ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Stupid is as Stupid Votes

Updated on September 27, 2011

September 26, 2011

Stupid is as stupid does. You know you're in trouble when even The Wall Street Journal runs an editorial that discusses how unintelligent Mr. Obama is by using that quote.

I recently followed a Bing search link to a blog regarding one of Mr. Obama’s recent blunders (I know it’s hard to keep track, his embarrassing gaffes are legion…).

In Mr. Obama’s recent “State of the Union” address, which has been historically reserved for more austere occasions, the perpetual candidate decided to use it as yet another opportunity to promote who? Himself. Had President Bush pulled a similar stunt none of the non-cable networks would have even bothered to broadcast this blatant self-promoting narcissistic grandstanding…

The question begs, should we expect less after almost three years of knowing this man?

Need we use any more evidence of our broken public schools and so-called “higher education” than pointing out a liberal discussion on a blog that defends not only Mr. Obama’s blunder regarding Lincoln and the founding of the Republican Party, but PBS attempting to cover up this blunder. Big Bird has indeed gone over to the dark side...

“No say it ain’t so Carol!”


PBS used a portion of President Obama's speech, yet took out the part where Mr. Obama made still another mistake with regard to factual information.

The Teleprompter in Chief said that the Republican Party was founded by Abe Lincoln.

It wasn’t. The Republican Party was founded in 1854. Abe didn’t burst onto the scene until around 1858 and in this reliable (key word reliable) secondary source; it is clear that Lincoln did not “found” the Republican Party.

What are they teaching in schools today? Oh, that’s right – six months on “earth day” and at least three or more months on Martin Luther King. Then, summer break.

Now before someone tosses out the race card because I believe a day, a week at the very most, devoted to the history of Martin Luther King is plenty -- don't bother making that mistake. A survey in The Wall Street Journal recently revealed that our school-age reading scores are way down in America. I firmly believe it is because they are not spending nearly enough time on the basics of what they should learn in school: reading, writing and arithmetic. Spending weeks and weeks on Martin Luther King will not help a student to increase their reading scores. A less read student is a less informed student.

Instead of the basics, students are brainwashed with the “earth day” myth, weeks and months on end. It has zero to do with any thing other than the fact a very liberal agenda has invaded our public schools and it needs to stop.

The result of our shoddy public school system’s warped sense of what is a necessary education (Sandra has two Mommies) is producing bloggers (good) who use Wikipedia as a source (bad).

Where did this blogger get his information he used to defend Mr. Obama saying Abe Lincoln founded the Republican Party? Wikipedia. Did anyone bother to teach this blogger and children like him that a “source” which can be edited by anyone with access to a PC is not a reliable source?

Did anyone teach these students that finding a primary source is the optimum way to back ones research? And when a primary source isn’t available (which can often be the case with history) then the next best source is a secondary source. Did anyone in our pubic school system bother to teach this to our students?

I refuse to turn any traffic to the liberal blogger’s rag. Suffice to say, the writer defended Mr. Obama’s gaffe by crying foul to those who would say Abe Lincoln wasn’t the founder of the Republican Party.

But he wasn't the founder.

The blogger actually cites other bloggers as further “proof” that Mr. Obama got it right.

Then he cites the GOP website as “proof” that even Republicans say he is the founder:

Abraham Lincoln helped establish the Republican Party with a speech denouncing an 1854 law, written by a Democrat Senator, that allowed slavery to expand into the western territories. Two years later, he co-founded the Illinois GOP. Lincoln was runner-up for the 1856 Republican vice presidential nomination and then became a Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate.

Using the very quote above that blogger uses to “make his point” – I can say confidently, in fact it does not make the bloggers point!

This quote does not say Lincoln was the founder of the Republican Party!

Read even out of context, nowhere does this quote say Abe Lincoln founded the Republican Party.

The word "established" was used only after the word "helped" as well as in the same sentence with "a speech". Meaning - this speech wasn't the moment the Republican Party was founded - it was the moment when the Republican Party became a "player" as it were... We know this because the Republican Party was founded years before Lincoln ran for President.

The blogger then goes on to defend PBS. PBS – such a fair and balanced network – said they didn’t edit Mr. Obama’s speech. They claim (I’m laughing as I type this making it very difficult to type) that they received a pre-speech of Mr. Obama’s and that the off-script, so to speak, remarks weren’t in this supposed draft of Mr. Obama’s.

Right. I wish someone could name for me one program ever that has taken some draft of a speech of any President, and used it for their broadcast that aired after the actual speech was delivered.

And just how did they get that draft anyway? Do they have a direct line to the President’s speech writer’s notes?

Liar, liar PBS’s pants are on fire. They took the blunder out because they wanted to protect Mr. Obama is my guess. Regardless, blogger was adamant that PBS said it, so therefore it must be so. If PBS makes an excuse that makes absolutely no sense it still must be so to a liberal (apparently).

Let’s face it folks, this latest mistake isn't the first and we know it won't be the last. I hate to say it, but our country has been conned by a very handsome, sharp dresser named Barry Soretoro.

We all remember the “57 states” blunder by Mr. Obama, his “Austrians speak Austrian” gaffe and other countless brainless things like bowing to a Saudi Prince, turning back the bust of Winston Churchill from the UK and sending them an iPod with speeches he made. Seriously?

We remember the oh-so-smart constitutional Harvard Graduate lawyer who can’t even get constitutional law correct (cue the Teleprompter in Chief where he wags a finger at the Supreme Court’s ruling of Citizens United v. the FEC).

He said:

Well I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, and worse, by foreign entities…They should be decided by the American people, and that's why I'm urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.

Even The New York Times called out the President for either knowingly twisting the facts or just being downright...well...stupid.

The Supreme Court decision did not hand down a new precedent that would enable foreign entities to “bankroll” U.S. elections. Congress already passed a law that would stop that from happening.

Congress passed the Foreign Agents Registration Act in 1996, which already prohibits independent political commercials by foreign nationals or foreign companies…

So has anyone heard about the latest blunders he’s performed?

He recently made a speech all about the “intercontinental railroad” he believes has to be built.

So which continents was he planning on hooking up with a railroad?

Has anyone seen his latest photo op blooper where he blocks the face of a dignitary next to him because he's waving? Notice, he is the only one waving here!

You just can't make this stuff up...

While anyone makes mistakes, like me for instance. While it isn’t nice to point out these mistakes, those of us who do wouldn’t be so driven were it not for The Bush Derangement Syndrome that pointed out any hint of a mistake Mr. Bush made by the left and the left stream media. And trust me here, George W. Bush on his worst day couldn’t make as many gaffes and blunders and downright stupid remarks as Mr. Obama has on his best days.

Can I get an Amen?

We have raised at least one generation of Stupid is as Stupid does voters. I blame the public school system and the liberal stream media. We have brainwashed an entire generation into believing that if they see it on the internet, if they see it in a movie, it’s real. These same numb-nuts who iconize Michael Moore and believe his mock-u-mentaries to be true! Why? Because he won academy awards for his fictional propaganda movies that’s why! And global warming must be real, Al Gore won an academy award too and a Nobel Peace Prize!

Which brings us to Mr. Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize…

No, I can’t go there. I’ll heave…

Hollywood is not a primary source. A blogger isn’t a secondary source. Wikipedia and Snopes (another liberal darling as it is run by a married couple with no credentials who are fairly consistent Obama apologists) isn’t a source to site for anything.

Never let a liberal get in the way of any factual information. Stupid is as stupid does and votes.

Remember to vote 2012 and make sure we replace the “Stupid” with people who will honor the Constitution, honor our country and truly represent We the People.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • cjv123 profile imageAUTHOR


      7 years ago from Michigan

      Poolman - you crack me up!!!! And you are absolutely right!

    • profile image

      Old Poolman 

      7 years ago

      cjv123 - Shhhhhh, don't tip them off to this. The only thing that makes his speeches bearable is waiting for the next "foot in mouth" mistake he is sure to make. We would not want this to stop would we?

    • cjv123 profile imageAUTHOR


      7 years ago from Michigan

      That has also always been my observation about Obama. I have to be totally honest - I can understand that the President can be very, very busy. So He can't verify every single jot and tittle that someone writes for him. In a speech, a mistake can happen. But Obama's got two problems. He's not smart enough -- apparently -- to catch ANY of them - he makes his own stupid mistakes over and over "corpsmen" - and that he KEEPS a staff who continue to make these mistakes for him over and over also says something about his intelligence. Abe Linclon founder of the Republican Party/intercontinental railroad etc. -- I'm sorry - if you're my speech writer and I'm President and you make one minor blunder - OK. Don't let it happen again. Two times, three times to the tenth power??? Get another job! He has STAFFS -- plural -- who put his stuff together. They're not even smart enough to verify what the heck they hand their boss! I verify my Hubs far better than his staff does with the material they give the President!

    • sheila b. profile image

      sheila b. 

      7 years ago

      As for the intercontinental railroad remark, it says a lot not only about him but about the people he surrounds himself with. No one caught the mistake? Wow!

    • cjv123 profile imageAUTHOR


      7 years ago from Michigan

      He not only can't learn (apparently) from his mistakes but he makes brand new blunders pretty much every single day. What a con artist this guy was to get elected and fool liberals and the entire lib stream media into thinking he had a brain that functioned! I love what you said "Obama does [learn from his mistakes] because he is stupid and stuck with an ideology of failure." ABSOLUTELY TRUE!

    • profile image

      Nick Lucas 

      7 years ago

      cjv - to answer the question is he that stupid.....I will say YES he is and time and time again he proves it......the man has no common sense ....he repeats mistake after mistake....everyone makes mistakes but those with an IQ over 70 learn from what went wrong or what does not work and move on with a new plan.....Obama does not because he is stupid and stuck with an ideology of failure

    • cjv123 profile imageAUTHOR


      7 years ago from Michigan

      Caltex - I know - I honestly thought it was photo-shopped when I first saw it. I said, "Holy cow - that HAS to be an altered photo. He isn't THAT stupid - is he?!" Could he LOOK MORE DORKY?!?

    • cjv123 profile imageAUTHOR


      7 years ago from Michigan

      Wayne -- the problem is - if Cain isn't the Republican selection - I don't know that the rest are going to make it. Perry shot himself right in the foot with his abliet honest but CRAZY stand on ILLEGALS. Romney is a no way - even Christie is a no way what with the WSJ article this morning. Christie is VERY liberal on things that most Conservatives will balk at - yet some things he's very Conservative. During his 2009 campaign he opposed requiring MINORS seeking an abortion to first notify their parents. HUH?! I can't send my kid to school with Tylenol but THEY can send her to get an abortion?! On that ALONE Christie is a no-go! We're in trouble - but I hope Cain can pull it out and get the country behind him or I'm afraid we're stuck with Obama for four more.

    • caltex profile image


      7 years ago

      The UN photo is just priceless! I did find an article from the MSM that covered it. I'm sure they were thinking it was just way too good to pass up. I could not believe it when the word 'moronic' was used.

    • Wayne Brown profile image

      Wayne Brown 

      7 years ago from Texas

      These were probably the same folks who took offense to Al Gore being called out on "inventing the Internet". The only thin Al invented was a giant crock of steaming BS with his environmental rants all designed to prop up his potential booming carbon credit brokerage business. Obama does mind modifying history since he plans to change everything else about America know fundamental transformation. We'll have wait and see how asleep at the switch America really is in 2012. WB

    • breakfastpop profile image


      7 years ago

      Brilliant and oh so true. Our education system is broken and we are producing a generation of students who don't know or appreciate history. They are clueless and when they enter the work force we all pay the price of their stupidity. As for the president, let's face it he really isn't all that bright despite the schools he was supposed to have graduated from. His gaffes and untruths never receive the coverage they would had he been George Bush. The MSM woks for him, not us. Great piece of writing carol. Up, awesome, useful and interesting.

    • Dave Sibole profile image

      Dave Sibole 

      7 years ago from Leesburg, Oh

      Good article. This was allowed to happen because the "right" slept through school and didn't say anything as the "left" brainwashed the gullible. Shame on us.

    • profile image 

      7 years ago from upstate, NY

      cjv123- Today's public schools are more like liberal indoctrination centers than educational centers and all with our money! Why teach our true history and Constitution when we have "Heather has Two Mommies" and a three week review on earth day.

      Why should we study the Constitution, when Liberal judges can manipulate its meaning by way of a "Living Constitution"? Those who rail against the Citizen's United ruling fail to understand that it upholds the plain meaning of the Constitution, which protects free speech but says nothing about the speaker ie(corporations). Of course, the media are also corporations but you don't see these poeple trying to censor them, unless its talk radio.-Regards WBA

    • profile image

      Nick Lucas 

      7 years ago

      PBS has become a progressive’s dream. Not only do they lean to the left but they even use childrens programming to indoctrinate kids….very sad…..sesame street went from a nice neighborhood to a liberal hell hole. I love the picture of Obama waving…I saw that on Fox and could not believe it. Good piece as usual Carol!!!

    • cjv123 profile imageAUTHOR


      7 years ago from Michigan

      ha ha ha ha you're killing me Old Poolman!!

    • profile image

      Old Poolman 

      7 years ago

      Only if the TSA doesn't get involved with trains. If that were to happen, I would just take a bus to the UK.

    • cjv123 profile imageAUTHOR


      7 years ago from Michigan

      ROTFL - I'm with you Old Poolman - maybe they'll give us a train to the UK! Won't THAT be cool?!

    • profile image

      Old Poolman 

      7 years ago

      cjv123 - Up and all those other buttons on this one. One cool thing about the internet and Google, if one searches long enough and hard enough, he can find exactly the answer he was looking for. And even better, he can then include the link showing where he got the information.

      I sure hope I live long enough to get a ride on that "Intercontinental Railway." That would be a fun trip.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)