To Ban or not to Ban
Origin of term, Ban
Ban or, in other words, boycott term was used ever since man was fighting for freedom. However, that time this official forbiddance led to something revolutionary. Making the foreigners leave their country attained freedom. This insurgency made people realize the impact of this noun and embraced it as they continued to rule, breathe and live on their terms in a country that they called home.
Man is boycotting things from his fellowman. Sure, sounds unconstitutional, but we ought to control each other by drawing boundaries now and then especially when we need to keep our environment clean from toxins that could be in the air or on the land. For an instance ban of plastic bags, or smoking cigarettes in public are some classic examples, which are worthy for the prohibition.
However, times have changed since then. Ban of some things, objects, and articles, have lately created a furor amongst the public.
When something is not going right ban it. When people oppress it, officially forbid it. When the thing is too explosive to handle, prohibit it. When an object is harming people, suppress it.
For instance, there had been uproar over ban on same-sex marriage, but gradually many states have lifted that limitation and are embracing same gender marriage. Result of this is that there is an appreciation of the man irrespective of the gender, and the fact that they are enclosed with love; an ordinary man has been able to close the issue by sealing the envelope and stamping its acceptance.
This brings me up a question: Is banning things a solution or is it helping to whitewash a particular scenario?
What is a ban in today's society?
Drawing censorship towards an object, gadget, or an article creates curiosity. This makes man very curious of why, what, how. Forbidding something goes way back to the age when even Adam was prohibited to eat that apple. We all are aware of the result!
Still some government officials try to abolish or keep something under the covers with the hope that the ugly truth does not get exposed.
When something has been uncovered, it is done via the actions of our brethren's then why keep it under the covers? Why not expose it, so that others learn from those mistakes?
A controversial documentary
BBC lately made a video, “India’s Daughter”, and it came in the spotlight. More so since the culprit was interviewed on his views, and to top it some dignitaries supported all his statements. There was uproar over their mindset, thus making the video go viral. But, soon it was nowhere to be found. The documentary was banned. Was it trying to protect the cowardliness or foolishness of those people being interviewed or was it trying to safeguard the rights of the victim?
Many questions came up, and since it was a banned item, it was a more talked about thing but mostly under the covers! Had it not been forbidden, the talk of respect, dignity and appreciation of a gender that is usually taken for granted would have been spoken with reverence. This in turn would have helped things being implemented for their safety, and yet giving them the freedom like the opposite gender to roam the planet with ease. After all, it is their equal right too!
Hushing things has just closed down the topic of discussion. This kind of matter can now not be discussed at family tables, or at a party event because of the fact that it is grotesque, and secondly the government has covered your mouth with its legality by using the word, ban.
Some bans should not be banned more so since they need to get closure from man because of the ghastly type of event. Man needs to feel ashamed of what his brethren is up to, and need to improvise upon his actions, more so by discussing it openly. This openness will lead to embracing our flaws, and helping make positive changes. We ought to make a smart choice by filtering out what is the need of the hour by bringing out the ugly truth. Man is a smart being to discriminate between good or bad, evil or virtuous.
Some banned products, actions
In the meantime, there are some prohibitions such as Ovaltine a no-no in Denmark. People need a permit to dance in clubs in Japan. Anything yellow in color is a total no-no if worn in Malaysia. Use of ketchup banned in French cuisine. Banning Blue jeans by Government of North Korea. Cannot chew gum in Singapore. The above are some of the bans that are always a talk of delight and make it to the dinner table or any event without any jurisdiction even though they are not practiced.