ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America

Updated on December 30, 2014
The author's well-worn T-shirt.
The author's well-worn T-shirt.

What Does the Second Amendment Really Mean?

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Much has been written about these 27 words, much of it useless claptrap. People who are against the individual ownership of firearms focus on the first clause “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, . . .” while those of us, including this writer, who believe individuals have a right to own and use firearms, concentrate on the second, and operative, clause: “ . . . the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Now the Supreme Court has spoken on the issue of whether the 2nd Amendment constitutes an individual right vs. a collective right in District of Columbia vs. Heller (2008) and in McDonald Vs. Chicago (2010). Here is Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority:

Nowhere else in the Constitution does a “right” attributed to “the people” refer to anything other than an individual right. What is more, in all six other provisions of the Constitution that mention “the people,” the term unambiguously refers to all members of the political community, not an unspecified subset. This contrasts markedly with the phrase “the militia” in the prefatory clause. As we will describe below, the “militia” in colonial America consisted of a subset of “the people”— those who were male, able bodied, and within a certain age range. Reading the Second Amendment as protecting only the right to “keep and bear Arms” in an organized militia therefore fits poorly with the operative clause’s description of the holder of that right as “the people”.

In spite of this, there are still efforts by certain parties (i.e., the federal government, and some local governments) to deny this right to freedom-loving Americans. I still hear the argument that the amendment pertains to you only if you are a member of a militia. Well, lets examine that claim. First of all, when the Constitution was written, the “Militia” was comprised of able-bodied men who kept their guns at home and were called together when needed, such as when the British invaded. So, they were ordinary citizens like you and me who were permitted to keep and bear arms. These were not members of the Continental Army or local constabulary, they were ordinary citizens who owned weapons and could be called upon to defend themselves and other citizens.

Actually, the “militia” argument can be dismissed just as easily with a little common sense (as Justice Scalia argued). Let’s take another look at the amendment as written: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. So, we have first a “because” clause and secondly a “therefore” clause. Regardless of what the “because” clause states, the operative clause is the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The “because” clause could have been “Because pigs don’t fly,” it would not matter - the “therefore” clause is the operative part of the statement.

Now I wish the amendment were written as follows: An armed citizenry being the greatest guarantee against tyranny, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. I would be willing to bet if our Founding Fathers could have foreseen the attempts to water down the 2nd Amendment (indeed, there are some who would repeal it altogether), they would probably have written it a bit differently. We shall never know but the Supreme Court has stated it is an individual right to keep and bear arms and that’s good enough for me. If you’re one of those people who absolutely loathe firearms, that’s fine - don’t own any. But leave mine alone. And I sincerely hope you don’t find yourself in a situation where you may need to defend yourself and have no weapon to do so. Hey, you can always call the cops . . . if you have time.

District of Columbia v. Heller

If you wish to read about the Supreme Court decision to uphold the 2nd Amendment as an individual right, go here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

UPDATE - MARCH 2013

As a result of the unfortunate shootings late last year in Newtown, Connecticut, the gun control issue is on the front burner again. This was a horrible case in which 20 kids and 7 adults were killed by this nut, Adam Lanza, who then shot himself (would that he had done that BEFORE he went to the school!) Of course, the clamor for "gun control" went up immediately, focusing on everyone's favorite bogeyman, "assault weapons." The state of New York passed strict gun control laws as did Colorado. In the NY case, 10-round magazines were made illegal so the maximum "clip" you can buy is a 7-round clip. Trouble is they don't exist! So they changed the law to read 10-round clips are legal BUT you can only put seven rounds into them. This is so stupid it's almost embarrassing to type the words! In the Colorado case, at least one local sheriff has declared he will not enforce the law as it is contrary to the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution (good for him!)

I read something recently that sums up my feelings on the matter: we don't need gun control - we need NUT control.

Update - April 2014: Another shooting at Ft. Hood, Texas

Once again the sheer lunacy of the gun-control crowd has been brought to the forefront. Just like the last time at Fort Hood with the Islamic terrorist Maj. Nidal, just like the kids that got shot at Columbine, just like the kids that got shot in Sandy Hook, CT, just like a hundred other incidents, THE ONLY PERSON ARMED WAS THE BAD GUY. An Army base and soldiers aren't allowed to carry? This is madness.

Once more for you liberal, anti-gun zealots out there: PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO COMMIT ILLEGAL ACTS WITH FIREARMS DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT GUN LAWS. 99.9% of gun owners in this country are law abiding citizens - DRACONIAN GUN LAWS ONLY NEGATIVELY AFFECT THEM, NOT THE OUTLAWS.

Ask yourselves why it is that the cities with the strictest anti-gun laws (Chicago, Detroit, Washington, etc.) have the highest crime rates? ONLY THE OUTLAWS ARE "ALLOWED" TO HAVE GUNS.

STOP TRYING TO DENY US OUR 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS. AND THE 2ND AMENDMENT DOES NOT MEAN YOU HAVE TO BELONG TO A MILITIA EITHER - READ IT AND YOU WILL SEE THAT. It is the ONLY place in the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights that uses the phrase "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."

Right-thinking people: you know what's coming, more calls for "gun-control" with asinine restrictions on guns that "look mean" or carry more than seven rounds, etc. Get out the checkbooks and the credit cards and make a donation to the National Rifle Association (NRA) and/or the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR). Do it NOW.

UPDATE - DECEMBER 2014

I'm adding the video below because it contains what a president SHOULD say about our 2nd Amendment rights. If only this guy actually WERE the president!

Common Sense Talk on "Gun Control"

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • AlexDrinkH2O profile imageAUTHOR

      AlexDrinkH2O 

      4 years ago from Southern New England, USA

      james lovelady and wba108 - yes, you're both right - thanks for commenting!

    • wba108@yahoo.com profile image

      wba108@yahoo.com 

      4 years ago from upstate, NY

      I agree with you completely, the founders were clear that the greatest deterrent for a tyrant is an armed populous. I think this amendment is pretty straight forward and those who oppose it generally could give a hoot about the Constitution anyway!

    • profile image

      james lovelady 

      5 years ago

      in my opinion if not for our right to keep and bear arms what would stop the (government) from having total control. Isn`t that one of the reasons for the 2nd amendment.

    • AlexDrinkH2O profile imageAUTHOR

      AlexDrinkH2O 

      6 years ago from Southern New England, USA

      WillStarr thank you. Appreciate your comment.

    • WillStarr profile image

      WillStarr 

      6 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      You're one of the few who have interpreted the clauses correctly. The Bill of Rights, is just that...a list of natural rights that are deemed to preexist the Constitution and restrictive clauses to prevent government from infringing on those rights.

      The restrictive clause in the Second:

      "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

      Simple, really!

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)