So Who Is Sandra Fluke?
You Should Have Expected This
One thing is becoming ever more obvious. Sandra Fluke wasn't a fluke at all. Maybe an activist that was used as an Obama patsy but not some innocent, young law school student caught up in the spotlight of free contraceptives. So lets expose some of the truth about Sandra rather than act like the blathering, slobbering idiots of the Main Stream Media looking for a story of how to absolve "The One" from stepping all over the First Amendment requiring the Catholic Church to toe his line. Fluke is no more a "victim" than any of you reading this are. She's being paraded all around the country as the poster child for free contraceptives and women's health rights. How does a destitute college student who can't afford, according to her anyway, $3K a year to make sure she doesn't have to also pay for an abortion.
Part of the story that is evolving deals with the evolution of facts about Fluke. A lie is usually a lie and you can't be paraded in front of the Lame Stream Media audience without things surfacing that you never thought about when you headed down the slippery slope of presenting facts. Fluke was presented as a mild mannered, demure 23 year old Georgetown University law school student. Just a minor portion of that presentation is proving to be true.
The facts are that Sandra Fluke isn't some 23 year old naive college student. She is a 30 year old, experienced adult. So the age factor was just an oversight? No, it was an outright lie. A liar is a liar and from that point on they usually lose their credibility when opening their mouth. It was all in the presentation and Pelosi is good at presentation, not much else but she can do political theater. Contrary to the way she was presented to the public she is probably anything but that. Here's Fluke's LinkedIn profile so take a look at her credentials.
Now it could be that the press, in particular Anne Williams from MSNBC, misreported Fluke's age as 23 when reporting initially that she was barred from testifying to Issa's panel. Doubtful since MSNBC doesn't seem to adept at checking out fact from fiction. She presented the woamn as a "23 year old Georgetown law student."
Fluke's own representation is that she is a third year law student at Georgetown. She is in fact that. If in fact she graduated from Cornell University in 2003 that would mean she was 15 years old when she graduated with a bachelor's degree. She entered Georgetown Law School in 2009 so do the math. Was the media confused when reporting Fluke's actual age? If so they should be further barred from reporting anything about anyone since that is easy to check out. The average age of a third year law school grad is approximately 25 years on the low end.
Matt Lauer from The Today Show, who does do a better job than the folks on MSNBC, as a reporter the revelation surfaced during an interview that she is 30 years old and not 23 at all.
It also seems that this known activist reviewed Georgetown University's health insurance policy before ever committing to attend the institution. Strange? In an earlier interview she admitted she noticed that it didn't cover contraceptive serves so she decided to attend that institution of higher learning to further her activist contraceptive battle. Strange again? She just also happens to be the past president of Law Students For Reproductive Justice. So nothing her stinks to high heaven huh?
Here's a report from The Washington Post before Fluke was denied testifying before the actual House Committee, and not some unofficial one chaired by Pelosi.
Farce Or Farcical?
- Meet Sandra Fluke: The woman you didn’t hear at Congress’ contraceptives hearing
The woman who you didn’t hear at the Congressional contraceptives hearing
So now I question, if Fluke received two emails from distraught females, why aren't those two students being identified by name so they can come forward and speak for themselves? Goodness this has a Gloria Allred tactic written all over it. Unnamed women at an unnamed Catholic University just happened to send Sandra emails? Come on now folks. Out of all the women available to testify before that Committee the Democrats on it only invited one woman, Sandra Fluke, to yield any testimony? They had already identified their patsy so that makes perfect sense. If you didn't read the WaPo story at the link then back up and actually read the interview.
Here's another interesting link to read to connect some more dots about Sandra Fluke and who she really is.
No Fluke This Sandra Fluke
So who should call Sandra Fluke? If you guessed Obama then you guessed correctly. Here's a video of him explaining to the press why he picked up the phone and called her. Listen closely as he plays the Sasha and Malia card and what he says about the verbal treatment of women. Also note that during this press conference that he doesn't utter one word about idiot Maher's verbal abuse directed at conservative women. This is another feeble attempt to make Sandra Fluke appear to be a "victim."
Double Standards Applied Anew...
All of this is completely bogus. Bill O'Reilly has put his research staff on Flukegate. His focus is on who ir "running" Sandra Fluke. There was initially some man named "Mike" who was involved in booking Fluke on the side show. No one seems to know how to contact "Mike," no contact number, no last name and no call back numbers? Next revelation is her tie into Anita Dunn. If you don't remember that nut job then Goggle her. Fluke is being represented by a PR tied to Anita Dunn. See which way the finger is pointing?
You need to watch the O'Reilly video at this link for some of the more salient points concerning Sandra Fluke. She was invited to appear on The Factor and I'm sure she wouldn't go near Bill O'Reilly because she's end up looking like the piece of burnt liberal toast that she really is.
O'Reilly Connecting The Dots Video Here
The problem with any of this is that when anyone suddenly materializes out of nowhere with an outrageous whine to divert attention from the real issue, the cheese is surely to follow. Fluke is no fluke. Fluke is more than likely a flake and this whole controversy was manufactured to divert attention away from the real issue - Obama's trampling of the First Amendment once again. Women's health issue my frog legs. Target sells a month's supply of contraceptives for $9.00. Title X covers the dispensing of free contraceptives for women as O'Reilly pointed out to the ladies on The View.
One of two things is happening with the liberal whiners. Either they are part of the smoke screen or they just can't seem to see through it. Smoke and mirrors is the Obama administrations forte. Look over here rather than over there.
The Frog Prince
Yesterday's Related Liberal Hypocrisy
- Far Left Hypocrisy Revealed
So it's okay for Bill Maher to be offensive to women and not Rush Limbaugh? Obama keeps calling for civil, public discourse discourse. Is he going to return the $1 million Super PAC donation Maher made to his effort to remain in office? Good question