ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

DRUGS ! IS IT TIME TO DECRIMINALISE?

Updated on January 24, 2012

THE HUB I NEVER THOUGHT I WOULD WRITE

Let me say at the outset that I have no personal or professional knowledge about Drugs and this topic is brought about by purely subjective thoughts which may or may not have any real substance but which I put forward simply because I find my long held views completely overturned over recent times and which were underlined when viewing a TV programme last evening. Indeed had not my wife noticed the programme was set in the town of Worksop in the North East Midlands, then I would not be sending this out today for sure. The programme is called "COPPERS" and is the UK equivalent of the American "COPS". The basis is to follow real life Policemen on real life, everyday duties dealing with the problems that Society confronts them with. These are wide ranging and in this particular case dealt with issues such as, anti-social behaviour, neighbour disputes and drug abuse, misuse and dealing in this small town which for ages has nestled unnoticed in the heart of the English Midlands and which, if it had any claim to fame was that it fringes on the famous SHERWOOD FOREST, supposed home of the legendary ROBIN HOOD. He was the guy who formed a group to resist the unfairness imposed by wicked King and his area leader, the SHERRIF OF NOTTINGHAM. His aim was to take from the rich and give to the poor. In modern day WORKSOP, it seems that it is now the criminally rich who take from the poor by means of drugs and the addiction so many now have for them.

I should explain here that my interest in WORKSOP stems from the fact that from 1969 to 1990, I lived in the village of WHITWELL just 5 miles from what was then, a sleepy, quirky tow with a rambling High Street, a decent Market, a small Football and Cricket Club and not much else. In fact the sort of archetypal English Town that defines the country every bit as much as those big towns and cities that more people have heard of worldwide. A touch of old England perhaps, founded on Agriculture and developed by Industry, especially Coal Mining.

In 1984, the battles between Miners and Government saw the beginning of the end for Mining and left a void to be filled. Into this void eagerly stepped amongst others, those peddling Drugs to those and their children suddenly left of a compelling reason to get up in the morning.. Following the death of my father in 2001, one of his good friends beseeched me to not to return to the village, as it was not as I would remember it. That mix of agriculture and mining had gone with the pit closure and the youth were ,as a result, a lost tribe, effectively running wild. Both my sons had had the good sense to scarper before and now one lives in Sussex on the more refined part of the South Coast whilst the other lives in what I term a "sanitised " area of another Midlands town , namely Chesterfield. We live in darkest Essex, also in a "sanitised" area and as such are away from the main thrust of what seems now to have, tentacle like, ensnared great swathes of the country. It seems that the Drug Culture now controls the less salubrious areas of towns to an extent that I find frightening. This is not to say that the better off are immune from the ravages of Drug taking, far from it, but the biggest threat to the English way of life seems to be in the way in which the basic, formerly working class, now in many cases bereft of any reasonable job prospects have become entangled in a world based purely on escapism via drugs. I see no reasonable chance of that changing in the future, for now machines can do many of the jobs once undertaken by those who maybe were stronger in the arm than in the head That being the case, then, as with everything, if things do not alter they will stay the same.

Watching, the modern Policeman struggling to deal with the problems brought about by this sorry state of affairs would have revolted my father, an old time Copper himself. In his day the Police Force and Policemen were both respected and feared. Neither is true today and as the front line in the war on Drugs successive Governments have declared to win some tawdry votes, they are placed in a no win situation. Watching them entering homes to encounter total squalor and great danger from dirty and discarded needles, made me reach a firm conclusion on the problems they were attempting, on our behalf, to deal with.The policy and thus the Police are doomed to failure and the longer this exists, so will the spill over problems extend. With apologies to my father and the Police of his day, we need to change our approach.

DANGEROUS DAYS AHEAD.

It now seems clear to me that our current policy on Drugs is akin to the 1930"S American policy on Alcohol, namely prohibition. The, like our current drug policy ,was a failure. Even worse it spawned a raft of racketeers, who made fortunes by providing unlicensed and often, dubious quality offerings to a keen public. Again, the same is true today of the drug problem. Low life exploiters of human misery are making fortunes out of those who can least afford it and, in many cases feed their addiction with State Benefit Funds provided to cover their basic life needs because their brains are so addled and their addiction so strong that they know no better.I know they should but they do not and all the berating in the world will not alter that.

Now, we have in our country a very specialised Agency that seeks to ensure that the Pharmaceutical Industry is closely regulated and tested on the drugs it supplies to assist in dealing with illnesses etc. Terrific, so unless you are devoid of a brain and buy those products off the Internet, there is soundly based protection for the Consumer. However, that in no way encompasses the unlicensed drugs that are sold on street corners, waste land, pubs, etc on a daily basis. There is no regulation, so the criminal supplier can provide just what he or she likes and maybe even kill their client.

THE CONCEPT OF SEEKING TO PROTECT PEOPLE FROM THEMSELVES HAS BEEN AROUND FOR AGES AND THOUGH IT PAINS ME TO REACH THIS CONCLUSION, I NOW BELIEVE THAT THIS IS WHAT WE MUST DO, IN A SENSIBLE AND ACCOUNTABLE WAY.

I now subscribe that, as we now have a whole raft of statistics regarding drug misuse etc that we should us them as a base for an experimental period of not less than 5 or more than 10 years to decriminalize and regulate drugs like cannabis, cocaine. heroin etc and establish licenced retail facilities for the purchase of the same. The immediate result of such a policy would be to drastically reduce the number of criminals involve and also lower the cost of the items, thus reducing associated crime, like burglary and shoplifting etc. Over the agreed period, statistics would be kept and compared to current ones, so that we would have something more solid than subjective opinion to determine policy at the end of the experiment.

Would it work? I can think of good reasons both for and against, but overall I favour it, for certainly, dark days lie ahead whatever happens and ,as stated earlier, if we do not alter our approach then they will inevitably stay as dark or get even darker in the future. Not the prospect I hope for my Grandchildren I must say.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile imageAUTHOR

      j w adams 

      6 years ago from Essex/ Alanya/ Hurghada

      I understand the point you make clearly now and comment only that Politicians usually go where the votes are to be found. As social behaviour associated with drugs worsens they will maybe belatedly, act to save their votes and thus their skins.

    • John Holden profile image

      John Holden 

      6 years ago

      I doubt if anybody is saying that big business is behind the current mess, unless you believe that the drug cartels are big business, but being behind it and being indifferent to it are pretty much the same thing.

    • profile imageAUTHOR

      j w adams 

      6 years ago from Essex/ Alanya/ Hurghada

      NO PROBLEM WITH THAT BUT WHO ARE THE PEOPLE SAYING THAT BIG BUSINESS IS BEHIND THE CURRENT MESS WITH DRUGS. I DO NOT BUY THAT.

    • profile imageAUTHOR

      j w adams 

      6 years ago from Essex/ Alanya/ Hurghada

      As you will see I advocate decrimilising for ALL drugs. However, the Cannabis lobby concerns me. I have a daughter in law with conception problems who smoked it and no one can rule out that it is not involved. No more no less. If it were to be licensed we would know more I believe. Thanks for your comment though.

    • kateperez profile image

      kateperez 

      6 years ago from pasadena, tx

      Cannabis is not nearly as dangerous as legal things like cigarettes, alcohol, or Twinkies. As each of the former have been attributed to death or terrible illness, Cannabis, even with all the studies completed, has never been proven to be a stand-alone cause of obesity, death, lung cancer, or liver disease.

      The choice to keep cannabis illegal is totally political, trying to keep the minority populations under control by throwing them in prison for small infractions.

      I know of a case where a man was on probation for 30 years after spending 15 years in jail for marijuana, however the man was shot in the shoulder with intent to kill by another man who got 3 years for shooting him.

      The problem is disparity, and a lack of common sense in law makers.

    • profile image

      geordmc 

      6 years ago from Beliot, Wisconsin

      Just check out Big Pharma's profits to see just how much govt they actually own.

    • profile imageAUTHOR

      j w adams 

      6 years ago from Essex/ Alanya/ Hurghada

      That is essentially my stance, hence why Ithink we need a rethink. Thanks for the point on Cannabis but however you package it a Giraffe is still a Giraffe, if you follow me. Clearly, licensed Cannabis would open the doors to a better understanding of it I think.

    • profile imageAUTHOR

      j w adams 

      6 years ago from Essex/ Alanya/ Hurghada

      "It is claimed------" but by whom? Iknow not whether it is right or not but not many of those who deal in drugs seem to be City moguls as far as my understanding goes. Mind you, as I say, Iam no expert. Thanks for the point made though.

    • profile imageAUTHOR

      j w adams 

      6 years ago from Essex/ Alanya/ Hurghada

      " IT is claimed" but by whom I ask?

    • John Holden profile image

      John Holden 

      6 years ago

      It is claimed that an enormous amount of the money going through the City of London (something like 75-80%). With this sort of money involved there is no chance of any government taking a rational stance on drugs.

    • profile image

      geordmc 

      6 years ago from Beliot, Wisconsin

      I agree that drugs should be monitered, however, cannibis should not be labled a drug when the plant has so many different uses ranging from fuel for our cars to food for our families to clothing and many more uses that would take too long to list. Here in the States, the war on drugs has been going on since 1937 and still, if people want drugs they will find a way to get them. Legally or otherwise.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)