ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

There Was No "Mandate" For Anyone As A Result of Election 2012!

Updated on November 23, 2012

Even 76% of the votes cast is not "a mandate"!

He won 76% of the vote to continue representing his district in the U. S. House of Representatives,
He won 76% of the vote to continue representing his district in the U. S. House of Representatives, | Source

Until more of the eligible voters in America actually vote, it is not logical for any politician or party to claim "a mandate"!

Being charitable and giving a higher estimated total as 58% of eligible voters actually voting in Election 2012, here is why neither party, nor President Obama, has any claim to “a mandate” coming out of the last election:

42%+ of America’s eligible voters did not vote to give anyone their approval,

President Obama received 50% of the votes cast for the office of president. As only 58% of voters voted, he received the votes of only 29% of America’s eligible voters….hardly “a mandate.”

Obama’s votes were fewer than he received in 2008, and Democrats suffered significant losses in 2010 which they did not recover fully in 2012, maintaining their majority only in the U. S. Senate.

Republicans admit that they lost significantly on November 6, 2012, figures that made it clear that they did not receive a mandate, even by virtue of their continuing majority in the House of Representatives.

The Tea Party supported candidates including many who lost in the 2012 elections, and the Tea Party as a whole still lacks the numbers to give them even a robust role to play within the Republican Party which seems more hospitable to their basic expressed values.

Libertarians, and other minority parties in America have never claimed a popular mandate.

In my own Utah congressional district, Representative Jason Chaffetz won reelection with 76% of the votes cast, but voting in all of Utah was lower than it was in 2008, and even Representative Chaffetz did not receive much more than a simple majority of the votes of the voters who could have voted for him in 2012.

So what? If some politician claims there is a mandate for anything, reply that you rather doubt it!

_______

Copyright 2012 Demas W. Jasper All rights reserved.

Generally speaking, voting numbers were down across the USA in 2012.

Few states had more voters voting in 2012 than in 2008 or 2004.  Those few which did, had other locally "hot" contests on their ballots.
Few states had more voters voting in 2012 than in 2008 or 2004. Those few which did, had other locally "hot" contests on their ballots. | Source

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Perspycacious profile image
      Author

      Demas W Jasper 5 years ago from Today's America and The World Beyond

      The Electoral College remains the only protection Americans have against a bogus "October Surprise" for which the candidate swept in primarily by virtue of the misrepresentation had no direct role in creating it.

    • profile image

      Old Poolman 5 years ago

      Attikos - Thanks for the education. I have always been confused why we would do it that way.

    • Attikos profile image

      Attikos 5 years ago from East Cackalacky

      The Electoral College was designed as an anchor on the ability of the states containing large cities, with their high concentrations of voters and their own parochial interests, from dominating the federal government. It has worked out reasonably well for that purpose, though it may now be weakening in the face of advancing urbanization.

    • profile image

      Old Poolman 5 years ago

      I have no idea why or when we started the Electoral College for selecting our winning candidates, but to me a popular vote would make much more sense and make our votes count. It is insane that a candidate can actually get the majority in popular votes, and lose the election.

    • Perspycacious profile image
      Author

      Demas W Jasper 5 years ago from Today's America and The World Beyond

      Perhaps we should look at the tactics and nature of the campaigns in 2012. The choice, as I have written, was characterized as a choice for president between a man the Republicans,and the super PACs supporting them, characterized as "Mr. Failure" and a man the Democrats and their super PACs characterized as "Mr. Flip Flop." As a result, the contest was made a contest between two candidates characterized as both being unworthy of the Office of President.

      Worse still, "the way forward" was poorly defined by either candidate, or at least perceived as poorly defined. Each candidate stressed that their opponent's ideas would fail to solve the nation's problems (hardly inspiring.)

      A public disgusted by the money, the rhetoric, the negatives, the dividing of the electorate into sub groups of Americans each with their narrow special interests, and the concentrated focus on the six or eight states whose voters seemed the only ones "in play" almost from the beginning of the campaign, marginalized the other voters by each major party taking some for granted and writing off the others.

      Several realities played into this marginalized feeling. The Supreme Court's ruling legitimizing the Super PACs let the big money donors take over the election with no limits and the potential small donors feel that they had no real role to play, the "winner-takes-all" system by which states allocate their votes in the Electoral College marginalized the minority voters in states where one party was dominant, the absence of term limits which could over time pump new blood and new ideas into a Congress which has become a predictable cast of contesting political ideologues is also a governing weakness.

      We need a system of elections in which every voter is important, no voter feels marginalized, and the real issues of the day are spelled out with concrete proposals for the future.

      Until then our system has built-in weaknesses which insure that our system of government is less than "...of the people, by the people, and for the people."

    • rfmoran profile image

      Russ Moran - The Write Stuff 5 years ago from Long Island, New York

      Well said Sir. Most politicians would like to claim a mandate by the simple fact of winning an election. The only true mandate is to "govern well."

    • Attikos profile image

      Attikos 5 years ago from East Cackalacky

      But for organized rent seeking special interests, which usually have a short-term focus, the public has concluded federal elections do not change the direction the US government in any important degree. They are tuning out federal politics.

      You are right, there is no mandate now. This was a status quo election. The people voted for continuing gridlock in Washington. I think they feel the national state has grown into a monster that is out of control, that presidential elections offer no real chance to put it back into its pen, and that they feel less threatened by it when it is divided and stalemated.

      A rising number of them feel that voting at all has become an exercise in futility, but those still sufficiently cognizant of civic duty to bother are choosing to attempt to neuter the federal government. Were the politicians paying attention to the America they in theory collectively serve rather than to the dynamics of the privileged, heady little world they inhabit once in Washington, they would recognize that and act accordingly. Tragically, they do not. All we are seeing even in the wake of this gray election is the usual business of struggle for control of even more power and wealth.

    • profile image

      Old Poolman 5 years ago

      For many years now, it seems like we have had to choose the lesser of the evils in most elections. I always vote even though I am not in love with either of the candidates. To not vote seems like just giving a vote to the candidate you like the least.

    • jandee profile image

      jandee 5 years ago from Liverpool.U.K

      Who would one vote for ? I mean any Country. Seems to me the candidates are almost all sales reps.. Vac.salesmen, arms salesmen .

      Greedy and evil people who don't give a care for anybody . Don't even care for the World...

      I doubt if I will ever vote again not after the lies and warmongering of Tony Blair and his gang,we are now left with the dreaded Blair Babes who do exactly as they are told.

    • profile image

      Janhorner 5 years ago

      What a good informative hub! I think voters are beginning to get tired of politicians in general. You hear so many corrupt stories (especially here in the UK), I admit I no longer vote because I simply have no confidence in any government that sweeps into power. Some people will probably think I should vote, and it's not a case of being too lazy to go and do this; because the voting station is almost next door and I have postal voting facility. My confidence ended totally when the government we have now in the form of Cameron and Clegg, who do not have any idea whatsoever what it is like for the working man and his family, nor come to that the pensioners! There rant over! Voted up,

      Jan

      Jan

    • eHealer profile image

      Deborah 5 years ago from Las Vegas

      Great and informative hub with many good points, Perspycacious. I agree, as long as the country is divided down the middle and so few vote, there is no mandate to brag about. Although it is clear that Republicans need a better and more modern voice in today's politics. It is difficult for them as a party, since conservatism by nature values tradition and does not change easily. The world is a different place now, though, and the GOP needs to understand that their message isn't being heard very well. Thanks for a very interesting hub!

    • carol7777 profile image

      carol stanley 5 years ago from Arizona

      Good points here and good research...Thanks for this ..

    • profile image

      Old Poolman 5 years ago

      Interesting that perhaps the most important election we have ever had drew less voters than 2008. Shame on those who didn't vote is all I can say.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)