ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • United States Politics

If there was influencing of the 2016 presidential election what about the 2018 interim election? Part 1

Updated on February 18, 2018

The 2016 presidential election influence couldn't have happened with out the dirty deeds of Hillary Clinton 2 time presidential loser!

2016 US Presidential Election Influencing.

Donald Trump mentioned during the 2016 presidential election the possibility of tampering. Then president Barack Obama not only said there was no possibility of the election being tampered, but made fun of Trump for even mentioning it.

There was however a clear case of tampering in the democrat primary, as evidenced by the WikiLeaks from the DNC emails. They clearly show that Hillary Clinton and the DNC successfully conspired to get Hillary Clinton's primary opponent out of the primary. Senator Bernie Sanders started off slow in the Democrat Primary race because of the Hillary Clinton Super Delegates that gave her an awesome lead. But as the primary campaigning went on, Sanders kept winning and the gap was closing as the convention neared. Yet, at the height of his campaign success Sanders drops out of the race.

There has not been an investigation of why Sanders left the primary, nor was there an investigation of the alleged DNC email leaks. The email that was leaked was never challenged to it authentication. And it was the contents of those emails that showed how Hillary Clinton, the DNC and even the Media was used to influenced the election. And the primary is part of the election because if you don't win the primary you can't win the presidency.

The Russian Trump Dossier

The next election influencing was the Hillary Clinton and DNC creation of the Russian Trump Collusion to influence the presidential election. The alleged DNC hacking of the email servers was the genesis of the existing investigations by the democrats on then president Elect Trump to now president Trump.

The sine quo non of the investigations on Trump and Russia hinge solely on the alleged DNC hacking. Yet, not a single US agency, intelligence or otherwise has ever been allowed to even get on the DNC servers, much less do a verification and investigation to prove or disprove the DNC allegation of hacking.

Then once the political singularity of the hacking was used a the basis of the investigation. Then step two was to put the DNC created bogus opposition paper on Donald Trump. Again, without checking the DNC servers, it was taken as a fact that there was hacking and that Trump was involved with Russia to influence the presidential election in his favor.

One can hardly give substance to this Hillary Clinton created report on Trump as a Dossier, because it was bogus, no one including any US agency actually verified it. Remember, when the big news was that all the US Intelligence agencies agreed on the Dossier. That influenced the voters because, it must be the truth, and Trump must be guilty.

But the truth was that this Dossier was never verified as being fact, and the document itself said as much. The document never claimed even to be accurate much less truthful.

And the powerful argument that ALL 16 US intelligence agencies agree on it was actually based on the fact that all of them used a copy of that dossier. And none of them did any investigation to prove its veracity.

The FBI took the dossier, and now we have prove what they did with it. They actually used it to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump and his associates. They knew that it was bogus, as many of the points in it were already debunked as not being true.

The FBI used one of its informants, Carter Page to get near the Trump team. And although Page even admitted that he never met Trump or ever communicated with him in any way. He was used on the first FISA warrant to spy on Trump and associates.

There was three ninety day extensions on that FISA warrant and they really had nothing to show for it. Yet, that warrant and its extensions lasted for the most part of the year.

Then president Obama using Susan Rice unmasked the people that were being spied upon.

You don't have to look at the Russians to see that president Obama spying on Hillary Clinton opponent is the definition of influencing the election.

After the Nunes memo came out to show the evidence of how the FISA warrant was based on the Dossier from the FBI minions of president Obama the left had to take the heat off.

They used Adam Schiff to write a democrat version to rebut the Nunes memo. They packed it with classified information knowing that president Trump wouldn't be able to release it.

Schiff was given time to redact the classified information from his memo, and resubmit it. That has happened yet.

After the Schiff distraction failed, they went to plan B. That plan is the Mueller indictment of 13 Russian Nationals for influencing the election. Interesting but the indictment itself doesn't name or involve any Americans, and that includes Trump. It also says that the Russian influence had no affect on the outcome of the election.

In the next part of this article

In the next part of this article, we will see that even though Trump won the presidency despite all of this influencing from Hillary, and president Obama that it continues the influencing into the 2018 election.

Yes, it does!


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.