ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • Environment & Green Issues

Explaining the Climate Change Hoax (and why the Paris Accords was a faux)

Updated on June 25, 2017

Many 'Climate Change Advocates' have their hearts in the right places, for mostly the right reasons, but they are being misled by their government, and particular institutions which are determined to find new ways to tax and control us.

The Paris Accords and other efforts being proposed by global warming advocates would ultimately cost hundreds of billions of dollars in additional taxes, regulations, and restrictions. Most of the proposed “solutions” are based upon massive government bureaucratic programs that will ultimately reduce personal freedoms and impose additional costs upon the citizens of all nations, especially those who can least afford it.

Could this be considered another form of globalism, control at the expense of nationalistic independence and individual rights? Perhaps.

If these Accords and Regulations were to target the real problems... Methane gas created by the meat industry, plastic rising to toxic levels in the oceans and becoming invasive in all our food sources emanating from the oceans, chemical toxicity in our sources of drinking water becoming an epic catastrophe in the making... I would be backing them 100%, but instead their focus is on 'carbon footprints' and 'taxing' those they say are responsible for it.

There is a better approach to addressing the matter of 'global climate change' rather than the campaign of mass hysteria being promoted by the mainstream media, much of academia, and many of the special interest groups that stand to profit from their “doom and gloom” pandemonium. The best solutions for preserving our environment will come from private enterprise that truly drives innovation, new technology, and truth in education, rather than indoctrination and efforts to squash all individualism in an effort to create a global collectivism.


Climate change occurs, no doubt, the earth has a pretty consistent history of it that can be traced back, that has to do with all sorts of things from the Earth's rotation to its tilt to shifts in the continents to what life forms are predominant in the oceans, etc. etc. but there are plenty who realize that once you look at all the facts, its pretty clear mankind has had, and is having far less impact than 'climate change fanatics' would like to believe.

Carbon has been MUCH higher in the atmosphere as recently as 11,000+ years ago, which also coincides with when we believe we had great melting incidents of glaciers, and ocean levels rose some 30+ feet.

Below is a link to a must read 'article' that discusses the global 'flood' that occurred some 11,000+/- years ago for those who are interested in such information:

http://grahamhancock.com/jayem1/

And here is a video that discusses the event (not related to the article above):

Its a great video full of facts, except I don't agree with his meteor theory, when you collect evidence of carbon dioxide levels found in the air during that time, or consider the volcanic hotbed that the entire region known as 'Yellowstone Park' is known for, there are a variety of things which could have had an incalculable effect on the Northern American continent (and any glaciers there), there is reason enough to believe there could be plenty of other explanations for what clearly was a flood of such enormous magnitude that it carved its way through half the continent leaving evidence as shown above, and such as the Grand Canyon.

Perhaps what caused it was man, it is somewhat of a 'secret' still, but there is overwhelming proof that human civilization had reached a level of achievement (and perhaps population levels as well) that could be compared to our own some 12,000 years ago. Was Mankind numerous enough then, did its civilization help to create that catastrophic event, known today in references around the world as the 'great flood'?

That is being debated by those more interested in historical accuracies than myself. But that seems to give a lot of credit to mankind, to say he nearly destroyed himself and did destroy his civilization as it was some 12,000 years ago, and is doing it all over again today.

Personally I believe a bigger threat to the world right now is cows, and the meat industry, more than man's carbon footprint. This according to plenty of studies which can be found in various articles, videos, etc.. as can be seen here in this short (5 min) video:

Of course we are the ones raising cows and slaughtering them in horrific rates and inhumane conditions, which causes the problem, if we all ate more salads and less cows, we would not only be healthier, we would be helping cure 'global warming'.


This next video lumps many of the issues together, methane being their biggest concern, this is a Princeton production no less. It points out clearly (IMO) that the biggest threat to our futures is the increasing production of methane levels in our atmosphere (hello meat industry!) and the threat of the frozen methane pockets under the oceans escaping into the atmosphere.


OK, I've given some food for thought, what do you think on the matter?

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • fpherj48 profile image

      Paula 3 weeks ago from Beautiful Upstate New York

      Ken...wonderful article and thank you for the excellent education. I need to KNOW a lot of this info since I have not spent time looking into all of this particular "Hullabaloo" on my own. I tend to pay more attention and do more research on several other issues facing our country for which I have major concern.

      At this point in time, frankly, I'm avoiding a lot. Too much is too much! I needed a break~as so many people I know have recently come up for air.

      Have never seen the likes of what Americans are saying, doing and instigating during these turbulent times. I almost can't ( or rather, don't dare) discuss much with anyone. Never know when someone will lash out, bite your head off or you know, overturn your vehicle and light it on fire..........the American terrorists. Good grief.

      Great article once again, Ken. Peace, Paula

    • Electro-Denizen profile image

      Charles 3 weeks ago from Wales, UK

      I agree that the mass rearing and slaughter of cattle, is one of the main problems facing us. It's even more disturbing when one realizes that there's no point to it whatsoever, apart to feed people's social habits. On the other hand, I have to disagree that global warming is a hoax. There are so many varieties of the hoax mentality, which always reminds me that our realities are entirely based on the people we know and what we read. There is the illuminati/control one (which perhaps you touch on in this article); there is the Russia v. USA one (creating the global warming hoax to damage US industry) and other less significant ones. But the fact is, is that if it was a hoax, thousands of scientists worldwide who don't even know each other, across decades, would have somehow to agree to present 'false' information, which is not possible. I've been reading widely on this issue for a while, and your figure off CO2 being much higher 11,000 years ago... not sure which ice core samples that data came from! So my view is that while it's true climate change has happened before, the acceleration created by human activity, is unprecedented. And while it's true that some people do stand to gain by introducing carbon emission taxes, this short term gain is rather pointless. Looking at the dying off rates, daily, of small creatures we don't even think about in our daily lives, we're already within the 6th great extinction. Only from that perspective do I think trying to stop global change is a sham. From that perspective, lunatic Trump's 'party on' mentality does make sense, even if it's a Titanic 'this ship can't sink' one! Anyway, interesting article.

    • Angel Guzman profile image

      Angel Guzman 3 weeks ago from Joliet, Illinois

      Climate change is happening now all around us. I feel there is hope to lessen the blow but I'm very concerned about our food supply becoming nonexistent.

    • Ken Burgess profile image
      Author

      Ken Burgess 3 weeks ago from Florida

      @Electro-Denizen 

      But notice I wrote that they are not focusing on the real problems or the real issues. Just like politicians in D.C. don't focus on finding real solutions. Why... because they are in the pockets of those trillion dollar corporations and conglomerations.

      Why won't we focus on beef, and meet in general, limiting it in our diets?

      It would be healthy for us to do so. It would lead to a better environment, more plants less animals, etc.

      But we will never get there because of the industry built up around it, the restaurants, the lobbyists, etc.

      Same for this effort on Climate change... politics... power... control, that is what it is really about, wrapped up in a 'cause' people can get behind.

      Take our fight against coal in America... yep, were burning a lot less coal... do you know where it is going now?

      China, they are the ones burning it instead of us. But it is still one world, still one atmosphere, still pollution that makes its way all the way back to America. So we did nothing but make our own energy costs go up, while shipping our resources over to China.

      And that was all planned out, well over a decade ago. You didn't know that. You weren't told that. But that was decided upon years before it began.

      You have been lied to about so much, for so long... or kept in the dark for so long. Forget conspiracy theory... the tin foil hat types keep being proven right time and again, people just don't want to accept it. Because if they do, they have to accept the fact that their leaders don't care about them, are working against their best interests, and are lying to them 24x7 and that makes for a tough reality for most to live in or accept.

    Click to Rate This Article