ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • North America Political & Social Issues

The Great Lie of the Last Century: George W. Bush and the "Search" for Weapons of Mass Destruction

Updated on June 5, 2015

What President George W. Bush Would Have Us Believe

The then President of Iran, Saddam Hussein, was linked to the terrorist group, Al-Qaeda. Hussein was a cruel dictator who used weapons of mass destruction against his enemies and his own people in order to maintain his rule. When the horrific events of September 11, 2001 befell the United States, the Hussein/al-Qaeda linkage was to blame, so the U.S. had to act in order to search for and seize the weapons of mass destruction, oust the dictator, rescue the people of the Middle East, and make the whole world safer by weakening Al-Qaeda and terrorism overall.

What Researchers and Conspiracy Theorists Alike Believe

Former United States President George W. Bush knew Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, because the U.S. government helped him gain access to them over the many years they publicly supported him. The U.S. government then looked the other way when he utilized those weapons in the Iraq-Iran war, against the Kurds and against his own people.

The events of September 11th was used as a smoke screen to get Americans, and the rest of the world, to band together against Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein…some even say the entire event might have been cleverly orchestrated to do just that. The plan worked, and the U.S. did indeed invaded Iraq and oust its dictator. However, the real reason for the invasion of Iraq was oil...pure and simple.

No one ever accused George W. Bush of being the brightest crayon in the box, and so it follows, and evidence suggests, the master planner behind the entire web of lies was President Bush’s father, another former U.S. President, George Herbert Walker Bush.

Back in the day, George H.W. Bush (father) saw no problem with building much of his fortune by helping the Nazis and their supporters, so there is no limit to what he might have done to get whatever he wanted. George W. Bush (son) was merely a puppet.

Check out this fact-based timeline and decide what you believe for yourself:

Buchenwald concentration camp. Buchenwald, Germany, April 23, 1945.
Buchenwald concentration camp. Buchenwald, Germany, April 23, 1945.

Fact-Based Timeline Reveals an Ulterior Motive

1942: The U.S. Congress seized the Bush family banking assets by enforcing the Trading with the Enemy Act. Prescott Sheldon Bush and his son, George Herbert Walker Bush made their massive fortunes by supplying the Nazis and other Axis nations with money, steel, ships, munitions, and synthetic gas.

1953: George Herbert Walker Bush, a Yale graduate and Skull and Bones fraternity member, becomes an owner of Zapata Oil (Now the HRG Group), which controls a large fleet of oil tankers off the Kuwaiti Coast.

1968: George Herbert Walker Bush, now a Texas Air National Guardsman, which conveniently exempts him from serving duty in Vietnam – becomes friends with Jim Bath, a former air force pilot.

1976: President Gerald ford names George Herbert Walker Bush director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), where he works to create build positive relations with the Saudi royal family, and he makes some CIA assets private.

Bush recruited his friend, Jim Bath, into the CIA. Bath enters into a trust agreement with Salem bin Laden, Osama’s older brother. This allows Jim Bath to act as the U.S. financial representative to the bin Laden family. In addition, Bath also represented Khalid bin Mahfouz, an owner of the National Commercial Bank, the trusted bank of the Saudi royal family.

1978: George H.W. Bush founds a Texas oil company he called Arbusto 78. Jim Bath invests more than $1 million dollars of bin Laden and bin Mahfouz’s money.

1987: Arbusto 78 fails, but is absorbed by Harken Energy. Harken Energy receives $25 million stock offer, underwritten by Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) – a Middle Eastern owned bank.

1989: George Herbert Walker Bush succeeds Ronald Reagan as the 41st President of the United States of America. One of his first orders was a top secret directive to foster closer ties with Iraq and provide $1 billion in aid to Saddam Hussein. This support of Iraq was continued from the days of Ronald Reagan, it is common knowledge that the United States government regularly and publicly supported Iraq and her president.

1990: Harken Energy is granted exclusive offshore drilling births by Bahrain. George H.W. Bush sells most of his Harken stock for nearly a million dollars, but somehow delays fling the necessary Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) report until a year later. One week after Bush’s profitable sell, Harken stock took a 60% nose dive.

In August of 1991, Saddam Hussein invades Kuwait and the United States government offered Hussein every indication the U.S. did not care about quarrel, nor would the U.S. interfere – neutrality was the official U.S. government response to the battle over oil drilling rights between Iraq and Kuwait. However, after the invasion, George Herbert Walker Bush suddenly declared the whole world would suffer if the oil reserves of the world fell into the hands of Saddam Hussein.

1991: The Gulf War began (Operation Desert Shield), its combat phase (Operation Desert Storm) was waged by coalition forces from 34 nations, with the United States leading the charge against Iraq in response to Iraq’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait – the same United States that claimed “neutrality” about Iraqi/Kuwaiti affairs.

George H.W. Bush publicly compared Saddam Hussein to Adolf Hitler, and Hussein eventually agrees to destroy his weapons of mass destruction. At the same time, former aide to the White House chief of staff, John Sununu leaves the Bush administration to go work for the Middle Eastern owned Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI).

George H.W. Bush spends three nights in a hotel in Houston in order to claim residency in Texas

1992: President George H.W. Bush loses the presidential election to William Jefferson (Bill) Clinton, he goes on to become an adviser to the Carlyle Group, yet another group with ties to the bin Laden family.

BCCI is finally exposed as a criminal enterprise with ties to Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega, the Medellin drug cartel, and many other terrorist leaders.

1994: George W. Bush is elected Governor of Texas

2000: The people of the United States Spoke and Democrat Al Gore receives more popular votes than George W. Bush in the 2000 Presidential Election. However, the United States Supreme Court declares George W. Bush the winner despite public outcry. Coincidentally, voting irregularities ensued in the state of Florida, where George W. Bush’s brother, Jeb Ellis Bush was governor.

2001: On September 11, while a-Qaeda planes slammed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, George Herbert Walker Bush is having a Carlyle Group business meeting with Shafig bin Laden at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington. Shafiq bin Laden is half-brother to Osama bin Laden.

2002: George W. Bush makes his infamous “Axis of Evil” speech, where he denounces Iraq, Iran and North Korea…interestingly enough, all three countries are exceedingly rich with oil.

George W. Bush Axis of Evil Speech

On January 31, 2002 Mohamed ElBaradei and the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency delivers a report that states they have concluded an extensive investigation, and there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

In March of 2002, the Bush Administration forges on stirring the waters about the possibility of engaging Iraq. U.S. National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice met with Brittan’s Chief Foreign Policy Adviser, David Manning, where the U.K. gave its support for an Iraqi regime change.

In April 2002, British Prime Minister Tony Blair met with President George W. Bush in Texas, where the United Kingdom gives its official, but conditional support to the United States for military force to remove Saddam Hussein from office.

In late May and early June of 2002, U.S. and British forces begin air strikes and air raids in Iraq

Former United Nations Inspector Scott Ritter goes on a personal media campaign to alert the U.S. Government and all Americans that Iraq does not possess weapons of mass destruction.

Expert nuclear weapons analyst, Hans Blix, insists there are no weapons of mass destruction to be found in Iraq, and he requests another inspection to prove his findings.

In August 2002, U.S. forces deliver heavy armor into the region and began increasing air strikes

In September 2002, the New York Times reports the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has found absolutely zero evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and surprisingly enough, they also have no evidence Iraq has any ties at all to al-Qaeda.

2003: George W. Bush authorized the invasion of Iraq – despite multiple pieces of intelligence to disprove his stated reasons for invading Iraq

2005: British reporter, Michael Smith, drops a bomb about the deception of the Bush Administration, and how the United States and United Kingdom used military force against Iraq more than a full year before it declared war (Downing Street Leaks).

British writer, Richard Norton Taylor reports that just before the invasion of Iraq, Bush told Blair he planned to further target Saudi Arabia, Iran and North Korea. According to international lawyer Philippe Sands, a memo was drawn up by one of Tony Blair’s foreign policy advisers in Downing Street after a phone conversation between Bush and Blair (Downing Street Leaks)

Norm Chomsky, profession of linguistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) stated, “If the United States can maintain its control over Iraq, with the world’s second largest known oil reserves, that will enhance significantly its strategic power and influence over its major rivals in the tripolar world that has been taking shape for the past 30 years: U.S. dominated North America, Europe, and Northeast Asia, linked to South and Southeast Asia economies."

Bush and his supporters cite “faulty intelligence” for leading them to the invasion of Iraq – all of the true intelligence pointed them to the fact that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq – time and time again.

Political researchers and conspiracy theorists alike believe the U.S. government, under the Bush administration simply refused to look at the real intelligence, because they were never seeking weapons of mass destruction in the first place. The war was also not about removing an evil dictator from office, nor was it about some trumped up “war on terrorism.”

George W. Bush was simply worried that the world’s largest oil reserves would fall into the hands of anti-American militant Islamists, so he followed a path that his father, George Herbert Walker Bush, laid the groundwork for years ago.

In June of 2005, President George W. Bush assured Americans that the invasion of Iraq was the right thing to do with respect to the “global war against terror.”

Today, researchers attest to the fact that the invasion of Iraq only served to increase the threat of terror. Now, terrorist from all over the Muslim world have realized that in engaging occupation forces in Iraq, they have discovered a perfect training ground methods of terror.

As I write this article in mid-2015, many Americans view George W. Bush as a liar who led us into an unnecessary war, many other Americans still support George W. Bush, and sadly enough, the vast majority of Americans lack the information or desire to connect the dots, because they are mostly just trying to make it each day.

The world is currently rife with hints, whisperings, and reports of human rights violations and weapons of mass destruction in North Korea, and Jeb Ellis Bush has been mentioned in the media as a possible candidate for the 2016 election…

One more thing, did I mention that no weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq?

The Master Architect: President George H.W. Bush

What Do You Think?

Do You Believe President George W. Bush Was After WMDs or Oil?

See results


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Sanxuary 11 months ago

      Weapons of mass destruction was a great lie and I am certain we only need to ask one person before he dies. I am quite certain he was lied to but I am sure his family was also put in jeopardy. I think his name was Collin Powell. if he had taken the VP position he would have been the first black President but they killed him when they forced him to lie to the World. If he became the first black president the Republicans would have hated themselves like the racist they are. Its to bad the racist have not discovered how much this party hates them to. These whores will do anything for money and a vote. You our years past anyone caring about the truth of Gulf War II. All the crimes of the past our forgotten once the next bunch of criminals are elected. We are burdened after the Russians made Trump rich and bought him the Presidency and they are still waiting to be paid back. They give the media hell but it sure would be nice if they were as simple as me and said the obvious. Until we destroy greed and evil we are wasting our time caring but lets just say what we really think and fight to say it until we really get enough people angry to do something about it.

    • jeff61b profile image

      jeff61b 2 years ago

      I think it has been well established that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. President Bush admitted this himself shortly after the overthrow of Saddam.

      It has also been thoroughly proven that President Bush had a lot of evidence from the CIA saying that Iraq did not, in fact, have an active program to develop nuclear weapons.

      The Iraq WMD program had been stopped by UN weapons inspectors after the first Gulf war. The Bush administration had ample evidence that Iraq had no WMD program but they cherry-picked the evidence and did not share all of that information with Congress.

      The Bush administration made it clear they wanted to go to war with Iraq long before 9/11 ever happened. They were consulting with oil company executives about who gets which oil field long before the war ever started.

      All the thousands of Americans who died in the Iraq war did not die fighting for freedom or democracy. They died fighting for oil.

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      I used to be a liberal. The difference between you and me is that I am willing to change my mind. I have opinions but I do not identify as a liberal or anything else so that my identity is not tied up in what I believe.

      I don't think that I have everything all figured out and I'm willing to have an open mind about things. If you think you have it all figured out then you have too much vested in what you believe to change your mind.

      Anyway toodle loo and best wishes.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Boy, liberals can't win anywhere can they?

      And I'm getting off this merry-go-round.


    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      It must be terrible to be the victim of liberal propaganda, wanting desperately to believe their lies because they guilt you with psychological warfare. It is terrible because even though you are determined to cling to the lies you cannot justify your beliefs with evidence using reason, logic and facts.

      White South Africans were victims of the same lies and propaganda and their believing it led to White genocide by double digit IQ savages.

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      If everyone is equal why do White people always have to feed the babies of black people and provide all the other races with opportunity that they cannot provide for themselves?

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      I did. We are all born human. Equal. Now you prove how one baby is better than another.

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      You are free to claim that all races are equal but you are obligated to show some evidence.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Wrong. We are all equally free to be a$$holes.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      wellll, I could take a guess......Israel just cut off Gaza's electricity.....maybe they're active in Africa, too.

      Maybe Israel is a rogue state that needs to be brought to its knees.

      OMG! reportreportreportreportreportreport

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      Why is South Africa starting to look like the rest of Africa and they can't even keep the electricity going?

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA


    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      Ok start with intelligence. Are all races equally intelligent?

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Yes, and we experiment and cage them.

      We are all equally human. What else is there? Intelligence? Musical ability? Artistic ability?

      Everyone is born with some innate ability. But we are equally human.

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      Chimps eat, breathe, sleep, die, have children, have hopes and dreams.

      My question is, in what way are the races equal?

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      We all eat, breathe, sleep, die, have children, have hopes and dreams, want the best for ourselves and our children....on and on.

      I don't know when this backwards, idiotic system started......we all learned it coming out of the womb.

      But I sure don't believe it's the way things were meant to be for the Human Race, nor do I believe it was always this way.

      As John Trudell says: "This isn't civilization....or if it is, civilization isn't good for us"

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      In what way are races equal?

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      I think it's Sweden.....very dear to me!!

      But I don't think any race is superior. Nor gender. Nor religion!

      We are all born to this that, we are all equal.

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      You say White Supremacy is a fact. Yes it is. White people are superior to other races in most ways. That is why we are told that we must not acknowledge it but must pretend that we're all equal.

      Thanks for the link I'll listen to that and get back to you - it might take a little while today though, I do like Red Ice, it's out of Iceland isn't it?

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Cultural Marxism i/e Planet Rothschild

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      I've read this theory before.....but the thing is, white supremacy is a fact in America. And I don't see Muslims as a threat at all....nor Russia....nor Iran.

      I do agree that the nwo would like to destroy everything that makes us all unique.

      But white people won't be destroyed. Because we too have indigenous roots. And that is the key to beating them. Thats why they destroy all indigenous knowledge--keep it for themselves.

      We all have shaman roots, no matter what color.

      That can defeat the nwo...that, and pulling together to reject them.

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      Not just slavery it's everything about race that we are supposed to feel guilty for. Why do you think there are terms like "White Supremacy"? Why that particular term? White people are to be brought down and everything is geared to that. A jew invented the word "racist" and it was to be used against us. Of course we should feel guilty about absolutely nothing.

      The same people who control our media control South African media and waged psychological warfare against White ppl there just like they do in all our countries. The result is White genocide in South Africa and the same thing will result here. We can't control black violence because those in control of our government don't want it controlled and even stir it up.

      The enemy is international jewry and the White traitors who support a One World Government. Muslims are no threat to us as long as they are in the middle east. They become a threat when they are inside our country and they wouldn't be here if not for jews and their multi culturalism - for us - not for israel.

      It costs a fortune to leave a third world country and migrate to a Western one. There are jews and people like bill Gates who give these ppl money and resettle them in the West.

      They must destroy White ppl and our civilization in order to rule over us and rule the world.

      Either we allow other races to come into our country and then give in to all their demands or we're racist. That is a false choice.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Funny--I never felt guilty for slavery--just knew it was wrong. And we can't even mention socialism without being bombarded with paranoia, let alone communism. Cold war is dead. The enemy are Muslims and Mexicans now....keep up.

      The puppet-master is Fascism, not Communism.

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      "In the book A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century, published in 1913 by Israel Cohen of the Fabian Society (a follow-up to Zangwill's Melting Pot), he wrote:

      "We must realize that our Party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races, that for centuries have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party ... In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While enflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will instill in the Whites, a guilt complex for the exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions, and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negroes will be able to intermarry with the Whites, and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."

      On June 17, 1957, this passage was read into the Congressional Record by Rep. Thomas G. Abernathy.

    • profile image

      big e 2 years ago

      Black skin would protect Bush. Black skin is a shield.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      It's funny...I remember reading something that Oliver North said when he was in Reagan's adm..... He said "If we get too close Saudi Arabia, we are told to back off" (paraphrasing)

      And, of course, the UAE is where our criminals go to avoid prosecution: Eric Prince!

      That whole OPEC deal is what started this ball rolling. It's all that money and power and owning people and things......

      All that money in oil....all those riches to be had......and keep us stupid and fighting just to survive.

      It would be ingenious if it wasn't so demented.

      Kissing cousins. YEK

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      Did you watch the video I posted of muslims in Dearborn attacking Christians and the cop's reaction? The police always say that "they have their orders" and I always wonder from how high up those orders come. I wonder if our leaders sent in the military to attack us if we protest too much would those soldiers use their weapons against us. There is a concerted effort to make the military diverse. We are told it is too White and too male.

      We all remember the Holodomer so we at least know what to expect if we don't stop all of this diversity. The video shows what muslims are doing NOW. Just wait til we're a minority. South Africa is also what we can look forward to.

      I believe that 9-11 was indeed done by Mossad with the complicity of the United States government or ZOG. I take your point.

      But none of these things are done with the consent of the founding stock or Christians. We never consented to diversity and never knew that the 1965 Immigration Act was written or that our borders would be opened. There was never a debate or discussions about whether we wanted our nation to be diverse and hordes of foreigners to be able to come in. On the other hand, Islam is different from Christianity. We can predict what Muslims will do and it's on the video.

      The neo cons said they needed another Pearl Harbor to get us into the middle east wars because they knew we wouldn't consent to fighting zio wars. 9-11 was their Pearl Harbor. We fought the first world war so jews could get Palestine.

      Of course it is jews and the people that they put into power who are willing to sell out their own people and their own country who are doing this. jews always have front men willing to do their bidding.

      As I said previously, muslims are no threat to us in the middle east but they are a threat inside our countries. And they wouldn't be here if not for jews who are exhibit number one for why diversity is bad.

      As I said we are bombarded with propaganda from the jewish controlled media, jewish Hollywood, publishing etc. They indeed demonize muslims while they are bringing them into our country. They stir blacks to hate us. Roots was written by a jew. Murray Fisher. And its only purpose was to stir hatred against White people.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      I have to take your word for what you're saying....but I know one thing: that Boston bombing was not done by Muslims. Nor was 9/11. Nor the subway bombings, In My Opinion.

      I believe there is a concerted effort to demonize Muslims-by these Right Wing neo-cons.

      I think the bombings and 9/11 were done by CIA/Mossad.

      I think they are murdering Russians in Ukraine, as well.

      So, where you see Muslims as the problem, I see Judeo-Christians.

      Top -o-the Food Chain, religion probly doesn't come into it at all.

      Just the maniacal ecstasy of Power.

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      Uh, yes. We are inundated with lies and propaganda. We are told that diversity is our strength and that jews have a right to a state of their own but of course Palestinians and Germans don't and neither do White South Africans. Nazis are used as the boogy men but what's the difference between a Nazi and a zionist? At least Nazis were in their own state.

      I have followed the British National Party and Nick Griffin and I saw these things happen. I know of an elderly White widow whose husband was a veteran and she lived in a house where muslims were encroaching. They continually harassed her, tore down her front gate, cut off her power lines and her phone and cable. They knocked her down when she came out of her house, she was in her 90s. They did this because they wanted her out and for muslims to get her property.

      I watched this. I watched the efforts of the BNP to help her and the way that the police would do nothing. Just as the UN and the jew controlled media have become silent on South Africa now that they managed to end apartheid and Whites are victims of mass genocide.

      I read of an American from FL who was visiting London, came out of a pub one night and was walking back to his hotel with a beer bottle. A gang of muslims who patrol "their" area jumped on him and beat the crap out of him with the beer bottle telling him they don't allow drinking. When he got out of the hospital he never went back to his hotel but caught the first plane home.

      I have seen videos of English people protesting the actions of the muslims and the English police forcing them to move away from the muslim neighborhood just as Americans are forced to be PC and never offend non Whites or jews even tho if they don't like what we say they can always leave.

      The black mayor of Baltimore recently did a press conference where she said she was giving the looters and rioters room to burn and loot and destroy. Giving them their space. And the jew controlled media reported that it was only a peaceful protest.

      I know of the grooming of the English girls because I followed the story and watched the videos. One girl has never been found and it is suspected that she was cut up and served in the muslim restaurants in kabobs. The government found human heads in one restaurant and shut it down. This is what is being allowed into White nations. Just like we had a bed bug infestation and God only knows what diseases we are bringing in.

      muslims create no go zones. Watch this

    • KDLadage profile image

      K David Ladage 2 years ago from Cedar Rapids, IA

      Muslim no-go zones in Michigan? Uh, no. No they have not.

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      Muslims have already created no-go zones in Dearborn, Michigan. They are beginning to demand Sharia laws. They are determined to force Islam upon us once they get the power and numbers to do so. You shouldn't have to be told that Islam and the West are a clash of civilizations.

      You can also learn about what muslims are doing in Europe now that Barbara Lerner Specter and other jews are resettling them there. We fight wars in the middle east against "terrorists" but then they are re-labeled "refugees" and resettled in the United States and Europe. Crossing the border doesn't make them law abiding assimilated Westerners who no longer care about their culture, religion and way of life.

      In London, England they have "groomed" vulnerable English girls and passed them around to hundreds of Pakistani muslims. The government knows about this but has done nothing. You can follow BNP, the British National Party or Nick Griffin on social media and get a lesson in the dangers of muslims and the fact that our governments are helping make our nations diverse because in order to usher in the One World Order that the Bushes and Clintons have talked about they must first destroy Western civilization, that's us.

      The Boston bombing, the subway bombings in London are acts committed by muslims inside our countries. Several terrorists have been caught before they could commit their acts of violence against us in our own countries.

      Also in France muslims now determine the outcome of French elections and needless to say it is all about what muslims need and want and to heck with our culture, values and futures even though we pay for everything.

      Becoming a minority in our own countries means the end of civilization. If you have a third world population you will have a third world country. Demographics is everything.

      We already see hospitals shutting down because they cannot afford to stay open and serve third world people who cannot pay. We can't help the entire world and the one world government crowd knows it. They want the end of borders and for all the people of the world to mix and become one race.

      We don't have to fear that the Chinese will disappear as a race or the people of India, but White people need to fear this. White people created civilizations in India, Egypt and other places and eventually disappeared. We are the only people standing between freedom and Western civilization and the One World Government, aka, hell on Earth.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

      "millions of muslims who are a clear and present danger to us."

      I don't see it. How is this clear and present to you?

    • profile image

      Emily Jessie 2 years ago

      Rachelle have you ever heard of the neocons? The neocons are the ones who wanted us to go to war in the middle east. We certainly didn't need to go there in order to get oil. We could get all the oil we need from the Saudis but the fact is we get most of our oil from Canada and Mexico. We never had problems with getting oil. Arabs built Dubai and other cities with our petro dollars. They want to sell us oil.

      And why would we need to worry that a middle east country would attack us? We are the only military superpower in the world. Arab nations may not be friendly but they are not suicidal.

      Most of the neocons are jewish. They are also incredibly powerful and well connected. The neocons wanted us to "rearrange" the middle east so that israel would be the middle eastern hegemon with Arab nations as minor satellites revolving around it. We knew that if we attacked Iraq the country would blow apart in a civil war between different factions of muslims. That is exactly what happened and the violence and unrest spread to other middle east Arab nations with the help of the CIA and Mossad.

      The only threat muslims pose for us is when they are inside our countries. We always brought in immigrants from Western Europe who were like us and diligently kept Asians, Mexicans and other non White third world people out.

      Norbert Schiel, a jew in Johnson's White House, wrote the 1965 Immigration Act that resulted in the United States becoming diverse and currently having millions of muslims who are a clear and present danger to us.

      You can watch this video to see that international jewry is also busy making every other White nation diverse while using White people as cannon fodder for the interests of a state they claim they have a right to as a state for only jewish people.

      We already knew that Saddam had no WMD because his soldiers surrendered to our reporters in the desert during the first gulf war. The neo cons wanted us to go on to Baghdad at that time and destabilize Iraq by taking out Saddam but our leaders refused so they kept on until they started a second war and got their way.

    • profile image

      Howard Schneider 2 years ago from Parsippany, New Jersey

      Excellent Hub, Rachelle. The Bush Administration, led by the head criminal Dick Cheney, cherry picked facts an cowed the Pentagon and CIA into bending facts to his liking for war. It was one of the most despicable and destructive acts in our country's history. All for a faulty neo-conservative theory to create a new Middle East.

    • KDLadage profile image

      K David Ladage 2 years ago from Cedar Rapids, IA

      I got that... sure.

    • Rachelle Williams profile image

      Rachelle Williams 2 years ago from Tempe, AZ

      KDLadge & cathylynn99: If you read the entire hub, and it's a loooong one, so I can certainly understand if you didn't... you'll see the lie began way back in the 1970s, which was squarely in the 20th Century, that is the reason for the title.

    • cathylynn99 profile image

      cathylynn99 2 years ago from northeastern US

      the last cenutry could mean 1915 to 2015.

    • KDLadage profile image

      K David Ladage 2 years ago from Cedar Rapids, IA

      I love the article. It is the title -- and the title alone -- I take issue with. The lie took place after 9/11; 9/11 took place in 2001; thus, the lie took place after this century began. This was not the lie of the last century--this was the lie of this century.

    • cathylynn99 profile image

      cathylynn99 2 years ago from northeastern US

      neither out for WMD or oil. out to make billions for halliburton. war is a business, a bad business, but still a business.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Cape Wind Girl 2 years ago from Cape Cod, USA