Security state apparatus - concern between two friends
There are times in every observer's work when one takes a proverbial thermometer and pokes it into the proverbial soup to see what the temperature vs the boiling point of our state happens to be. Those of us who wander the back halls do this from time to time. Alot of our internal dialogs, meaning the rarely publicized ones, are basically this temperature checking. We'll make analysis commentary which more resembles small talk in the course of touching base with each other, but there is meat to be seen there if you listen often enough to be cognizant of the flow of thoughts, opinions, and ideas.
Often for people like myself there are dry periods in which I don't write much. This is mostly due to being unable to share what I'm doing or what I've been party to conversationally because so much of it is confidential. Doesn't mean I wouldn't like to. Whenever I speak I have to weigh carefully what I can say, who I can reference, in what venue I can speak, and if so how can it be couched. Then I have to have a reasonable purpose for speaking. If there is no one with an interest or if it would fall on ears that would only misinterpret or use it in a negative rather than thoughtful way, then there really isn't any point in speaking.
I have a friend with whom I share a mutual concern about the disconnect between the general public and the real governing powers. Part of that mutual concern is how uneducated the public is in regards to how governance currently is accomplished. Most of the general public think governance involves voting, elected bodies, representatives, and special interests. Well that's like the celophane wrap around that pot roast in your fridge waiting for that picnic you've been meaning to get to but just can't find enough value in to attend. So let's see how good you are at reading between my lines.
Just today my friend and I shared a few comments, mostly filled with a layer of silent frustration about public awareness and capacity to understand their predicament. Let's give him a name of "Gus" for the sake of making this article a little more personable.
Gus on manchurian candidate
In the exopolitical end of our paradigm we are routinely familiar with how governances utilizes plausible deniability to maintain secrecy in the open. Left hand says 'you are mistaken' in a syrup'y voice whilst the right hand laughs at the fact you aren't in the decision making loop and are thereby powerless to do anything in its opinion and so it doesn't even have to say one way or the other just keeps on trucking.
Gus pointed at one of the pink elephants and stated this morning, "Once Denial Plausibility is no longer capable what then???? Isn't it enough that we have a proven forgery before us that suggests POTUS was born in Hawaii .... and now there seems so much more to this story of the real Manchurian Candidtate !!!!!!"
My reply wasn't much more than we've known for a year or so. Big events require alot of preparation and the system's right people in the places they want them in, to do this or that. And I never even specify the circumstances involved here because we're way ahead of that.
I said, "that's the key question I think we all have. I've been hearing repeatedly through the proverbial grapevine that there is a plan to keep him in office one more term no matter what, so that he can complete the tasks set for him. There's a heck of a thought because he's doing a great job tearing the country apart and making a laughing stock of all governance. Where people didn't trust government before now they outright loath it for its corruption, disdain of the constitution, depopulation policies, endless war making, and the belligerance it holds toward our own people in the name of 'protecting' us. Who needs enemies with friends like this?
I think it's doing a great job of illustrating just how apathetic and incompetant the public has become. We can't seem to work collectively together to put the crooks in their place with one big boot. Those with the most desire are too broke or too wrapped up in other matters. Those who are well off seem to not have enough impetus or awareness to know just how close to the cliff edge they are....and others are simply too socially mind controlled to do anything but snear at those who can see with discomforture that we're in one heck of a mess.
I think the biggest thing this society needs is some way to come to an understanding they don't need and should not have any government or governance with a public mandate (real or proverbial) to 'protect' them from anything. Government and governance is a tool for the use of the people or collective portions of the people to accomplish work that is important to the collective. One small sector of the population has perfected control and utilage of it, whilst the rest are left to flounder and suffer beneath it, because control and influence has been removed from their grasp via the "security state apparatus". Most can't even recognize the "security state apparatus" let alone specify when or how it operates. And if they can't do that then they certainly can't identify the food chain...so what does that make them? Victims."
For the benefit of new or less frequent readers of mine, I'll just reiterate a few things I've insinuated in past writings. Ignorance means that you're not actually a beneficiary of any system. That's because in ignorance you're only along for the ride or a fixture in the environment around which everything that is not ignorance related moves. To be ignornant makes one potentially collateral damage to someone who is not ignorant's purposes and actions. Ignorance is an adjustable or correctable state.
So having identified a pink elephant is never enough. One must be influential or more than a fixture in the system to get the left and right hand to respond in ways that have an effect with regards to any pink elephant. This generally involves desire, intent, planning, purpose, type of action, and position from which actions move out on their course. We also need to understand that sometimes one pink elephant is a doorway or consequence of other pink elephants. Elephants usually travel in herds. And there are levels of ignorance...one can be non-ignorant enough to garner a response from the left and right hand of power but still too ignorant to control the outcome. Meanwhile power is still ten steps ahead. So one could surmise that not only collective determination, an adequate level of non-ignorance, AND a necessary and effective degree of urgency must be present in the equation of any would-be influence to not only cause an alteration in the left and right hand but to control effectively with purpose and achieve intended result.
So here's the question can you value that there is more to governance than the celophane and can the general public pay enough homage to the importance of observing, demanding clarity and understanding of the 'security state apparatus' to come to terms with how governance is done? Can they put together a long enough attention span? Can they correlate pieces of its history to see intents and actions? Understanding and recognition always precedes any attempt at influence and control.
This is my answer to those who howl at the enigma and want the details. The mistakes of the past by the interested public have primarily a great deal to do what I've pointed out above. Misunderstandings about system enigma details compound the problem of how you react to those primary enigma details. You aren't ready for the details because you don't understand yet your world. From the system inhabitants point of view, the system has enough of its own problems just yet without adding public system ignorance to the mix...this is why we have a vicious circle preventing the advent of open dialog on the topic. The ball is in the public court but the public hasn't done its own homework yet. You have to prove you didn't cheat on the exam to get the A in class. To do that you first have to study for the exam and publish your class notes.
It's all suggestions. No one has to do anything it's all being decided for you...but the voices in the assigned 'ome indicate they wish to be included so a sign post has been set to lend direction.