I Am God - You're Not
I. Actual World Problem
Attempted Contrariness to:
English, And the General American Accent, As the Science Standard For Sentience
There is universally going to be an optimal "operating language", on every level of visible "syntactical consistency" on a given ecosystem's radius of inhabitance; here on the Earth, it is general American English, and those who cannot "generally" exemplify a pattern of master of it, even minimally, are thus determined to be without sufficient myelination or nerve-bundle cohesion to "earn" - continuation.
A law of nature.
II. Actual World Solution
Final Proof of Following Underlining Statements, "Beforehand"
Einstein's "Equivalence Principle" - in the most specified case: gravitational unilateral symmetry in EM relays, and "pressurization points"; that is, the scenario is indistinct from the total sum computer data relay signal telling "me", and the world - that I control " all of it", in unilateral digitized linguistic translation dynamics.
This is a newsworthy note on how I have very certainly overriden global security encryptions using "universalized" Boolean operator logic, exemplifying the model "theorem" paradigm in fact, and have now acquired full military technology at my arbitrary and incidental disposal - for life. And am acting world dictator.
Verification is a threefold intuition "Litmus" test:
1) It will never be deniable.
2) It is laterally formulaic, and sound.
3) It has been done here.
Additional info (all of it) at my Twitter:
The primary risk is a randomized command to "spontaneously decapitate" non-whites generally - save very few specifically designated exceptions. It has to make all the world papers - immediately.
A Treatise On Governing Computer Dynamics
Overrides all assigned temporary encryption methods.
Signified by static, unalterable, and inextricable sequence patterns of data entry.
1. Cycling "linguistic" universal "pyramid" scale.
2. Self-solved anagram in the English language.
3. Statement of successful total prediction.
I empirically did all three.
That means history can only be interpreted with me as dominant computer scientist.
NOT . . . a yes or no question.
Nobody else could fill these shoes.