ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Racial Equality: How America Has Progressed Over 150 Years

Updated on March 31, 2016
Jaynie2000 profile image

With a degree in Sociology & concentrations in English & Religion, Jaynie has a keen interest in politics, social norms & mental health.

Dred Scott
Dred Scott

Racial Equity: How America has Progressed over 150 Years

Slavery was abolished in the United States in 1865 when the thirteenth amendment was added to the constitution. This marks a grim period in American history that to this day continues to have a rippling effect throughout our country. The United States has made significant advances toward equality for all of her citizens. There is no greater example of the progress we are making toward true equality than the election of our first African American president in 2008. I can recall sitting in front of my television, fingers crossed, praying for what was eventually to be. I vividly recall the tears of joy, relief and extreme pride that I felt in a country that had finally set aside prejudice in favor of hope and equality. The precedent that this single act set is monumental, as it also paves the way toward white America’s increasing respect and tolerance for citizens from a variety of other racial and ethnic backgrounds.

Given the state of the union today with regard to equality, it is almost incomprehensible to look back and remember from where we have come. The following court cases are perfect illustrations of a time that stained American history and serve as reminders of what could be if we allowed hatred and bigotry to once again rule our proud nation. History teaches us many things. We must never grow tired of learning from them.


Dred Scott vs. Sanford

Dred Scott was a former slave that had made attempts to purchase his and his family’s freedom with the help of abolitionist advisors. When his attempts failed, he used the legal system to sue for their emancipation. After a jury found in favor of the Scott family, the Supreme Court of Missouri overruled the decision and ordered that the Scotts were still considered to be slaves. It was this ruling that convinced Scott to take his case into federal court, where in 1857, the landmark ruling was issued.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that people of African descent that had been imported to the United States and had been held as slaves had no protection under the U.S. Constitution and would never be allowed to obtain U.S. citizenship. This ruling extended not only to the formerly held slaves, but also to their descendents, whether or not they had also been held as slaves. This ruling included the stipulation that Congress had no authority over federal territories to abolish slavery in those territories, and that perons held as slaves, as a result of their lack of citizenship, had no rights to sue in court. Slaves were also not permitted to be removed from their owners without due process. To this day, there has never been a formal ruling to overturn the Dred Scott decision, thought protections afforded by the Fourteenth Amendment naturally dissolve some of the ruling's spirit and legality.

Plessy vs. Ferguson

In the late 1800s, after the American Civil War, the country began to pass Jim Crow Laws, which dictated that separate facilities must be held for blacks and whites. From these laws, separate water fountains and restrooms were constructed. Blacks were separated from whites in congregate settings such as courtrooms and public transport by being forced to the back of the bus, so to speak. Blacks were also required to have separate accommodations on railways including entirely separate cars.

Homer Plessy, a gentleman that was 1/8 black, became a member of the Citizens Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, which was comprised of both African Americans and whites from New Orleans, including then Governor, P.B.S. Pinchback. The group was dedicated in their efforts to have the Separate Car Act repealed. Plessy was able to purchase a ticket for the white car because of the light color of his skin. The plan was for Plessy to begin discussing his African American ancestry while on board in order to instigate his being thrown from the train and arrested in violation of the Separate Car Act, a move which the group then planned to challenge in court. Prior to his arrest, Plessy was asked to move to the “colored” car. When he refused, he was arrested.

While Plessy should have been granted protections under the Fourteenth Amendment, the court ruled in a 7 to 1 decision, that racial segregation was protected by federal law. It was suggested that segregation was a matter of mere public policy and not an act of discrimination. The Plessy case sparked the county’s movement toward Separate but Equal doctrine, which held that as long as the facilities provided for “coloreds” were of equal quality to those provided to whites, there was nothing illegal about enforcing such segregation.

Brown vs. the Board of Education

The Separate but Equal Doctrine that resulted from the Plessy vs. Ferguson case was put to the test when its constitutionality was called into question beginning in 1952 in the United States Supreme Court. It was during this landmark case that the protections of the Fourteenth Amendment began to be enforced. The plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was the parent of an African American child in the Topeka Kansas school district. He and the parents of twenty other black students challenged the Topeka Kansas Board of Education’s practice of erecting separate schools for black students. The law on the books stipulated that the district was permitted, but not required to provide separate facilities in twelve communities that had more than 15,000 citizens. The suit was instigated by the NAACP, which enlisted the help of the families named in the suit. The suit was not settled when heard in the spring of 1953 and the court reconvened in the fall of the same year.

The Brown case had a more positive outcome than that of Dred Scott’s and Homer Plessy’s cases several decades earlier. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that segregated schools in several states are unconstitutional because they exist in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. While the court did not overturn the Separate but Equal doctrine, they did rule that such doctrine had no place in the field of education.

Loving vs. Virginia

It wasn’t until 1967 that marriages between blacks and whites were considered to be legal. This landmark civil rights case was unanimously decided by the US Supreme Court in a 9-0 ruling. Prior to 1967, marriages between the races had been disallowed. The case was brought forth on behalf of Mildred and Richard Perry Loving, an African American woman and white man, who had been married in the District of Columbia in 1958. Upon returning to the the Commonwealth of Virginia, the couple was declared in violation of the Racial Integrity Act when a group of officers burst into their private home hoping to find them having sex. While they were not “caught in the act,” they were in bed and taken into custody, despite being able to present a certificate of marriage. The couple was charged and sentenced each to one year in prison.

Prior rulings on the legality of marriage between the races included the following quote by Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, a German philosopher and physician as adopted by presiding court judge Leon M. Bazile.

“Almighty God created the races, white, black, yellow, malay, and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for these races to mix.”

The quote is a far cry from quotations that can be cited from the Loving’s case, including this excerpt from court documents:

“…The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not to marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.”

The Fifteenth Amendment

It wasn’t until 1870, when the Fifteenth Amendment to the US Constitution was ratified, that blacks had been granted the right to vote. The amendment prohibited states from denying any citizen the right to vote based upon, among other things, race or color. The first black to vote was a former slave named Thomas Mundy Peterson, who voted in a school board election. During the period of 1865 to 1880, more black citizens were elected to office than at any other time in American history.

As we move forward as a unified nation, let us never forget the mistakes of our past, lest we be doomed to repeat them.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      phurwa 

      4 years ago

      i got so many knowledge from this hub .on a free time i like reading all this .Well written and presented.

    • Jaynie2000 profile imageAUTHOR

      Jaynie2000 

      7 years ago

      Thank you, Mimi. I appreciate that.

    • Mimi721wis profile image

      Mimi721wis 

      7 years ago

      Informative. Beautifully written. Voted up.

    • Jaynie2000 profile imageAUTHOR

      Jaynie2000 

      7 years ago

      I"m glad to hear it. Thank you for reading.

    • junko profile image

      junko 

      7 years ago

      I'm enlightened by your this hub and that is good for me. I needed to be enlighten again.

    • Jaynie2000 profile imageAUTHOR

      Jaynie2000 

      7 years ago

      I complete agree, cwarden. Our history is excruciating at times, but I guess it takes such harsh lessons to make us all more enlightened people. Ever onward.

    • cwarden profile image

      cwarden 

      7 years ago from USA

      Really nice hub. It is truly hard to read some of these cases from the past, but very encouraging to look at where we are now.

    • Jaynie2000 profile imageAUTHOR

      Jaynie2000 

      7 years ago

      Thanks very much, Denise.

    • Denise Handlon profile image

      Denise Handlon 

      7 years ago from North Carolina

      Well written and presented. Voted it up. Great job.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)