ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

"Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell:" The Politics of Repeal

Updated on March 24, 2011

By a vote of 255 to 175, the US House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a stand-alone bill overturning the controversial policy barring openly gay and lesbian soldiers from serving in the US military.

But there are no guarantees that this bill, championed by the current Nancy Polesi-led House Democratic Leadership, would attract expedited affirmative action in the US Senate. After all, a similar repeal action previously taken by the House of Representatives as part of a larger defense authorization bill was most conveniently allowed to be tangled in procedural cross-hairs.

Conservative Republicans in the Senate, most notably John McCain (the ranking Republican member of the Senate Armed Services Committee) and Lindsey Graham (widely recognized and respected as a leading GOP spokesman on defense matters), remain as unbending and resolute in their opposition as ever.

McCain and Graham, both decorated service men themselves, generally ridicule the DADT repeal effort as ill-advised and misguided.

When they are not busy attacking President Obama and labelling it as "a political promise made by an inexperienced president or candidate for president of the United States," they are comfortable applying one of several worn excuses: that with “recruitment, retention, professionalism and capability” at record points, suggestions that the policy has been damaging to the military are disingenuous; that repeal would negatively impact battle effectiveness and morale; or that overturning the policy now would place an unreasonable burden on the military at a time when it is already facing severe strains in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

For awhile, McCain and Graham masterfully indicated that they would table or defer final judgment on the issue pending the release of the long-awaited report based on an extensive survey of a representative sample of men and women currently serving in all areas of the US military. But when the report came out in resounding support of repeal, both men reverted to the same proven tactics of delay, trammel and obfuscation.

"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, otherwise known as DADT, currently in its 17th year, is mandated by federal statutes and basically prohibits service men and women who "demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts" from continued service in the US armed forces as it is believed that their presence "would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability."

DADT evolved as a compromise measure between President Bill Clinton, who hitherto campaigned on the promise to allow all citizens to serve in the military regardless of sexual orientation, and a Republican-controlled Congress sworn to an absolute ban policy. Its origin is traceable to the Clinton administration’s Defense Directive 1304.26 which on December 21, 1993, proclaimed that military applicants were not to be asked about their sexual orientation.

Till date, approximately 15,000 service men and women have been summarily expelled for violating the policy.

That DADT is blighted and discriminatory is irrefragable. It is an immanent affront to the very principles that service men and women routinely swear to uphold: duty, honor and integrity.

It is frankly difficult to understand how any decent, forward-thinking human being can bold-facedly defend this abstruse and most primitive policy. One has to be certifiably daft to truly believe that a service man and woman’s sexual orientation can be so successfully concealed; or that its disclosure instinctively compromises the unit’s battle readiness or the concerned individual’s ability to gallantly live up to his/her uniform’s calling.

Apart from the Survey results from the rank and file, both civilian and military leaders at the Pentagon have been unanimous in their support for the repeal of DADT.

Starting from the premise that it was a simple matter of right and wrong, Defense Secretary Robert Gates concluded that “a policy that requires people to lie about themselves” seems “fundamentally flawed."

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, on his part, sought to allay lingering fears that repealing DADT would impact military morale or readiness. He unequivocally stated that "This is a policy that we can do and we can do it in a relatively low-risk fashion."

I’d like to end by saying that the fact that tens of thousands of our young service men and women have been forced to labor, and die, under this insufferable and ignoble policy is a national shame. Allowing DADT to endure, even for one extra day, is a scourge on the conscience of this country. The US Senate must join the US House of Representatives in taking action, as necessary, in the few days left of this lame duck session of Congress to totally repudiate the policy.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Arum I. Arum profile imageAUTHOR

      Arum I. Arum 

      7 years ago from Columbus, OH

      @ OpinionDuck, disagree with what exactly?

    • OpinionDuck profile image


      7 years ago

      I disagree

    • Arum I. Arum profile imageAUTHOR

      Arum I. Arum 

      7 years ago from Columbus, OH

      @Greg, I totally agree that one's sexual orientation has no bearing whatsoever and should never detract or overshadow the decision to serve, defend and die protecting the country. @ Nicomp, that DADT will soon be a shadow in our inglorious past ought to be celebrated by any decent, fair-minded citizen of this great nation.

    • gregas profile image

      Greg Schweizer 

      8 years ago from Corona, California.

      Hi Arum, I just have one question. What difference does it make what their sexual orientation is? They can save lives, serve their country and die just like anyone else. They join of their own free will and should be allowed to serve their country without having to hide behind some "bill" that was passed because certain people can't face the way the world is these days. A lot more open minded than it used to be. Greg

    • nicomp profile image

      nicomp really 

      8 years ago from Ohio, USA

      Kudos to the House for passing a stand-alone bill rather than hiding the legislation in a snail darter protection omnibus bill.

      At the very least, the congresspeople will have nowhere to hide when asked to explain their vote.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)