- Politics and Social Issues»
- Social Issues
The NRA are mounting an attack. Take heed they will push too far. No solution Just pollution. Industry not folk.
Why does any one need a weapon that just looks like a Fully Automatic Assault Weapon
Just drop the pretenses. NRA is out to stop all discussion. Why?
Because they are bought and owned my gun manufacturers. What a gullible market. Gun owners join with a group hell bent on selling them their product. Very hard to take that group seriously.
No one has a constitutional right to carry a weapon that looks just like a fully automatic military grade (bullet hose) Assault weapon. I understand that normal practice in the military does no even clear such weaponry. In rare occassions the weapon has a purpose but we have found that a 3 round burst has the same benefits but not the complications and logistic problems.
Have you ever fired a weapon that can shoot 20 or so rounds just in one pull of the trigger?
Have you ever fired what we normally call an assault weapon?
Well with regards to the above poll, you really should.
There are different restrictions and legal and not so legal ways to do it. But it is really fun. Unless you are rich you cannot do it much because it is super expensive. And it is not like you can do it 10 times in short order with the same weapon, it just gets too hot.
And I must say that if I thought I might be attacked in my home by superior forces I would sure like to have one at the ready. But I do not think that way based on 99.99999% reality.
But here in my San Diego County they just rounded up a gang sweep and confiscated over forty of the weapons and that is a bit scary to me.
I lean toward keeping those weapons in civilian hands as off limits and too much.
We say grace and we say mam!
Taking the life of another.
We cannot prepare ourselves or stand tall in the proclamation of the ability to take another life. Only true men secure in their cause and supported by the righteous can take the life of another.
No man on mortal American soil can justify the armament required to blast 30 rounds per 1.5 seconds. There is no proper use for such weaponry in a domestic setting.
The need or desire to have weapons that look or act like they can do so, have no protection in our constitution. That desire stems from a "style", a need to act out scenes from video games to movies.
Do not get me wrong, I think that is just fine on a qualifying range.
At this age, this boy could shoot a gun well. Seriously. But the ammo was water.
Stand straight and ask, "why do you need such a weapon", does it secure our freedoms?
I think every American should have weapons. I think we should all be ready for catastrophe, insurgence and oppression by force.
But there is no place for Assault Weapons in a home in America.
Those that argue that there is no reason, to gauge, regulate weapons of mass destruction are painfully boring. A fully automatic AK 47 assault weapon, is wrong. A wannabe look the same is equally wrong and those that demand a right to it, have no intellectual constitutional integrity.
I promise you there are better weapons for a person who wants quality.
If you have not done it. Do the paperwork and the research. Go out and fire some awesome equipment. It is fun to blow things up at 500 meters. It is a blast to fire so many rounds a second and tear apart a target. It is an interactive amusement park.
Justice does not come at the end of a barrel.
I heard tell of a man that wanted peace but carried a gun.
Wyatt Earp was his name and he used to be a sheriff where I live.
I really think that this man wanted peace, so that he would not be shot dead when it was realized he was cheating at poker. I was raised in Arizona the home of Tombstone and the OK Corral shootout. And then moved to San Diego where I understand Wyatt Earp "kept the peace" for a few years as Sheriff. A fine line between outlaws and lawmen. So we wonder if we need to escalate the ability to kill another.