ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Is The Tea Party Dead, or Just Dying?

Updated on November 7, 2012

2006-2012 sounds like a short life span....

What has become of the Tea Party?
What has become of the Tea Party? | Source

Both major parties have worked effectively so far to eliminate any new contenders!

The Bull Moose Party, the United We Stand Party, and now The Tea Party---all just an expression of their times, movements that tried to become and remain political parties.

Typically they had a prominent figurehead, a Teddy Roosevelt, a Ross Perot, or a Sarah Palin, and when (and if) the figurehead abandoned the movement, the expression of their times was abandoned.

The latest of these three movements, The Tea Party, has seemingly morphed into being local groups around the USA devoting themselves to local causes and candidates that express the original Tea Party causes of less government, lower taxes, and strict constitutionality.

That the local groups have not coalesced into a more powerful national organization, but have seemingly declined and almost withdrawn from the national stage, is due to a variety of factors, not the least of which is an effort by both major parties to discredit the original movement, and the relative success the two parties have had in doing so.

The other major factor has been that the "less government" and "lower taxes" have been traditional Republican values, and most Tea Party adherents and proponents have been, or looked like, Republicans who lacked a real platform to make them distinguishable from that major party.

A congressional Tea Party Caucus appears to have been too small in numbers to have had a decisive clout in doing anything more than lending its weight to blocking legislation it disagreed with, and thus had few accomplishments to recommend itself as an alternative party, if it ever had any real aspirations to be one.

The Supreme Court ruling which has caused Super Political Action Committees (Super PACs) to flourish, opened the way for The Tea Party to have voices at the national level, as long as any Super PAC was adequately funded and effectively voiced their movement's message. In the 2012 campaigns a few Super PACs have appeared to do so.

Today it appears that local Tea Party groups have declined in number to less than the number of such groups which a leading Washington, DC newspaper queried in 2010 as to who best represented their values at that time. The results were that the largest response said that no individual did, and the other numbers were scattered among the relatively few local and national figures most prominently associated in the public's mind with the original movement's expressed values including testing every new proposal and law as to its constitutionality. Among those national figures were these individuals in order of Tea Party popularity at that time: Sarah Palin ,Glenn Beck ,Jim DeMint, Ron Paul, and Michele Bachmann.

As Ron Paul was a prominent presidential candidate throughout the Republican primaries (and Michele Bachmann also early on), a dispute arose at the Republicans' 2012 national convention over the role Ron Paul's supporters seemed to be denied. They lacked enough influence to prevail and gain a more prominent party role, leading to deep resentment in their ranks while going on to grudgingly support the national Romney/Ryan ticket in which Romney's selection of Ryan was a mollifying influence on the Ron Paul supporters.

Is The Tea Party moribund? It may take a little longer to die, but its remaining spark could still be fanned into flame again, if given the right political events similar to what caused it to express itself in the past. Like The John Birch Society, The Tea Party is certainly less visible than in its past.


Copyright 2012 Demas W. Jasper All rights reserved.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Perspycacious profile image

      Demas W Jasper 5 years ago from Today's America and The World Beyond

      A case of political "Wealth makes stealth" is the apparent setting up of bogus "Tea Party" groups in several states in an effort to sponsor public events which would bring discredit to the legitimate Tea Party movement through such things as offensive signs and slogans. Tea Party advocates were warned to be aware of such disruptive activities and to squelch them promptly at any of their own events and at any bogus events they became aware of. A case in point of "dirty politics."

    • eHealer profile image

      Deborah 5 years ago from Las Vegas

      I don't see the Tea Party as noticeable but perhaps the ideology is more mainstream and has died down to a dull roar. Reform is not easily accomplished in DC, and using tactics they were famous for were not effective in the long run. I was never impressed by the members of the Tea Party, they just seemed to fall apart when pressed on essential objectives, like plans, or cohesive ideas. Perhaps the movement will re-emerge with more comprehensive objectives in the future and create more dedication by interested individuals.

    • Attikos profile image

      Attikos 5 years ago from East Cackalacky

      The Taxed Enough Already party is the latest of numerous reform movements that have broken out over the era of US nationalism., which began with the Civil War. Like the others, including the two you mention, it rests on the premise that reform is possible, which is to say that the US national state has not grown so entrenched, powerful, wealthy and authoritarian it has superseded control not only of its Constitution but of the American people themselves. In my view, that is a false assumption and has been the fatal flaw common to all these recurring reform movements, including the current one.

      Delusion always collides with reality. The ship of the TEA party is breaking up on the rocks of the Washington establishment because it was built on the popular but misguided faith that the US national state is remains open to reform either from within or without. The hard truth is, IMO, it is not. It passed the point of reformability long ago.

      No American political movement fixed on reform within the existing system can for long succeed or even survive. It is attempting the impossible. Those interested in real change must either rethink their positions and goals or reconcile themselves to failure.