ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel


Updated on June 1, 2012

What was so confusing about that?

If here was one issue that was dividing the nation, it would be how marriage should be defined.

Some judicial judges did not even understand the situation; and they would go along to make matters worse for all concerned, instead of using a little bit of common sense, which incidentally has become very rare in society nowadays, in making vital decisions.

"If we are right in thinking that disparate impact on minority interests and federalism concerns both require somewhat more in this case than almost automatic deference to Congress' will, this statute fails that test," said the three judge panel. (CNN, 6/01/12, on the DOMA case).

However, the point was a simple one, that nobody in his or her right mind could stop any pair of individual people cohabiting out of their own free volition; and the judges would agree with that; but it was just the word "marriage" that should not be extended to cover such unions.

It was like a prison group wanting to have the same name as "The American Bar Association", and that would be contested from the United States Supreme Court to eternity; but the fact remained that the prison group could legally use that name.

Yet, what amount of confusion that would create, if that was permissible; and that was exactly what the Homosexual and Lesbian communities were asking society to do.

Headlines like , "Worldwide push for marriage equality" should be incorrect, because no culture on earth would say that homosexuality and heterosexual behavior should be classified under the same category. Why? Because they were entirely different life styles.

What many people were doing, and in particular, judges who would want to legislate from "the bench" was to put those that were clamoring for same sex "marriage" in a box.

They would come under the nomenclature of "marriage", but they would still be isolated or marginalized by a great majority of people; and that would result in making the discrimination of such types as homosexuals or lesbians even worse.

If there should be equality in advocating for any type of legal rights for any group of people, they should agree to operate under a different name or names and argue for those rights. That would be the only way to bring equality about; and brand names like "domestic partnership" or "civil union", were those to consider.

A federal law could be made to define all those categories to the letter, that the meaning of each category was not the same as the other; but they would all have the same legal rights.

The "automatic deference of Congress' will" would not apply, if DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) would fully be categorized, as to "which was which", in reference to all the numerous life styles, for judges to clearly see their way through the law.

That would help society as a whole to be conversant of what marriage legally meant; and that would cut the BS going on.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Cassie Smith profile image

      Cassie Smith 

      6 years ago from U.S.

      Those judges were idiots. It's a lot easier to mandate that civil unions should have the same effect as marriage instead of redefining marriage. This whole issue was designed to go to the Supreme Court and they'll probably come out with some weird outcome because social issues aren't designed to be tried in courts.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)