ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • North America Political & Social Issues

"The" Telephone Company: How a Virtual Monopoly Hurts Consumers

Updated on February 10, 2018
DzyMsLizzy profile image

Liz's advice on finance, credit, frugal living practices, & anything monetary, is from the 'school of hard knocks,' research, & experience.

Phone Games

No matter the phone style, the providers all play the same games
No matter the phone style, the providers all play the same games

Telephone Service?

There is, for all practical purposes, just one, single gigantic telephone company available in this entire country! That would be AT&T and its various subsidiary companies, such as Southern Bell. Even if they have retained their locally-recognized names, AT&T owns most all of them. (The number not so owned is a dismally small number; essentially a statistical zero.)

This is surprising and shocking, because they were deemed to be a monopoly, and ordered by the Supreme Court to split themselves up many years ago.

For some reason known only to the slippery lawyers they keep on an in-house payroll, the order did not "hold." After a few years, they started once again buying up, merging with, and otherwise putting out of business, their competitors.

How Does This Hurt Customers?

Denial of choice in any free-enterprise system based upon competition is always harmful to the consumer. It prevents them from comparison shopping, because there are no other providers to which they can compare service and pricing options.

AT&T and its myriad of subsidiaries are, (despite games of semantics that may be played out in courtrooms across the nation), guilty of what amounts to price-fixing. The slippery corporate lawyers may try to pretty it up and make it sound benevolent, but, to any student of English, all it amounts to is double-speak and obfuscation.

The language of Legalese is so cluttered with contradictions hidden in clauses, sub-clauses, sections, chapters, numbered paragraphs and sub-paragraphs, each and every one filled with "whomsoever; except; third party; parties of the first part; unless; as deemed; to wit; shall; shall not; hereinafter referred to as; ..." ... and so forth, that it amounts to weaseling out of both the spirit and letter of the rules that should apply.

A pile of steaming pile of waste is just that: no matter whether you call it by it's vulgar common street name, or try to make it sound innocuous by giving it a scientific-sounding name such as "nitrogenous waste material."

Other Options?

As a result of this denial of choice, we are seeing ever more ads for all kinds of "magic devices" offering to provide "free" phone service by means of "VoIP," (Voice over Internet Protocol) systems.

Simple. Just hook it up to your computer, and you can call anywhere for free. Hold the phone! It is not free! Nothing is free! You still must have an Internet connection, and that means an Internet service provider (ISP), for which you will pay a monthly fee. Guess who provides a fair share of ISP services? Bingo! There's that telephone giant again!

Sure, you may not have an actual telephone bill, but then again, you very well might. That ISP may be tied into your telephone service, and without paying that telephone corporation for the land line, over which your computer connects to the Internet, you would not be able to use that swell little gizmo.

To be sure, landline phones these days are getting rare; it's all about wireless connectivity via cell phones and their repeater towers. All the same, the phone company is involved.

(And, if you have cable TV service, you are paying another corporate giant for the same things, since it has long been possible to have multiple types of service with your cable subscription.)

Avoidance by Internet?

Maybe, if you have cable connection to the Internet, you'd escape. No, not really! That big bad old monopolistic telephone giant now also has its tentacles into cable systems as well.

Even if you have an ISP (Internet Service Provider) that is independent of the phone company (and are not using a cable-subscription service) such as one we used to have, we were still dependent upon the phone company for our Internet Service.

Why is that? It's because the phone company has a monopoly on the telephone lines. Any other independent ISPs, who do not have their own phone lines, have no choice but to piggyback onto the phone lines already in place.

This is a problem because, even though the government has forced the phone company to allow such access, they are not required to offer access to their best and most modern equipment.

Therefore, slower speeds and other annoying issues were and are common. At times, it was only marginally better than having an old-fashioned dial-up modem, instead of the ADSL to which we had also subscribed. We gave up this service, in disgust.

We've now subscribed to cable, and have bundled TV/Internet/Phone service through them.

(That doesn't mean they are entirely innocent of these practices, either, however; we're still dealing with another corporate giant; the 'bundling' issue remains!)

Truth In Advertising?

Hope springs eternal. There are truth in advertising laws. The problem is, they are either:

  1. written without any "teeth," for proper enforcement, or,
  2. the government is exceedingly lax in enforcing the laws, or,
  3. there are insufficient personnel hired to keep up with all the false claims (which is related to point 2.), or,
  4. they are routinely ignored, circumvented, and scoffed at, or
  5. All of the above!

Anyone interested in buying a bridge? I have several in my inventory. Sure I do!

When you sign up for telephone service, you are quoted a per-month cost for the services you have chosen. Unfortunately, that is not the whole story. They very carefully omit telling you about all of the assorted surcharges, taxes and fees that will be added on to those charges, also monthly.

These extra charges add about half again the original quoted charges. In the case of cell phones, these added charges nearly double the quoted monthly rate.

Another point: that great big corporate giant I mentioned by name earlier? They have a huge share of the cell phone market, and have gotten there by buying up smaller companies.

We used to have cell phones. We hated that big giant, and deliberately searched out a smaller, independent. We found Cingular. They were good.

Guess what happened? AT&T bought them out/took them over/eliminated the smaller company, so we ended up with exactly the same old company with which we did not want to do business in the first place!!

Our revenge? We got rid of our cell phones!

What About Your Phone Bill?

Phone bills, like other utilities, are skyrocketing. We called to try and get ours reduced.

It was pointless. The phone company seems to have taken a page from the cable and satellite TV systems' playbooks, offering "package deals."

Supposedly, you get all the cool stuff for a cheaper price. Well, it's not so cheap. Our phone service had gone up to about $60. per month for the items we wanted to use.

For one thing, we used the phone company's answering service, as we got tired of answering machines breaking down/wearing out on about a 3-year cycle. In the end, it worked out cheaper to subscribe to the phone company's "message center." Next, as we had elderly family 3 hours away, we needed unlimited long distance.

That's all. Just two simple things. But, could we get those? No. It was "cheaper" to 'bundle' those services with other things we didn't want, such as call waiting, conference calling and call forwarding.


You Might As Well Do This!

Source

Money Down the Drain

When I called to find out about getting just the services we needed, it was going to cost me more than the rate we were then paying, for fewer services. The fact that we also qualified for the California "lifeline" rate did not make any difference to that quote.

Instead of saving me money, then, they wanted to charge more for less, leaving us stuck with a monthly bill that was higher than we could really afford. Where's the logic, truth, or fairness in that?

This "bundling" trend is pure unadulterated nonsense. With the current technology, they do not have to come out to your house to initiate these various services. It's a simple matter of flipping a switch somewhere. It is absolutely possible to flip a single switch instead of 2, 3, or more,

Or, nowadays, simply selecting an item from a drop-down menu on the computer, thereby flipping the switch remotely; no personnel need dirty their overalls.

It should not cost more to do less.

Enough is Enough!

On all of these things, these corporations need to be taken sternly to task.

Everything is wrong with everything these corporate giants are doing, and that is why no single reason can be given by any one member of the current "occupy" movement.

Everyone who is there participating is protesting on behalf of their own particular problem, or that of an organized sub-group. There are a multitude of reasons, yet there is only one reason. It boils down to this:

The single reason is "everything!" It's all gone wrong--it all needs to be fixed. No more excuses need be offered; they will be not accepted.

Research References

“Antitrust Law.” Antitrust Law, West's Encyclopedia of American Law, 1997, iris.nyit.edu/~shartman/mba0101/trust.htm.

David Rosen, Bruce Kushnick / AlterNet. “The Secret $8 Billion Wireless Scam:” Alternet, 16 June 2011, 03:00 GMT, www.alternet.org/story/151317/the_secret_$8_billion_wireless_scam:_how_at&t,_t-mobile_and_verizon_game_the_system.

“A Short History of the Telephone Industry and Regulation.” A Short History of the Telephone Industry and Regulation, International Telecommunication Union, 2002, som.csudh.edu/cis/lpress/471/hout/telecomhistory/.

Themancommon. “Common Man News.” It's Time to Break Up AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, Time Warner and the Rest of the Telecoms, 1 Jan. 1970, themancommon.blogspot.com/2011/05/its-time-to-break-up-at-verizon-comcast.html.

© 2011 Liz Elias

Comments

Submit a Comment

  • DzyMsLizzy profile image
    Author

    Liz Elias 6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, triciajean--

    That is indeed so annoying, and if not illegal, it is certainly unethical. People are busy, and don't always notice these sly maneuvers. It should definitely be made into law that opt IN is the only way.

    Thanks so much for stopping by and adding your thoughts.

  • triciajean profile image

    Patricia Lapidus 6 years ago from Bantam, CT

    Dolores and DzyMsLizzy, I had a similar problem, with the phone company allowing third parties to charge to my phone bill. I was able to request no third party payments and have not had to deal with it lately. But they should have asked me beforehand and had written consent. Not sure the exact laws they are breaking, but at very least they fail basic courtesy.

  • DzyMsLizzy profile image
    Author

    Liz Elias 6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hi, Dolores-

    Oy, what a PITA! This new "must opt out" instead of having to opt IN only if you want some feature is annoying in the extreme, and in my opinion, should be made illegal!

    Thanks for adding to the conversation with that point.

  • Dolores Monet profile image

    Dolores Monet 6 years ago from East Coast, United States

    A few months back, every time I opened my phone bill, there would be another charge for something that I didn't even know what it was. Once, we were charged for some kind of gaming system. When I called up the company, they said they had emailed me that they would be including the system on our phones. Now, back in the old days, if you wanted something, you would agree to it. But this time no answer was a yes, to them. I asked them to take it of the bill and that I would pay what I actually owed. They said, just pay it and then they'd credit us in the future! This happened several times. It got so that every month, we had to call the phone company and cancel some nonsense that we didn't want. What a pain!

  • DzyMsLizzy profile image
    Author

    Liz Elias 6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, pmccray--

    Thanks so much for your added input. Not only does the BBB membership or lack thereof influence your "rating," it also determines whether or not they will report to any inquirers about complaints against you. Miraculously, members 'never' have any reported complaints....

    Thanks, also, for the votes

  • pmccray profile image

    pmccray 6 years ago from Utah

    Very insightful. Many of us 99% live from paycheck to paycheck. We can ill afford sneak attacks from cancerous corporate knuckle draggers who systematically ripoff and hold in contempt the very people that keep them in business! Your comment about the BBB is so right on point. Your membership fee or lack thereof determine your rating. Thank you for sharing, voted up, marked useful and interesting.

  • DzyMsLizzy profile image
    Author

    Liz Elias 6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, triciajean--

    So true, so true. You make an excellent point. And the so-called consumer protection agencies, such as the Public Utilities Commission or the Better Business Bureau are a very un-funny joke--they are nothing but a protection racket for the corporations!

  • triciajean profile image

    Patricia Lapidus 6 years ago from Bantam, CT

    Thanks, DzyMsLizzy. You spelled it right out.

    Corporations are not people. You can't put them in jail for illegal activities because they exist only as an idea. They should not have the rights of people in courts of law. Only the individual owners should be tried and held accountable.

  • lovemychris profile image

    Cape Wind Girl 6 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

    Exactly!

    We need not have ANY problems with people living in quite desperation.

    1% of corporate wealth would solve poverty....yet they are trying to give them even MORE. It's unbelievable!

  • DzyMsLizzy profile image
    Author

    Liz Elias 6 years ago from Oakley, CA

    Hello, lovemychris--

    Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts. That's a good idea about making the corporations swear allegiance to America!

  • lovemychris profile image

    Cape Wind Girl 6 years ago from Cape Cod, USA

    Spot On! Time for these ingrates to either care about the citizens who make them rich, or get out of dodge!

    You know, immigrants have to pledge allegiance to America when they become citizens, why don't we hold corporations to the same standard?

    After all, they ARE people too!

working