ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Top Reasons For Intelligent Design

Updated on July 23, 2010

I recently got a heads-up to check out Intelligent Design Facts, and as I have had a long standing interest in the intelligent design vs. evolution battle I found it a refreshingly scientific and logical approach to defending intelligent design without resorting to the absolutist approach of "the Bible says it, I believe it, and that settles it."

The website essentially covers similar ground to Dr. Stephen C. Meyer's "The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories" but it does so through a very stimulating and salubrious approach. Consider it a guide to the justifications for intelligent design based exclusively on scientific facts written in a way that anyone with an eighth grade education can easily comprehend it all: Not a single phylogeny, ontogeny, or genocentricity in sight. However, instead of just ignoring those aspects of intelligent design, the website deals with those topics without once alienating its readers by even mentioning the topics by name. This represents an extremely wise approach given the level of interest in intelligent design by average Americans who lack an alphabet soup of diploma letters after their names.

As in Dr. Meyer's thesis much of the website centers on the Cambrian Explosion, but then again it is the primary event which evolutionary theory has proven effectively incapable of explaining, so the focus is definitely justified. To the lay person who may not be familiar with the Cambrian Explosion, it was a five million year period where almost 90% of all types of life present today suddenly appeared, fully formed and ready to go. The website meticulously explains, always in easy to understand language, the extent of the innovation in the basic forms of so many organisms that occurred in this period, and how recent scientific discoveries have determined that the very development of body forms we see around us is not possible under any current evolutionary theory.

It is also refreshing that the website does not lean on any theological crutches. Although the conclusion on the website is that according to the scientific evidence there has to be an intelligent sapience conducting this design, the site's articles do not ever go beyond a strictly scientific analysis of that evidence and venture off into the realm of theology.

The section headings sum up the areas which are credibly covered by the website in a thorough and scientifically valid manner:

  • Small Scale Evolution Can't Cause Large Scale Changes
  • The Cambrian Explosion
  • Defining The Forms Of Living Things
  • The Cambrian Specified Complexity
  • New Genes & Proteins
  • The Mathematical Impossibility Of Genetic Evolution
  • The Great Darwinian Paradox
  • The Illusion Of Self-Organization
  • Hurry Up & Wait Evolution
  • Evolution Cannot Account For Origins

There is also a resource section which lists hundreds of references.

Some of the pull quotes are extremely interesting:

 

It's a very interesting, if busy, website which is definitely worth a look. The intelligent design versus evolution confrontation can always use a new voice of scientific reason. As to my own personal position on Darwinian evolution versus intelligent design, it's completely irrelevant to the overall debate and I'll keep that to myself, thanks. I also will not engage in comment debates but I want to be very clear that inflammatory or obscene statements on either side of the debate will be deleted prior to being made visible in the comments section.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      7 years ago from Toronto

      ID does not dispute that.

    • profile image

      7 years ago

      evolution is a fact

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      8 years ago from Toronto

      Have a fun day! :)

    • profile image

      AKA Winston 

      8 years ago

      Naw. I don't object to the findings - only to the idea that somehow these findings are supportive of creation or a creator or designer.

      Like I said in my original comment, the idea that disproving evolution somehow proves ID is an Argument from Ignorance (if you can't prove yours, mine is right) and also uses the logical fallacy of False Dilemma (only two possiblities exist).

      See ya.

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      8 years ago from Toronto

      Please review the last paragraph of the hub:

      "As to my own personal position on Darwinian evolution versus intelligent design, it's completely irrelevant to the overall debate and I'll keep that to myself, thanks. I also will not engage in comment debates."

      Therefore, I'm not coming down for or against Dr. Meyer. All I'm stating is that the paper was published in the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington (volume 117, no. 2, pp. 213-239). The Proceedings is a peer-reviewed biology journal published at the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington D.C.

      You want to argue against their peer qualifications, go ahead. I won't join you. :)

    • profile image

      AKA Winston 

      8 years ago

      Hal,

      It took about 2 minutes to dig this out from a web search and Wikipedia: (Intelligent Design Facts run by: Access Research Network (ARN), based in Colorado Springs, evolved from an earlier creationist organization, Students for Origins Research (SOR). It acts as a de facto auxiliary website to the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture (CSC)[citation needed] in promoting intelligent design (ID),)

      So much for neutral scientific observations. The common ancestor of Intelligent Design is The Discovery Institute.

    • profile image

      AKA Winston 

      8 years ago

      Hal,

      Not to quibble, and you are entitled to believe whatever you wish, but peer-review is a little trick the Discovery Institute has learned to utilize to make their propaganda appear more "scientific" in nature, by creating their own publications with their own "peers" and "reviews". The critical issue is still in what journal and by what peers was the review made.

      Picking out acknowledged holes in the fossil record has absolutely no bearing on whether a creative force did or did not originate life. Can we agree on that much?

      Because to believe otherwise is the exact same thing as claiming that because you cannot produce film documentation of your dad placing Christmas presents under the tree it is proof that Santa was here and did plant the gifts himself.

      That doesn't sound so "scientific" does it?

      Evolutionary theory has never ducked issues like the so-called Cambrian Explosion. But the best science ever attempts is a rational explanation for physical phenomenon, so if you are waiting for "proof" you will forever be disappointed, as the bar of "proof" is one you set for yourself.

      Truth is subjective. You either believe it or you don't.

      Thanks. See ya.

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      8 years ago from Toronto

      Sorry to disagree with you, but that site seems to be a very accurate paragraph by paragraph rewriting (in simple terms to suit a wide audience) of Dr. Meyer's peer reviewed paper. It's even specified as such right on the site. I'll take a peer reviewed paper written by a Ph.D. over anyone else's comment any day of the week. :)

    • profile image

      AKA Winston 

      8 years ago

      Hal,

      The site you promote as scientific is actually just a large advertisement for the Argument From Ignorance. The Argument from Ignorance fallaciously claims that disproof of one idea validates a competing idea.

      Instead of offering their own rational explanation for events, all they are doing is lobbying and trying to prove their opponent "doesn't believe what is right before your own eyes. So who ya gonna vote for?"

      It's politics as usual. Don't be conned.

      This site is not science. ID offers no predictive possibilties or falsifications. It is simply creationism.

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      8 years ago from Toronto

      I can understand your recalcitrance but if you read that site's clear and easy to understand review of the scientific data, I have to admit that it is quite convincing. Thanks for your comment! :)

    • WillGrander profile image

      WillGrander 

      8 years ago from New York

      A lot of this still seems God of the Gaps-ish. "We don't understand how this works, so G...I mean, an intelligent designer did it." Not really a good explanation for anything, unfortunately.

    • Hal Licino profile imageAUTHOR

      Hal Licino 

      8 years ago from Toronto

      Hi, Paraglider! That is one of the main reasons why I found that site so different and captivating. It actually goes through all of the post-Darwinian theories showing how each seems to have a gaping hole in the middle which is best filled by the "hand" of a sapient designer. Again, it's basically the same info as Dr. Meyer's work, but it is written so that anyone can read it without referring to the dictionary six times in each sentence. :)

      Thanks, John T.! :)

    • John T. profile image

      John T. 

      8 years ago from Portland Oregon

      Nice post I enjoyed the information on ID.

    • Paraglider profile image

      Dave McClure 

      8 years ago from Kyle, Scotland

      Darwin made a first stab at something difficult. But there is nobody in the Scientific community holding out that Darwin was right. His theories have been superseded. Quaint that there are still people in Religious camps arguing that he was wrong. They are simply out of touch.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)