ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Why Do Some People Just Not Like Anything About President Trump? [F1 366]

Updated on July 16, 2019

The left and the media cannot find a single thing they like about President Trump

The left and the media started with the attitude Trump was going to be a bad president, and they vowed to resist him as President and to do everything to get him out of office even before he was inaugurated. This has been going on since before Trump won the presidency. They have kept that promise and keep on threatening to impeach him. When this is the case, then we must look at the left and the media for the cause of the problem they have with Trump and then President Trump. The cause is simple, he wasn't supposed to win the presidency. That had been gifted to Hillary Clinton by the DNC and their Hillary biased media. For proof look back at election night on CNN, MSNBC and any other left leaning media. When they found out the Trump won the presidency, they cried, they shouted, whined and predicted the end of the US. They did this live on the air while they were purportedly covering the election as the media. That answers why the left and the media still make very biased statements against anything, and everything that is President Trump. They keep looking for something, anything to hang their prejudices onto, but they can't show it detracts from his accomplishments. They nit pick and think that giving a link to the biased media or alleged fact checking sites is the same as facts. They are not!

More importantly If president Trump didn't do anything, then why are they so enraged and emotional?

What did president Trump do to them personally?

These people are not just unhappy with president Trump, they are emotionally asphyxiated on anything to do with president Trump. This level of emotion, rage, disgust, and madness has to be rooted in something personal. What personal act, feelings, or wrong doing was perpetrated or seemed to be perpetrated on these people that they skipped over political differences and created this person into the hostile, rude, militant and irrational anti Trumper?


The Queen of the Anti Trumpers

The Queen of the Anti Trumpers
The Queen of the Anti Trumpers | Source
The King of the Anti Trumpers
The King of the Anti Trumpers
The Black Knight of the Anti Trumpers
The Black Knight of the Anti Trumpers | Source
Trump over the Anti Trumpers
Trump over the Anti Trumpers | Source

What has president Trump done that makes them Anti Trumpers?

There are democrats, independents, republicans, and then there are the Anti Trumpers. We know the classical bounds of the democrats, independents, and republicans, but what are the bounds for the Anti Trumpers?

It seems that while most of the Anti Trumpers are the democrats, the pro Hillary, and even the pro Sanders people. And they just seem to blame their candidates loss of the presidency to Donald Trump. It seems like the only thing that president Trump has done to make them Anti Trump is to win the election.

The more mysterious group of the Anti Trumpers are the voters that actually voted for Donald Trump for this presidency. But, now for some unknown reason they are not happy with their vote for Trump. What could president Trump have done to turn these people against him. Consider also that many of the Anti Trump many not have even voted in the 2016 presidential election. It doesn't matter to an Anti Trumper.

There could be another category of Anti Trumpers, but I don't really know how to define them.


The Pro Hillary or Pro Sanders Anti Trump

The biggest and the most vocal Anti Trumpers are those that were the Pro Hillary Clinton, or the pro Senator Bernie Sanders supporters.

The Pro Bernie Sanders Supporters

------------------------------------------------

It seems like the Sanders supporters should be at least Anti Hillary Clinton. Why, because it was Hillary Clinton and her DNC that actually forced their candidate Bernie Sanders to leave the primary. They should even be enraged because they saw Bernie Sanders come from way behind at the beginning of the democrat primary to gain on Hillary each month thereafter. When it looked like Sanders would not only catch up with Hillary Clinton, but maybe even pass her before the primary, Sanders mysteriously drops out of the primary. Sanders let his supporters down as he should have at least stayed in the primary until the democrat convention. And then let the democrat voters decide who should represent them in the presidential election.

The Sanders supporters were not fans of his opponent Hillary Clinton, and Sanders didn't drop out of the race because of anything that republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said or did. And it appears that most of the Sanders supporters took their vote to the Independent candidates like Jill Stein. The steep increase in voting for the independents seems to verify that.

Of course, there may have been some of the Sanders that were still democrat in their voting that they switched their vote to Hillary Clinton. But, why should they be Anti Trump? Maybe, they weren't when they voted for Hillary Clinton, but when she won the popular vote but lost the Electoral College voter 304 to 231 is when they snapped and became Anti Trump. Here they could feel that their two candidates were wrongfully denied the presidency. While this seems to be a logical argument, it was nothing that Donald Trump did other than campaign better, have a better platform, and resonated with more of America than did Hillary Clinton.

Pro Hillary Clinton Anti Trumpers.

--------------------------------------------

The pro Hillary Clinton Anti Trumpers are the hard core, and they don't have any better reason than the Pro Sanders supporters. I wrote an article that was annotated by me on over thirty reasons that Hillary Clinton claimed that lost her the race. Guess what the list was missing, yes, there was nothing in the list that she did to lose the presidency.

One of the big reasons was ex FBI director James Comey for reopening the case against Hillary Clintons gross negligent use of her private and unsecured email server that she used to send and receive Classified Emails. First Hillary and the democrats praised Comey for exonerating her of all criminal charges including the Gross Negligence of sending and receiving classified information. Then, a couple of weeks before the election, Comey reopens the case because they had found tens of thousands of new emails on Anthony Weiner's computer. A computer that he shared with his wife, Huma Abedin. Abedin was Hillary Clinton's top aide.

Now, we have since found that those emails were found by the FBI a month before Comey reopened the case. The timing then so close to the election made Comey the target of the democrats. They now wanted him fired. But, when Trump later fired him, they wanted president Trump investigated.

The emails that were found through WikiLeaks and the Weiner's computer were never contested as being fake. The contents of those emails rather than how they got published got undermined with the Democrat playbook. While never contesting the veracity of the emails, they blamed the leakage on the Russians. But not just the Russians they had created a bogus Russian Report that tried to make it look like Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election.

Too date, there has not been a single piece of evidence to validate, and indictment but the investigation keeps going on. And the Anti Trumper cling to it like the survivors of the Titantic to their life preservers.

President Trump

---------------------

Donald Trump the republican candidate beat 16 of the best and most experienced republican opponents, without any help from the Russians or even the RNC. As the winner of the Republican Party Convention, he campaigned better than Hillary Clinton who didn't really campaign or even hold press conferences in the last six months of the election campaign. Hillary lost not because of the Russians but because she didn't have a platform, much less one that resonated with the voters.

She lost because most of the heartland of the country voted for Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton won the big population hardcore democrat controlled state, and she won 104 Electoral College votes with only CA, NY, and Il, but Trump won over 90% of the counties in the US. And that is one of the big reasons why the Electoral College exists in the race for the US presidency.

Donald Trump was not a politician until he won the presidency. And when he came into the Executive Office he was in a set stage, A stage that was more than three decades in the making and the result of several presidents and and several congresses. Yet, the Anti Trumper made every single one of those unsolved problems and issues look like Trump caused them. He didn't cause them because he wasn't in congress or the presidency when they developed.

Yes, he inherited these problems, and he has solved some of them, and worked on others. But the Anti Trump and the democrats having lost the election only wanted to resist, much less not help president Trump.

Can anyone tell me or the rest of the country what Trump has done as president that is so wrong or bad for the country.

Be specific and detailed without using emotional generalities.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      2 hours ago

      Scott

      What is your source?

      ----------------------------

      "Texas Criminal Illegal Alien Data

      The Department of Public Safety and local law enforcement agencies in Texas participate in the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Priority Enforcement Program (PEP). Participation in PEP enables DHS to work with state and local law enforcement to take custody of individuals who pose a danger to public safety before those individuals are released into our communities. In Texas, PEP begins at the local level when an individual is arrested and booked by a Texas law enforcement officer for a criminal violation of Texas law. The arrested individual's fingerprints are submitted to the Texas DPS and subsequently to the FBI for criminal history and warrant checks. This same biometric data is also sent to DHS' IDENT database so that ICE can determine the person's immigration status and whether the individual is a priority for removal, consistent with the DHS enforcement priorities. The immigration status information is returned to DPS by DHS. The following report is based upon the status indicators provided to the DPS. For the purposes of this report, the term "criminal alien" refers to an individual who has been identified as an alien by DHS and who has been arrested for a state criminal offense, typically a Misdemeanor B or higher, committed in Texas.

      Lawful Presence Determined Through PEP

      According to DHS status indicators, over 297,000 criminal aliens have been booked into local Texas jails between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019, of which over 202,000 were classified as illegal aliens by DHS.

      Between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019, these 202,000 illegal aliens were charged with more than 317,000 criminal offenses which included arrests for 570 homicide charges; 35,019 assault charges; 6,040 burglary charges; 39,850 drug charges; 457 kidnapping charges; 16,783 theft charges; 25,122 obstructing police charges; 1,761 robbery charges; 3,752 sexual assault charges; 5,019 sexual offense charges; and 3,211 weapon charges. DPS criminal history records reflect those criminal charges have thus far resulted in over 127,000 convictions including 262 homicide convictions; 14,534 assault convictions; 3,335 burglary convictions; 18,904 drug convictions; 182 kidnapping convictions; 7,406 theft convictions; 11,855 obstructing police convictions; 1,063 robbery convictions; 1,845 sexual assault convictions; 2,457 sexual offense convictions; and 1,359 weapon convictions.

      Illegal Arrest Convictions

      Enlarge chart

      These figures only count individuals who previously had an encounter with DHS that resulted in their fingerprints being entered into the DHS IDENT database. Foreign nationals who enter the country illegally and avoid detection by DHS, but are later arrested by local or state law enforcement for a state offense will not have a DHS response in regard to their lawful status and do not appear in these counts. However, in addition to the PEP program, DHS actively adjudicates the immigration status of individuals incarcerated in the Texas prison system. From 2011 to date, the Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) has provided DPS with information on more than 27,000 individuals who were identified by DHS as in the country illegally while they were incarcerated at TDCJ. 10,362 of these individuals were not identified through the PEP program at the time of their arrest. DPS does not know the current incarceration status of the individuals identified while they were incarcerated nor when their alien status was initially determined.

      Lawful Presence Determined While Incarcerated at TDCJ

      Between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019, these 10,362 individual identified as illegal aliens while in prison, but who were not previously identified through PEP, were charged with more than 7,000 criminal offenses which included arrests for 90 homicide charges; 842 assault charges; 516 burglary charges; 1,363 drug charges; 30 kidnapping charges; 332 theft charges; 672 obstructing police charges; 273 robbery charges; 563 sexual assault charges; 253 sexual offense charges; and 164 weapon charges. DPS criminal history records reflect those criminal charges have thus far resulted in over 4,000 convictions including 68 homicide convictions; 515 assault convictions; 345 burglary convictions; 787 drug convictions; 15 kidnapping convictions; 190 theft convictions; 306 obstructing police convictions; 212 robbery convictions; 399 sexual assault convictions; 186 sexual offense convictions; and 75 weapon convictions.

      Prison Arrest Convictions

      Enlarge chart

      Because DPS does not know the date these individuals were identified as illegal while in prison, the count of charges for which this population was arrested between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019 does not necessarily align with the size of the population of illegal aliens identified while in prison. A more accurate assessment can be seen when examining this population's entire Texas criminal history and not just for offenses committed during this time period (see the Historical Data section of this report). However, for this report, in order to be consistent with the timeframe utilized to provide counts of arrest and conviction for the population identified through PEP, we have limited the arrest and conviction counts for prison identified illegal aliens to the same June 1, 2011 to July 31, 2019 time frame used for individuals identified through PEP.

      Report Notes

      These figures do not attempt to allege that foreign nationals in the country illegally commit more crimes than other groups. It simply identifies thousands of crimes that should not have occurred and thousands of victims that should not have been victimized because the perpetrator should not be here. It is also important to note that these figures represent the minimum number of crimes associated with criminal illegal aliens:

      These figures only count arrests in Texas for state offenses. These individuals may have criminal records in other states.

      These figures only represent offenses and convictions that are associated with arrest events that occurred between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019.

      The criminal activity for individuals identified as illegal while in prison is under represented for this time period because they may have been incarcerated during the time frame used in this report.

      These figures do not count federal criminal charges.

      These figures do not include similar data for foreign nationals who are lawfully in the country and commit state criminal offenses.

      Individuals whose lawful presence was determined while in prison may or may not be currently incarcerated."

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      3 hours ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      Never mind, I know you can't - so I will. Base statistic, non-citizens represent 7% of the populous. So proportionately, if the percent of a crime is higher than 7% then you MIGHT have a point.

      Violent Crimes - 6%

      Property Crimes - 20%

      Drug Crimes - 29%

      Public Order Offenses - 7%

      Weapons Offenses - 5%

      Oh Yes - Immigration Offenses - 87% (go figure)

      So, what do we have?

      - Citizens are more violent than non-citizens

      - Non-citizens do more property crimes, it seems

      - Same for drug use (probably a combination of grass and profiling)

      - But citizens commit, contrary to you and Trump, more weapons violations

      - Both groups seem to be equally disorderly.

      Let's compare

      - Citizens are more violent and prone to use guns

      - Non-citizens steal and use grass more.

      Who is worse?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 hours ago

      Scott

      No Rodeo Clowning allowed.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      7 hours ago

      Once again this is your answer

      "It is irrelevant as to the nature of the federal arrests of non US citizens. It is an expensive that could be save or severely reduced by building the wall. Just the arrest, the confinement and the processing through the courts, and adding other crimes to the mix is just something where the wall can help.

      In the meantime, the SCOTUS and the Congress can change the catch and release to catch an immediately return them to their country. This would alleviate the children and separation, and children issue.

      And when these illegals are let loose in the country pending their court date, they are committing another crime when they don't show up in court."

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      11 hours ago

      You missed the whole point and you didn't supply any facts,

      ----------------------------

      Reagan's Argument for Eliminating the State and Local Tax ...

      [Search domain www.nationalreview.com/corner/reagans-argument-eliminating-state-and-local-tax-deduction/] https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/reagans-argu...

      Reagan's Argument for Eliminating the State and Local Tax Deduction. Eliminating the deduction would dramatically reduce the impact of the coming tax cut for millions of Americans. America Rising reaches out, sharing two clips of President Ronald Reagan calling for this deduction to be eliminated

      ------------------------------------------------------

      Spam and No facts no post

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      12 hours ago

      The 1986 Regan Tax Reform Act took away two big personal tax deductions.

      Credit Card Interest

      State and Local Taxes (SALT)

      In 2010 Congress pursuant to the requirements of ACA raised the Medical Deduction Threshold from 7.5% to 10% ironic that the Affordable Care Act would raise this deduction threshold.

      The Trump Tax cut took more of the personal deductions this time those with 2% thresholds.

      The thought is that by raising standard deductions would be OK, but that is not the case.

      These deductions are the only real tax cuts afforded to the working class up to the middle class. The rich don't care about these wage making loss of deductions. What affects them is the hundreds of tax deductions, tax credits and tax deferments along with the 20% flat tax on capital gains. They didn't lose any of them, and they might even get the capital gains at a lower percentage.

      These are two things that I don't like about Regan and Trump. Not that the democrats do better as they don't do tax cuts of any kind.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      13 hours ago

      Who had more ties with Russia and Putin?

      President Obama

      Hillary Clinton

      Donald Trump

      No guessing.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      13 hours ago

      If you have answers to the questions posed to you then I would like to read them. But you have ignored, diverted, distracted, cherry picked and just made rude statements about the president.

      People already know this about you and your rodeo clowning.

      I didn't take the time to answer your comments to have you do these things. I gave facts and you gave nothing in return. I don't get paid for writing articles, I do it to get serious answers from people and ideology I can't comprehend, nor could I come up with them on my own.

      Your choice!

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      14 hours ago

      Scott

      I answered your question twice , you just don't read, and you avoid answering all the questions, and comments put to you.

      No spam please.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      21 hours ago

      Scott

      It is irrelevant as to the nature of the federal arrests of non US citizens. It is an expensive that could be save or severely reduced by building the wall. Just the arrest, the confinement and the processing through the courts, and adding other crimes to the mix is just something where the wall can help.

      In the meantime, the SCOTUS and the Congress can change the catch and release to catch an immediately return them to their country. This would alleviate the children and separation, and children issue.

      And when these illegals are let loose in the country pending their court date, they are committing another crime when they don't show up in court.

      At the same time, we have a serious homeless problem in the country that isn't being addressed. Along with the homeless beside bad sanitation comes drug use. There is no real benefit for having these illegal aliens in the country. They are only cheap labor for their employers. To the taxpayers they are a major liability.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      22 hours ago

      Texas Criminal Illegal Alien Data

      The Department of Public Safety and local law enforcement agencies in Texas participate in the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Priority Enforcement Program (PEP). Participation in PEP enables DHS to work with state and local law enforcement to take custody of individuals who pose a danger to public safety before those individuals are released into our communities. In Texas, PEP begins at the local level when an individual is arrested and booked by a Texas law enforcement officer for a criminal violation of Texas law. The arrested individual's fingerprints are submitted to the Texas DPS and subsequently to the FBI for criminal history and warrant checks. This same biometric data is also sent to DHS' IDENT database so that ICE can determine the person's immigration status and whether the individual is a priority for removal, consistent with the DHS enforcement priorities. The immigration status information is returned to DPS by DHS. The following report is based upon the status indicators provided to the DPS. For the purposes of this report, the term "criminal alien" refers to an individual who has been identified as an alien by DHS and who has been arrested for a state criminal offense, typically a Misdemeanor B or higher, committed in Texas.

      Lawful Presence Determined Through PEP

      According to DHS status indicators, over 297,000 criminal aliens have been booked into local Texas jails between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019, of which over 202,000 were classified as illegal aliens by DHS.

      Between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019, these 202,000 illegal aliens were charged with more than 317,000 criminal offenses which included arrests for 570 homicide charges; 35,019 assault charges; 6,040 burglary charges; 39,850 drug charges; 457 kidnapping charges; 16,783 theft charges; 25,122 obstructing police charges; 1,761 robbery charges; 3,752 sexual assault charges; 5,019 sexual offense charges; and 3,211 weapon charges. DPS criminal history records reflect those criminal charges have thus far resulted in over 127,000 convictions including 262 homicide convictions; 14,534 assault convictions; 3,335 burglary convictions; 18,904 drug convictions; 182 kidnapping convictions; 7,406 theft convictions; 11,855 obstructing police convictions; 1,063 robbery convictions; 1,845 sexual assault convictions; 2,457 sexual offense convictions; and 1,359 weapon convictions.

      Illegal Arrest Convictions

      Enlarge chart

      These figures only count individuals who previously had an encounter with DHS that resulted in their fingerprints being entered into the DHS IDENT database. Foreign nationals who enter the country illegally and avoid detection by DHS, but are later arrested by local or state law enforcement for a state offense will not have a DHS response in regard to their lawful status and do not appear in these counts. However, in addition to the PEP program, DHS actively adjudicates the immigration status of individuals incarcerated in the Texas prison system. From 2011 to date, the Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) has provided DPS with information on more than 27,000 individuals who were identified by DHS as in the country illegally while they were incarcerated at TDCJ. 10,362 of these individuals were not identified through the PEP program at the time of their arrest. DPS does not know the current incarceration status of the individuals identified while they were incarcerated nor when their alien status was initially determined.

      Lawful Presence Determined While Incarcerated at TDCJ

      Between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019, these 10,362 individual identified as illegal aliens while in prison, but who were not previously identified through PEP, were charged with more than 7,000 criminal offenses which included arrests for 90 homicide charges; 842 assault charges; 516 burglary charges; 1,363 drug charges; 30 kidnapping charges; 332 theft charges; 672 obstructing police charges; 273 robbery charges; 563 sexual assault charges; 253 sexual offense charges; and 164 weapon charges. DPS criminal history records reflect those criminal charges have thus far resulted in over 4,000 convictions including 68 homicide convictions; 515 assault convictions; 345 burglary convictions; 787 drug convictions; 15 kidnapping convictions; 190 theft convictions; 306 obstructing police convictions; 212 robbery convictions; 399 sexual assault convictions; 186 sexual offense convictions; and 75 weapon convictions.

      Prison Arrest Convictions

      Enlarge chart

      Because DPS does not know the date these individuals were identified as illegal while in prison, the count of charges for which this population was arrested between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019 does not necessarily align with the size of the population of illegal aliens identified while in prison. A more accurate assessment can be seen when examining this population's entire Texas criminal history and not just for offenses committed during this time period (see the Historical Data section of this report). However, for this report, in order to be consistent with the timeframe utilized to provide counts of arrest and conviction for the population identified through PEP, we have limited the arrest and conviction counts for prison identified illegal aliens to the same June 1, 2011 to July 31, 2019 time frame used for individuals identified through PEP.

      Report Notes

      These figures do not attempt to allege that foreign nationals in the country illegally commit more crimes than other groups. It simply identifies thousands of crimes that should not have occurred and thousands of victims that should not have been victimized because the perpetrator should not be here. It is also important to note that these figures represent the minimum number of crimes associated with criminal illegal aliens:

      These figures only count arrests in Texas for state offenses. These individuals may have criminal records in other states.

      These figures only represent offenses and convictions that are associated with arrest events that occurred between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019.

      The criminal activity for individuals identified as illegal while in prison is under represented for this time period because they may have been incarcerated during the time frame used in this report.

      These figures do not count federal criminal charges.

      These figures do not include similar data for foreign nationals who are lawfully in the country and commit state criminal offenses.

      Individuals whose lawful presence was determined while in prison may or may not be currently incarcerated.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      22 hours ago

      https://greatamericanpolitics.com/2019/08/doj-64-o...

      -----------------------------------------

      ICE ramps up DNA testing for migrant families along the ...

      [Search domain wtkr.com/2019/07/22/ice-ramps-up-dna-testing-for-migrant-families-along-the-southern-border/] https://wtkr.com/2019/07/22/ice-ramps-up-dna-testi...

      The DNA testing, in particular, takes direct aim at individuals posing as families amid the increase in families at the border. The administration has argued that people are using children to get

      ------------------------------------

      DOJ: 64% Of Federal Arrests Were Of Non-Citizens In 2018 ...

      [Search domain greatamericanpolitics.com/2019/08/doj-64-of-federal-arrests-were-of-non-citizens-in-2018/] https://greatamericanpolitics.com/2019/08/doj-64-o...

      Non-citizens made up 64% of all federal arrests in 2018 despite making up 7% of the U.S. population, according to Justice Department data released Thursday and reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation. Between 1998 and 2018, federal arrests of non-citizens grew by 234%, while federal arrest of U.S. citizens climbed 10%.

      --------------------------------------------

      64% Of Federal Arrests Were Of Non-Citizens In 2018, DOJ ...

      [Search domain dailycaller.com/2019/08/22/federal-arrests-non-citizens-doj/] https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/22/federal-arrests...

      Non-citizens accounted for 28% of all federal fraud arrests, 25% of all federal property arrests, and 24% of all federal drug arrests. The Justice Department identified the top five crimes non-citizens were most likely be prosecuted for: illegal re-entry, drugs, fraud, alien smuggling and misuse of visas.

      --------------------------------------------------

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      23 hours ago

      Scott

      Why don't you show some facts.

      Jason Hopkins

      Immigration and politics reporter

      August 22, 2019 6:42 PM ET

      Federal arrests of non-citizens has increased exponentially over the past two decades, and account for the majority of all federal arrests, data released by the Justice Department revealed.

      Non-citizens made up 64% of all federal arrests in 2018 despite making up 7% of the U.S. population, according to Justice Department data released Thursday and reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation. Between 1998 and 2018, federal arrests of non-citizens grew by 234%, while federal arrests of U.S. citizens climbed 10%.

      While the numbers provide credence to President Donald Trump’s argument that illegal immigration results in increased crime, immigration experts also pointed out that migrant apprehensions make up a significant portion of current federal arrests.

      “Experience has taught the immigration agencies and DOJ that this works to reduce recidivism — in other words, when illegal crossers face some more severe consequence than just being sent back home, they don’t keep doing it,” Jessica Vaughan of the Center for Immigration Studies told the Washington Examiner.

      A crest of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is seen 03 August 2007 inside the J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building in Washington, DC. AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

      A crest of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is seen 03 August 2007 inside the J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building in Washington, DC. AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

      Trump made increased immigration enforcement a hallmark goal of his administration. His efforts at beefing up border security and providing additional funding to the Customs and Border Protection have yielded satisfactory results. Federal immigration apprehensions climbed more than 50,000 from 2017 to 2018, according to the Justice Department data. (RELATED: Hundreds Of Illegal Migrants Carry Criminal Histories, DHS Investigation Finds)

      Ninety-five percent of the increase in federal arrests over the past 20 years were, in fact, due to immigration offenses, the Justice Department data found. Non-citizens accounted for 28% of all federal fraud arrests, 25% of all federal property arrests, and 24% of all federal drug arrests. The Justice Department identified the top five crimes non-citizens were most likely be prosecuted for: illegal re-entry, drugs, fraud, alien smuggling and misuse of visas. (RELATED: 109 US Counties Have Become Majority Non-White Since 2000, Analysis Finds)

      “Opponents of immigration enforcement are obsessed with trying to establish that illegal aliens and legal immigrants commit fewer crimes than Americans, and so, as their narrative goes, local law enforcement agencies should not cooperate with ICE and should adopt sanctuary policies,” Vaughan continued in her statement. “This is first of all not true, but is off-point and a dangerous conclusion.”

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      27 hours ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      Why did you forget to mention Brad, that the VAST majority of those "arrests" were misdemeanor arrests of people turning themselves in at the border. Sort of makes your measure meaningless and your use of it misleading, doesn't it.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      27 hours ago

      President Trump is not a Racist.

      Illegals are not a Race.

      There is Legal and then there is Illegal

      The president is not against immigration he is only against Illegal Immigration.

      With Illegal Immigration comes the good and the bad but this fact seems to be lost on the left.

      Also, for the last ten years the the government has not been doing DNA testing on migrants.

      "We have a great tool that was mandated by and approved by Congress as a law and we’re not using it,” fellow whistleblower Mark Jones added. “We are allowing ourselves to apprehend individuals and process them and by not taking the DNA sample, we’re not giving our law enforcement — both state and federal — the additional tool to solve these outstanding crimes.”

      According to the whistleblowers, an extensive DNA-test pilot program was supposed to have gone into effect as early as 2010 but was put on hold by then-Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano after she obtained a waiver from then-Attorney General Eric Holder.

      Yet years later, and even with President Donald Trump, a Republican, now in the White House, the program still remains permanently stalled — and despite a vow from then-Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen back in 2018 that the program was in a “planning stage.”

      In fact, Jones claims that during a 2018 Homeland Security conference call he participated in, the unnamed officials present appeared to suggest they wanted the program to fail."

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      27 hours ago

      In 2018 64% of Federal Arrests were Non US Citizens

      Scott

      #notapproved

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      35 hours ago

      It will be hard for Scott to top his last propaganda while dismissing the facts in my comments.

      Who wants the democrats idea of free medical, for all including illegal aliens, and free college education on top of that.Open borders to bring in more people to get more benefits while increasing the tax burden on American taxpayers.

      The current budget is $4.4 Trillion, and that would double it.

      The question to Scott is with this free medical what happens to FEHS?

      tsadjatko profile image

      Brad 3 hours ago

      The left are just sheep regurgitating and writing left, ultra left propaganda. They dismiss even Judicial Watch which uses documents that they have to sue the government to get under FOIA.

      They have no credibility because they have no facts, and no proof. They have the attention span of a butterfly. They divert, distort, and attack instead of arguing their points.

      They put zero time and effort into their statements.

      I comment on what they write, and what they write is propaganda. They are the modern day Tokyo Rose!

      Brad 3 hours ago

      2008 Obama 365 EC

      2012 Obama 332 EC

      1988 GH Bush 426 EC

      Bill Clinton in both 1992 and 1996 did better than Obama

      Which of the 25 democrat presidential hopefuls is an Obama or Clinton to get 375 votes with a sitting president that has so many accomplishment?

      Then compare them with the Hillary Clinton 230 EC

      What have the democrats done for the country and our people to warrant 375 EC? Maybe if they let Mexico and the illegal aliens vote but even that is not for sure.

      We have a lot of the Obama administration involved in the Uranium One Coverup. They include Mueller, Rosenstein, Wiseman, Clinton and Obama. Mueller was appointed by Rosenstein, who was a US attorney when Mueller was FBI director. Andrew Wissemann ran the justice department Fraud section during a RICO investigation of Vadim Mikerin Russian official in charge of the TENAM company involved the Uranium One deal that effectively gave Russia and Putin 20% of all US Uranium Mining Stock.

      The Obama people mentioned above ironically became the people putting together the Russian Trump Collusion investigation. Mueller hired Weissmann and Weissmann not Mueller made the investigation to target Trump. But even that stacked team including Rosenstein who should have recused himself, as well as Mueller couldn't find anything against Trump.

      This will come out this year.

      The 375 EC for any D, now that is desperate left mind numbing propaganda.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      Scott

      You said

      "Yes, I read what you wrote. Please return the favor. Clinton and MSM told the truth about Trump and let people draw their own conclusions."

      B:

      Why don't you scribe out their Truths and we can discuss it, and open it up to anyone that wants to comment on it?

      Put is in your own words What Clinton and the MSM told the Truth.

      -------------------------------------

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      Scott

      You didn't comment on this and you made the same statement

      B:

      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      "All you have is opinion based on - well - nothing.

      Yes, I read what you wrote. Please return the favor. Clinton and MSM told the truth about Trump and let people draw their own conclusions.

      Any unbiased thoughtful person, having observed Trump over three years would definitely become biased against him because that is the ONLY realistic conclusion you can draw about his terrible behavior.

      He Retweeted the idiots' tweet and then expounded and expanded upon it. Later today he called himself the "chosen one" and joked about the fact that he deserves the Medal of Honor - an insult to anybody who has served in the military.

      And again, today, he insults the Jews calling them stupid or traitors to Israel. I suppose you agree."

      "Scott once again you fail to argue any of my many points.

      Your comments are a sad attempt to just keep hating President Trump while giving only opinion and fabrication.

      Once again, if you are serious about your position then answer my 9 questions. You provide Vanity Fair and their writer who is biased against Trump but that doesn't make facts out of opinion.

      President Trump did what several other presidents said they would do and put the US Embassy in Jerusalem but they didn't do it. That endeared people in Israel to President Trump.

      While president Obama worked against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu trying to force progressives into his right leaning governing coalition, then dedicating US Taxpayer funds to a failed effort to defeat Netanyaho in 2015.

      Bill Clinton 20 years earlier said "I tried to do it in a way that didn't overtly involve me".

      Washington Times July 12, 2016."

      -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      lm

      I told you not to do that!

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      Scott try again

      -------------------

      Let me be clear about why Hillary Clinton is germane and integral to this article on people not liking President Trump. I have twice explained the reason why Hillary Clinton is not outside the scope of this article. They either can't grasp its simplicity or they are just not open to reason.

      #1

      In either case, the reason why Hillary Clinton is always in this topic is because Hillary Clinton and the democrats are the ones that along with the left leaning MSM started the hate against Trump during the presidential campaign of 2016.

      #2

      Hillary Clinton's entire presidential political campaign was based that she was not Trump, don't vote for Trump and we hate Trump. She had no other platform and that along with her failure to do campaigning was the reason she lost the election.

      #3

      The 25 current democratic presidential hopefuls for the most part are using that Hillary vitriol and venom becomes a large part of their political platform. Hillary directly and indirectly created the Russian Trump Collusion to work both to get her elected by creating false connections between Trump and Russia. Which is ironic with her and Bill Clinton's Russian connection. The Russians even paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a single speech in Russia, after he talked with Putin. The Clinton foundation received over $140 million from Russia, and other foreign companies.

      #4

      Hillary used a law firm to hide the money that paid for the Russian Dossier put together in Russia and supplied by Russians from Christopher Steel and that is what he put in the Russian Dossier.

      #5

      This dossier was fake even on its face, as it said that the document information was not known to be true, nor was it verified. Yet, the FBI paid Steele and eventually used it to acquire a FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page and through him the Trump team. Carter Page was suspected by the FBI of a crime. That crime was never charged and it was just the means to spy on him and the Trump team. The prove is that after a year of spying on Carter Page and his connection to the Trump team, he today is a free man without any pending criminal action.

      #6

      So whether you agree or don't agree. believe or don't believe in this fact, Hillary Clinton and the DNC propagated this lie to use it to win the 2016 presidency.

      #7

      If they failed to win the election they would use it to try and stop him from being inaugurated as president.

      #8

      And if that failed they would continue to use it to try an impeach or convict him to remove him from office.

      #9

      Their last resort which is now is to try and prevent him from being reelected.

      #10

      They failed with the Russian Trump hoax, and now they have moved on to calling him a Racist, and also predict a Recession.

      #11

      That is how desperate the democrats are today. Yet, they have 25 clowns impersonating serious democrat presidential candidates. With these acts and false narratives they prove that they would risk continuing the divide in the country that they started, and wish for a recession that would again devastate the middle class just to try and prevent the reelection of President Donald Trump.

      #12

      In addition, they are not the party representing the USA, they are the party representing Illegal Aliens while not caring about the Americans and veterans that are homeless in their Red controlled states and cities like CA and SF.

      #13

      They don't care about child sex trafficking especially those fond illegally crossing the US Mexico border. They don't care about the drug trafficking also done by the Mexican Cartel. They don't care about protecting the sovereignty of America, nor of protecting the country and its people.

      #14

      A vote for the democrats is a vote for the illegal alien, including Convicted Illegal Alien Felons protected by the democrats from being legally deported.

      #15

      All of this is being used by the democrats to make Trump have a cloud and be viewed as a bad president, but none of it is true.

      #16

      The democrats must believe that repetition of a lie, or a false accusation is the same as a Truth, but it really is still a lie.

      #17

      The DNC allegation hacking of their server was never investigated by the FBI or any US intel agency. They were refused access to their email server, and the drives were cleaned and physically destroyed.

      --------------------------

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      Scott

      "The Russian Trump Collusion was a Hillary Clinton, DNC, FBI democrat fabrication. " - THAT, of course, is your conspiracy theory not based upon anything but wishful thinking.

      B:

      Check in my previous comments where I lay down all the facts.

      So your comment is meaningless until you tell me where my facts are wrong in that previous comment.

      ------------------------------------------

      Trump asked for and got the Russian help he needed to squeeze out a win. That is proven.

      B:

      That is your conspiracy theory, and no it hasn't been proven.

      --------------------------------------------

      Was the collusion sufficiently involved to rise to the level of conspiracy? Mueller did develop some evidence but not enough to bring charges had he been allowed. Those are the facts.

      B:

      Mueller didn't find any evidence about Russian Trump Collusion.

      NONE

      ---------------------------------------------

      All you have is opinion based on - well - nothing.

      Yes, I read what you wrote. Please return the favor. Clinton and MSM told the truth about Trump and let people draw their own conclusions.

      B:

      If you read then quote it so we can fact check instead of making this childish query. I don't believe you read it, because you don't seem to know what I wrote.

      ----------------------------------------------

      Any unbiased thoughtful person, having observed Trump over three years would definitely become biased against him because that is the ONLY realistic conclusion you can draw about his terrible behavior.

      B:

      This is just a false baseless accusation.

      ----------------------------------------------

      He Retweeted the idiots' tweet and then expounded and expanded upon it. Later today he called himself the "chosen one" and joked about the fact that he deserves the Medal of Honor - an insult to anybody who has served in the military.

      B:

      I say his news conference, but I didn't hear medal of honor. But I wrote a comment on that tweet and Israel and the Jews and you didn't read it, or ignored it.

      How many medal of honors do you have?

      And don't push your military service, it is what you write today that is not American, not for America or its people. You don't even know what platform the democrats have today, but you are disrespecting the country with your writing.

      ------------------------------------------------

      And again, today, he insults the Jews calling them stupid or traitors to Israel. I suppose you agree.

      B:

      He wasn't referring to all Jews only those that vote for democrats. And I agree with him.

      But you are OK when the squad makes antisemitic statements about All Jews and Israel.

      Pick a country, it doesn't appear that you belong here.

      ------------------------------------------------

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      3 days ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      "The Russian Trump Collusion was a Hillary Clinton, DNC, FBI democrat fabrication. " - THAT, of course, is your conspiracy theory not based upon anything but wishful thinking.

      Trump asked for and got the Russian help he needed to squeeze out a win. That is proven. Was the collusion sufficiently involved to rise to the level of conspiracy? Mueller did develop some evidence but not enough to bring charges had he been allowed. Those are the facts.

      All you have is opinion based on - well - nothing.

      Yes, I read what you wrote. Please return the favor. Clinton and MSM told the truth about Trump and let people draw their own conclusions.

      Any unbiased thoughtful person, having observed Trump over three years would definitely become biased against him because that is the ONLY realistic conclusion you can draw about his terrible behavior.

      He Retweeted the idiots' tweet and then expounded and expanded upon it. Later today he called himself the "chosen one" and joked about the fact that he deserves the Medal of Honor - an insult to anybody who has served in the military.

      And again, today, he insults the Jews calling them stupid or traitors to Israel. I suppose you agree.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      You are wrong

      The Russian Trump Collusion was a Hillary Clinton, DNC, FBI democrat fabrication. The prove once again, none of the 5 investigations based on this hoax found Anything. The proof again is no indictments none at all.

      Mueller and his report folded like a paper house.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      Scott

      B:

      There you go again spouting more opinion as fact.

      You only got as far as the 2nd paragraph and struck out.

      Want to try with the rest of that comment?

      ----------------------------------------------------------------

      "Hilary Clinton and MSM didn't start anything about Trump - they simply told the truth."

      B:

      You didn't read my comment, or you just decided to ignore the facts and replace it with this false story.

      Told the truth about what?

      Your style of opinion shrouded in vague, and ambiguous concatenation of words is meaningless.

      The only point you make is that you are ignorant to real facts or just disregard them because of your bias and hate for the president of the US.

      -------------------------------------------------------------------

      Trump has done this to himself. All any thoughtful person has to do is observe him to understand his basic evil nature."

      B:

      Any thoughtful person wouldn't be biased against Trump for over 3 years.

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------

      "Hell, he just tweeted that some Jews may think he is the second coming of Christ!!! The man is nuts."

      B:

      “Thank you to Wayne Allyn Root for the very nice words. "

      What is your problem, President Trump didn't say anything about himself he just retweeted Mr. Root's tweet.

      -------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Scott once again you fail to argue any of my many points.

      Your comments are a sad attempt to just keep hating President Trump while giving only opinion and fabrication.

      Once again, if you are serious about your position then answer my 9 questions. You provide Vanity Fair and their writer who is biased against Trump but that doesn't make facts out of opinion.

      President Trump did what several other presidents said they would do and put the US Embassy in Jerusalem but they didn't do it. That endeared people in Israel to President Trump.

      While president Obama worked against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu trying to force progressives into his right leaning governing coalition, then dedicating US Taxpayer funds to a failed effort to defeat Netanyaho in 2015.

      Bill Clinton 20 years earlier said "I tried to do it in a way that didn't overtly involve me".

      Washington Times July 12, 2016.

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      3 days ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      Hilary Clinton and MSM didn't start anything about Trump - they simply told the truth. Trump has done this to himself. All any thoughtful person has to do is observe him to understand his basic evil nature.

      Hell, he just tweeted that some Jews may think he is the second coming of Christ!!! The man is nuts.

      https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/08/donald-tru...

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      Let me be clear about why Hillary Clinton is germane and integral to this article on people not liking President Trump. I have twice explained the reason why Hillary Clinton is not outside the scope of this article. They either can't grasp its simplicity or they are just not open to reason.

      In either case, the reason why Hillary Clinton is always in this topic is because Hillary Clinton and the democrats are the ones that along with the left leaning MSM started the hate against Trump during the presidential campaign of 2016.

      Hillary Clinton's entire presidential political campaign was based that she was not Trump, don't vote for Trump and we hate Trump. She had no other platform and that along with her failure to do campaigning was the reason she lost the election.

      The 25 current democratic presidential hopefuls for the most part are using that Hillary vitriol and venom becomes a large part of their political platform. Hillary directly and indirectly created the Russian Trump Collusion to work both to get her elected by creating false connections between Trump and Russia. Which is ironic with her and Bill Clinton's Russian connection. The Russians even paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a single speech in Russia, after he talked with Putin. The Clinton foundation received over $140 million from Russia, and other foreign companies.

      Hillary used a law firm to hide the money that paid for the Russian Dossier put together in Russia and supplied by Russians from Christopher Steel and that is what he put in the Russian Dossier.

      This dossier was fake even on its face, as it said that the document information was not known to be true, nor was it verified. Yet, the FBI paid Steele and eventually used it to acquire a FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page and through him the Trump team. Carter Page was suspected by the FBI of a crime. That crime was never charged and it was just the means to spy on him and the Trump team. The prove is that after a year of spying on Carter Page and his connection to the Trump team, he today is a free man without any pending criminal action.

      So whether you agree or don't agree. believe or don't believe in this fact, Hillary Clinton and the DNC propagated this lie to use it to win the 2016 presidency. If they failed to win the election they would use it to try and stop him from being inaugurated as president. And if that failed they would continue to use it to try an impeach or convict him to remove him from office. Their last resort which is now is to try and prevent him from being reelected. They failed with the Russian Trump hoax, and now they have moved on to calling him a Racist, and also predict a Recession. That is how desperate the democrats are today. Yet, they have 25 clowns impersonating serious democrat presidential candidates. With these acts and false narratives they prove that they would risk continuing the divide in the country that they started, and wish for a recession that would again devastate the middle class just to try and prevent the reelection of President Donald Trump. In addition, they are not the party representing the USA, they are the party representing Illegal Aliens while not caring about the Americans and veterans that are homeless in their Red controlled states and cities like CA and SF.

      They don't care about child sex trafficking especially those fond illegally crossing the US Mexico border. They don't care about the drug trafficking also done by the Mexican Cartel. They don't care about protecting the sovereignty of America, nor of protecting the country and its people.

      A vote for the democrats is a vote for the illegal alien, including Convicted Illegal Alien Felons protected by the democrats from being legally deported.

      All of this is being used by the democrats to make Trump have a cloud and be viewed as a bad president, but none of it is true. The democrats

      must believe that repetition of a lie, or a false accusation is the same as a Truth, but it really is still a lie.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      Leslie McCowen 3 hours ago from Cape Cod, USA

      On topic: ********************B: But all bias, no facts!

      @StevenBeschloss

      “When you voted for a man who thinks he can buy other countries with your taxpayer money, then he throws a tantrum when the prime minister of the other country rebuffs him for his insult, you should wonder how could you have voted for this man. Unless you prefer unfit malignancy.”

      B:

      https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2019/08/trump...

      "Aug 16, 2019 · Trump's desire to buy Greenland wouldn't be the first time an American president broached the idea. The U.S. military had a presence on Greenland during World War II as a means to protect the"

      Apr 21, 2016 · Greenland Has The World's Highest Suicide Rate, And Teenage Boys Are Especially Vulnerable : Goats and Soda Greenland has the world's highest suicide rate. And teen boys are at the highest risk.

      "Trump is due to visit Copenhagen in September and the Arctic will be on the agenda during meetings with the prime ministers of Denmark and Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory. "

      Greenland is gaining attention from global super powers including China, Russia and the United States due to its strategic location and its mineral resources.

      In May, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Russia was behaving aggressively in the Arctic and China’s actions there had to be watched closely as well.

      A defense treaty between Denmark and the United States dating back to 1951 gives the U.S. military rights over the Thule Air Base in northern Greenland.

      There has been no indication that a Greenland purchase will be on the agenda for Trump’s talks with Danish officials.

      Martin Lidegaard, senior lawmaker of the Danish Social Liberal Party and a former foreign minister, called the idea “a grotesque proposal” which had no basis in reality.

      "Trump: '$700M' cost of Greenland is 'hurting Denmark very badly'

      [Search domain nypost.com/2019/08/18/trump-700m-cost-of-greenland-is-hurting-denmark-very-badly/] https://nypost.com/2019/08/18/trump-700m-cost-of-g...

      Aug 18, 2019 · President Trump on Sunday said that buying Greenland isn't "No. 1 on the burner" but quipped that Denmark may want the US to take the world's biggest island off its hands to save money"

      B:

      Remember when Seward wanted to buy Alaska. They called it Seward's folly.

      Your @StevenBeschloss is just another Anti Trump looking to use whatever President Trump does, or in this case, what he is thinking about.

      If the US doesn't buy Greenland will it go to Russia, China or some other foreign country. So Steven your opinion is baseless, and biased.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      Leslie McCowen 4 hours ago from Cape Cod, USA

      So brad, you agree with dummy’s assessment of democrats?

      B:

      This verbiage of "dummy's" is vague as is assessment of democrats?

      You are ostensibly an adult, try to write so it appears to be written as an adult.

      -------------------------------

      But people of color who say trump is a racist don’t know what they’re talking about, huh?

      B:

      Again, your writing is vague and I have to guess what you are talking about here.

      If you are talking about the squad, they called Pelosi a racist, and they told people of color to not talk if they don't have the same view as the squad. The squad is the one, not president Trump to bring up their color, so they use it as a shield. While they make anti semantic statements about Jews, and Israel.

      --------------------------------

      And why u bashing Hillary in an article about trump?

      B:

      Why do people not like Trump because it started and continued with Hillary Clinto?. You might look at the 9 questions I made earlier. She is also the one that started the Russia Trump collusion hoax that just recently came to an end after 3 years against President Trump.

      --------------------------------

      Practice what you preach.

      None of you know how.

      B:

      B:

      Another vague and ambiguous meaningless statements. You might want to try using context.

      ---------------------------------

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      3 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      On topic:

      @StevenBeschloss

      “When you voted for a man who thinks he can buy other countries with your taxpayer money, then he throws a tantrum when the prime minister of the other country rebuffs him for his insult, you should wonder how could you have voted for this man. Unless you prefer unfit malignancy.”

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      3 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      So brad, you agree with dummy’s assessment of democrats?

      But people of color who say trump is a racist don’t know what they’re talking about, huh?

      And why u bashing Hillary in an article about trump?

      Practice what you preach.

      None of you know how.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      The left Triad S M L

      One more time, you ignore these questions and you divert by making false accusations. I am ready to argue my points.

      #1

      Did President Obama mastermind the Russian Trump Collusion to influence the 2016 presidential election?

      #2

      Did he vouch for his former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton?

      #3

      Did he directly and indirectly obstruct justice to ensure that Hillary Clinton wouldn't be indicted for any crimes, including her private email server which transferred and received classified information to and from her unprotected server?

      #4

      He knew that she was using this private email server.

      #5

      That private email server violated government laws, rules, and procedures. It also allowed anyone including foreign countries to hack, tap or otherwise capture any and all information on that server.

      #6

      Do you really believe that Hillary Clinton had over 30,000 emails that were on that server deleted because of emails about her Yoga, and her grandchildren.

      #7

      What could possibly be on those emails that would necessitate her deleting them? Then after deleting them to remove any all forensic traces of them on those drives by using BleachBit.

      #8

      She did all of this cleanup when the congress subpoenaed her server and that information on it. How is this any less criminal than actual paper shredding documents that were subpoenaed to destroy evidence?

      #9

      Why did the FBI give her IT people and her staff immunity w

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      3 days ago

      Scott

      Is that all you have? I had approved it, but then when you don't contribute to a discussion and make your childish and unwarranted accusation about President Trump you went to far. Then you continue with the hoax about the Russians.

      And you claim Trump lies, well that is too much gas to let loose on this article. Stop parroting these fanatical lies.

      The only people in bed with Russia was the democrats and Clinton with their opposition paper they filled from Russians in Russia. Putin and Russia played her, and the democrats. The paper trail is now being followed and it may go as high as president Obama.

      You can try again, if you have anything to contribute.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      These are not real comments.

      Leslie McCowen

      4 minutes ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Joe Biden:

      “We will make Donald Trump a one-term president.”

      Yay!

      Can’t really say much, can you? It’s what you all stood for when BO was there.

      B:

      We didn't try to impeach him from the day he won the election, did we.

      We didn't fabricate an insurance plan that was the Russian Trump Collusion hoax. And it was a hoax because after 5 investigations, over a year of spying on the Trump organization they found nothing.

      The media didn't align with the republicans to oppose everything the Obama did, or said he would do.

      The right didn't have the FBI, DOJ, CIA and the State department working against Obama.

      Hollywood didn't use their star status to say they wanted him dead, they wanted he thrown in jail, and they didn't use SNL to continue to mock him. That is what the left has done for the last 3 years. There is no comparison. And when the media like CNN shows their hate for the president everyday and call him names that he doesn't deserve. they didn't do that to Obama...

      -------------------------------

      Leslie McCowen 6 minutes ago from Cape Cod, USA

      According to trump, Democrats execute babies, are anti semites and hate America.....sounds like you really should hate them hard, huh? Meanwhile, calling trump a racist is just so so mean.

      B:

      1. Democrats support abortion and that is a true fact.

      2. The squad has come out with antisemitic statements about Jews, and Israel and Trump was correct. The democrats won't censure the squad for there antisemitic statements.

      3. The democrats focus on illegal aliens, including hiding Convicted Illegal Alien FELONS from being deported. While homeless Americans and veterans are on the street, and doing drugs.

      4. Calling President Trump a Racist is just a lie, and it is another democrat fabrication like the Russian Trump Collusion hoax.

      --------------------------------------------------

      Leslie McCowen 9 minutes ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Nope. We’re going into recession cause of the tax cuts. And I think you may want to think about who hates whom. It’s pretty clear trump hates democrats. I don’t see why they are obliged to love him!

      B:

      That is the fantasy of the democrats who don't care about the people of this country that would go through another recession. Just like the other hoax there is no factual basis for it. And the tax cut worked for most of the middle class. You need a better tax person.

      Democrats don't have to love him, but they should love America enough to work with him for the country and the people.

      BTW

      don't try to hijack this article like you do with AGW.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      4 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Joe Biden:

      “We will make Donald Trump a one-term president.”

      Yay!

      Can’t really say much, can you? It’s what you all stood for when BO was there.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      4 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      According to trump, Democrats execute babies, are anti semites and hate America.....sounds like you really should hate them hard, huh? Meanwhile, calling trump a racist is just so so mean.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      4 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Nope. We’re going into recession cause of the tax cuts. And I think you may want to think about who hates whom. It’s pretty clear trump hates democrats. I don’t see why they are obliged to love him!

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      Joe Biden's wife just did a campaign ad for her husband. Basically, she said that you might not like his healthcare plan as the others, but if you want to beat Trump in 2020 he is your choice.

      The democrat campaign of hate Trump is in its second revision.

      It didn't work for Hillary, and I doubt if it will work for Biden. Even Obama doesn't want him to run for the presidency.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      Do you think that those people including many of the democrat presidential candidates hate him so much that they Wish for the Country to go into a recession, even though that means really serious problems for the middle class and no problems at all for the rich.

      Are you one of them?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      How many people don't like President Trump just because he is so white?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      Lm

      This isn't the religious topic.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      Topic

      Politics and Social Issues»United States Politics»Presidents of the United States

      Title

      Why Do Some People Just Not Like Anything About President Trump? [F1 366]

      Summary

      What did Donald Trump do as president to create the Anti Trumper?

      This is the entire subject of this article.

      So anything that goes to Anti Trump is on target.

      And if you notice it is not Donald Trump but President Trump.

      We could stretch it to presidential candidate Donald Trump and still be on target. As the people that hate President Trump probably didn't like and most likely hated Trump.

      I personally never saw Donald Trump on the Apprentice or any other TV show that he may have been on or associated with.

      Before Trump ran for the presidency, I did see a youtube on him and his 757 plane. It was narrated by his pilot. I found it interesting and I liked the story.

      I have visited the Trump Tower in Manhattan, and a couple of Trump casinos. That is the extent of my knowledge of Trump before he ran for the presidency.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      4 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Quick: who said “love your neighbor as yourself”?....

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      Mike

      You read my detailed comment on it.

      I don't know what way, as that is vague and ambiguous.

      It is also not a comment on the content of my comment.

      Getting people on the left to actually engage in a discussion about the content is impossible as you have demonstrated on this article.

      I am interpreting your I am sorry you feel that way, as an act of surrender. As in the context, Of you yield.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      LM

      It doesn't address my comment, and I have no idea what you are writing about here.

    • peoplepower73 profile image

      Mike Russo 

      4 days ago from Placentia California

      Brad: Have you noticed that the only thing I say is I'm sorry you feel that way, nothing more nothing less? I'm not sorry about anything else other than I'm sorry you feel that way. Whether I'm sincere or not is based on your interpretation of my words. I mean it sincerely. I'm sorry you feel that way.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      4 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      4 Chan, 8 Chan, woman hate. Gun lovers are a lot of domestic abusers. NRA uses guns to compensate for teeny weeny peenys. You know the guy you all pretended you would vote for for President?....you know, Colin Powell?

      He said the email investigation was a politically motivated witch hunt. That’s where the name witch hunt came from.

      McCarthy said it got her numbers down.....are u all blind?

      Trump is now today calling for Vladimir to be re -enstated into the G7...

      He is Putin’s puppet, Hillary knew it and you hate her for it.

      Bang bang....shooting blanks.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      The difference between a sincere apology and cheap one has a lot to do with how it’s phrased.

      We asked therapists to share the phrases you should avoid

      when trying to apologize to a friend, family member, significant other or pretty much anyone, for that matter. Here’s what they had to say.

      --------------------------------------

      1. “I’m sorry you feel that way.”

      --------------------------------------

      “Even though this phrase begins with the words, ‘I’m sorry,’

      it is not a real apology.

      It does not take ownership of any wrongdoing.

      It does not communicate remorse for your actions, and it does not express any empathy towards the other person’s feelings. Instead,

      --------------------------------------

      it may imply that you think the other person is being irrational or overly sensitive.

      --------------------------------------

      Try to understand and take responsibility for how your actions or words hurt the other person, saying something like, ‘I’m sorry that I canceled our plans at the last minute. It was inconsiderate of your time and I understand why you are angry at me.’” ― Gina Delucca, clinical psychologist at Wellspace SF

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      Mike

      You consider these questions about politics?

      Your comments display a lack of understanding of these 9 questions.

      It goes to the breaking of US federal criminal law by Hillary Clinton and those that tried to cover up her crimes, up to an including President Obama under who control and direction the DOJ, FBI, CIA and the State Department obstructed justice.

      They also go to the topic why some people don't like Trump and it started with the Hillary Clinton and Democrat creation of the Russian Trump Collusion to Influence the Election. That is why you and the left not only don't like Trump, you hate Trump.

      This is not opinion, these are facts that AG Barr is investigating.

      Proof is that after 5 investigations, and the FBI spying on the Trump organization starting in March of 2016 and ending after his inauguration.

      I just proved your comment was patently wrong, and the facts not opinion are proof. When I posed these as questions is was based to wait for the IG and the Barr report on their investigations.

      #1

      Did President Obama mastermind the Russian Trump Collusion to influence the 2016 presidential election?

      #2

      Did he vouch for his former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton?

      #3

      Did he directly and indirectly obstruct justice to ensure that Hillary Clinton wouldn't be indicted for any crimes, including her private email server which transferred and received classified information to and from her unprotected server?

      #4

      He knew that she was using this private email server.

      #5

      That private email server violated government laws, rules, and procedures. It also allowed anyone including foreign countries to hack, tap or otherwise capture any and all information on that server.

      #6

      Do you really believe that Hillary Clinton had over 30,000 emails that were on that server deleted because of emails about her Yoga, and her grandchildren.

      #7

      What could possibly be on those emails that would necessitate her deleting them? Then after deleting them to remove any all forensic traces of them on those drives by using BleachBit.

      #8

      She did all of this cleanup when the congress subpoenaed her server and that information on it. How is this any less criminal than actual paper shredding documents that were subpoenaed to destroy evidence?

      #9

      Why did the FBI give her IT people and her staff immunity when they gave no testimony or contributed to their investigation?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      Mike

      Either comment on the content or don't comment at all.

      Look up the word Patently

    • peoplepower73 profile image

      Mike Russo 

      4 days ago from Placentia California

      Brad: I'm really sorry you feel that way. Patently wrong is your opinion.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      Mike

      Why don't you answer questions instead of just responding with your question?

      BTW

      All of your statements are patently wrong!

    • peoplepower73 profile image

      Mike Russo 

      4 days ago from Placentia California

      Brad: Yes I have thoughts. Why do you and the AG keep going after Hillary when she is no threat to the current political landscape? You are so far off topic from what the title of this article, why is that?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      4 days ago

      Did President Obama mastermind the Russian Trump Collusion to influence the 2016 presidential election?

      Did he vouch for his former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton?

      Did he directly and indirectly obstruct justice to ensure that Hillary Clinton wouldn't be indicted for any crimes, including her private email server which transferred and received classified information to and from her unprotected server?

      He knew that she was using this private email server.

      That private email server violated government laws, rules, and procedures. It also allowed anyone including foreign countries to hack, tap or otherwise capture any and all information on that server.

      Do you really believe that Hillary Clinton had over 30,000 emails that were on that server deleted because of emails about her Yoga, and her grandchildren. What could possibly be on those emails that would necessitate her deleting them? Then after deleting them to remove any all forensic traces of them on those drives by using BleachBit.

      She did all of this cleanup when the congress subpoenaed her server and that information on it. How is this any less criminal than actual paper shredding documents that were subpoenaed to destroy evidence?

      Why did the FBI give her IT people and her staff immunity when they gave no testimony or contributed to their investigation?

      These are just a few of the questions that AG Barr is going after now.

      Any thoughts.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      5 days ago

      I looked at some more ANTIFA videos and I was wrong they don't look like a para military group. When I saw them bullying a Guy and a little woman they were looking pretty lame.

      I also did run across someone who referred to them as

      Anti First Amendment, and I like that meaning.

      I don't know why you like these people?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      5 days ago

      "Scott Belford

      13 minutes ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      You don't know anything about the Proud Boys, Brad, they you should learn before making up false statements. Some wore masks and some were armed, while some Antifa were NOT masked and Most Antifa were NOT armed.

      Most Antifa protests DO NOT end up in riots. Antifa only protests to confront Nazis and fascist whom you don't seem to mind being masked, armed, and rioting."

      B:

      That is not what I saw when I looked at the footage from Portland?

      In any case, I don't think any of them should be masked or armed when going to a protest.

      I did see a lot of masks when the protests were to keep conservative speakers from talking on a contracted speech at liberal universities in Northern Ca. And they turned into riots.

      And it doesn't add anything when your throw around your false statements. I looked at the footage and saw ANTIFA looking like a para military group. I saw the proud boys unmasked and looking like their were going to a beer festival. That is not a false statement.

      B:

      And protests that are set to become riots are predictable. But Portland is Red and they don't care. They want to make political points.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      5 days ago

      Mike Russo 13 hours ago from Placentia California

      Mike

      I am responding to your comment you made 13 hours ago.

      "

      M:

      Prove me wrong on everything I have stated, not with your opinion, but with facts."

      B:

      I have answered many of these in my detailed comments that you have not commented on nor referenced.

      -----------------------------------

      M:

      Brad: Now do you think I'm making up The Great Replacement Movement? Do you deny that Trump says racists remarks? Do you deny that he sided with the Great Replacement people in Chartlottesville? He said both sides have very fine people. Tell me where are the very fine people in that demonstration? He doesn't condemn them.

      B:

      Previous answer copied here.

      ""Brad: Now do you think I'm making up The Great Replacement Movement? Do you deny that Trump says racists remarks? Do you deny that he sided with the Great Replacement people in Chartlottesville? He said both sides have very fine people. Tell me where are the very fine people in that demonstration? He doesn't condemn them."

      Answer the previous comments

      " [Search domain www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/us/politics/trump-press-conference-charlottesville.html] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/us/politics/tru...

      Aug 15, 2017 · Trump Defends Initial Remarks on Charlottesville; Again Blames 'Both Sides'. WASHINGTON — President Trump reverted Tuesday to blaming both sides for the deadly violence in Charlottesville, Va.""

      -----------------------------------------------------------------------

      M:

      Slurring Mexican immigrants as criminals and rapists?

      B:

      If you want a factual answer, then give me a factual and contextual question.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------

      M: Calling for a ban on all Muslims coming into the country?

      Suggesting that a U.S.-born judge overseeing a Trump University lawsuit should recuse himself because of his Mexican heritage (“He’s a Mexican,” Trump said)?

      B:

      Asked and answered.

      Brad 2 weeks ago

      Mike

      B:

      As for your comments that occurred before these they are not relevant, nor accurate as you put them in a racist tone.

      One more time.

      The birther question by Trump and others is not a Racist issue. This had nothing to do with Color, it had to do with did Obama meet the constitutional requirement to run for the president.

      What business does to keep the big spending customers is business.

      ----------------------------------------

      On top of all that history, Trump has repeatedly made racist — often explicitly so — remarks on the campaign trail and as president:

      Trump launched his campaign in 2015 by calling Mexican immigrants “rapists” who are “bringing crime” and “bringing drugs” to the US. His campaign was largely built on building a wall to keep these immigrants out of the US.

      B:

      These are not immigrants, he was talking about Illegal Aliens and he wasn't talking about all of them. He was pointing to the criminal elements. It is a fact, that crime and drugs do come across the open border.

      ---------------------------------------

      As a candidate in 2015, Trump called for a ban on all Muslims coming into the US. His administration eventually implemented a significantly watered-down version of the policy.

      B:

      Again, you misstate the issue. It wasn't ALL Muslims, it was Muslims from 7 Middle Eastern countries that were war torn, and infested with terrorists.

      It was a 90 day ban with the purpose of trying to vet the victims from the terrorists.

      --------------------------------------

      When asked at a 2016 Republican debate whether all 1.6 billion Muslims hate the US, Trump said, “I mean a lot of them. I mean a lot of them.”

      B:

      What is your point? Can you refute his answer is not being true?

      ---------------------------------------

      He argued in 2016 that Judge Gonzalo Curiel — who was overseeing the Trump University lawsuit — should recuse himself from the case because of his Mexican heritage and membership in a Latino lawyers association. House Speaker Paul Ryan, who endorsed Trump, later called such comments “the textbook definition of a racist comment.”

      B:

      But you think the police profiling of blacks isn't OK, while you think Trump shouldn't want another judge. The history backs Trump, when you look at all the lower courts filled with democrats that rule for injunctions, and block his EOs.

      -----------------------------------

      Trump has been repeatedly slow to condemn white supremacists who endorse him, and he regularly retweeted messages from white supremacists and neo-Nazis during his presidential campaign.

      B:

      Do you have examples?

      ----------------------------------

      He tweeted and later deleted an image that showed Hillary Clinton in front of a pile of money and by a Jewish Star of David that said, “Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!” The tweet had some very obvious anti-Semitic imagery, but Trump insisted that the star was a sheriff’s badge, and said his campaign shouldn’t have deleted it.

      B:

      What is wrong with that explanation?

      And yet, the democrat party wouldn't pass a resolution to stop one of the members of the squad from making anti Semitic remarks about Jews and Israel.

      ------------------------------------------

      Trump has repeatedly referred to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) as “Pocahontas,” using her controversial — and later walked-back — claims to Native American heritage as a punchline.

      B:

      Warren lied and he called her on it, He mentioned Pocahontas in his last campaign trip. He said he had more Indian blood in him then her, and he said he has none.

      Where is the problem, have you heard what she says about him, as well as the rest of the democrats.

      What is your point, it is only OK if you are a democrat?

      --------------------------------------------

      At the 2016 Republican convention, Trump officially seized the mantle of the “law and order” candidate — an obvious dog whistle playing to white fears of black crime, even though crime in the US is historically low. His speeches, comments, and executive actions after he took office have continued this line of messaging.

      B:

      You are just ranting here.

      -------------------------------------------------

      In a pitch to black voters in 2016, Trump said, “You’re living in poverty, your schools are no good, you have no jobs, 58 percent of your youth is unemployed. What the hell do you have to lose?”

      B:

      True statement, what is your point.

      ---------------------------------------------------

      Trump stereotyped a black reporter at a press conference in February 2017. When April Ryan asked him if he plans to meet and work with the Congressional Black Caucus, he repeatedly asked her to set up the meeting — even as she insisted that she’s “just a reporter.”

      B:

      Again what is your point?

      --------------------------------------------------

      This is all you have for 32 months of Trump as president.

      --------------------------------------------------

      M:

      Tweeting that four black and brown members of Congress — three of them born in the United States — should “go back” to their countries of origin?

      B:

      1. At no time did President Trump mention their Color. He referred to them as congressional representatives.

      2. The squad made the point of their color.

      3. The go back was followed by him suggesting that they fix their heritage countries of their problems, and then Come Back To The US and help fix our problems. That is why full context when you quote something is very important to its meaning.

      ---------------------------------

      M:

      Launching a slimy birther crusade against President Barack Obama?

      B:

      What is slimy when the eligibility for the presidency is being born in the US?

      --------------------------------

      M:

      Constantly resorting to racially charged language in his rallies.

      B:

      That is your opinion.

      -----------------------------------

      M:

      The “Imperial Wizard of the Rebel Brigade of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.” Declaring his support for Republican candidate Trump, the imperial wizard said: “The reason a lot of Klan members like Donald Trump is because a lot of what he believes, we believe in.”

      B:

      Trump didn't solicit this from the Klan.

      Prove me wrong on everything I have stated, not with your opinion, but with facts.

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      5 days ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      You don't know anything about the Proud Boys, Brad, they you should learn before making up false statements. Some wore masks and some were armed, while some Antifa were NOT masked and Most Antifa were NOT armed.

      Most Antifa protests DO NOT end up in riots. Antifa only protests to confront Nazis and fascist whom you don't seem to mind being masked, armed, and rioting.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      5 days ago

      Mike

      You continue to make your comments personal, and play the victim. At the same time you don't argue your points on my responses to your comments.

      I gave you many olive branches, and opportunities to argue your points, but you chose to ignore them.

      You also continue to assert your false narratives as facts, and even truths, but you didn't argue them with facts or logic.

      Good luck with your new signature saying, "Sorry you feel that way".

      It is itself a Vague, Ambiguous, and insincere statement of five concatenated words without value.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      5 days ago

      Mike

      This is your last approved comment.

      I spent the time to answer in detail your questions and comments. You ignore them and divert to this comment which I have already answered several times.

      ML

      All you care about is that some how Trump is not directly connected to it. But you can't deny that he influences them with his rhetoric.

      B:

      I do deny, and I have continued to deny that President Trump is in no way influencing anything other than his plan to make America Great Again and its details as he already accomplished, and the one he is working on now and in the future are for American Citizens, and every Legal Immigrant.

      Anything outside of that is the left fabricating false accusations.

      I have numbered all the points in your two part to make it easy for you to reply on subject.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      5 days ago

      Vivian Coblentz 15 hours ago

      Brad,

      Oh, and you probably heard that the New York Times revealed they are shifting from the Russia Collusion Hoax stories to framing all news as Trump-is-a-racist leading up to the election? That's not fascist propaganda? Fox News has been reporting on this, but I seriously doubt if anyone else has been.

      https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columni...

      B:

      No, I hadn't heard that but the Russian hoax is just one of many of their created hoaxes. What it means to me is that the NY Times no longer believes in its creed of yesteryear that "All the News that is Fit to Print". Today it should "There is no News Fit to Print" and that unshackles them from having to deal with the News.

      Today, it is hard to tell where the democrat party ends and the NY Times and other media End!

      Their new goal is OK if they put it in their opinion page, but it is not OK when they call it news. It is like the difference between a Book and a Book Review. The book contains the story, while the book review is someones opinion about that story.

      ------------------------------------------------

      Vivian Coblentz 15 hours ago

      Brad,

      For the record, I had to google the "proud boys" because I had never heard of them. I found their website, and they are clearly far-right crazies as Antifa are the far-left crazies. Regardless, all conservatives are lumped together as "far-right" when they expect our rule of law to be upheld and our rights not be infringed upon.

      B:

      ANTIFA

      The first question is why are they masked. Except for the fictional Lone Ranger, the mask symbolizes the bad guy.

      The second question is why are their protests ending in riots?

      The third question is why do they go to these protests Armed?

      I also didn't know about the proud boys.

      But, they weren't masked, and they weren't armed.

      The left and Their media are so desperate to get something on President Trump they resort to making false connections, purposely misinterpreting what President Trump says or does, even what he might want to do.

      There is no connection with either President Trump and his supporters to the Proud Boys or any Aryan group. But that doesn't stop the left and the media from implying there is some connection.

      ----------------------------------

      Brad, it's sheer lunacy to declare oneself a patriot and then adhere to and support socialist ideals that are contrary to our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

      B:

      Vivian, I agree with you. The founders didn't fight, die and get injured to create a country run under socialism. Socialism is the passive aggressive sibling of the Monarch Rule that the founders broke away from.

      In fact, they weren't fond of a large central government. They were structured to have the states run local government, while the federal government would be our interface to the world, and also to settle conflicts and disputes among the states.

      The democrats started their move to expand the federal government. The result is the obese and gridlocked do nothing congress that in 2008 brought down the economy.

      Quick history.

      In 1913, they slipped the Income Tax in through the 16th amendment. This would allow them the revenue needed for pay for unlimited expansion. The 16th amendment didn't give the government the power to to tax, as that power already existed in the constitution. What it did do is to bypass the apportionment clause. By doing that they were able to apply Income Tax across the entire country instead of having to do it state by state and apportioning their value to be taxed.

      Next the SCOTUS keep making the two lines of the Interstate Commerce Clause to be interpreted basically as the old adage of making everything a federal case out of a mole hill.

      This gives federal jurisdiction to whatever the federal government wants it to be.

      The 10th amendment which contains the state's rights is basically a residuary of a zero sum total government control.

      That is all the power of government in the US goes to the federal government, and the 10th amendment has control over anything that the federal government has not taken control through the Supremacy Clause or others found in the constitution. For example the constitution doesn't allow states to make treaties.

      The third party of this move to an obese and lethargic Federal Government comes from SCOTUS. For more than 100 years they have protected the expansion by deciding against all attacks to get rid of the Income Tax, and in any case that might involve the federal government from attacks on their taxing and regulations and other means that may impact on their continued expansion SCOTUS has found in favor of the government.

      Now the left in the 21st century wants the country to go even more extreme measures to make the country run like a monarchy while still looking like a democratic republic.

      The result is like a school system where the school takes the slowest students and that sets the pace for everyone. The new socialist democrat wants equality over individuality. Their goal is to eliminate the middle class. The class that makes America the best country in the world.

      The two classes then mimic that of a monarchy. The ruling class, and the peasants.

      It sounds like the 24 of the 25 democrat presidential candidates are running on the bizzaro version of the classic Robin Hood. The bizarre is that they don't steal from the rich and give it to the poor. They are the rich stealing from everyone to make the middle class poor as the poor. Then trade their wealth from their theft into power to control the peasants as a monarch would in the feudal system.

      The rich will not be affected because with their wealth comes power. In fact one might say the left is just executing what the rich have told them and in return we will give you power over the people. They would become the Earls, Dukes, Duchesses etc.

      That fairy tale doesn't have a happy ending for America, and Americans, and any legal immigrant. It will look like the 1929 depression but it won't be because the economy crashed, it will be because they crashed the constitution.

    • peoplepower73 profile image

      Mike Russo 

      5 days ago from Placentia California

      Brad: I'm posting this again. The last time I posted it, you dismissed it as being written by a bunch of biased left wing democrats. Read it again and scroll to the bottom. It has references to every source for the article.

      If you delete it or dismiss it again then I know you are suffering from cognitive dissonance about Trump. You never did answer my questions about whether The Great Replacement Movement is real or not. All you care about is that some how Trump is not directly connected to it. But you can't deny that he influences them with his rhetoric.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_views_of_Dona...

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      5 days ago

      Mike

      Brad: Part 2;

      #14

      B: We are not Europe yet, that would take a democrat president to make us like Europe.

      M: Your opinion

      B1:

      And what is your opinion. If that is all you are going to do for comments, then you are just playing a game with your no content responses.

      ------------------------------

      #15

      B: In my opinion, the left including those in congress, those in Hollywood, and those in the media don't represent America, Americans or American values. We are still a democratic republic and we select who to represent us. And we wait until the next election to make another choice. We don't spend an entire first term of a president doing everything to try to impeach, convict or just prevent him from doing his job. That is exactly what the left has done. You talk about how Trump doesn't act like a president, but you ignore how the democrats in congress not only don't act like the represent congress, their resistance is a blatant failure of their oath to office.

      M: Oh, do you remember McConnell saying our mission is to make Obama a one term president. They blocked every one of his moves and he was still able to succeed for another term despite all their efforts to RESIST him. Just think would could have had single payer health care, instead of settling for the handicapped ACA that we now have thanks to the GOP congress.

      B1:

      Your comment doesn't respond to my comment, it diverts to your narrative.

      Single payer through socialism and covering illegal aliens. FDR saddled us with SS tax, and then LBJ gave us another tax tied to SS and that is Medicare. Then Obama gave us the third tax of that trilogy ACA.

      Obama had 6 years to implement ACA and you are blaming President Trump for what? The only thing he did was to remove the tax from ACA. How good is a healthcare system when you have to force people to use it?

      The republicans didn't resist him in the manner that they are continuing to do to President Trump. They didn't put him through 5 investigations for a democrat created bogus Russian Trump Collusion, they didn't spy on Americans, they didn't spy on the democrat party like Obama did having his DOJ, FBI and State Department avoid prosecution. The media didn't fault everything Obama did like they continue to do with President Trump. And the list goes on. There is no comparison.

      -----------------------------------------------------------------

      #16

      B: Even the democrat presidential candidates of today, 24 of the 25 of them think Obama did a bad job, and they have attacked his disciple VP Joe Biden to say we don't want you to continue where president Obama left off.

      B1:

      You didn't respond to this comment?

      ------------------------------------------------------

      Here are the links again, in case you missed them.

      B1:

      There is nothing in those links that ties President Trump into it.

      You have made false accusations to make a connection that doesn't exist.

      ------------------------------------------------------------

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      5 days ago

      Mike

      I have spent time on answering your questions, the least you can do is read them so you don't ask twice.

      "Brad: Now do you think I'm making up The Great Replacement Movement? Do you deny that Trump says racists remarks? Do you deny that he sided with the Great Replacement people in Chartlottesville? He said both sides have very fine people. Tell me where are the very fine people in that demonstration? He doesn't condemn them."

      Answer the previous comments

      " [Search domain www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/us/politics/trump-press-conference-charlottesville.html] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/us/politics/tru...

      Aug 15, 2017 · Trump Defends Initial Remarks on Charlottesville; Again Blames 'Both Sides'. WASHINGTON — President Trump reverted Tuesday to blaming both sides for the deadly violence in Charlottesville, Va."

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      5 days ago

      Mike

      #11

      M:

      That's why I posted the links, but you dismiss them as left wing propaganda. When in fact that is exactly what took place in Portland. You demonize ANTIFA, but it is an anti-fascist movement against the neo NAZI movement. Yes, they can be aggressive and even violent, but that is how you fight fire with fire

      B: Again, ANTIFA or anyone that causes protests to become riots are unlawful, and unAmerican. President Trump, I have to remind you is not associated with Fascists.

      #12

      M: No but he supports those who oppose ANTIFA who are the same people who hate Jews. How do you square that round?

      B: ANTIFA was doing their riots before Trump was president. They can make peaceful protests within the First Amendment Free Speech, but when they have weapons, and they use weapons, they are not protected by the 1st amendment, and they are not being Americans.

      #13

      M: Oh, you mean like the mass shooters, who cite The Great Replacement Movement in their manifestos?

      B1:

      You didn’t answer the question, you diverted it.

      Your statement about mass shooters is Vague, Ambiguous and not pertinent to the question. You are trying to make a connection where none exists.

      You don’t mention what shooters, but you already missed used the manifesto of the El Paso shooter when he clearly states in it that his issues with the Invasion from Mexico predate Trump.

      Trying to mislead by not mentioning that from the manifesto makes a false conclusion by not putting it in context. That context not only doesn’t include President Trump, it clearly eliminates him.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      Mike

      #5

      "

      B: That same wall and that same protected border keeps out All colors and all ethnicity. You and the left tend to use color and ethnicity to make a point that only you bring to the issue. Injecting Racism where none exists. That is why that claim is baseless.

      M: What claim? Really, you call people racist who call Trump and his supporters racists, including you. That’s just like saying, black lives matter. And then replying with all lives matter. That is designed to minimize the significance of Black Lives Matter. I know I’m not a racist, do you?

      B1:

      When you call President Trump a Racist when he isn’t a Racist and you try to connect him with the far right, you are a Racist. Whites are a Race, and blaming Whites for what you think the far right is doing, is false, and defamatory and Racist.

      ---------------------------------------

      #6

      B: At the same time you support 4 house reps that are Racist, and even call White Democrat Pelosi Racist. The people that make these accusations of Racism are the Real Racists.

      M: Prove I support them and prove they are racist

      B1:

      They make anti Semitic statements about Jews, and Israel.

      As far as you, do you or do you not support these democratic representatives?

      ---------------------------------------------------------

      #7

      M: You see there is no simple definition. Why don't you define what an American is?

      B: What definition did you give for a American here?

      #8

      M: You see you never answered my question, but you asked me a myriad of questions and you expect me to answer them. right out of Brad’s playbook. I’ll ask you one more time. How do you define an American? And don’t ignore the question.

      B1:

      You are still making it personal, insulting, and threatening

      This was already here, and you say I didn't answer it, but I did here.

      1. Does an American call the president a RACIST, when there is no proof that makes it true.

      2. Does an American root for the economy to fail just to get rid of a sitting president?

      3. Does an American spend the time before a presidential election, and during and after the election and even to the inauguration, and then 32 months into the presidency to try an impeach, convict and remove the president from office just because he won the election.

      4. As proof, there is the consensus of democrats the day after the election to resist the president. and to call for his impeachment and conviction where there were and still aren't any grounds for it.

      -------------------------------------------

      #9

      B:

      5. Just look at how many tries the left has made to impeach him from the day after the election The left from the time Trump won the RNC primary they became an impeachment hammer where everything Trump did would be their impeachment tool.

      6. And when Trump won the election they went into overtime to try and stop him before he was inaugurated and when that failed they started with making everything impeachable.

      7. The proof is the number of attempts in the last 32 months to be uttered as grounds for impeaching him or convicting him of something.

      8. They all failed, but the left never stopped.

      Your comment calling Trump's Racist is one of their mechanisms where telling a falsehood and repeating it, and having their media repeat is the same as the truth. At least if you are a democrat.

      9. Trying paint Trump as a modern day Hitler has no truth in it. Trying to make that connection with baseless statements is unAmerican rhetoric.

      -------------------------------------------------------

      #10

      M: Prove everything that you said above

      B1:

      10. Are you claiming that you don’t know this is what happened? Now you are just playing a game, using this statement to divert, instead of answer.

      11. For example, from day 1 after the election the democrats came up with the Trump Russian Collusion when there never was any Trump in that accusation.

      12. They then had 4 investigations on it,

      13. and then they created a special counsel to investigate a 5th time.

      14. Robert Mueller was appointed the SC and he investigated up to the 2108 midterm election,

      15. then he continued after the election and didn’t conclude his investigation until 6 months later.

      16. The result of his investigation is No Charges against President Trump on any crime.

      17. No determination on his POSSIBLE obstruction.

      18. The reason is clear President Trump didn’t collude with Russia, and he didn’t try to interfere with the election.

      19. D-NY Jerry Nadler then continues by instituting articles of impeachment.

      20. And in addition is trying to impeach SC Justice Kavanaugh.

      21. The democrat Dianne Feinstein broke House rules by not turning over the letter from Dr. Ford to the committee.

      22. She waited until the committee was ready to vote on Kavanaugh before she unleashed it.

      23. This was a political tactic to prevent judge Kavanaugh from becoming a SC justice.

      24. There was NO evidence of any crime 30 years ago.

      25. Dr. Ford was not a credible victim, and no one corroborated her story.

      26. And that brought several other claims by other women that were proven false.

      27. Continually calling President Trump a RACIST is another attempt to get grounds for impeachment.

      28. He asked for a TEMPorary Injunction on 7 Middle Eastern countries for 90 DAYS is not racist.

      29. First, the reason was to vet them as these countries were in turmoil and there was no way to vet the people from them. That is not Racist, it is trying to protect the country from possible Terrorists that had say they would infiltrate these immigrants.

      30. Second, it is 90 day, and the democrats couldn’t give 90 days to the president,. Why? Isn’t protecting the country from terrorists a valid reason for the injunction?

      31. Third, if it was a Muslim Ban than why was it only 7 Muslim countries when there are more than 40 Muslim countries in the world?

      "

    • peoplepower73 profile image

      Mike Russo 

      6 days ago from Placentia California

      Brad: Now do you think I'm making up The Great Replacement Movement? Do you deny that Trump says racists remarks? Do you deny that he sided with the Great Replacement people in Chartlottesville? He said both sides have very fine people. Tell me where are the very fine people in that demonstration? He doesn't condemn them.

      Slurring Mexican immigrants as criminals and rapists? Calling for a ban on all Muslims coming into the country? Suggesting that a U.S.-born judge overseeing a Trump University lawsuit should recuse himself because of his Mexican heritage (“He’s a Mexican,” Trump said)? Saying people in the United States from Nigeria will never “go back to their huts”? Referring to Haiti and African countries as “s---hole countries” while wishing the United States would take more people from places like Norway? Tweeting that four black and brown members of Congress — three of them born in the United States — should “go back” to their countries of origin? Launching a slimy birther crusade against President Barack Obama? Constantly resorting to racially charged language in his rallies.

      The “Imperial Wizard of the Rebel Brigade of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.” Declaring his support for Republican candidate Trump, the imperial wizard said: “The reason a lot of Klan members like Donald Trump is because a lot of what he believes, we believe in.”

      Prove me wrong on everything I have stated, not with your opinion, but with facts.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      Mike

      #4

      M:https://www.ilfoglio.it/userUpload/The_Great_Repla...

      B: President Trump hasn't done anything that is Racist. The immigration policies belong to Congress and they then must be Racist in your view. President Obama has to then be included as Racist for enforcing the immigration laws.

      M: The immigration policies belong to Trump, the AG, Stephen Miller, and The GOP Senate. Again, you are just like Trump trying to blame others for your own ills.

      B1:

      The immigration laws are made by congress.

      B: There is nothing Racist in protecting our borders. President Trump is protecting the sovereignty of the United States of America. There are almost 8 billion people in this world today. We can't take in all of them, and that is where immigration laws tell us who can and who can't come into the country legally.

      M: Trump wants only college educated white rich people that he thinks will enhance the country.

      He even wants to change the poem on the statue of liberty to read: "Give me your tired and your poor who can stand on their own two feet and who will not become a public charge"

      B: Why is it fair for the illegal aliens to get into the country ahead of the million of immigrants who come through the legal immigration procedure?

      M: Prove that.

      B1:

      Where does President Trump saying anything about

      "White" or "Rich"?

      ------------------------------------

      B1:

      The immigration laws were made a year before that poem, and the poem is not the law.

      -------------------------------------

      B1:

      The statement is self evident that illegal aliens get into the country by walking across the border.

      -------------------------------------

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      Mike

      #3

      "M: Next time don’t delete my comments and educate yourself. I’m giving you a view into the real world.

      M: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug...

      M: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Replacemen...

      M: The New Zealand shooters Manifesto:

      M:https://www.ilfoglio.it/userUpload/The_Great_Repla...

      B: President Trump hasn't done anything that is Racist. The immigration policies belong to Congress and they then must be Racist in your view. President Obama has to then be included as Racist for enforcing the immigration laws."

      B1:

      None of your links has any connection to President Trump.

      And once again the El Paso shooter's manifesto specially says his feeling about the invasion PREdates President Trump, and he further warns that the media will use this event to blame the president. And he was right.

      -----------------------------------------------

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      Mike

      #1

      B I am not playing a game. Again you made it personal.

      M: That’s your opinion. My name is Mike Russo. You write your comments to him. That makes it personal.

      B1:

      First I write them to "Mike" to direct my comment to Mike.

      Second, that is not what I mean when I say you make it personal and you know that.

      It is when you make insulting remarks to the person, rather trying to argue points on the content.

      --------------------------------------

      #2

      "M: All whites are not white supremacist. We are all part of the human race. White supremacist is a sub-set of that race who look upon others as being inferior to them. And they will do harm to those others by whatever means they have, including mass shootings.

      White Supremacy in this country has taken root by disenfranchised white people who have a fear that their environment and culture is being taken over by an increasing population of non-white mixed races.

      B: Yes, there are groups of every kind that had a different opinion about race. but when you accuse the President and his supporters for being or supporting those groups is when you and the left become Racists.

      M: Prove that Trump doesn’t have a well-documented history of racism.

      "

      B1:

      First we need to talk about President Trump, and focus on what he has done since he won the election.

      Second, you are the one making the claim, and that means you have to prove that President Trump is a Racist.

      Third, How can I prove he is not a Racist when he isn't a Racist.

      I gave you examples about the border, and illegal aliens.

      -----------------------------------------------------------

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      Vivian

      You are not clogging you are making contributions. I liked your last two comments. Hope you are having fun with the family.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      Mike

      Your last two comments not addressed to me were nothing but stalking and personal attacks.

      What is wrong with you?

      One of your comments was flagged as Spam.

      The other one was just rude, and not to me.

      I won't lecture you but this is the reason they were deleted.

    • peoplepower73 profile image

      Mike Russo 

      6 days ago from Placentia California

      Brad: Part 2;

      B: We are not Europe yet, that would take a democrat president to make us like Europe.

      M: Your opinion

      B: In my opinion, the left including those in congress, those in Hollywood, and those in the media don't represent America, Americans or American values. We are still a democratic republic and we select who to represent us. And we wait until the next election to make another choice. We don't spend an entire first term of a president doing everything to try to impeach, convict or just prevent him from doing his job. That is exactly what the left has done. You talk about how Trump doesn't act like a president, but you ignore how the democrats in congress not only don't act like the represent congress, their resistance is a blatant failure of their oath to office.

      M: Oh, do you remember McConnell saying our mission is to make Obama a one term president. They blocked every one of his moves and he was still able to succeed for another term despite all their efforts to RESIST him. Just think would could have had single payer health care, instead of settling for the handicapped ACA that we now have thanks to the GOP congress.

      Even the democrat presidential candidates of today, 24 of the 25 of them think Obama did a bad job, and they have attacked his disciple VP Joe Biden to say we don't want you to continue where president Obama left off.

      Here are the links again, in case you missed them.

      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Replacemen...

      https://www.ilfoglio.it/userUpload/The_Great_Repla...

    • peoplepower73 profile image

      Mike Russo 

      6 days ago from Placentia California

      Brad: Part 1

      B: What is your definition of White Supremacy, and Supremacists?

      M: I gave you the links from two different sources that give the facts, but you don't accept them. But you ask for my definition instead. Why is my definition more important than the facts? But to play your silly game I will give you my definition.

      B:I am not playing a game. Again you made it personal.

      M: That’s your opinion. My name is Mike Russo. You write your comments to him. That makes it personal.

      B: I wanted Your Definition because I wanted to know how you put President Trump in with your definition and that group?

      There is no connection between President Trump nor his supporters that connect to these groups.

      M: No he just ennobles them with his racist rhetoric and immigration policies. They love it. It fits right in with their agenda. Prove me wrong.

      B: It is a racist comment to make this connection. Whites represent the White Race but why do you and the left not call these accusations of the entire white race not being Racist. It is a perfect example of Racism. and it is done by the left and you.

      M: All whites are not white supremacist. We are all part of the human race. White supremacist is a sub-set of that race who look upon others as being inferior to them. And they will do harm to those others by whatever means they have, including mass shootings.

      --------------------------------------------------

      White Supremacy in this country has taken root by disenfranchised white people who have a fear that their environment and culture is being taken over by an increasing population of non-white mixed races.

      B: Yes, there are groups of every kind that had a different opinion about race. but when you accuse the President and his supporters for being or supporting those groups is when you and the left become Racists.

      M: Prove that Trump doesn’t have a well-documented history of racism.

      ---------------------------------------------------

      They fear they are being replaced by these groups. Therefore, the name The Great Replacement Movement. Its roots are from Europe and now it is gaining momentum in this country as evidenced by mass shooters referenced it their manifestos and the riots by neo NAZI groups chanting "You will not replace us."

      B: Again, just making a connection that doesn't exists, And it is still a Racist remark to make that connection.

      ----------------------------------------------------

      Their ultimate goal is to have an all white Aryan race, just like Hitler wanted. And Trump's racists rhetoric and immigration policies fit very nicely with their agenda. If you don't believe me I will post their 84 page manifesto.

      B: Now here is where you go off the facts, and you substitute opinion instead of facts.

      M: Next time don’t delete my comments and educate yourself. I’m giving you a view into the real world.

      M: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug...

      M: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Replacemen...

      M: The New Zealand shooters Manifesto:

      M:https://www.ilfoglio.it/userUpload/The_Great_Repla...

      B: President Trump hasn't done anything that is Racist. The immigration policies belong to Congress and they then must be Racist in your view. President Obama has to then be included as Racist for enforcing the immigration laws.

      M: The immigration policies belong to Trump, the AG, Stephen Miller, and The GOP Senate. Again, you are just like Trump trying to blame others for your own ills.

      B: There is nothing Racist in protecting our borders. President Trump is protecting the sovereignty of the United States of America. There are almost 8 billion people in this world today. We can't take in all of them, and that is where immigration laws tell us who can and who can't come into the country legally.

      M: Trump wants only college educated white rich people that he thinks will enhance the country. He even wants to change the poem on the statue of liberty to read: "Give me your tired and your poor who can stand on their own two feet and who will not become a public charge"

      B: Why is it fair for the illegal aliens to get into the country ahead of the million of immigrants who come through the legal immigration procedure?

      M: Prove that.

      B: That same wall and that same protected border keeps out All colors and all ethnicity. You and the left tend to use color and ethnicity to make a point that only you bring to the issue. Injecting Racism where none exists. That is why that claim is baseless.

      M: What claim? Really, you call people racist who call Trump and his supporters racists, including you. That’s just like saying, black lives matter. And then replying with all lives matter. That is designed to minimize the significance of Black Lives Matter. I know I’m not a racist, do you?

      B: At the same time you support 4 house reps that are Racist, and even call White Democrat Pelosi Racist. The people that make these accusations of Racism are the Real Racists.

      M: Prove I support them and prove they are racist

      ---------------------------------------------------------

      M: You see there is no simple definition. Why don't you define what an American is?

      B: What definition did you give for a American here?

      M: You see you never answered my question, but you asked me a myriad of questions and you expect me to answer them. right out of Brad’s playbook. I’ll ask you one more time. How do you define an American? And don’t ignore the question.

      Does an American call the president a RACIST, when there is no proof that makes it true.

      Does an American root for the economy to fail just to get rid of a sitting president.

      Does an American spend the time before a presidential election, and during and after the election and even to the inauguration, and then 32 months into the presidency to try an impeach, convict and remove the president from office just because he won the election.

      As proof, there is the consensus of democrats the day after the election to resist the president. and to call for his impeachment and conviction where there were and still aren't any grounds for it.

      B: Just look at how many tries the left has made to impeach him from the day after the election The left from the time Trump won the RNC primary they became an impeachment hammer where everything Trump did would be their impeachment tool. And when Trump won the election they went into overtime to try and stop him before he was inaugurated and when that failed they started with making everything impeachable.

      The proof is the number of attempts in the last 32 months to be uttered as grounds for impeaching him or convicting him of something.

      They all failed, but the left never stopped.

      Your comment calling Trump's Racist is one of their mechanism where telling a falsehood and repeating it, and having their media repeat is the same as the truth. At least if you are a democrat.

      Trying paint Trump as a modern day Hitler has no truth in it. Trying to make that connection with baseless statements is unAmerican rhetoric.

      M: Prove everything that you said above

      ---------------------------------------------------

      That's why I posted the links, but you dismiss them as left wing propaganda. When in fact that is exactly what took place in Portland. You demonize ANTIFA, but it is an anti-fascist movement against the neo NAZI movement. Yes, they can be aggressive and even violent, but that is how you fight fire with fire

      B: Again, ANTIFA or anyone that causes protests to become riots are unlawful, and unAmerican. President Trump, I have to remind you is not associated with Fascists.

      M: No but he supports those who oppose ANTIFA who are the same people who hate Jews. How do you square that round?

      B: ANTIFA was doing their riots before Trump was president. They can make peaceful protests within the First Amendment Free Speech, but when they have weapons, and they use weapons, they are not protected by the 1st amendment, and they are not being Americans.

      M: Oh, you mean like the mass shooters, who cite The Great Replacement Movement in their manifestos?

    • Wesman Todd Shaw profile image

      Wesman Todd Shaw 

      6 days ago from Kaufman, Texas

      Why do Christians like Trump? This is the most obvious thing in the world. How someone could be blind to it, I don't know.

      Trump is pro-Christian.

      More than two years of investigation, and nobody investigating Trump managed to "commit suicide."

      Mrs. Clinton, you know, has a list of around SIXTY DEAD PERSONS who were involved in investigations and the countless evil deeds involving the Clinton family; who managed to "commit suicide."

      Pretty easy to see which one of those two is more Christian, it's the guy who's not murdering everyone who crosses his path, and the cherry on top is he actually is working for the betterment of American citizens. His name is Donald J. Trump.

      Oh, and he's going to win easily in 2020 as well. It's something I thank God in prayer for, often.

    • Noelle7 profile image

      Vivian Coblentz 

      6 days ago

      Brad,

      Sorry to clog your posts.....this is my last one before I hop off the computer for some family time!

      Dan Crenshaw tweeted this great one about the difference between Antifa and those who are actually anti-fascist:

      "In Hong Kong, antifascists wave American flags, demand freedom and actually fight fascists.

      In Portland, “antifascists” burn American flags, demand violence in the name of socialism."

    • Noelle7 profile image

      Vivian Coblentz 

      6 days ago

      Just wanted to share a few reminders with you from Charlie Kirk via Twitter:

      Remember the country Democrats have been creating:

      Maxine Waters said get up in their faces

      Eric Holder said kick ‘em while they’re down

      Pelosi said violence is just collateral damage

      Hillary said civility is impossible

      Do not give power to the mob!!

    • Wesman Todd Shaw profile image

      Wesman Todd Shaw 

      6 days ago from Kaufman, Texas

      I've certainly read about The New York Times dedicating itself to #FakeNews instead of journalism.

      It's not something I find the slightest bit surprising. And you know already the troupe of clowns will just up and regurgitate whatever the admitted Fake News mongers tell them to say.

      It's like they're non playable characters in a video game, just robots, repeating what they were told to repeat. Believing what their admitted fake news masters tell them to believe. Should such persons even be considered human, I wonder.

    • Noelle7 profile image

      Vivian Coblentz 

      6 days ago

      Brad,

      Oh, and you probably heard that the New York Times revealed they are shifting from the Russia Collusion Hoax stories to framing all news as Trump-is-a-racist leading up to the election? That's not fascist propaganda? Fox News has been reporting on this, but I seriously doubt if anyone else has been.

      https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columni...

    • Noelle7 profile image

      Vivian Coblentz 

      6 days ago

      Brad,

      Jesus didn't debate with the devil. He said, "Get behind me, Satan." Jesus didn't play patty-cake with the demon-possessed, he cast the demons out. Hence, I'm not sure why you bother engaging with far left people who spew anti-American sentiment, brand all conservatives as far-right Nazis, and think patriotism is synonymous with white supremacy. It's a waste of time, and the best way to deal with these people is to ignore them. Otherwise, they tend to wallow in smugness, thinking they have outsmarted everyone else by making illogical arguments founded on emotionalism, offering opinions not grounded in facts, and making false accusations against anyone with a different perspective--then accusing you of doing the exact thing they did. Not surprising since satan is referred to as "the accuser of the brethren." I'm just saying your energies would be put to a more fruitful use by incorporating your research and knowledge into new articles, but you do as you see fit!

      For the record, I had to google the "proud boys" because I had never heard of them. I found their website, and they are clearly far-right crazies as Antifa are the far-left crazies. Regardless, all conservatives are lumped together as "far-right" when they expect our rule of law to be upheld and our rights not be infringed upon.

      Brad, it's sheer lunacy to declare oneself a patriot and then adhere to and support socialist ideals that are contrary to our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Only God can make the blind see--you can't. Save your energy to help those who want help.

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      6 days ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      "But when I write that your content and statements have no base, no facts, and they are unfounded accusations, that is based purely on the content that you provide in your comments." - AND that is your opinion, to which you are entitled.

      As best as I can tell, there is nothing you consider "founded", other than maybe your opinion that Trump is a good president.

      Since Vivian can't tell that organizations like Proud Boys are Nazi tells me she is one herself - otherwise she would know. No wonder she supports them.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      B: What is your definition of White Supremacy, and Supremacists?

      M: I gave you the links from two different sources that give the facts, but you don't accept them. But you ask for my definition instead. Why is my definition more important than the facts? But to play your silly game I will give you my definition.

      B:

      I am not playing a game. Again you made it personal.

      I wanted Your Definition because I wanted to know how you put President Trump in with your definition and that group?

      There is no connection between President Trump nor his supporters that connect to these groups.

      It is a racist comment to make this connection. Whites represent the White Race but why do you and the left not call these accusations of the entire white race not being Racist. It is a perfect example of Racism. and it is done by the left and you.

      --------------------------------------------------

      White Supremacy in this country has taken root by disenfranchised white people who have a fear that their environment and culture is being taken over by an increasing population of non-white mixed races.

      B:

      Yes, there are groups of every kind that had a different opinion about race. but when you accuse the President and his supporters for being or supporting those groups is when you and the left become Racists.

      ---------------------------------------------------

      They fear they are being replaced by these groups. Therefore, the name The Great Replacement Movement. It's roots are from Europe and now it it is gaining momentum in this country as evidenced by mass shooters referenced it their manifestos and the riots by neo NAZI groups chanting "You will not replace us."

      B:

      Again, just making a connection that doesn't exists, And it is still a Racist remark to make that connection.

      ----------------------------------------------------

      Their ultimate goal is to have an all white Aryan race, just like Hitler wanted. And Trump's racists rhetoric and immigration policies fit very nicely with their agenda. If you don't believe me I will post their 84 page manifesto.

      B:

      Now here is where you go off the facts, and you substitute opinion instead of facts.

      President Trump hasn't done anything that is Racist. The immigration policies belong to Congress and they then must be Racist in your view. President Obama has to then be included as Racist for enforcing the immigration laws.

      There is nothing Racist in protecting our borders. President Trump is protecting the sovereignty of the United States of America. There are almost 8 billion people in this world today. We can't take in all of them, and that is where immigration laws tell us who can and who can't come into the country legally.

      Why is it fair for the illegal aliens to get into the country ahead of the million of immigrants who come through the legal immigration procedure?

      That same wall and that same protected border keeps out All colors and all ethnicity. You and the left tend to use color and ethnicity to make a point that only you bring to the issue. Injecting Racism where none exists. That is why that claim is baseless.

      At the same time you support 4 house reps that are Racist, and even call White Democrat Pelosi Racist. The people that make these accusations of Racism are the Real Racists.

      ---------------------------------------------------------

      You see there is no simple definition. Why don't you define what an American is?

      B:

      What definition did you give for a American here?

      Does an American call the president a RACIST, when there is no proof that makes it true.

      Does an American root for the economy to fail just to get rid of a sitting president.

      Does an American spend the time before a presidential election, and during and after the election and even to the inauguration, and then 32 months into the presidency to try an impeach, convict and remove the president from office just because he won the election.

      As proof, there is the consensus of democrats the day after the election to resist the president. and to call for his impeachment and conviction where there were and still aren't any grounds for it.

      Just look at how many tries the left has made to impeach him from the day after the election The left from the time Trump won the RNC primary they became an impeachment hammer where everything Trump did would be their impeachment tool. And when Trump won the election they went into overtime to try and stop him before he was inaugurated and when that failed they started with making everything impeachable.

      The proof is the number of attempts in the last 32 months to be uttered as grounds for impeaching him or convicting him of something.

      They all failed, but the left never stopped.

      Your comment calling Trump's Racist is one of their mechanism where telling a falsehood and repeating it, and having their media repeat is the same as the truth. At least if you are a democrat.

      Trying paint Trump as a modern day Hitler has no truth in it. Trying to make that connection with baseless statements is unAmerican rhetoric.

      ---------------------------------------------------

      That's why I posted the links, but you dismiss them as left wing propaganda. When in fact that is exactly what took place in Portland. You demonize ANTIFA, but it is an anti-fascist movement against the neo NAZI movement. Yes, they can be aggressive and even violent, but that is how you fight fire with fire

      B:

      Again, ANTIFA or anyone that causes protests to become riots are unlawful, and unAmerican. President Trump, I have to remind you is not associated with Fascists.

      ANTIFA was doing their riots before Trump was president. They can make peaceful protests within the First Amendment Free Speech, but when they have weapons, and they use weapons, they are not protected by the 1st amendment, and they are not being Americans.

      We are not Europe yet, that would take a democrat president to make us like Europe.

      In my opinion, the left including those in congress, those in Hollywood, and those in the media don't represent America, Americans or American values. We are still a democratic republic and we select who to represent us. And we wait until the next election to make another choice. We don't spend an entire first term of a president doing everything to try to impeach, convict or just prevent him from doing his job. That is exactly what the left has done. You talk about how Trump doesn't act like a president, but you ignore how the democrats in congress not only don't act like the represent congress, their resistance is a blatant failure of their oath to office.

      Even the democrat presidential candidates of today, 24 of the 25 of them think Obama did a bad job, and they have attacked his disciple VP Joe Biden to say we don't want you to continue where president Obama left off.

      -----------------------------------------------

    • peoplepower73 profile image

      Mike Russo 

      6 days ago from Placentia California

      Brad:

      B: Your comments present lies as facts, and you make baseless accusation that you want people to think are facts.

      M: Prove it.

      B:It is also based on those contents that when I write they are Vague, Ambiguous, and without context that is not personal.

      M: Prove it.

      B: As for your service to the country, it is not relevant when your content doesn't show patriotism, and it does show a resentment, resistance, and opposition to America, and its people. When you write that ALL Trump supporters are something they are not, that is not using any base.

      M: Your opinion

      B: For example, it is a fact that the democrats focus more on illegal aliens than they do on Americans that are homeless, and on drugs. Many of these homeless people are also veterans, and being homeless doesn't seem to get the same attention as Illegal Aliens who don't server our country, and don't follow our laws, and want to be fed and kept like they were our children.

      M: Prove it.

      B: Focus on the content, not the person.

      M: O.K. I focused on your content. Now you prove to me that your content is based on fact and not your opinion. And you haven't answered my question as to why you like Trump.

      B: What is your definition of White Supremacy, and Supremacists?

      M: I gave you the links from two different sources that give the facts, but you don't accept them. But you ask for my definition instead. Why is my definition more important than the facts? But to play your silly game I will give you my definition.

      White Supremacy in this country has taken root by disenfranchised white people who have a fear that their environment and culture is being taken over by an increasing population of non-white mixed races.

      They fear they are being replaced by these groups. Therefore, the name The Great Replacement Movement. It's roots are from Europe and now it it is gaining momentum in this country as evidenced by mass shooters referenced it their manifestos and the riots by neo NAZI groups chanting "You will not replace us."

      Their ultimate goal is to have an all white Aryan race, just like Hitler wanted. And Trump's racists rhetoric and immigration policies fit very nicely with their agenda. If you don't believe me I will post their 84 page manifesto.

      You see there is no simple definition. Why don't you define what an American is? That's why I posted the links, but you dismiss them as left wing propaganda. When in fact that is exactly what took place in Portland. You demonize ANTIFA, but it is an anti-fascist movement against the neo NAZI movement. Yes, they can be aggressive and even violent, but that is how you fight fire with fire

      Now why do you like Trump?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      Scott and Mike

      I have not been consistent myself with separating content from personal.

      So I will start by saying, it was wrong for me to call you Anti American.

      I should have said that what you write is Anti American. But when I write that your content and statements have no base, no facts, and they are unfounded accusations, that is based purely on the content that you provide in your comments.

      It is also based on those contents that when I write they are Vague, Ambiguous, and without context that is not personal.

      As for your service to the country, it is not relevant when your content doesn't show patriotism, and it does show a resentment, resistance, and opposition to America, and its people. When you write that ALL Trump supporters are something they are not, that is not using any base.

      For example, it is a fact that the democrats focus more on illegal aliens than they do on Americans that are homeless, and on drugs. Many of these homeless people are also veterans, and being homeless doesn't seem to get the same attention as Illegal Aliens who don't server our country, and don't follow our laws, and want to be fed and kept like they were our children.

      My point is that we can discuss my statements without diverting to make it personal.

      Yes, I have strayed at times, falling for your traps. It is fair to call me on them when they happen. From now on, I will call what you write, and not you as the subject.

      And free feel to try and argue against my assertions. But making it personal and using baseless names is not arguing your point. You are making a point, but it is about you rather than the content.

      Yes, initially you gave me your reasons why you didn't like Trump. I should have just left it posted without commenting.

      I felt compelled to argue against them, but I also felt they were just baseless accusations. Guilty, I changed the game, but attacking, name calling and making it personal were never part of the game, as you like to label it.

      Consider this comment as a reset for all parties.

      Focus on the content, not the person.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      Mike

      You don't have to guess why I didn't approve your comment. It was personal, off the subject. and another attempt for you to divert from the topic.

      I have no problem when you focus on content, and deal with it.

      But you and Scott are not answering the question posed to you. Instead you are trying to use your comments to induce chaos.

      Your comments present lies as facts, and you make baseless accusation that you want people to think are facts.

      You haven't answered my question on White Supremacy, White Supremacists nor applied them to President Trump, and yet you continue to make these demented unsubstantiated statements.

      Your claims are baseless because they don't have any facts to support them. They are just made to accuse. It is not my job to support your baseless claims, it is up to you to back them.

      You and Scott want me to answer your questions, while you ignore, and in your last comment you attack my detailed explanations.

      Loaded questions you say?

      What is your definition of White Supremacy, and Supremacists?

      You didn't answer it, and yet you continue to use it, along with Nazis and other meaningless terms.

      Thanks again comparing me with President Trump.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      6 days ago

      Scott

      Your hash tag is offensive, not true, and not relevant to answering my questions, which you still avoid.

      You continue with personal attacks while avoiding serious questions posed to you several times.

      Focus on content without trying to be a bully.

    • Wesman Todd Shaw profile image

      Wesman Todd Shaw 

      6 days ago from Kaufman, Texas

      LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!! I guess the clowns at CNN Fake News central told Alternative Moonshine's father that the Proud Boys were Nazis.

      And being the father of Moonshine, he either believed it, or he's continuing with the clown performance.

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      6 days ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      Hey Vivian, you know that video with the Fake description about Antifa pepper spraying a Nazi? Funny thing about lies, they get caught. That was the police who sprayed a Nazi to control him.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      7 days ago

      Scott

      There is no difference in saying Trump is Hitler or comparing his traits with those of Hitler.

      None of these on your list has any credibility. They are all baseless accusations that you repeat from the left and the left's media who fabricated them to use against Trump.

      I have gone through this with you before, and yet you keep asserting these as facts. They are baseless accusations and your belief that they are true, relevant and valid is your problem, they are not mine.

      Playing these word games is going to make your dizzier, and you will have to double down on the meds.

      In the future, make a point on the content, and resist the urge to make it personal. Start by answering my previous comment to you.****

      -----------------------------------------------

      "And again you Lie, Brad - WHY? " calling Trump the far right which he consider Hitler." is absolutely untrue since I never said such a thing, please stop making things up to suit your purposes. What I said was Hitler and Trump have many characteristics in common such as:

      Narcissistic Personality Disorder

      Megalomania

      Pathological Lying

      Misogyny

      Xenophobia

      Racism

      and sooooo many others."

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      7 days ago

      Scott

      "Brad, why do you keep making untrue statements such as " associate conservatives with Nazis" As you perfectly well know, but nevertheless lie about, I didn't associate conservatives with Nazis. I asked the question, which neither you nor Vivian answered, why do conservatives support Nazis such as the Proud Boys.?? Can you answer that?"

      "Just to remind you, two of those are being tried in NY for assaulting some Antifa (a point you pointedly ignore) and Joey Gibson, leader of the right-wing Patriot Prayer, for felony rioting stemming from a May 1 incident. Yet you keep insisting these are the good guys."

      B:

      Go back and read my answers, that I have copied into this comment because you don't seem to remember. I already answered it and you haven't answered my questions. But you moan when someone doesn't answer your question.

      ------------------------------------------------

      Scott

      You answered one of my questions.

      "Brad, there is no doubt Trump is far-right today (who knows about tomorrow since he flips his allegiances on a whim)"

      B: ********Scott you didn't answer these questions.*****

      You didn't give any reasons why you think he is far right?

      And it was no value at all to add the who knows in ().

      What is your definition of far right?

      What is the basis in fact to say Trump is far right?

      ---------------------

      Scott

      "I find it amazing that you and other conservatives support Nazis while opposing those who don't want another Holocaust. Why is that?"

      B:

      I find it annoying that you associate conservatives with Nazis, and you support make this ridiculous statement.

      ***Scott didn't answer*****Why does ANTIFA wear masks, why is their usually violence associated when ever they show up?

      I hope you do better when you answer my previous comment.

      ---------------------------

      Scott

      Do you consider Trump, and or his supporters far right?

      Scott **** said yes but didn't give any reasons.*********

      ********This was my answer that you said I didn't answer******

      Because I don't support either Antifa, or Far Right and I don't have a clue about proud boys.

      You have previously defended ANTIFA so you must support them.

      And you apparently support ANTIFA using masks and engaging in protests and riots.

      -------------------------------

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      7 days ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      And again you Lie, Brad - WHY? " calling Trump the far right which he consider Hitler." is absolutely untrue since I never said such a thing, please stop making things up to suit your purposes. What I said was Hitler and Trump have many characteristics in common such as:

      Narcissistic Personality Disorder

      Megalomania

      Pathological Lying

      Misogyny

      Xenophobia

      Racism

      and sooooo many others.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      7 days ago

      Vivian

      Gutfield makes a good point.

      I do remember seeing that video a while back.

      They did it wit impunity and as if they were the law of the country.

      And Scott supports that while calling Trump the far right which he consider Hitler.

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      7 days ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      Brad, why do you keep making untrue statements such as " associate conservatives with Nazis" As you perfectly well know, but nevertheless lie about, I didn't associate conservatives with Nazis.

      I asked the question, which neither you nor Vivian answered, why do conservatives support Nazis such as the Proud Boys.?? Can you answer that?

      Just to remind you, two of those are being tried in NY for assaulting some Antifa (a point you pointedly ignore) and Joey Gibson, leader of the right-wing Patriot Prayer, for felony rioting stemming from a May 1 incident. Yet you keep insisting these are the good guys.

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      7 days ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      Vivian - your first video showed a guy on the ground with a lot of feet standing around him - he could have been a member of the anti-Nazi group for all I could tell.

      As to the second video, what hammer??? What that showed was what was going on by both sides. No telling what insults and vulgarities were coming out that bus.

      Why do you support Nazis?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      7 days ago

      Scott

      You answered one of my questions.

      "Brad, there is no doubt Trump is far-right today (who knows about tomorrow since he flips his allegiances on a whim)"

      B:

      You didn't give any reasons why you think he is far right?

      And it was no value at all to add the who knows in ().

      What is your definition of far right?

      What is the basis in fact to say Trump is far right?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      7 days ago

      Scott

      "I find it amazing that you and other conservatives support Nazis while opposing those who don't want another Holocaust. Why is that?"

      I find it annoying that you associate conservatives with Nazis, and you support make this ridiculous statement.

      Why does ANTIFA wear masks, why is their usually violence associated when ever they show up?

      I hope you do better when you answer my previous comment.

    • Noelle7 profile image

      Vivian Coblentz 

      7 days ago

      Brad,

      If you'd prefer "Mob-lite," Greg Gutfeld has a unique way of describing the Antifa mob: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gutfeld-on-the-ant...

    • My Esoteric profile image

      Scott Belford 

      7 days ago from Keystone Heights, FL

      Brad, there is no doubt Trump is far-right today (who knows about tomorrow since he flips his allegiances on a whim)

    • bradmasterOCcal profile imageAUTHOR

      Brad 

      7 days ago

      Vivian

      This is about the same as they did in 2016 when conservative tried to speak at liberal universities. As i said to Scott neither of these groups are mine.

      Thanks

    • Noelle7 profile image

      Vivian Coblentz 

      7 days ago

      Brad,

      Here's the video footage:

      Middle-aged man beaten and maced by Antifa mob--if you follow the video threads, you will see more violence by them recorded: https://twitter.com/toddstarnes/status/11628873119...

      Video footage of Antifa pulling people from bus: https://twitter.com/toddstarnes/status/11628744065...

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)