardless, it was a start even if it was only a token. On

March 29, 1990, then Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Edward J. Derwinski announced a decision to honor disability claims from veterans stricken with a rare form of cancer called non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

Derwinski was adamant that his decision be viewed merely as a “policy determination”, rather than a scientific decision. He said such decision was made after the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) had released their Selected Cancers Study the day before. The report showed evidence that Vietnam veterans are at a 50% risk increase to develop NHL 15-25 years after military service in Vietnam. The results released by the CDC don't show a similar increase in veterans who served in locations other than Vietnam, suggesting that the association to NHL is specific to Vietnam.

Interestingly, though it found a significant link to military service in the Vietnam theatre, the study didn't find any evidence that NHL is related to Agent Orange or any other herbicides used there. The study relied upon by Derwinski was part of the epidemiological study mandated by Congress in 1979, but after four years with no progress, the responsibility was transferred to the CDC in 1983. By 1990, the CDC had still not completed nor released it's final results. Years later, analysis of the CDC study, determined there had been suppression and interference by the Reagan Administration in an effort to downplay the connections between Agent Orange exposure and the health of military veterans. The Selective Cancers Study only revealed a very slightly increased possibility of developing NHL by veterans of Vietnam as opposed to other veterans.

Two months after the decision by Derwinski, recognition for other service-connected soft tissue sarcomas (based on exposure to dioxin-containing herbicides) was granted by the VA. Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of cancerous tumors which can appear in muscle, fat, lymph and blood vessels, and connective tissues. There are about twenty five of such tumor type cancers. That same month, retired Navy Admiral Elmo R. Zumwalt, appointee to the Veteran's Advisory Committee on Environmental Hazards, declared that there is sufficient association between twenty seven other health problems and Agent Orange exposure to justify compensation by the VA.

On January 31, 1991, Congress adopted a bill ratifying Derwinski's decisions to provide permanent disability benefits to Vietnam veterans suffering the specified cancers and chloracne. The bill also provided for independent scientific reviews by the National Academy of Sciences to determine other conditions possibly caused by Agent Orange and the other Rainbow herbicides. If and when causes are discovered, the Department of Veterans Affairs is expected to make suffering veterans eligible for service-connected disability benefits.

Since 1991, the original list of illnesses and diseases has continued to grow, but another question to be settled was to determine exactly who would be eligible for benefits under the service-connected criteria. Initially, the eligibility requirement was simply being a veteran who served “in the Republic Vietnam” between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975. All branches of the military were included.

Common sense seemed to dictate that any ground troops would certainly have been exposed, as well as those charged with activities related to the spraying of the herbicide. But what about those in the Navy? This is a question that has risen and caused much debate in recent years. No one argues the fact that Navy veterans rode up and down the Vietnam waterways, as openly exposed as regular foot troops. The question being asked is about those termed “Blue Water” Navy veterans?

Prior to 1997, there wasn't much consistency in determining Blue Water service, but one of the standards was whether a veteran possessed a Vietnam Service Medal (given to those Blue Water sailors who served in or near Vietnamese waters). Then in 1997, the VA took the position that “service on a deep water naval vessel, in waters off the shore of the Republic of Vietnam does not constitute 'service in the Republic of Vietnam' for purposes...”, eliminating compensation benefits to many Blue Water Navy personnel.


The case of Haas v. Peake (Secretary of Veterans Affairs) created a long drawn out debate over the question of Blue Water veterans being eligible for presumptive service connection to herbicide exposure. After being denied eligibility by the VA, he appealed the decision to the Board of Veterans' Appeals, where it was denied again in 2004. Not willing to give up and accept the decision, he appealed, yet again. The VA decision to deny was reversed in 2006 by the US Court of Aeals for Veterans Claims.

Given the spraying of Agent Orange along the coastline and the wind borne effects of such spraying, it appears that these veterans serving on vessels in close proximity to land would have the same risk of exposure to the herbicide Agent Orange as veterans serving on adjacent land, or an even greater risk than that borne by those veterans who may have visited and set foot on the land of the Republic of Vietnam only briefly (Haasv. Nicholson. 2006. Jonathan L. Haas, Appellant v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee. No. 04-0491. United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.)”

But 2008 saw yet another reversal in favor of the Department of Veterans' Affairs who had appealed the 2006 decision. Haas continued his battle, but the high court refused to hear the case early in 2009. The VA took the refusal to be an affirmation of their prerogativeto rewrite the rules as they did in 2002, preventing Blue Water veterans from receiving Agent Orange benefits.

In 2002 (under the Bush Administration), without public notice or regulatory comment, the VA changed the guidelines for presumptive connection to Agent Orange. The change required Navy, Marine, and Coast Guard veterans to demonstrate that they had actually set foot in Vietnam, regardless how close or far their offshore service ship may have been to the shore, or what duties were assigned to the ship.

That very same year, an Australian study provided evidence that distillation processes on Blue Water ships could result in increased concentrations of TCDD (chemical in Agent Orange) in potable water made on the ship. The study was prompted by the higher mortality rate of Royal Australian Navy veterans than “boots on the ground” Australian veterans.

In comparing those findings to how they would relate to American Navy water-distillation systems, the Institute of Medicine determined, No measurements of TCDD concentrations in seawater were collected during the Vietnam conflict, so it is not possible to ascertain the extent to which drinking water on US vessels may have been contaminated through distillation processes. However, it seems likely that vessels with such distillation processes that traveled near land or even at some distance from river deltas would periodically collect water that contained dioxin. Thus, a presumption of exposure of military personnel serving on those vessels is not unreasonable.”

The contamination of potable water isn't the only consideration to be taken when determining exposure on such ships. The boilers on such ships required far more distilled water than the crews consumed. Fumes from the distillation process were sent into the air circulating throughout the ship, so sailors were not only drinking, cooking, and bathing in contaminated water, they were also breathing contaminated air.

Perhaps even more telling is a citation taken from the CDC's own study, which has been revealed to be less than truthful and accurate. In an effort to remove agent orange exposure as a cause to Vietnam veterans' illnesses, they described their findings regarding non-Hodgkins lymphoma,

Compared with other Vietnam veterans, the risk of NHL tended to be higher among Navy veterans, most of whom were stationed on ocean-going vessels. Overall, the risk tended to be higher for men based at sea than for those based on land.”

Over the last decade there have been a number of bills introduced as the Agent Orange Equity Acts, designed to correct this injustice. They have been introduced in 2008/9/10 and now the latest, S.1629: Agent Orange Equity Act of 2011. Introduced on September 23, 2011 by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) there has been no word of progress since it was assigned to the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

The committee has fifteen members. For a complete list of the members:

The site you will be taken to is a tracking site for elected government officials. If you click on the image of each committee member, a complete analysis of the track record will be presented, including voting record, campaign contributions, etc.

It's time the Vietnam question of compensation is settled. Contact the committee members and let them know where you stand, as well as your own senators. And then spread the word.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Terri Meredith profile image

      Terri Meredith 5 years ago from Pennsylvania

      Unfortunately, I don't have the information you need. I would suggest that you hit as many forums and articles you can find related to the USS Midway during your time period, and ask there. You may be able to locate someone. I'd also check with the VA and see if you can get a list of names of those who served with your friend. Thanks for commenting and I wish you good luck in finding your answers.

    • profile image

      Rick Morrow 5 years ago

      Thanks Terri. I was exposed to AO on the Korea DMZ. I am now trying to help a Blue Water Navy Vet who has prostate cancer & Parkinson's to obtain a service-connected disability for AO exposure. Because he served on the USS Midway the VA says he has to prove he went on shore in Vietnam to qualify for AO exposure. Do you know if there is anyone out there who was on the USS Midway between 1959 and 1964 who can give some light? Email: Thanks for your support and efforts. God bless you.

    • Alastar Packer profile image

      Alastar Packer 6 years ago from North Carolina

      Appreciate you Terri. REMs "Orange Crush" indeed.

    • Terri Meredith profile image

      Terri Meredith 6 years ago from Pennsylvania

      I so glad the information presented here is able to be used as added information. I, myself, didn't understand the complexities of the situation, nor did I understand how massive the coverup. There are so many like your friend who have suffered for years, their health deteriorating, because of lack of information but mainly because there is so much denial of benefits based on poor decision making and monstrous lies perpetrated.

    • Alastar Packer profile image

      Alastar Packer 6 years ago from North Carolina

      Read this very carefully and it has added immeasurably to what I already knew about the Agent Orange situation. Well done as always Terri. I'm aware of a Vietnam vet who for 20 years has been battling a mystery illness that has now totally disabled him. For years he was passed from one doctor to another with guess's to his illness ranging from tick fever to who knows what else. Well, finally, last year it was diagnosed as Agent Orange related. Terri, thank you a million times for your courage and compassion in writing on this and like articles. You know how much I respect you for it.

    • Terri Meredith profile image

      Terri Meredith 6 years ago from Pennsylvania

      There are far too many people who don't have the facts on all aspects of the Agent Orange issue. The issues surrounding the Navy are difficult to clear up. There is clear evidence that our sailors were just as likely if not more so, to have been heavily exposed to the chemicals, but they are ignored. It's about the money. Keeping the lid on AO has been the agenda for 40+ years. Our military exposes our men to so many dangerous activities without the men even knowing. There are billions spent for Defense, but most of it isn't really about defending our country as it is about experimenting on our own people. There are countless men who have already died, suffering the consequences of AO BEFORE it became an issue. Testing was being done on our bases both in the US and other countries as far back as the 50's. These clowns know things are dangerous and just keep on using and testing anyway.

    • one2get2no profile image

      Philip Cooper 6 years ago from Olney

      Very interesting hub. I never knew this. Thanks for writing it.

    • Terri Meredith profile image

      Terri Meredith 6 years ago from Pennsylvania

      You are quite welcome. I have 2 uncles who served in Vietnam. The one is waging a terrible battle with heart, diabetes, and now bladder cancer. He was on the front lines. My other uncle was in the navy...brown water. He was discharged early due to diabetes developing. They are not related to each other, so there isn't a genetic connection between them.

      There is just too much evidence for the continued denial of benefits. It's so terribly dishonorable. Thanks for sharing!

    • Peggy W profile image

      Peggy Woods 6 years ago from Houston, Texas

      Thanks for writing this hub. I wrote one regarding "Old photo negatives of soldiers in Vietnam ~ 1960s" and it had to do with my brother Jim. My brother John was on a navy ship at the same time. They are both now gone.

      Sad that our government is so slow to recognize the needs of our soldiers...and also sad for those civilian folks who lived in Vietnam and who also suffered the effects of Agent Orange. We don't speak much about that.

      Up votes and sharing.

    • Terri Meredith profile image

      Terri Meredith 6 years ago from Pennsylvania

      Not likely I'll quit. I'd really like to see the stock portfolios of those gov't officials who helped Monsanto coverup their dirty deeds. Even those more current...they're still dancing around naming the associated illnesses as being caused by Agent Orange and the other Rainbow herbicides.

    • Wesman Todd Shaw profile image

      Wesman Todd Shaw 6 years ago from Kaufman, Texas


      I've been way into doing other things recently, but don't you worry, it's coming - sooner or later, it's coming.

      I've forever been more into the current events side of Monsanto, but you're doing such a wonderful job with the history of it that I can only hope that you won't stop...EVER!

    • Terri Meredith profile image

      Terri Meredith 6 years ago from Pennsylvania

      Well, now I'm really impressed with myself...I was able to teach something to you, the great Monsanto Annihilator! Thanks for the slinging, Slugger.

    • Wesman Todd Shaw profile image

      Wesman Todd Shaw 6 years ago from Kaufman, Texas

      I'm slinging your links around to my favourite places on the net.

      I've got to go back to part two for my reading though, or I'll be messing up my following of the story.

      Having scanned a good deal (who am I kidding, I read most of it...) - I'd never have guessed that Naval folks were affected. I officially learned something today!