ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Quality of Life vs. Right to Life

Updated on July 17, 2018
Faceless39 profile image

I'm a dental hygienist, pyrography artist, avid gardener, writer, vegetarian, world traveler, and many other things!


The question of life versus death is one of the biggest dilemmas facing families and modern medical professionals in this age of life-sustaining and death-defying technology. There has been a debate for many years about the ethical dilemma to either maintain or to stop maintaining life dependent on its perceived quality.

It has been debated both ways: one side sees death as the ethical choice if quality of life is very low, and the other side sees life as the ethical choice no matter what the quality of that life may be. Life is precious.

In 1973, the American Medical Association (AMA) House of Delegates made a statement regarding active euthanasia: "The intentional termination of the life of one human being by another–mercy killing–is contrary to that for which the medical profession stands and is contrary to the policy of the [AMA]."

They continue by saying the quality of a person's life is not taken into consideration unless the person is about to die, in which case that person may be allowed to die naturally. If the person is not about to die, then quality of life is not calculated into the equation at all.

It is the doctor's job to save life, no matter what the quality of that life may one day be. Doctors are not ethicists. Their job is to save lives, not debate whether the life is worth saving.


The Texas Natural Death Act

There are many laws providing legal answers to this debate. The Texas Natural Death Act (TNDA) is one of these.

Under the TNDA, patients with "incurable or irreversible condition[s] caused by injury, disease or illness that would produce death without the application of life-sustaining procedures, according to reasonable medical judgment, and in which the application of these procedures serves only to postpone the moment of death" are once again given the option of withdrawing "extraordinary means" when these measures only serve to prolong the inevitable.

For those patients with low or no quality of life that are not terminal, however, there is no consideration as to the ethicality of a prolonged torture. This whole debate is viewed in terms of black and white, right and wrong. As we know, life is all different shades of gray.


Hospital Ethics Committees

Any hospital ethics committee is a morass of conflicting ideas on quality of life versus the outright right to life. Some examples of what they face on a daily basis are outlined below.

In the case of Kelsey, the choice became whether or not they should operate again, knowing it was merely prolonging her death. She had been in the hospital for much of her life, and her disease was finally winding down to the end. She was in constant pain, was only kept alive via drugs and machines, and was very tired and wanted it to just end. She'd made her peace with it long ago, and now she was ready. Should the ethics committee allow her to discontinue treatment? She wanted to die.

In the case of José, it was debated whether the quality of his life would be worth living, given he was paralyzed from the neck down. They decided to ask him if he'd like to live paralyzed and be resuscitated if anything happened, or become DNR (do not resuscitate) and die naturally. It turned out that, despite needing his family to care for him for the rest of his life, he was perfectly happy watching his favorite TV shows all day long and being fed by his Italian grandmother. His family was perfectly happy about the idea. He wanted to live.

In the case of John it was debated whether or not his quality of life would be worth living, or if it would be more ethical a decision to spare him the misery of what his life might become, born with severe spinal and brain problems. His parents would have to tend him 24/7 for the rest of his life. Would John's life be worth living, or would it be better for him to die peacefully? Was it worth upsetting the parents' own lives for someone totally unaware and severely handicapped mentally and physically? They wanted him to be put out of his misery.

There is almost never a "real" concensus and never a straightforward "perfect" answer. In the end, right to life almost always wins over quality of life. It's a tough decision to end a life while knowing that it could be saved. It's difficult to know how one person or another will react to living in severe pain, or grossly disfigured. One person may hate every minute, while another may feel they're the luckiest person alive.


What Do You Think?

If only there was a way in which we could all come to a definite conclusion as to life's worth. But there's the rub.

Life means one thing to one person, and quite another to someone else. One person may wish to die peacefully when they're on life support, and one person may want to fight death all the way to the grave.

With life-saving drugs and technological miracles, these are questions that won't soon go away: is quality of life more important than a person's right to life? I think the answer is, "It depends who you are, and how much spirit you have."

Have you ever had to make a tough decision for a loved one? Does quality of life matter, or is all life so sacred that even the hardest amongst us should be spared? Is there ever a point where medical professionals should step in and play God?

What do you think?

© 2011 Kate P


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Ian Dabasori Hetr profile image

      Ian D Hetri 

      8 years ago from Papua New Guinea

      Love the way you presented the information. Superb. voted up and useful. Following you to read more of your hubs.

    • Faceless39 profile imageAUTHOR

      Kate P 

      8 years ago from The North Woods, USA

      Cost definitely does become a factor, and quickly. That's a very good point, and is high on the priority list in hospital Ethics Committees.

      I see how having a choice is good; at the same time, many people who have tried to commit suicide, and survived, have been VERY grateful that their attempt failed. Food for thought!

    • roshall profile image


      8 years ago from Ohio

      hi I admire people you overcome diversity in their life. I believe that its should be your choice to end your life when you want for whatever reason you feel fits.Great story!! Have a great day.

    • Sherry Hewins profile image

      Sherry Hewins 

      8 years ago from Sierra Foothills, CA

      I recently heard on the radio, a case about a severely disable, ventilator dependent child who was turning 18. He had been on a government program for disabled children that was ending because he was no longer a child. His very dedicated family had been caring for him at home with some homecare support. As an adult his expenses would only be covered if he were in a Nursing facility, which he and his family felt, based on previous experience, was would be a death sentence. So, there's another aspect to the question, who should pay and how much is a life worth?

    • Larry Fields profile image

      Larry Fields 

      8 years ago from Northern California

      Here's a link to an article about the medical rights of women vs dogma in Catholic pseudo-hospitals, by Molly M. Ginty.

      The Church also has 'teachings' about end-of-life care. My understanding is that if you land in a Catholic pseudo-hospital, allow yourself to be intubated, or to be connected to artificial life-support of any other kind, and then become comatose, the moral mediocrities in charge will never voluntarily pull the plug, regardless of what your written medical directives say.

      In that case, the only realistic option for your designated advocate is to have you put into an ambulance, and then transported to a REAL hospital, which will respect your final wishes.

      I'm not an expert on this subject. Someone please correct me if I'm mistaken about any of these details.

    • Au fait profile image

      C E Clark 

      8 years ago from North Texas

      State laws do very, sometimes quite a bit, other times not so much. I'll check with my former husband (attorney) on what the law is in regard to living wills, etc., here where I live.

    • Larry Fields profile image

      Larry Fields 

      8 years ago from Northern California

      Au fait, sorry about that. Fundies are Fundamentalists--Christian in this context.

      About the trumping. That applies in California. I'm assuming that it applies everywhere in the U.S. However I'm not a lawyer, and can't be 100% certain about that.

    • Au fait profile image

      C E Clark 

      8 years ago from North Texas

      Interesting article and interesting comment from Larry Fields about DPOA and living wills. What are Fundies?

      Voted you UP and interesting because I think you have provided some good food for thought.

    • Faceless39 profile imageAUTHOR

      Kate P 

      8 years ago from The North Woods, USA

      Thanks Kaitlincolee and Larry for your positive feedback and commentary.

      I was not aware that the DPOA trumped a Living Will; that's sure food for thought. I definitely should add a section here about living wills and DPOA. Thanks!

    • Larry Fields profile image

      Larry Fields 

      8 years ago from Northern California

      Also voted up. On a related note, I'd like to mention Living Wills and Durable Power of Attorney. Getting both can DECREASE your chances of having your final wishes respected. It's not like wearing suspenders and a belt.

      Why? Because DPOA trumps a Living Will. If the person holding DPOA is not absolutely trustworthy, you're more likely to suffer needlessly in your final days. On the other hand, with a Living Will, it's more likely for your hospital physicians to honor your wishes. (However that's not true if you have the misfortune to land in a Catholic hospital, or in a hospital run by bloody Fundies.)

      I know, because someone in my extended family had his final wishes disrespected by the DPOA-holder, another family member. In this situation, the Living Will was absolutely useless.

    • kaitlincolee profile image


      8 years ago

      I never had to make the tough decision for a loved one, and if that day ever comes, I think I'll choose to let them fight till the end. A thought-provoking article, voted up!


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)