ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Climate Crisis Hysteria Is Corrupting Civilization

Updated on May 29, 2019
Robert Kernodle profile image

I have been independently researching and writing about climate issues since 2009.

"The Real Climate Reality" banner created by Robert G Kernodle
"The Real Climate Reality" banner created by Robert G Kernodle

Credibility Crisis

"Global warming", "climate change", "climate crisis", "climate emergency", and "climate disruption" are phrases that continue to appear frequently in the news, instilling unreasonable fears of carbon dioxide throughout the world.

Exaggerated claims continue to abound in supposedly respectable news reports and revered scientific papers, having reached a level of absurdity that easily leads rational people to conclude that a unique form of mass brain washing has overtaken the planet.

The primary leader in this brain washing is the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

CO2 Monster picture compiled by Robert G Kernodle from various sources
CO2 Monster picture compiled by Robert G Kernodle from various sources

The Truth About Predicting Climate

In the year 2001, the IPCC issued a report called Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Houghton, J.T.,Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C.A. Johnson (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 881pp.

On page 774, Chapter 14.222, paragraph 5 of this report, a very important statement about limitations of the IPCC's information appears -- a statement that seems to have been cleverly hidden by prominent reporting agencies that explained IPCC findings. The statement reads as follows:

  • In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.

Page 744 of the IPCC's Climate Change 2001
Page 744 of the IPCC's Climate Change 2001 | Source

Anyone reading this report should have viewed all its other language through the lens of the above critically important statement. No amount of intellectual gymnastics or academic toying with the language of uncertainties and probabilities can erase this underlying truth. Yet, the sheer volume of this other language (framed in the name of science) has supported an emotional outlook, completely at odds with the underlying reality expressed in that pivotal statement.

This bizarre coexistence of a blatant statement about forecasting with an entire volume of other words to explain it away gives a person cause to reflect on the dominance of word quantity over word precision in controlling human minds.

The sheer quantity of words in this IPCC report, thus, enabled ample freedom for many of its readers to fabricate all manner of scare stories that actually had no solid scientific foundation.

Read the last part of that critical statement again:

"... the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible."

Now ask yourself, "What is the purpose of this 744 pages of words, other than to justify an academic, political enterprise that ultimately lacks the required foundation in actual facts to guide leaders in making real-world decisions? "

Ask yourself, "What are climate model experts doing for the practical world?" In 2001, they knew that they could not forecast future climate, and yet today, decades later, they still allow people to believe that climate models can do what their original creators knew that they could not do.

The United Nations Goes Extreme

Nowhere is the questionable delivery of information more evident than in IPCC, 2018: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, T. Waterfield (eds.)].

This is often abbreviated as SR1.5

As explained by Professor Ray Bates of University College Dublin

  • SR1.5 departs from the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report in conveying an increased sense of planetary emergency, without giving rigorous scientific reasons for doing so.
  • It fails to communicate to policymakers a considerable body of important observation-based research that has accumulated since the Fifth Assessment, which reduces the sense of a looming emergency.
  • It fails to communicate important information made public by climate modelers since the Fifth Assessment regarding the empirical tuning of models to achieve desired results.

Consequently, Bates concludes that the SR1.5 report does not meet the standard of a scientifically rigorous document for use by policymakers.

Although criticized in detail for his assessment of SR1.5, Bates responded to the criticism in equal detail, thereby strengthening his analysis.

The United Nations Doubles Down on Doom

An associated United Nations organization - the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) - issued a summary of its 1800-page special report with dire warnings of future mass extinction resulting from human-caused climate change.

Like SR1.5, this report raises alarm over human-caused climate change to new heights. The summary alone, released without the full-length report, was enough to cause a media frenzy, where news outlets accepted IPBES claims on faith alone, not bothering to examine real evidence or to verify the validity of the statement that "around 1 million species already face extinction, many within decades".

Screen capture of a United Nations website, with 1,000,000-species-extinction claim highlighted with red
Screen capture of a United Nations website, with 1,000,000-species-extinction claim highlighted with red | Source

Fabricated Figures

Veteran geologist and author, Gregory Wrightstone explains how this summary (remember, released before the report itself) manipulates data and facts to arouse the most fear. The IPBES report, he points out, states that we can expect 25,000 to 30,000 extinctions per year, yet the average over the last 40 years is about 2 species annually, which means that the extinction rate would have to multiply by 12,500 to 15,000 to amount to the dizzying 1,000,000 predicted by the IPBES.

He further explains the irony in this study, where the number one cause of predicted extinction is habitat loss, not CO2-induced, human-caused climate change, and where the stated solution is to pave over enormous stretches of land with solar or wind factories that would further consume habitats and kill the endangered birds or other species the study authors claim to want to save.

The True Picture of Current Extinction

Wake Up Call

The two United Nations (UN) studies described above, in combination with other studies that use UN information as sources, clearly have upped doomsday hype to unprecedented levels, targeting emotionally driven people and even children as pawns in a global political chess game. Smart people would be wise to wake up to this reality.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)