ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Separation of Church and State with a Charoset Passover Recipe

Updated on October 11, 2014

Cathedral Church of the Nativity

Beautiful inside picture of the Cathedral Church of the Nativity.
Beautiful inside picture of the Cathedral Church of the Nativity. | Source

Church and State Separate?

The federal, and even state government, should not have any function at all when it comes to religion, due to the separation of church and state. Likewise, religion should not be a part of any governmental body. There are more arguments in support of this position then there are arguments against it. The arguments supporting the fact that the government should not interfere in religious affairs start with the Scopes Trial of 1925. Another argument supporting the fact that government should stay out of religious affairs is the fact that the Constitution makes no mention of God, Christianity or any religion for that matter, other than to constrain religious participation in federal government by saying that no religious test shall be required to hold a federal office. The First Amendment also specifically says that the federal government should not interfere in any religious matters. "Religious disestablishment created a more conducive environment for what many in the Founding generation valued most of all: the free exercise of religion" (Ivers, 2013). One of the counter arguments to this is that; "there is no convincing secular-liberal argument for religious liberty, in the sense of unique accommodation of religious beliefs and practices specifically because they are religious" (Paulson, 2014). There is also an issue with separation of church and state laws, as there are some states that have wished to put religion back into the educational institutions.

The real big start of people questioning the government's role in religion was the trial of John Scopes. The Scopes Trial of 1925 was a big deal where John T. Scopes was put on trial for teaching the Theory of Evolution in the school that he taught in. The reason he was put on trial was because the Theory of Evolution directly conflicted with the religious teachings of Christianity and the Bible, and there was a "state law that prohibited teaching evolution in the public schools" (Ivers, 2013). Scopes was found guilty and fined $100.00, partly because of his lawyer relentlessly and ridiculously questioning a self proclaimed expert on religion. Even though Scopes was found guilty "the combustible mix of issues involved in his case—religious establishment, free speech, and religious free exercise—would soon find a permanent place on the docket of the United States Supreme Court" (Ivers, 2013), due to the fact that church and state are supposed to remain separate entities. It was unconstitutional that he was found guilty because the Constitution makes no "mention of God, Christianity, or anything else even remotely connected with any one church or particular religion. The only references the Constitution makes to religion actually constrain government power to act on behalf of or against religion" (Ivers, 2013).

Another argument for the separation of church and state would be the fact that the Constitution states that numerous federal employees will have to take an oath but will never have to take a religious test. The exact wording is stated in Article VI of the United States Constitution and specifically says; "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States" (The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, 2014). This shows that the framers of America wanted and meant for church to be a separate entity from the federal government, at least when it came to choosing and swearing in federal employees. Beyond this statement of Article VI of the Constitution, there is really no other mention of religion through the rest of the Constitution until you get to the amendments. Even then religion is only mentioned once more.

The First Amendment has quite bit to do with Americans rights to certain freedoms like the freedom of speech, press, assembly and the freedom to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Another freedom that the First Amendment guarantees is the freedom of religion by stating that; "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" (The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, 2014). This means that each individual American has a right to chose whatever God they want to believe in, or do not believe in, and that they have a right to have their religion respected just like every recognized religion should be. This also means that Americans have a right to refuse to do certain things if they go against their religious beliefs, for example saying the "One Nation, under God" part of the 'Pledge of Allegiance'. This particular issue with the 'Pledge of Allegiance' has been solved in numerous ways. Over the years children used to say the Pledge every day before starting school, but this has gradually phased out. American immigrants and non-Christians began to complain about this so schools began altering rules for the 'Pledge of Allegiance'. These altered rules began with students being allowed to just sit out and not say the Pledge at all. These rules have progressed over time and now most schools have removed the Pledge from their morning rituals altogether. The schools that have not removed the Pledge normally say a different version of the Pledge which omits the "One Nation, under God" part of it. Even the current President of the United States of America, Barrack Obama, refuses to say the God part of the Pledge, showing that church and state should truly be separate entities. Even though The Bill of Rights and the United States Constitution state that church and state should be separated, and most states agree, there are still some counter arguments this, even though they are few, far between and weak at best.

One of the biggest arguments against the fact that church and state should be separate is the fact that there are no convincing, non-religious, liberal arguments in favor of religious liberties where the debater is not a religious individual. This means that every time there is an argument made in favor of separation of church and state it could be considered a biased argument. The reason that this is a weak argument is because it is not necessarily a true statement. Just because someone is religious and thinks that church and state should remain separate does not mean that they could not come up with a valid and non biased argument as to why they feel that way. Another sort of counter argument, which is less of an argument and more like a defiance, to the separation of church and state is the difference between the state and federal regulations.

Federal regulations for the separation of church and state, adhere as closely as possible to the Constitution as they can, because the federal government has to govern all of the states in the union as a whole. State regulations have a tendency to veer, not so much from the Constitution but from federal government rules that they feel are not good for their citizens. On the occasion this causes states to come up with questionable regulations that could be considered unconstitutional. Recently a school in South Carolina determined to put prayer back into schools. The state Representative Wendell Gillard introduced a bill "that would require teachers to initiate prayer every morning" (Boston, 2014). This has been viewed as unconstitutional due to the fact that church and state are supposed to be separate and schools are run by the government. The arguments for the separation of church and state are clearly much stronger than the arguments against it.

The federal, and even state government, should not have any function at all when it comes to religion, due to the separation of church and state. The arguments in favor of the law follow the Constitution as closely as they can just like they are supposed to. The arguments against the separation of church and state are few and if they are not fully unconstitutional they are quite borderline. The framers of the Constitution did not want the federal government to be a part of religion for very good reason, the main reason being that they wanted the American people to have a right to believe in whatever they wanted, even if they wanted to believe that there was nothing and we just popped into existence.


Boston, R. (2014). States of confusion: across the country, legislators are proposing bills that would violate separation of church and state. Church & State, (2), 4.

Ivers, G. (2013). Constitutional law: An introduction. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.

Paulsen, M. (2014). Is religious freedom irrational?. Michigan Law Review, 112(6), 1043-1069.

The US National Archives and Records Administration. (2014). Bill of rights. Retrieved from

The US National Archives and Records Administration. (2014). Constitution of the united states. Retrieved from

10 Minute Lecture

JFK on Church and State

Charoset Recipe

5 stars from 1 rating of Charoset Passover Recipe

Cook Time

Prep time: 20 min
Ready in: 20 min
Yields: 4 to 6 servings


  • 6 cups Granny Smith Apples, Peeled, cored and grated
  • 2 Lemons, Juiced
  • 1 cup Walnuts, Roughly chopped
  • 1 cup Golden Raisins
  • 1/2 cup Honey
  • 1 teaspoon Cinnamon
  • 1/4 cup Sweet Red Wine, Kosher


  1. In a large bowl combine all of the ingredients. Serve.


Tasty looking Jewish Passover dish.
Tasty looking Jewish Passover dish. | Source

Religious Peace

America is full of different religions because a lot of immigrants moved here for the religious freedom.
America is full of different religions because a lot of immigrants moved here for the religious freedom. | Source

Should Church and State Be Separate?

Should church and state be separate?

See results

© 2014 Kelly Miller


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image


      4 years ago

      I completely agree.

    • mio cid profile image

      mio cid 

      4 years ago from Uruguay

      I am a Catholic,the more separation between church and state the better both for the church and the country.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)