ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Just How Good are the Mainland Chinese Fighter Pilots?

Updated on May 3, 2020
Mamerto profile image

A silent observer looking around. At times he must protect his identity with avatars and weird sounding names.

The People’s Republic of China is now a global force to reckoned with. And up to this day it kept on evolving, hoping that one day it will gain an edge over Western Powers. It did come a long way since it unmasked itself as a communist nation under chairman Mao Zedong. And now, it is an economic and military powerhouse in Asia, though nations could agree that such great power now lacks great responsibility. It seems that being on the top turned this nation from a dragon, into a monster. The smaller nations are now feeling the pressure of China’s newly found might, when they found their territories unjustly taken.

China is always keen on flexing its muscles and maintaining a frightening face across the world. Just look at the upgrades it made in its air force. They now got a homegrown stealth fighter to begin with. But one question remains though. How qualified are their pilots to even take those fighters to the sky? How good are they, or are they more than a match to the Western Powers? As we all know, owning deadly toys is one thing, and getting to use those is another. China might have advanced technology, but it also needs competent pilots to fly those things. Otherwise, they are no different than a tacticool mall ninja who poses with a semi-auto rifle in social media.

But, Their Air Force is Flawed

J-10B crash
J-10B crash

Make no mistake about it. The People’s Liberation Army Air Force is no joke. It is a heavily armed unit, with more than 5200 aircrafts and 398000 active personnel. And among those 5200 aircrafts are 3000 combat jets, like bombers and fighters. It has an ongoing upgrade, and soon fourth generation aircrafts like the J-20 will serve as its backbone.

Compared to most of its neighboring nations, the Chinese air force is a head above the rest. But it still got a long way to go before it matches the Western Powers. Yes, it got advanced combat jet in its arsenal. 500 of its many aircrafts are modern warplanes. But everyone knows how the PLA tends to “borrow” technologies from other country. And some critics pointed out that the PLA warplanes are nothing but knock-offs from established combat aircrafts.

And knock-off technology means knock-off quality.

These aircrafts are plagued with reliability problems. Everyone knows the disastrous J-15 program. This supposedly competent fighter jet is a clone of the Russian SU-33. It was meant to match U.S. carrier borne aircrafts, like the F-18 hornet, given that it could even fly properly. After several crashed, the J-15 is now going to the scrap heap for replacement.

Even the indigenous fighter J-20 is not immune to quality issues. With an underpowered engine, it will have troubles engaging the likes of the European Typhoon, or the F-22.

The PLA’s fondness for illegally copying foreign technologies could be its greatest downfall (it will be discussed in future articles). And then, there is pilot competency. In an event that war broke, are the PLA pilots ready enough to face the more seasoned western combat aviators?

When Thailand Beats the Chinese Air force

Thailand's Gripen Fighter Jet. The one that shamed the Chinese J-11.
Thailand's Gripen Fighter Jet. The one that shamed the Chinese J-11.

In 2015, Thailand held a joint exercise with China. The Exercise Falcon Strike 2015 was held in Thailand’s Korat Royal Air Force Base for two weeks. It involves a mock dog fight, and the Chinese brought their J-11 fighters. In the Thai corner, they got their F-16s, but instead they deployed different fighters; the JAS 39C/D Gripen.

The J-11 (a clone of the Russian SU-27) was reputed to be the better dog fighter, but the Gripens are a better long-range shooter. It is no surprise that the J-11 won in the first day of the exercise, as it involves visual range only. The Gripen got weaker engines unlike the J-11. The J-11 “shot down” all 16 Gripens with zero loss.

But the game shifted to beyond visual range, which is another aspect of air combat.

And for three days, the Thais proved superior. Their Gripen defeated 19 J-11s and only lost three. Their winning streak continued until the last days of the exercise. Overall, the Thais shot down 42 J-11, while losing only 34 Gripens.

In the post war game analysis, the Chinese pilots lacked situational awareness and coordination. They had no experiences with missile evasions and countermeasures either.

So basically, a powerful Chinese fighter plane was beaten by a cheaper Swedish fighter jet of the Thai Air force.

The Chinese Pilot's Problems

Pilots posing with the J-20 stealth fighter.
Pilots posing with the J-20 stealth fighter.

Yes, China is aware that their pilots’ skills are still flawed. In fact, in 2005 they began to organize realistic war games to hone their skills. But until today, they are yet to produced competent pilots capable of taking on more proficient western pilots.

Yes, China is partaking on war games, but the pilot training itself is unrealistic and the tactics underdeveloped. The approach to training is very by-the-book as well. Then, there is the rigid structuring of the PLA. It is highly centralized that could hinder the skills of its pilots. This resulted with less adaptable pilots, where they are unable to make decisions on the spot as the tactical maneuvers are fed to them by commanders on the ground.

To illustrate this, when they fly in a formation, the lead plane will take commands on dogfights. Tactical skills are needed here by the lead pilot, something that Chinese pilots lack. They need to refer to ground commanders to know what to do. It is a major disadvantage when they are in an actual fight, where split second decisions matter. Before the pilots could hear the commanders’ orders, they are dead.

Ground commanders are not helping either. They are not quick enough to adapt to the rapid changing air situation.

And maybe, the Chinese Air Force’s lack of combat experience also contributed to the poor training, planning and management of its pilots. Having not seen war for a long time, the PLA could have forgotten how modern warfare looks like.

Overall

China got formidable air force indeed, but not formidable enough to match the air powers of the likes of Russia and the U.S. Yes, they got advanced air assets, but can they use such assets to its full extent? The military exercise with Thailand exposed such weakness when the cheaper Thai fighters defeated the Chinese J-11. Its pilots lacked situational awareness, missile evasion skills and coordination. Training realistically is also a problem, as well as managing the planes in the air. The rigid command style also deprived the pilots of their quick reactions.

Up to now, China was said to be fixing such problems. But there are the problems with its machines also. Yes they are advanced, but the reliability is a question.

References

1. Beckhusen, Robert (2016) ""China Might Have Stealth Fighters, But How Good are the Pilots Who Fly them". War is Boring

2. Axe, David (12 December 2019). "How the Chinese Air Force Lost a War Game to This Fighter Jet." The National Interest.


Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Mamerto profile imageAUTHOR

      Mamerto Adan 

      4 weeks ago from Cabuyao

      CHRIS57 thanks! And will be interesting to watch how those unmanned fighters will take shape.

    • Mamerto profile imageAUTHOR

      Mamerto Adan 

      4 weeks ago from Cabuyao

      Thanks MG Singh! Plus their tactics are undeveloped. China is highly unprepared to go in a war.

    • CHRIS57 profile image

      CHRIS57 

      4 weeks ago from Northern Germany

      In one of my former and more recent lifes as an engineer and consultant, i had quite some contact with the Chinese aircraft industry, both military and commercial. Some comments:

      Chinese are well aware of the pilot skill issue. But it takes time to build up training schools, even to develop and manufacture adequate training aircraft. China tries to do everything by themselves, so they don´t go shopping for excellent trainers like Pilatus PC23 for example.

      Major technical issue with all Chinese aircraft is engines, engines, engines. Not reliable, too thirsty.

      A last remark: Many years ago i had business with Saab, Linköping. On one occasion we talked about the Gripen and Saab management mentioned that the Gripen would be one of the last manned combat fighters. Too much g-force. You can´t have Olympic medalist sportsmen in every fighter.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 

      4 weeks ago from UAE

      The Chinese pilots are not hot and combat experience limited. That is the view of pilots of the IAF and I tend to agree.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)