Analysis of the 1996 Film "The Crucible" by Arthur Miller
“The Crucible”  by Arthur Miller and Bob Miller
- Based on a screenplay by Arthur Miller from his 1953 play and 1967 film.
- United States film release by FOX, 1996
- MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for mature themes and brief nudity)
- Cast: Daniel Day-Lewis, Winona Ryder, Joan Allen, Paul Scofield, Rob Campbell, Karron Graves, Bruce Davison, Mary Pat Gleason, Peter Vaughan.
- Directed by Nicholas Hytner.
- Produced by Bob Miller (son of Arthur Miller) and David V. Picker
Arthur Miller's Background
Arthur Miller grew up the son of New York Jewish immigrants and witnessed both scenes from the Jewish Holocaust and the Cold War. Mr. Miller wrote his play The Crucible to protest the abusive politics of McCarthyism during the Cold War in the United States.
Never a supporter of Communism, he clearly remembered the Great Depression and its related social issues. However, he did not see Marxism as the cure for fascism, because of the severe and prolonged Soviet persecution of artists like himself. Any artist, musician, writer, or singer that did not follow the Soviet line and Soviet rules of the arts was shunned.
In the early 1950s, small-time Wisconsin politician Joseph McCarthy placed himself at the head of the crusade for American democracy. He did this for personal fame and he did it with his House on Un-American Activities Committee.
From his platform, McCarthy accused artists and writers in the US of Communist affiliations. With help of radio and newspaper columnists like Hedda Hopper, he successfully blacklisted several artists form gaining any type of substantial work. Others were threatened and eventually changed their political party from Communist, Socialist, or even Democrat to Republican, so fearful were they to be categorized anywhere left of center. Still, many lost their livelihoods during the McCarthy Inquisition, fired at a mere suggestion of knowing Communists.
Miller himself was called to testify before McCarthy's group in the mid-1950s after writing his play in 1953.
Arthur Miller used his writing techniques in The Crucible as a play, a 1967 film, and a 1996 remake produced by his son Bob, against these injustices. The Millers compared the US injustices toward "suspected Communists" with the Salem Witch Trials. The only difference was that McCarthy burned books, rather than witches.
The Crucible is set in 1692 Salem Massachusetts in the play and on film, where Puritanism interferes in the lives of individuals and its repressiveness reigns as it did in 1950s America. A theocracy is an analogy for the 1950s government administration and the Cold War, and for today's Democrats, and such US 21st century movements as the hunt for the Axis of Evil.
Story Line and Implications
Hard work and church activities are the only activities in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692 and land disputes arise over boundaries and deeds. Anger and resentments boil and a target is sought. It is found as witchcraft phobia begins, splitting Salem into citizens using witch hunts for selfish gains and those wanting to cleanse society.
Reverend Samuel Parris (Bruce Davison) discovers his daughter Betty (Rachael Bella) dancing naked with a dead chicken in the woods with other girls and his Barbados slave Tituba (Charlayne Woodard) near home. They are attempting to use a love potion to attract village boys. Abigail Williams (Winona Ryder), an orphan who witnessed her parents' murder by Indians is also in the household. Incensed with anger and frightened, Parris calls Reverend Hale (Rob Campbell) to hunt witches, which he finds in Abigail and Betty, because of the Indians Abigail saw and because of Betty's dead chicken. We see among various characters the petty, small-minded Putnams (like the McCarthy committee), the scholarly Hale, and an adulterer - This is protagonist John Proctor (Daniel Day Lewis) who fornicates with savage Abigail. Abigail is a manipulator behind the love potions, trying to get rid of Proctor's wife, but setting in motion the witch hunts, instead.
This 1996 version more strongly highlights the manipulation and the sense of power that Abigail feels and that the authorities (Paul Scofield and others) feel in selecting witches for execution, than the original play and 1967 film versions.
Proctor tries defending truth at his home when he and Mrs. Proctor argue about whether he should stand against his adulterous partner, Abigail. The adultery has practically destroyed the Proctor's marriage. When the Salem court arrives to arrest another character, Elizabeth, for witchcraft, Proctor sees a need for action.
Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life! Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them you have hanged! How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name!— John Proctor (Daniel Day-Lewis)
In a meeting room/court, Proctor and other citizens oppose the court and are attacked by people with selfish interests in the trials. Giles Corey and Francis Nurse protest the trials and are arrested. Proctor confesses his adultery, which was covered by the hysteria of massive, obsessive witch hunting. However, the court does not believe his confession and goes on finding witches and finding them guilty. Many die by burning or in prison. Abigail pretends that another young woman, Mary (Karron Graves), sent out her spirit to attack her and causes Mary, who had encouraged Proctor and believed his story, to renounce her own testimony. Mary accuses Proctor in order to protect herself and Proctor is then arrested. A revolted Judge Hale (Scofield) quits the trial and simply abandons the court to its own devises.
In jail, John Proctor chooses between life and death by signing his confession. He will be executed. Realizing it will be used against others as well; he rips the document into pieces and sentences himself to death in order to save the others. His action cleanses and restores him to goodness and self-sacrifice seems the only means to restore the balance of this society. He hopes the furor will end with his death.
Chaplin Evicted From USA by the Witch Hunts
Miller Interview with Charlie Rose
Well, all the plays (and screenplays) that I was trying to write were plays that would grab an audience by the throat and not release them, rather than presenting an emotion which you could observe and walk away from.— Arthur Miller
Meanings and Importance
Major Themes: conformity and good versus evil.
The individual and society must deal with the threat of evils within the law, power, and social issues. The need to conform to the church's views is overwhelming. Characters must forsake their faith or lie that they interacted with Satan. They must conform or follow their own code. Is it more important to conform to policy or to vocalize personal views and be eliminated? Is a person doomed if they don't live by the rules of the Church or is dissent allowable?
Minor Theme: hysteria and cleansing
Hysteria can cover greed, adultery and the bad behaviors caused by too much or not enough work in a repressive society.
Salem is recalled when thinking about McCarthyism in a repressed and oppressive 1950s. Employees were told to spy on coworkers and neighbors and report anyone who might be a communist sympathizer. Sympathizers had to be cleansed from society. It was free publicity for McCarthy, covered up by national hysteria. Ultimately, the Communist witch hunts ended in failure, but many lives were ruined. McCarthy's political aspirations were, however, at an end.
Arthur Miller addressed issues that still exist today. We face the option of nonconformity. People who define the systems in which we live still exist, as do the accusers of minorities. The House Un-American Activities Committee tried to "cleanse" America, just as Salem tried to cleanse itself of witches.
In the 21st century, terrorists and anybody that remotely knows one "must be cleansed from America." Perhaps this is a witch hunt and perhaps there will always be witch hunts. Perhaps they are poor attempts at unifying a nation. What do they cover in each generation and who will speak out against them in the future?
© 2008 Patty Inglish MS