ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Evidence in the Darlie Routier Case

Updated on July 1, 2017

Prologue

Darlie Lynn Peck Routier is on death row in Texas, convicted of murdering one of her sons in the early morning hours of June 6, 1996 (while considered guilty of murdering both sons, she was only tried for the youngest one’s murder). Also wounded, it was concluded her wounds were self-inflicted. Charges of police ineptitude, cover-ups, prosecutorial misconduct, and conspiracy have beleaguered this case from the outset, courtesy of those who desperately want her to be innocent. Is this going to be a case that goes into the books as solved but unresolved? Her supporters fanatically wish this to be the situation, despite the lack of evidence supporting their position. In fact, many who support her realize the situation is not likely to change, no matter how much they try. However, they will attempt almost anything to get the case re-opened (unlikely), or a retrial on new evidence (equally unlikely, as there is none). About the only likelihood of anything happening is her execution.

Recent events in the case include DNA tests requested by the defense at the behest of Routier’s mother, Darlie Kee. The results were asked to be sealed; this presents the probability that they were not favorable. Had they come back in her favor, this position would no doubt have been trumpeted far and wide as reason for a new trial, or at the very least the re-opening of the case. Such has not been the situation; therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the next event will be a scheduling of the execution, barring any unforeseen circumstance.

The best evidence we have at our disposal for examination are the statements made by the Routiers and trial transcripts. Although not an exact science, since it is open to question, linguistic/statement analysis and common sense should help to decipher the truth of the events that took place that early morning. Using these analyses and comparing them to the crime scene as well as to the “blood map” and other pieces of evidence, one may come to a reasonable conclusion of what happened. For the record, I am convinced that Darlie Routier was rightfully convicted for this crime. I was neutral for some time, but once a friend and I performed the analyses that will be outlined in forthcoming articles, my opinion changed.

Darlie's Statement of June 8, 1996

Although many verbal statements gave varying accounts of what Darlie said happened, starting with her written statement, she locked in for all time her "official" version of the events of June 6, 1996.

Application of linguistic/statement analysis and common sense allows someone to discover an individual's language use, verbal tics, slips in verb tense, and operates much the same as speech analysis (an imperfect science). By careful reading of the transcript of this statement, one finds discrepancies with other transcripts that need resolution. Such resolution leads to a conclusion that supports her murder conviction.

Darin's Statement of June 8, 1996

As with Darlie's written statement to police, Darin's written statement also locked him into a specific account of the events of two mornings prior. Once committed, he had to stand by his account or admit to filing a false police statement, which could have had serious repercussions. Similarly, linguistic/statement analysis allows comparison with other transcripts to determine where discrepancies and possible deceptions occur. It is interesting to note that many supporters of Darlie Routier tend to point out all the “lies”, “deceptions”, and “mistakes” in Darin’s statement and testimony, but vehemently deny that Darlie lied (she was confused), deceived (she was really confused), or mistaken (she was drugged and therefore totally confused). It is sad the lengths people will go to in order to try to sway others to their positions, however tenuous those positions are.

Jury Trial Transcripts Examinations

Since most of the pre-trial transcripts concern motions, voir dire, and the like, those do not need to be examined as greatly as the trial transcripts, where one finds testimony pertaining to the events prior to, and after, the murders and wounding of Ms. Routier. The pertinent information from each will be presented and then examined considering the Routier’s statements and testimony.

Where conflicts arise, and there are undoubtedly many them, it will be necessary to turn to crime scene photographs and physical evidence to determine which is the correct and truthful position. For this, one must consider the laws of physics, forensics, and human nature. Taken together, these help the investigator come to the proper conclusion.

Comments are welcome, but are moderated by the author. Any that resort to off-topic remarks; that try to steer people toward other articles not specifically mentioned by the author; promote pro-Darlie Routier websites; or foster racist, hateful, or libelous attitudes will be deleted without being published. This is not the forum for such activity. If you cannot respect such conditions, you will be banned from this series. Consider yourself forewarned, I have no respect for such shenanigans, nor for the individuals who foster them.

Next up: Darlie Lynn Peck Routier’s June 8, 1996 Statement Analyzed

Comments

Submit a Comment

No comments yet.

working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)