ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • Politics & Political Science

Some Myths of The Indian National Army

Updated on December 23, 2017

POW's as Freedom Fighters

The Indian National Army is supposed to have fought for Indian Independence with decisive results. Many Indians have some romantic notions of the INA as a creation of Subhas Chandra Bose the fiery Indian nationalistic leader who had sided with the Japanese in fighting for Indian Independence.

The INA was actually formed much before Bose appeared on the scene. When the Japanese advanced against the British and occupied vast colonies of the British, the Japanese higher military echelons thought of harnessing Indian POW’s to help them further their war aim. At the outbreak of the war the British had about 70,000 Indian troops in Malaya and after a spectacular campaign, the Japanese were able to make 55,000 Indians as POW.

The First INA

In September 1942 the first INA was formed under General Mohan Singh (Captain in British Indian Army). The Japanese agreed to arm about 16000 Indian troops who had joined the INA. The INA was an extension of the Indian independence league whose mentor was Rash Bihari Bose. But differences between the Japanese Military command and Rash Behiri Bose on one side and Mohan Singh on the other side cropped up and the result was that the Japanese arrested Mohan Singh and imprisoned him on the island of Palau Ubin. The INA was disbanded and many Indian soldiers reverted back to POW status. The Japanese were ruthless and sent these soldiers to work on the death railway in Siam or in New Guinea.

Revival of INA and Bose

Subhas Chandra Bose landed from Germany in 1943 and he along with Rash Bihar Bose revived the INA. Thus the INA was again formed in mid-1943 and this time under Bose it sided completely with the Imperial Army. Romantic notions of the strength of the INA was just about 45,000. This a small number compared to the Indian strength fighting for the British which was over 2 million. Thus the fact is that the vast majority of Indian soldiers never wanted to join the Japanese or the INA of Bose.

Contribution of INA

A force of about 45000 is just a little more than 2 divisions and surely anybody can realize that this was a woeful strength to liberate India. So the result was that INA rode piggy bank on the back of the Japanese army. The INA traveled along with the Japanese army and surrounded Kohima. Here again, the appeal and magnetism of Bose failed and despite intense propaganda by Bose and the Japanese, asking the Indian soldiers to defect and turn on their British officers it never happened. The Indian soldiers remained loyal to the British and did not join the INA.

The siege was lifted and the Indian national army and the Japanese were pushed back. There were some counter dissertations and many Indian soldiers escaped back to the British lines. It is not well-known that the only place where the INA was able to set foot was in the Andaman and Nicobar islands. Here Bose proved himself ineffectual and records show that the Japanese tortured and executed the local Indians. So much for the INA, which in real terms turned out to be a force with more smoke than substance. The biographers of Bose have never been able to explain this inaction on the part of Bose to the massacres of the Indians by the Japanese.

But popular notions die-hard and it is one of the myths of history that the INA had any significant role to play in the Second World War or Indian independence. But perhaps what caught the imagination of the general public is the trials in the Red Fort of the leaders of the INA by the British. They were sent to transportation for life, but the sentence was never carried out.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Lorin 3 years ago

      With all these silly weetssbi, such a great page keeps my internet hope alive.

    • profile image

      ITBP 3 years ago


      Sir please read them.

      And about Jap brutality INA had plans to fight back Japanese if they had decided to to remain in India.

      And INA's aim was not to defeat BIA Militarily.

      Prem Kumar Sahgal, an officer of the INA once Military secretary to Subhas Chandra Bose and later tried in the first Red Fort trials, explained that although the war itself hung in balance and nobody was sure if the Japanese would win, initiating a popular revolution with grass-root support within India would ensure that even if Japan lost the war ultimately, Britain would not be in a position to re-assert its colonial authority,[6] which was ultimately the aim of the INA and Azad Hind.

      Thus what you said INA failed is not true.

    • profile image

      ITBP 3 years ago

      Your this article is very biased.

      Japanese killed many in Andaman and Nicobor, but British were killing in Millions in India, so who was killing more? British.

      Indian soldiers fought for British despite leaflets it's truth, but why? Because British largely relied on Soldiers from Martial race- those people who fought for Britain in 1857. Large part of BIA was Muslim and Muslim leader Jinnah was supporting british, so can you understand how much this influenced those soldiers who were Muslim?

      And soldiers were fed British propaganda, Fay in his book even quoted British intelligence service saying INA agents were successful to convince Indian soldiers to defect. Later British used Japanese-Indian army theory.

      But when same Indian soldiers when advanced in deep SE Asia, then they found out what they were told are plain lies. Later those soldiers themselves spread news about INA after returning to India.

      INA despite it's small size fought very well, it defeated British-African division in Battle of Admin Box, and successfully laid ambushes on enemy, in one incident INA opposed BIA from crossing Irawardi river so much that even General Slim said it was longest opposed river crossing and defection of INA soldiers to British were very low compared to what about British told.

      Sir, you know very little. Go study history before you spread your lies.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 4 years ago from Singapore

      Your comment belies truth. I speak from first hand knowledge as my great uncle fought against the Japs. Thosands of leaflets were showered on Indian soldiers to defect in the battle of Imphal, but it didnt happen. Also read the auto biography of General Harbaksh singh who was made a POW and asked to join the INA, but he refused. Bose has a lot to answer for the deaths and atrocities on the people of Andaman islands. I suggest you vist Car Nicobar, because i flew so often there and realize the monstrous crime done by Japs undr the nose of Bose. They killed the entire male population and took the women as comfort women.

      Come on man know your facts.!

    • profile image

      A Very Baised Article 4 years ago

      Yes your article has been written from the point of view of a imperialist power and rightly u described the INA as a small force, yes it was, but it was organised in a very short time.. Another point of yours that majority of Indian soldiers fought for the british... the reason was they didnt know much about the INA and Netaji, they were fed the information that they were fighting under japanese command, which is entirely wrong, INA was commanded by Indian general, most of INA funding was done by overseas INDIANs, even weapons used by the INA was self manufactured , they were making their own weapons. Now another point i would like u to read since ur knowledge history lil weak of perverted as your article proves, please read about the RIN revolt and Jabbalpur revolt etc all these happened because of the INA, Indian soldiers came to know about the INA after the world war as the british now lifted the ban from the media and they started putting up the facts about the INA.. And Indian army under british command felt that they too could protest... yes bose ignored many of japan's atrocities because he was looking for larger , that is independence for all INDIANs , EVEN THE SWINES LIKE THOSE WHO R COMMENTING HERE, without even reading proper facts... It was the INA's sacrifice that did the trick for India.. even largest scholar of the world can challenge me with that...

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 4 years ago from Singapore

      Dear iweet, it was nice reading your comment

    • profile image

      lweet 4 years ago

      I think it would be true to say that the British Rajah did kill more Indians than the Japanese.

      It would also be important to point out that the numbers were over the the entire period of British rule.

      The great famine or the slaughter of peaceful demonstrators or even the reprisals after the Indian mutiny had rationals such as administrative failings,an out of control general or shock reaction that such a loyal army could ever mutiny(thou in truth the vast majority stayed loyal to the existing order).

      THe Japanese seemed to be much more irational in such actions..

      One should never allow sentiment to have sway but hard facts.

      Its true to say that the victors will always write the history books but time also allows for view points to be modified.

      The British had no real policy beyond trade and profit or just preventing the french from gaining control in India.

      Imperial rule will always have faults but can also have benefits such as the destruction of the pindari bands and free lances,the outlawing of of suttee and thugee to the creation of a great railway,canal construction for famine relief etc.

      OK it was to enhance British control but it would be a mistake to suggest that India did not benefit along the way.

      Nothing in the history of ww11 or since suggests that the greater co prosperity sphere instigated by Japan would have been of any benefit to India.

      I suggest that Japans occupation or control of India would have been very harsh indeed.

      look at Japans actions in korea,manchuko or china.

      A British general wrote in 1912 that the Indian soldier could be compared to the cat inso much that the cat may not be attached to the master but to the house.

      The master being the British and the House being the Indian army..

      I again suggest that the Indian soldier may have seen British rule as unwelcome but better than Japanese.

      At best Netaji was mistaken in his understanding of the Japanese or at worst a traitor to his people.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 4 years ago from Singapore

      Thank you Waffen SS. The fact is Netaji failed. However i appreciate your sentiments

    • Waffen SS profile image

      Waffen SS 4 years ago

      Sir, Netaji did not think he would be able to liberate India. We cant be sure that if his plan was successful then would Japanese really manage to capture India type large country? By 1944 Japanese Military was exhausted, and scattered in Eastern Asia and Pacific, in Burma Japanese had only 350000 soldiers. Would British Indian army's Indian soldiers allow Japan to be India's new ruler? No. People in 1940's were much more conscious then they were in 1857. Japanese yes killed many Indians, even freedom fighter in Andaman, but British killed more Indians, so IMHO British was India's more bigger enemy, and Netaji did no wrong by taking help from Japanese. Thanks.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 4 years ago from Singapore

      Thank you Waffen SS for your comment, but rhetoric cannot replace actual history.

    • Waffen SS profile image

      Waffen SS 4 years ago

      This article is completely misleading. Did not british kill 3 Million Indians in 1942-43 famine?

      To stop British-Indian army's Indian soldiers from defecting British said Indian soldiers that these INA soldiers are actually Japanese Indian army, fighting for Japanese to enslave India, it was propaganda that prevented Indian soldiers from defecting, still some soldiers defected, of course Japanese was very ruthless, but how goo british was? Dont forget Jalianwalabagh. There was no difference between british imperialism and German Nazism. Please read history before writing such article. British indian army was nothing but a mercenary army who were paid to kill their own countrymen, they dont deserve respect.

      What Gandhiji could not do in 3 movements, Netaji did that in within just 1 movement, btw De Gualle also took help from Allies, do it is clear here is nothing wrong in taking help from enemy's enemy.

      And those who say Netaji was like another freedom fighter to them-Ignorance is bliss and little education is dangerous.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 4 years ago from Singapore

      Thank you L weet for a wonderful comment

    • profile image

      L weet 4 years ago

      one of the things that puzzles me with the view points of many Indians is the appreciation of the INA and very little for the imperial Indian army.

      Whilst the vast majority of the peoples of India both military and civilian were pro independance they were inteligent enough in my opinion to appreciate the old saying " better the devil you know than the devil you dont know".

      post war history has some what confirmed this.

      The japanese military were far more ruthless than the British had ever been.

      appreciate the peoples that stayed loyal to the old order and untill the end of hostilities.

      is it not an indian military tradition of being loyal to the salt.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 4 years ago from Singapore

      Thank you rana masood for commenting. I appreciate your view point

    • profile image

      rana masood 4 years ago

      It is purely the British side of the story. My father was a proud soldier having fought against colonial rule in India.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 5 years ago from Singapore

      Mr Sudeep, Please read the history books. Bose and the INA were defeated by December 1944 and the Japanese army was looking for a face saving way to end the war. This is brought out by the Japanese historians themselves. Truman knew about it but for political reasons the A Bomb was used.

      As far as Bose is concerned the less said about him the better. The one place the INA flag flew was in the Andaman islands and there the Japanese executed thousands of Indians with Bose just watching.

    • profile image

      madan g singh 5 years ago

      Dear Sudeep, You have mentioned ' alleged atrocities ' about the Andaman islands. I have been 5 times to Andamn and Nicobaar islands and the attrocities are REAL AND TERRIBLE.. Thank you for commenting

    • profile image

      sudeep 5 years ago

      Sir your comments are akin to what a true blooded Britisher would say & perhaps justify nuclear bombing of hiroshima & nagasaki killing 2.5 lac mostly civilians women & children.

      Compare these to the British propaganda on A& N Islands & alleged atrocities of indigenous population by Jap forces, 45000 strong INA & the Japanese force could have prevailed but for the sudden aend to WW-II due to above bombs...sir history changed in 5 minutes and a huge standing army of Imperial Japan was left with no choice but to go for unconditional surrender

    • profile image

      Vinayakan 5 years ago

      Mr MG Singh I find your article very illuminating and damning of "Netaji". Rajbhan's comment about the "freedom fighters" of India (the dubious variety who lied to and cheated the average Indian) must be exposed.

      First up - Bose. Excellent work MG Singh. Exposure of his conduct in the Andaman's would have been the fitting icing on the cake for the many deluded individuals who go about prating "Netaji's" courage and patriotism. I won't bother answering the die-hard supporters of "Netaji", but here is a tiny, but white-hot question for them: If dear "Netaji" was the undying nationalist and patriot he proclaimed to be, why marry an Austrian? Needless to say, this fact is hushed today.

      The next heads on the block should be Nehru and his family followed by Annie Besant, Jinnah and finally Gandhi. Greater India was lost because of these people.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 6 years ago from Singapore

      Thank you Vignesh for your comment. One cannot live on dreams and notions. Everysingle polnt made by you is answered in my hub. I also write from first hand experience,my great uncle was a captain in Burma. No Indian soldier wanted to join the INA. Only some POWs did. Bose conduct in Andaman islands was not the best

    • profile image

      Vignesh 6 years ago

      Mr.Rajbhan Singh ended his comment with "Jai Hind"(a phrase coined by Bose).It just shows Netaji's influence will always be there in every Indian.He might have failed, but never ever question his patriotism!! In Gandhi's own words "Subhash's patriotism is second to none".

      Well Mr.MG Singh, your facts are right.But your interpretation of these facts is awfully wrong. Bose was not a fool to think that he could defeat British with a troop of 45000.He only wanted to use INA as a catalyst to arouse the patriotism of Indians in British army and create a mass revolt. If the trials of INA generals much after the supposed death of Bose aroused the people so much, imagine what would have happened if the strict censor on INA activities was not in place during the war(march of INA till Imphal). One must also note that more than the British forces, poor logistical support,monsoon & disease outbreak were the prime reasons for INA's downfall. One must salute their bravery!!It's a shame that people like you take great pride in belittling the efforts of Bose & INA. How long will you people continue to admonish Bose for not following Mahatma's line??? You guys say "India would never have been truly free as She is today." I ask you one question.Are we really free today?? Even if it's so,of what use is this freedom? How much progress did the nation make in the last 65 years?? What was once a single united nation split into two and eventually into three with none progressing!

      If there was a leader who could have made India a better country, it was none other than Bose. His intellect, farsightedness,discipline & administrative skills are simply unmatchable.Please give the "Leader of the nation" the respect that he deserves.

      All those who still believe that Netaji & INA's contributions were insignificant, please read this JAI HIND.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 6 years ago from Singapore

      Thank you Raj, a wonderful comment

    • profile image

      Rajbhan Singh 6 years ago

      I have always felt "Netaji" was just another of the numerous "freedom fighters" willing to carve up and sell India, our beloved Bharat for a price, just as our politicians do today. This article dispels just one of the myths about "Netaji". If he had become the PM of India as has been asserted, the Japanese shadow goernment backing him would have been utterly more crude, cruel and barbaric than the British. Just a case of trading one master for the other. India would never have been truly free as She is today. Jai Hind.

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 6 years ago from Singapore

      Thank you Craig

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 6 years ago from Singapore

      Thank you Saminathan. Great to hear from you

    • profile image

      Saminathan Munisamy 6 years ago

      A fair gudgement! very well written, Sir. As a grandson of a survivor of Death Railway ordeal, I feel that Subhas Chandra Bose was incapable of standing against the atrocities of Japanese Imperial Army towards the Indian indentured laburers from Malaya. Almost 33 thousand Indians died in the process of building the railway and many Indian in cluding my grandfather was deceived by the Japanese in the name of liberating India. Even today, many of the Tamils in Malaysia, who had their fathers and brothers "snatched" away by the Japanese Army, find it very difficult to justify Subhas Chandra Bose's vision of liberating India!

    • profile image

      Craig Allen 6 years ago

      A fine & very well written article. Well done Sir!

    • MG Singh profile image

      MG Singh 6 years ago from Singapore

      Thank you Cecile, a potent comment

    • profile image

      Cecilie Blikker 6 years ago

      Finally an article by someone who has informed himself about the facts. Excellent.

      Most writing on Bose and the INA is written by people who want there to have been a real Indian warrior and they are ignorant of what really happened.

      Sugata Bose´s claim that his granduncle was a warrior statesman is at least half incorrect. Bose was no warrior, but his charisma seduced thousands to follow his dream only to die of hunger and desease. Bose had no training, no experience and the uniform was the only military aspect of the man. Generals do not appear out of nowhere.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: ""

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is used to quickly and efficiently deliver files such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisements has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)