ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Fracking- Good, Bad, or In-Between?

Updated on August 3, 2016

Hydraulic fracturing – AKA “fracking” – is a practice where pressurized liquid is used to fracture solid rock, providing easier access to hydrocarbon fuel sources such as natural gas and natural gas and oil. However, fracking has proven quite controversial in many circles, with many people citing studies that claim the technique poses threats to the environment and residents living local to any such activity. Of course, the reverse is also true, with proponents of fracking stating that it is perfectly safe. But which side is right? Let’s take a closer look at the act of fracking, and what some prominent people are saying about it.

The BBC examines fracking and the opposing views playing a vicious tug-of-war over it, but first and foremost, they discuss exactly what the process entails and the benefits it has offered the general public and industry, and we will examine that aspect first before getting into the potential negative ramifications of its practice.

“Fracking is the process of drilling down into the earth before a high-pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the gas inside. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which allows the gas to flow out to the head of the well,” they said. “In the US it has significantly boosted domestic oil production and driven down gas prices. It is estimated to have offered gas security to the US and Canada for about 100 years, and has presented an opportunity to generate electricity at half the CO2 emissions of coal.”

State Impact, while admitting that potentially hazardous waste can be produced via fracking, noted that it can be safely and effectively treated and/or disposed of if handled properly and in a timely manner, minimizing any rick to the surrounding environment or populace.

“Wastewater from the process returns to the surface contaminated with some of those chemicals, as well as buried salts and naturally occurring radioactive material,” they said. “That wastewater needs to be treated, or buried deep in the earth using underground injection wells.”

So, fracking has diminished the United States’ reliance on foreign sources of fuel and subsequently lowered gas prices, and has provided a more environmentally sound alternative to coal in terms of electricity production. That’s good. However, opponents of fracking have sounded off about multiple environmental concerns as well, and that’s something that we will now address, citing the BBC once again.

“Fracking uses huge amounts of water, which must be transported to the fracking site, at significant environmental cost,” they said. “Environmentalists say potentially carcinogenic chemicals used may escape and contaminate groundwater around the fracking site. The industry suggests pollution incidents are the results of bad practice, rather than an inherently risky technique. There are also worries that the fracking process can cause small earth tremors. Campaigners say that fracking is simply distracting energy firms and governments from investing in renewable sources of energy, and encouraging continued reliance on fossil fuels.”

Environmental blog Yellow Pages Goes Green also is critical of fracking, especially when it comes to the assertion that the process leaves behind potentially harmful waste products within the earth after fracking is complete…waste products the nature of which many people are not completely aware of, due to a perceived lack of transparency on the part of natural gas and oil companies.

“Only about half of the poisonous chemical concoction that was pumped into the shale also returns to the surface when the fracking process is completed. Flowback is generally contained in steel tanks and eventually “stored” in deep oil and gas wells. The rest of the fracking fluid remains in the earth to wreak untold havoc,” they said. “The fracking fluid injected into the earth contains numerous toxic chemical contaminants that the natural gas industry feels no obligation to disclose because they consider the contents of their fracking fluids to be proprietary trade secrets.”

With the 2016 Presidential race heating up to be the most competitive – and controversial – in United States history, it’s only right to include the opinions of the two candidates – Republican nominee Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton – on the hot button topic of fracking. Proving that he is not a Republican in the strictest sense and ever the businessman first and foremost, Trump appears to have no inherent issues with fracking, as stated in a recent interview with 9NEWS, where he stated that regulation of the practice should be on a local, not national, level.

“Well, I’m in favor of fracking, but I think that voters should have a big say in it. I mean, there are some areas maybe that don’t want to have fracking,” he said. "“If a municipality or a state wants to ban fracking, I can understand that, but banning it is short-sighted, would financially hurt those who can least afford it, and would be detrimental to our national security.”

Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, according to Politifact, has been a much more open and active supporter of fracking, but also has voiced her support of strong regulation and strict environmental controls being in place governing the practice.

“Clinton clearly supported the practice as secretary of state. Her special envoy for international energy affairs launched the Global Shale Gas Initiative encouraging other countries to explore shale as an energy source,” they said. “After Clinton left the State Department in 2013, she continued to support fracking but repeatedly called for ‘smart regulations’ in speeches. Essentially, she supports it as long as there’s environmental oversight and no local opposition.”

As you can see, there are many, many, MANY viewpoints on fracking, both positive and negative, and unlike many hot modern topics where the answer is really plain as day, in this instance fracking produces as many questions as is does answers- possibly more. All we can do is research and make the best choice for us and the planet…after all, it’s the only one we’ve got!

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Chris Boylan profile imageAUTHOR

      Chris Boyle 

      2 years ago from New York, NY

      Thanks for the comments/share. As for our two Presidential candidates, we as a nation have never had a worse choice then the one we have with Clinton/Trump. As someone who doesn't fit in on the far Right or Left (I tend to agree/disagree with positions on both sides), I don't know who is the worse choice. I'm really bummed either way, honestly.

    • lions44 profile image

      CJ Kelly 

      2 years ago from Auburn, WA

      Good summary of the issue. Sharing.

      Even though I can't stand the guy, I agree with Trump on this one: the issue should be decided locally (unless neighboring regions might be impacted negatively). We must do everything we can to foster complete energy independence, while still encouraging funds to be put aside to alternative energy research.

      As for Clinton's stance on the issue: follow the $$. I'm sure a lot of energy companies donated a lot to the Clinton Foundation and campaign.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)