ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • Politics & Political Science

Is Media Censorship a Necessary Evil?

Updated on September 3, 2015

Media Censorship

Are the youth of today learning negativity, bad language, and how to treat each other unfairly from the television programs they watch? It’s troubling to walk in a room while children are watching a network, such as The Disney Channel, and hear characters telling each other to shut up or calling each other stupid. Do we live in a day and age where children who are watching family friendly programming need to be closely monitored during commercial breaks? All children have to do now a days is turn on the television for 45 minutes to learn about the birds and the bees, how to treat people terribly, and how to swear like a sailor. Television regulations and lack of censorship are contributing to a culture of mean, desensitized children.

There is value in media censorship as media in our society is such an influential source of information and while in many cases censorship is necessary, there are counter-arguments to support that censorship may go too far and violate Rights to Free Speech. In section 4.14 of the e-Learning material, the importance of a counter-argument is addressed. The need to consider opposing viewpoints helps to formulate a well rounded perspective on an issue and helps to make informed decisions.

You must know that I consider myself an easy going parent of three young children ages 10, 9, & 5. I am a firm believer in picking my battles over issues that have little significance in the big picture but there is one area that I put my foot down and that is being kind to others. I have shown my children from an early age how to treat people with respect, how to use kind words, and that being mean to others is unacceptable but as soon as you turn on the tv to let the children watch a family friendly program, all that hard work goes right out the door. It amazes me that the content that is now allowed on the air has people wondering why we live in a nation where bullying and treating others disrespectfully is so prevalent in our society, “A new study finds that "social bullying" isn't just a real-life phenomenon. It's also common in the TV shows popular among kids aged 2 to 11. The researchers said 92 percent of 150 episodes reviewed featured some form of "social aggression" -- on average about 14 incidents per hour”. (Dotinga 2012) As a child, I remember watching shows like The Brady Bunch and Little House on the Prairie where the content didn’t contain illicit behaviors or vulgar language. Somewhere along the line between Little House on the Prairie and Hannah Montana, the definition of indecent material has taken a left turn. According to the FCC, “The Commission has defined broadcast indecency as language or material that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory organs or activities.” (FCC) I feel our standards have lowered and the need for increased censorship in our children’s programming is necessary as the trend for children to be socially aggressive to one another is being learned right from the comforts of their homes.

I am also in support of censoring media violence to a degree. Violence is prevalent in today’s society, all you have to do is turn on any news channel to witness violence taking place all around our nation. Police brutality, innocent lives shamelessly being taken, and cities such as Ferguson, Missouri being thrust into a media magnifying lense due to acts of violence. It seems to me that the more the media covers the violence and sensationalizes it to the viewers, the more violence continues. Is it possible that the news and internet airing violence on television is actually causing our society to in fact, be more violent? “Censorship restrains them(children) from seeing such things and it protects the morals of the society. It also prevents violence through stopping broadcast of events that might trigger it. The prevention of public display of disrespect to community and individual is also one of most important things about censorship.” (Asia-Pacific 2014) Media choosing to cover stories that potentially promote negativity may be causing our society harm.

Although I feel that there are many other justified reasons that media censorship is necessary such as protection of national security, banning graphic and illicit content, and dissuading political bias, there is an opposing view. On the flipside of my argument in favor of censorship of media, some do make the argument that over-regulating may not be good for our society. Censorship does in fact violate our Freedom of Speech, on some levels. Censorship can potentially stifle people’s creativity and innovative contributions to society. Multiple opinions is what keeps society full of ideas and constantly enriching our culture. An example of censorship to one’s creative thoughts would be radio talk show host, Howard Stern. While some don’t support some of his beliefs or choose to listen to his show, many argue that he has the right to speak his mind based on the First Amendment. After many FCC violations, Howard was left with no choice but to leave public broadcast and sign a contract with Sirius Satellite Radio, a medium that he can host his show uncensored. It seems that the FCC is perpetually evolving as content continues to challenge the parameters, “Anyone who cares about the First Amendment and press freedom should find this chilling. Apparently, “Congress shall make no law” abridging press freedom now has several caveats. Congress shall make no law unless they think media is “too big,” or unless they don’t like some of the content they see or hear, or unless they want to investigate newsgathering practices by a major news anchor many congressmen have long despised”. (Thierer) Media censorship regulated by the Federal Government is an area that appears to be a changing conversation as content continues to walk a fine line between acceptable and unacceptable.

Another argument on the harm of censorship is made by suggesting that when censoring what we see or hear as a society, it could potentially create an entire society based on ignorance and partial truths. “Censorship denies access to vital information.” (Pillai, 2012). The term mass media framing comes to mind in this example. Mass media framing is when the media presents stories and issues to fit the reality it wants the public to accept. By reporting partial truths or half stories, the audience is not able to make a full evaluation of a situation, in turn only being able to make an uneducated assumption of relevant media topics. Agenda setting may cause an audience to make uninformed decisions, but in some cases, certain facts may be left out of a story to protect the audience from graphic details or inappropriate content.

Media censorship is a topic that has many different perspectives and a difficult topic to be completely for or against. After looking at multiple viewpoints and researching arguments in favor of censorship as well as arguments against media censorship, I firmly believe there is a need to censor content so that our future generations don’t continue with a negative trend of social aggression and apathy. Although I was hoping to prove that all media censorship is a good thing, I do see that censorship can steer viewers and society into cultural ignorance based on the portrayal of partial truths.

As parents, it is ultimately our responsibility to monitor what our children are consuming on television and maybe trusting that Disney or Nickelodeon will handle that for us isn’t a fair assumption. If we don’t want our children to be exposed to certain realities of life, and like myself, want to keep them young and innocent for as long as I can, then keep an eye on their consumption.

References

(2014) Asia-Pacific Economics Blog. Pros and Cons of Censorship. http://apecsec.org/pros-and-cons-of-censorship/

Dotinga, Randy (2012). TV for Kids Filled with Social Bullying. Health Day, News for Healthier Living, http://consumer.healthday.com/mental-health-information-25/behavior-health-news-56/tv-for-kids-filled-with-social-bullying-study-finds-669008.html

FCC. Federal Communications Commission. Obscenity, Indecency & Profanity. Definition of Indecent Material. https://www.fcc.gov/guides/obscenity-indecency-profanity-faq

Pillai, Prabhair (2012). Pros and Cons of Censorship. Buzzle, http://www.buzzle.com/articles/pros-and-cons-of-censorship.html

Thierer, Adam D. (2004). Howard Stern and the Future of Media Censorship. Techknowledge No. 90. Cato Institute. http://www.cato.org/publications/techknowledge/howard-stern-future-media-censorship

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Big E 2 years ago

      I noticed the media always potrays white guys as weak and nerdy and black guys as strong and cool. I am shocked that there are not truck loads of white guys that want to change their appearance to black. Especially after Robert Downey Jr and Rachel Doezal showed the world it may be possible. Than you see white guys getting hung out to dry for saying something controversial like Hulk Hogan or Donald Sterling when black guys have so much more protection in our society it makes you wonder why there are not a portion oh white men trying to change their appearance to black.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      bradmasterOCcal 2 years ago from Orange County California

      Media should be censored for passing off spin as news. Reporting a story is news when all the verifiable facts are told, but when they report a story but fail to verify it then it is just spin.

      Then there is the outright spin, when they tell you what you should think about their stories.

      I censor the media by not watching it. That is what they are doing with the presidential election. It is not their job to do polling and tell us what a small group of people think about the candidates.

      We don't know much about the polls, and how they were given, and under what circumstances, and any other details about them. The accuracy of these polls comes not from their results but from the people that adopt these results and parrot them.

      The polls make the people conform to their results , as opposed to being a homogeneous reflection of the opinions found across the country.

      Why should I care what the people of New Hampshire, or Ohio think about the candidates. I don't even care what the people of Ca think about them.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)