ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Interpreting the Constitution, is it necessary?

Updated on September 9, 2013

The Constitution is the framework of our society and over the years it has become a part of lawsuits by individuals and organizations who seek to impose what they believe are the requirements identified within. Interpreting documents is a fabric of society but with regards to our Constitution the question is whether that is necessary. The answer is a yes and a no. The simple fact is that as in the first sentence there are always going to be those who feel they understand the Constitution as it applies to their circumstances and it sometimes takes a court case to set the record straight.

Whether statements by individuals are interpretations or they are just accepting the words written in the Constitution is a matter of opinion in some respects. Laws are written associated with the language of the Constitution or they should be. They are basically an effort by those who write them an interpretation of the requirements/rights identified under the Constitution. This statement may not agree with legislative efforts but they are in fact interpretations. Some laws however show a direct correlation to the responsibilities of Congress as identified in the Constitution. One example is immigration and citizenship requirements. This responsibility is clearly is part of the authority granted to Congress. Even when there is a direct correlation to congressional responsibilities legislation must be defined with regards to the language necessary to address specific responsibilities.

The definition of interpret as provided by dictionary.com is provided below:


  1. To give or provide the meaning of; explain
  2. To construe or understand in a particular way
  3. To bring out the meaning of by performance or execution
  4. To perform or render according to one’s own understanding or sensitivity


The definition provided above is broad in scope so much so that the act of interpreting any document let alone the Constitution can cause problems. When individuals get together in an office environment what they perceive from language may be clear to one person but vague to another. This is what is occurring in Congress and across the country in state legislatures. Many laws are on the books and if they are not specific as to the requirements according to the applicable Constitution they must be interpreted.

Congress is not the only organization who interprets the meaning of any topic embedded in the Constitution. Today many businesses must have lawyers or sometimes constitutional lawyers to understand the language of legislation as it relates to constitutional documents. Lawyers make a good living providing such service but again interpreting a Constitution should only be necessary when an individual or groups of individuals have a disagreement which must be settled in court.

Our Constitution and the Constitution of states have language which has been changed through a vote of the people. Courts have had to make difficult decisions involving constitutional battles and many are controversial in nature. What have we become as a country where the language of any Constitution must be interpreted rather than taking the words as the requirement. While interpretation may be required in some cases we should in most cases accept the language as it is written. What would our country be like if we accepted the language in a Constitution rather than requiring an interpretation. Constitutional language is not rocket science. If there is a need for interpretation of any document, especially a Constitution our country would be a totally different place with reduced lawsuits and fewer cases within our judicial system. It would free up court time and reduce the cost of a major segment (government) of our society. When cases are backlogged as they are today it costs money. Eliminating or at least reducing the need for interpretation reduces government costs but the cost incurred by individuals and organizations in fighting for their interpretation. It would have a positive effect on business costs throughout the country.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      mbuggieh 

      4 years ago

      Yes...we are, I suspect, in total agreement...:)

    • profile image

      Brenda Durham 

      4 years ago

      Wow. Very cool that we agree on that.

    • profile image

      mbuggieh 

      4 years ago

      Believe it or not, I agree with you on this one specific example. There is no constitutional "right" to take a life just because that life is inconvenient.

    • profile image

      Brenda Durham 

      4 years ago

      mbuggieh, I will give you one very stark example of where the Constitution is twisted and embellished by Supreme Court Justices with a personal agenda-------Roe v. Wade.

      Read Norma McCorvey's books (Norma is the "Roe" of Roe v. Wade. She wrote "I Am Roe", and "Won By Love". Read them both. The first one will read like the confused young girl she was, and her journey and the manipulation that she came under by lawyers who wanted to make a name for themselves but didn't care what baby got killed by doing so. The second will tell you the rest of her journey and how she grew into wisdom and saw the horror of what the liberal movement perpetuated.

    • profile image

      mbuggieh 

      4 years ago

      Give me one---just one, real example of this: "The Constitution is the framework of our society and over the years it has become a part of lawsuits by individuals and organizations who seek to impose what they believe are the requirements identified within."

      Dictionary definitions when dealing with complex legal matters such as judicial review are irrelevant. The Supreme Court is not there to "interpret" the laws as a translator would "interpret"---which is what your dictionary definition refers to, but to review and judge the CONSTITUTIONALITY of laws passed by Congress---even those passed by Congress on matters over which Congress has constitutional authority.

    • profile image

      mbuggieh 

      4 years ago

      Any factual evidence of your claims that the Constitution is "twisted" and "embellished" by Supreme Court justices with a "personal agenda"?

      I am sure, of course, Brenda, that this excludes justices with a right-wing personal agenda and applies only to those who you perceive as left-of-center.

    • Dennis AuBuchon profile imageAUTHOR

      Dennis AuBuchon 

      4 years ago

      Brenda,

      Thanks for contributing your comments to my hub. It is much appreciated.

    • profile image

      Brenda Durham 

      4 years ago

      No kidding!

      One part of the problem is that people don't use common sense when they interpret the Constitution. And patriotic sense, since it IS the Constitution for American citizens.

      Another part is that they twist it and embellish upon its words in order to change it to suit their personal agenda. Sadly, even the Supreme Court does this, and they've been doing it for years.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)