ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Trump and the Complexities of the Middle East

Updated on April 12, 2017

Background:

In order to understand the dynamics of the mid-east, you first have to understand that the major stakeholders of the mid-east do not pay allegiance to their countries, but to their religious beliefs. They are bound, not by the borders of the maps drawn by others, but to their allegiance to their religious sects.

I believe the media has done a dis-service by lumping everybody into two categories in Syria. The media presents the people either as part of the regime or they are rebels. It is the intent of this article to give identity to those in the region and show the complexities of the situation.

The Major Stakeholders

Here are the major stakeholders grouped by major religion and sects:

  • Iran - Shia
  • Iraq – Shia
  • Yemen - Shia
  • Syria - Sunni
  • Saudi Arabia - Sunni
  • ISIS – Sunni
  • Kurds – Shia/Sunni/Christian
  • Israel- Jewish

The Differences Between Sunni, Shia, and Kurds

So what are the differences between Shia and Sunni?

  • Shia believe Mohammad’s successor should be a descendant of Mohammad, that person is called an Imam.
  • Sunni believe that it should be someone with the knowledge and capabilities to lead the nation of Islam. That person is called a Caliph, a person who rules a Caliphate. These differences may seem small to a westerner, but to these religious sects, they are large enough to justify killing each other

Notice from the list above that ISIS and Saudi Arabia are Sunni. While Iraq, Iran, and Yemen are Shia.

The Kurds are a mix of all three sects, depending on their region and beliefs. But, the Kurds are sitting on a very oil rich area that ISIS wants to control. So you can see there is a three-way civil war raging among the major sects of the mid-east.

Who do they Support?

  • Iran’s Shias support fighting Sunni ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
  • Iraq’s majority are Shia and they support fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
  • The Syrian majority is Sunni. However, their leader, Bashar Al Assad, is Shia and is in the minority in the country he rules. That is why Bashar Al Assad is ruling his Sunni majority with an iron fist as a dictator. He hates the Sunni and Shia that are not of his sect. Al Assad is an alwite shia, but he hates the non-alwite shia and Sunni to the point of exterminating them.
  • (Editor’s note: Saddam Hussien’s rule of Iraq was just the opposite. Saddam was a Sunni dictator in the minority, who ruled a Shia Iraqi majority with an iron fist.)
  • Saudi Arabia’s Sunni’s support the Sunni led ISIS and by the same token Saudi Arabia Sunni’s are attacking Yemen’s Shia called Houtis with military arms supplied by the U.S

ISIS, Israel, Russia, and Turkey

ISIS wants to take the mid-east back to the time of the Ottoman Empire, when the entire region was ruled by a Muslim Caliph who ruled his Caliphate. They have embedded themselves with the civilians who they hold hostage and are used as shields during attacks. They rape and pillage to pass on their genes to the next generation. It’s not just about acquiring and controlling land mass. It also about controlling the people and their culture.

Israel is afraid of being attacked by Iran because Iran sponsors the Shia led terrorist group Hezbollah and Sunni led terrorist group Hamas. Israel does not like the nuclear deal because they think Iran will weaponize their nuclear operations and attack Israel. We give Israel 3 billion per year. While the total payout for Iran was 100 billion of their own frozen assets. Netayahu says Israel has the right to defend themselves. I say let them defend themselves, but leave the U.S. out of it. We have lost too much blood and treasure by protecting them from Saddam Hussein. We do not need to get into a war with Iran or Saudi Arabia to protect Israel. If Israel does nothing, they are the winners. They are purely in a defensive mode, except when they attack the Palestinians.

Russia has now gotten into the act, by supplying Syria’s Bashar Al Assad with natural gas from the Crimea. Russia has now built up forces in Syria to help Assad. This includes naval ship maneuvers off the Syrian coast and the build-up of SA-22 anti-aircraft missile systems. Putin has brought in tanks and artillery to Syrian airbases to protect his attack aircraft. This places the Trump administration in a very precarious position. Both Russia and the U.S. want to take out ISIS in Syria. However, Putin wants to protect Assad and the U.S. wants him out. Currently, Putin is using his aircraft to attack Sunni and Kurdish militants that wants Assad deposed. He is currently not attacking Sunni ISIS held positions.

As stated earlier, Turkey hates the Kurds, who are our allies in fighting Al Assad’s regime, but at the same time, we base our aircraft and missiles in Turkey. Since the Syrian conflict has started, Turkey has taken in 250 million refugees, but their refugee camps can only house about 200,000. The remainder are deported or turned away.

What does a President do?

Given these circumstances, what does a president do? Obama tried to stay out of the fray. If he attacked Iran, he would have lost the Shia support for Syria against ISIS. If he attacked the Sunnis in Iraq and Syria, he would have lost his support from Saudi Arabia. ISIS would love to fight the U.S. on their own turf and their own terms.

Should we keep the sanctions on Iran, just to appease Netanyahu? Demographically, Iran is a young country that is ready for progress with the western world. However, their ruling clergy are Muslim hardliners who will make it very difficult for them to become progressive with the western world.

Currently, Al Assad has gassed more people and the images of the atrocities moved Trump emotionally to the point of launching 59 cruise missiles on the airbase that launched the chemical attacks. The news stated, 20 aircraft were destroyed, but the next day the base was operational again. Trump called it a measured attack. His people stated they are going to focus on destroying ISIS first. Once that is done, they will deal with Assad. In the meantime Assad is free to commit more genocide and the Russians are free to attack the rebels as they are called. And all the previous conditions that Obama had to deal with still exist with Trump and his administration.

You see, it is not a simple situation, as the politicians would like us to believe. Now you can understand why Obama said he would not defeat ISIS while on his watch. If it wasn’t for the atrocities of Bashar Al Assad, I would say let’s pull out of the three way civil war in the mid-east. But something must be done with Assad as he is an evil person. As you can see the situation is like Jello. If it is pushed in one place it will jiggle in another. So what is a president to do?

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • peoplepower73 profile image
      Author

      Mike Russo 12 days ago from Placentia California

      I have changed this hub and updated it to be current with Trump's actions and the Middle-East conflict.

    • jackclee lm profile image

      Jack Lee 12 days ago from Yorktown NY

      Mike, a great lesson. So what is your opinion. Who has it right? Obama or Trump? A simple question that deserves a simple answer.

      You see, that is the difference of leadership. A professor who knows a lot and a businessman who accomplishes a lot.

    • peoplepower73 profile image
      Author

      Mike Russo 12 days ago from Placentia California

      Jack: I don't think there is any right. There are only trade-offs. If we take out Assad, we will upset Iran and Russia. If we take out ISIS, we upset Saudi Arabia. How has Trump done a lot? He launched 59 cruise missiles and the next day, that base was operational again. Only this time they attacked with barrel bombs. I think you are expecting a lot from a business man who knows nothing about the middle east and its complexities. We should not even be there, if it wasn't for the atrocities that Assad and Putin have committed. But thanks for reading the article.

    • jackclee lm profile image

      Jack Lee 12 days ago from Yorktown NY

      Mike, I am confused. Why is Saudia Arabia friends with ISIS? If they are friends with ISIS, then they need to be called out, not cuddled. Perhaps that is where Trump will be a different kind of leader almost like Reagan. He does not follow conventional wisdom in the past... which has not worked anyway. He wants to keep them guessing and knock them when they get out of line. He also believes in keeping out of other's business and put America first. I see no contradictions so far.

    • peoplepower73 profile image
      Author

      Mike Russo 12 days ago from Placentia California

      Jack: If you read my article, you will understand that allegiance in the mid-east is not based on country, but on religious sect. The core of ISIS is made up of Sunni's and run by a Sunni called Anwar Al Baghadi. The majority population in Saudi Arabia are Sunni's. They will not fight their own kind.

      Bashar Al Assad, the president of Syria is a Shia, the same as the majority of Iran. That is why Iran supports Al Assad. The reason we train Iraqi's to fight ISIS is because they are Shia and they hate Sunni's like ISIS and they even hated Saddam Hussien who was also a Sunni. It's almost tribal from many centuries ago. Also we don't want to upset Saudi Arabia because we sell them arms to attack the Shia in Yemen who are called Houtis.

    • peoplepower73 profile image
      Author

      Mike Russo 11 days ago from Placentia California

      Jack: You are probably wondering why people living in the Middle East are not loyal to the country they live in, but rather their religious sects. It's because their countries were carved up after WWI Read my hub on WWI and the effects it had on the those countries today.

      https://owlcation.com/humanities/The-Effects-of-Wo...

    • MizBejabbers profile image

      MizBejabbers 11 days ago

      Theocracies, bah, humbug. Now I understand the phrase, "kill them all and let god sort 'em out." I wonder if we would be there at all if it were not for big oil. A former CIA agent told me that the real reason we support Israel is because we need the eyes and ears of their Massad. I still don't understand why Obama couldn't get along with Netanyahu. Can you explain it?

    • peoplepower73 profile image
      Author

      Mike Russo 10 days ago from Placentia California

      MizBejabbers: I believe Putin wouldn't be in Syria if it wasn't for the oil. Obama couldn't get along with Netanyahu because of his constant expansion of housing into the Palestinian territory while peace talks were underway. He does not want peace with the Palestinians because then he would have to stop expansion into their territory. He is making refugees out of the Palestinians who have the right to live there. Read this article I wrote. It explains the whole enchilada. https://hubpages.com/politics/Why-Israel-and-Pales...

    Click to Rate This Article