ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Politics and Social Issues»
  • North America Political & Social Issues

Trump is My President

Updated on November 22, 2017
Source

Buck Up, Buttercup

The people have spoken, and this time it’s not the usual elite, narcissistic, self-absorbed people who have. You know the ones. The ones who are certain that they know what is best for you, and for America. They are the imperious ones, the ones who get to read about how smart they are in almost every newspaper. The ones who tune into the nightly news (all except FOX that is), and find out how great it is to be enlightened, inclusive, educated, and exquisitely superior to the unwashed, deplorable masses.

The last presidential election was decidedly different. This time, it was the “common man” and “common woman” who spoke up. The people who actually want to work at a job and pay their own way. The people who want to know which bathroom to use without having to think about it. The people who truly want to pay for their own health insurance, for themselves and their own family, as opposed to paying insane premiums that are supporting dozens of others on the government dole.

Self-sufficient, hard-working, and well-meaning people finally had their say, and it has changed the trajectory of the United States of America. Some say it has changed things for the worse, some say for the better. Either way, there’s a new wave of enthusiasm running through Middle America. And it wasn’t a mistake. It wasn’t a conspiracy. It had very little to do with James Comey or the Russians. It was simply a candidate who knew what the people wanted. And here we are.

The Electoral College

The only way this worked was because of the Electoral College. Vast expanses of the United States (basically everything between the two coasts), have finally been heard. These are what are known as the “fly over” states, where millions of Americans work every day to create the food and other products that people on the coasts consume, without ever thinking about how they got there.

What about the popular vote, you ask? Well, if you exclude California (and only California), Trump would have won the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes. This serves to prove the real genius behind the Electoral College, which was primarily designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections. So, in essence, California is not able to dictate for the rest of the United States. Sorry, Mr. Zuckerberg.

When I hear Hillary say, “I won the popular vote,” I’d really like to scream back, “So what difference, at this point, does it make?” You must know the rules if you’re going to play the game. How many of you out there have been in a position where you thought you’d won something, only to realize that you’d been disqualified because you made a foul, went over the allotted time, or did something else that didn’t follow all the rules? Same thing here, only on a much larger scale.

Despite what the liberal media would have you believe, the last election was not about race and gender. Okay, maybe just a little. But mainly it was about self-determination, work ethic, and taking responsibility.

Source

These United States

I am a proud citizen of the United States of America. Being a U.S. citizen is part of my identity. I was taught growing up to respect and love my country, and the things it stands for. Chief among these are some basic freedoms. I can, for example, get in my car and drive from one side of the country to another, without limit or reservation. I can say any truthful thing that I want, and even publish my thoughts in writing, with very few limits (e.g., I can’t shout “bomb” in an airport, or “fire” in a theater, or call someone a “liar” if these situations are not in fact the truth).

Recently, I have felt a gradual erosion of what I can and can’t say in public. I can’t, for example, express any doubts whatsoever about the wisdom of homosexual marriage, without being labeled every foul name in the book. If I articulate my opinion that marriage should be between one man and one woman, and that this arrangement is what nature intended, I will be branded homophobic, and worse.

The very notion that I might actually not “fear” homosexuals, but at the same time think that marriage is ideally between two heterosexuals, is inconceivable to some. I am not “allowed” to think that way. Even now, reading this paragraph, many readers are already thinking about how they can blast me in the comments section. The idea that I can hold an opinion contrary to what the “mainstream” dictates I should think, is cause for violent reactions. This is yet another one of the reasons why Donald J. Trump was elected President.

I am so tired of people being ugly to one another. Calling people rude and crude names, distorting the facts to suit their own personal agenda, and demeaning even innocent children. It is unfathomable to me. And I should add that it’s coming mostly from people who voted for Hillary, who didn’t get their way, and now feel somehow entitled to spew hate and venom at anyone who dares to point out anything positive about our new President and his administration.

Taking Responsibility

I don’t expect my government to take care of my personal needs. As long as I am able, I will take responsibility for my own well-being. I expect my government to provide for the safety and security of our great nation, from enemies both foreign and domestic. I expect my government to provide law and order, and possibly to use tax payer dollars for the common good, such as funding roads, bridges, ports, and medical research.

The world is a different place than it was eight years ago. There have been fundamental shifts in our social and cultural fabric due to social reengineering. The voices of “tolerance” and “diversity” have thundered so loudly in our ears, that most people are afraid to say or do anything that might cause them to be branded as a racist, or any kind of “phobe,” even if that was not their intent.

The new word is “inclusive.” It means that we should be tolerant, and accept all variations in style, race, creed, gender, and so forth and so on. If you want to be “exclusive” in any way, you are painted as some horrible, unfeeling subhuman. Except, apparently, on some college campuses, where it is okay to exclude conservative speakers.

And another thing about being exclusive. If I get up at 4 AM, to catch the train to work by around 5 AM, work all day, five days a week, year in and year out, to accumulate some wealth, why on God’s green earth must I feel embarrassed if I want to be “exclusive” with the money that I have earned? Why should I feel shame if I want to use the money that I earned to live in an “exclusive” neighborhood? Oh wait – that’s okay. It’s okay to live in a gated community with walls, as long as I don’t advocate one on the border. Sorry, I forgot.

Immigration

Quiz question, and it's a "fill in the blank" type. Who said this?

"Illegal immigrants take jobs from citizens or legal immigrants, they impose burdens on our taxpayers...That is why we are doubling the number of border guards, deporting more illegal immigrants than ever before, cracking down on illegal hiring, barring benefits to illegal aliens, and we will do more to speed the deportation of illegal immigrants arrest for crimes...It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws that has occurred in the last few years.. and we must do more to stop it."

I will give you a hint: It was NOT Donald Trump. It was actually Bill Clinton, and he got a standing ovation for saying it. You see, caution is not the same as having a lack of compassion. Apparently this message gets confused when the liberal left leaning media gets involved.

What's Next?

My advice to you is to stop whining about the results of the election, and get busy making things better for yourself and those you love. You can do this by looking forward. Volunteer on the local level. Donate to charity. Help someone in need. And, if you feel so moved, get personally involved in politics. These are all more productive things to do with your time than complaining about a failed presidential candidate.

What are your thoughts about Hillary's "I should have won" speaking tour?

See results

Comments

Submit a Comment

  • tsadjatko profile image

    TSAD 5 months ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

    http://www.wxyz.com/news/national/supreme-court-re...

    Another reversal of the loony left 9th Circuit activist court! But a good thing they are there if only to remind us what this country would be like without constitutional rule but judges legislating from the bench.

  • Carolyn M Fields profile image
    Author

    Carolyn Fields 6 months ago from South Dakota, USA

    Ara,

    Thank you for reading and commenting! I appreciate it when a Democrat takes the time to read about Trump without dismissing it out of hand.

    Carolyn

  • CELEBSFAN78 profile image

    Ara Vahanian 6 months ago from LOS ANGELES

    Carolyn Fields: well done on this article! Two things that I do agree with here are that 1) a major reason why Trump won the election is because many in the Rust Belt states felt that there wasn't a better effort by the Democrats to listen to their concerns. People are angry. They are angry that their factory jobs have vanished. They are angry that tuition and fees at the universities have skyrocketed making it much harder for their children to go to university. Bernie Sanders has repeatedly mentioned this. I get the fact that they are angry and they have a reason to be. As a Democrat, I say that the Democratic Party did not do a good enough job to talk to people in the Midwest and it cost them. And 2) I agree we can't allow people to illegally come to the United States. I'm not a Trump supporter but I can honestly say: well done! I hope that by commenting and giving my perspective, I can brighten someone's day.

  • tsadjatko profile image

    TSAD 6 months ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

    Joc there you go again, putting words in Carolyn's mouth -"when we say half the country." WE? nowhere did Carolyn even say half the country - only you said that and you didn't mean half the people who voted or else why didn't you say just that - Half the country doesn't mean half the people who votred no matter what the context and you know it, instead of admitting you are just plain wrong and deceitfully manipulating the discussion you have to redefine "half the country." I'll tell you why, because you have to exaggerate (some would say intentionally lie) to make your loony point which you know is a lie. Your a liberal and as a liberal you have to find some way to offend Carolyn because she tells it like it is. This time you lose cause your tactic was pathetic.

  • Carolyn M Fields profile image
    Author

    Carolyn Fields 6 months ago from South Dakota, USA

    TSAD,

    I can't confirm or deny, but I will say that you're a good guesser.

    When someone posts that "the only positive outcome will be the total destruction of a tyrannical regime that has been posturing as the beacon of liberty for 250 years," I would call that sedition. I like a lively exchange of ideas, but I can't allow calls for the overthrow of our government on my hub. Sorry. Just can't go there.

  • tsadjatko profile image

    TSAD 6 months ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

    So at whom are you directing that comment? Let me guess, Ronnie?

  • Carolyn M Fields profile image
    Author

    Carolyn Fields 6 months ago from South Dakota, USA

    There are some comments that I can't approve, for this reason:

    Sedition is the crime of revolting or inciting revolt against government. Sedition remains a crime in the United States under 18 U.S.C.A. § 2384 (2000), a federal statute that punishes seditious conspiracy, and 18 U.S.C.A. § 2385 (2000), which outlaws advocating the overthrow of the federal government by force.

    18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government

    Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

    Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

    Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

    If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

  • Valeant profile image

    JOC 7 months ago from Syracuse, NY

    TSAD - the article was about politics, so it should be pretty obvious that we're talking about the voting population when we say half the country. Your focus on the literal semantics misses the point and is just a sideshow that distracts.

    As for your advice, there were no words put anywhere, I simply gave her a compliment on a well written article and then a perception of how her one paragraph came off to help her point come across in a stronger manner.

    You and I can disagree about it and the author can make her own choices. That doesn't mean either of us is wrong, we possibly just see it in different ways.

  • tsadjatko profile image

    TSAD 7 months ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

    Joc, where did she say half the country is doing anything? Half the country doesn't even vote so if you are referring to Hilliary supporters even that would only be 1/4 of the country who is eligible to vote, even less if you talk whole country not eligible to vote.

    My advice to you is not to put words in people 's mouths or ignore specifically what they say, maybe you then can make an honest case about something, but not this. I hope Carolyn sees past your frivolous accusations because she has more on the ball than you ever will.

  • Valeant profile image

    JOC 7 months ago from Syracuse, NY

    TSAD - insinuating that half the country is immature is pretty crude and ugly in my own opinion. And telling someone what to do never goes over well. That's pretty offensive as well. So if you're hoping for people to act better, the smart move is to not perpetuate those things in ourselves.

  • tsadjatko profile image

    TSAD 7 months ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

    So Joc, do you always take words out of context, in this case one word "ugly" to sneer at people's comments?

    She defined what she meant by ugly, namely (any people) "Calling people rude and crude names, distorting the facts to suit their own personal agenda, and demeaning even innocent children..."

    The fact that can't be denied is it IS "coming mostly from people who voted for Hillary, who didn’t get their way, and now feel somehow entitled to spew hate and venom at anyone who dares to point out anything positive about our new President and his administration."

    Carolyn, you did nothing wrong.

  • Carolyn M Fields profile image
    Author

    Carolyn Fields 7 months ago from South Dakota, USA

    JOC,

    Point taken. You are correct, I should watch myself more carefully. I should not complain about behavior, and then demonstrate it myself. I have made the appropriate edits. I will add that "grab your pacifier" is very mild, as compared to the hate coming from the left. However, it is still derogatory. My bad.

  • Valeant profile image

    JOC 7 months ago from Syracuse, NY

    Good article, but it became comical the moment you whined about people being ugly to each other, then in the same paragraph order them to grab their pacifiers. Yeah, it's only Hillary supporters who are being ugly. Sure it is.

  • jksouthard profile image

    JK Southard 7 months ago from USA

    Good article. Donald Trump is my/our President. However, I did not vote for him. But that is OK. I voted for Adlai Stevenson back in the day when the adage was..."with Republicans, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer" ... a take off from the Woody Guthrie era. My how time changes just about everything. However, Eisenhower turned out to be great....in that he kept us out of war and put the fantastic Interstate Highway system to work for us all. I hope with similar grand infrastructure designs in the coming 3 years our economy will enjoy growth and our diverse peoples will find a positive interactive glue. But to be clear, I hope and will work tirelessly for that adage about the "rich v poor" of long ago not widen any further than it has already. Being poor in the shadow of obscene unearned wealth is not my idea of what a democracy is all about. "this land is your land, this land is my land...." PAX

  • Carolyn M Fields profile image
    Author

    Carolyn Fields 7 months ago from South Dakota, USA

    Ronnie (aka wrenchBiscuit),

    Your first line:

    "Adolf Hitler did not materialize out of thin air."

    My hub is about Trump and Hillary.

    I connected the dots. Sorry for my error.

    That said, I am confused how your point that the USA was responsible for the rise of Hitler is connected to the point of my hub, which is that Hillary lost the election and should move on (I'm over simplifying).

    Anyway, your view of reality and mine are worlds apart, to say the very least. I don't have the bandwidth to address it here. If you feel that the US election process is a sham, then we all have larger issues to be concerned with.

    Thanks for the comments, though. I enjoy having my mind stretched.

    Note to commentors: I do moderate my comments. I try to approve them all, even ones I don't agree with. I don't, however, approve comments that are little more than personal attacks. Just so you know.

  • savvydating profile image

    Yves 7 months ago

    Bless you for articulating Inga Andrews' deep understanding of how socialism is dismantling this country. The voting in of Trump gave the U.S. a much needed reprieve, but even so, the extreme Left is doing everything in their power to destroy him and our sacred Constitution. Very, very sad. The "progressives" seem to be winning and in so doing, American's will lose. Why? Because then we will be in real danger of giving rise to another Hitler---and that person will be very unlike President Trump.

  • breakfastpop profile image

    breakfastpop 7 months ago

    Bravo! Trump is my president too. The behavior of those on the left is beyond appalling. Our freedoms have been eroded thanks to their misguided and biased intolerance of anything or anyone who isn't left. If we don't get beyond all this craziness, I fear for our nation's future.

  • wrenchBiscuit profile image

    Ronnie wrenchBiscuit 7 months ago

    What a lovely strawman you have assembled here! However, I did not make a comparison between Trump and Hitler. Trump is a different kind of tyrant. Furthermore, your response completely ignores the point I was making, which is the verifiable fact that the United States and her allies were responsible for the rise of Hitler, as well as the fact that American Capitalists profited from the war and the Holocaust.

    It appears Inga Andrews still doesn't realize that a majority of the motor engines used in the Nazi war machine were sold to the Nazis by Henry Ford, and that Prescott Bush, the father of two U.S. presidents, conducted business with the Nazi's until the U.S. government forced him to stop. The problem I see here is that people have an apparent need to identify a "good guy" a "bad guy". But when it comes to world politics, we often find that the only "good guys" are the pawns: the sons and daughters of the poor who are dying on the battlefield, not for the sake of freedom, but for the enrichment of a ruthless and greedy ruling elite.

    You believe the popular vote, as well as the Electoral College are real. I maintain that these are part and parcel of a web of deception. Donald Trump, just like Obama and all who came before,at least since Woodrow Wilson, was elected by the true power that sits behind the White House. He doesn't call the shots. He is simply the regional manager of a franchise.

  • Carolyn M Fields profile image
    Author

    Carolyn Fields 7 months ago from South Dakota, USA

    Ronnie:

    Inga Andrews, who survived Adolf Hitler’ regime, has a harsh message for liberal protesters comparing President Donald Trump to the Nazi leader.

    A German woman who survived Nazi leader Adolf Hitler’s tyrannical reign, lived in a refugee camp, and fled to America has noticed that liberals love to compare President Donald Trump to Hitler. However, when asked about the similarities between the two, she had just 7 words that completely shocked leftists.

    Before Inga Andrews escaped Hitler’s “final solution,” the Holocaust, she and her mother were forced to survive the catastrophic events brought about by the Nazi party’s socialism and racial hatred. For decades, her harrowing experience has been locked away in her mind’s eye, however, it was recently awakened when angry liberals began combatting Trump’s travel ban and other executive orders with easily repeatable slogans that equate Trump to Hitler.

    Now, Andrews feels a duty not only to dismiss the dramatic propaganda that compares the two leaders but also to point out who the really represents everything that encompasses Hitler and his Nazi militants.

    When the Independent Journal Review asked Andrews about her thoughts on leftists saying that Trump is a dictator much like Hitler, she not only refuted this mistruth with personal experience, she explained that “it’s the destruction of freedom of speech” from the liberal protesters that resembles Hitler and Nazi-Germany.

    “What is going on in this country is giving me chills. Trump is not like Hitler. Just because a leader wants order doesn’t mean they’re like a dictator,” Andrews told IJR. “What reminds me more of Hitler than anything else isn’t Trump, it’s the destruction of freedom of speech on the college campuses — the agendas fueled by the professors. That’s how Hitler started, he pulled in the youth to miseducate them, to brainwash them, it’s happening today.”

    Andrews added that she recognizes the liberal bias in the school system, especially on college campuses, and says that it’s breeding the same intolerance and fascism that gave rise to Hitler in the 1930s. In addition, Andrews has actually lived through a travel ban even stricter than Trump’s when her mother married an American. Still, she believes that liberals should have a respect for these measures as our national security depends on them.

    “It took six years to clear her to be able to be married,” she said. “Then when you married an American, because we were the enemy, you had to wait. We had to go from Heidelberg to another city where a camp was. They vetted us in both places. There were all these German brides with their children and families who had to be vetted again for three of four days before they could get on the ship. So we had a vetting process like what we are going through now because you have to have this to make the country safe.”

    As for the liberal protesters, Andrews says that because of their emotionally-driven activism, they have abandon logic and reason. She remembers the desperation Democratic Socialism caused, including times when she only had “maple leaves and grass to survive,” something she says these leftist millennials have never had to endure. In short, equating Trump to Hitler is more of an insult to her and the millions who suffered and died during Hitler’s reign.

    “Professors shouldn’t be telling their students to go after freedom of speech,” she said. “They should be telling them that this is the greatest country in the world…I see what is happening here reflecting some of the things we saw in Germany, and it’s terrifying. It’s sad. But it’s not because of Trump. It’s because of poor education. Trump is not like Hitler. The theory that he is is propaganda. Yes, I lived through some of Nazi Germany, but all you have to do is read some books about that period to see how wrong that theory is.”

    Andrews added a harsh but much-needed message to the liberals who are protesting against Trump and believing that bullying and violence will get them what they want.

    “America needs to grow up. The young people who are rioting and destroying property, who have no respect for elders and freedom of speech, I was so proud to become a citizen of this country,” she said.

    Andrews knows from personal experience that America is an exceptional country because of the constitutional rights liberals often protest against. She easily identifies the parallels between the liberal movement in America and that of Nazi-Germany.

  • wrenchBiscuit profile image

    Ronnie wrenchBiscuit 7 months ago

    Adolf Hitler did not materialize out of thin air. The stage for his rise to power and World War II was set by the Treaty of Versailles and the post World War I naval blockade of Germany. The United States government was complicit in the destruction of the German economy, and the starvation of the German people after WWI. The death and destruction of World War II is only one chapter of the evil legacy of the United States.

    However, from the perspective of Pollyanna, the United States and her allies "saved the world" by destroying the Nazi's. Furthermore, she will never realize how Henry Ford, Prescott Bush, and other prominent Americans and American businesses profited from the war, and from the Jewish Holocaust. Pollyanna is proud to be an American too, but from the perspective of a German, an Aniyunwiya, and a U.S. military veteran, I take no pride in my service, nor am I proud to be a slave to an evil cabal of Capitalist puppet-masters. Donald Trump is just another puppet; business as usual.

  • fpherj48 profile image

    Paula 7 months ago from Beautiful Upstate New York

    Carolyn...First of all, "Thank you!!" this hub is THE hub I've wanted someone to write for some time now. I've said practically every last thing you've included here, at some point or another However, I could not and would not have been able to pack it all up so accurately and precisely. I've simply had it up to my eyeballs with the politics here at HP and the constant whine, vitriol, moaning and repeating of the damned FAKE news reports. You just cannot fix stupid & I will no longer put forth efforts in futility. The Dems are self-destructing. Let it be & I would add, "Rest in Peace," but they know not what peace is

    All they know is violence, pouting & protesting, self-pity and lots and lots of lies. It is no winder why they bow to Hillary, the Supreme Liar herself, the Queen of corruption.

    Throughout my voting history, not being a party-loyalist, I have voted both D & R, After this insanity we're going through, I will never, ever again even consider a D candidate! It's never been more clear that they are a pathetic, shameful lot.

    Hillary's rant about her "popular vote win" is the biggest joke of the decade. She won the Illegal aliens vote....she won California, without which....SHE GOT HER SELF WHIPPED.

    Nothing ~ No one caused her loss but Hillary Rotten Clinton her bad self!

    I've backed off from reading & commenting as well as listening & responding in terms of anything political. I truly needed a break. Your hub is well worth sharing my opinion.

    I shudder to think of what some of the envious haters will dump on your thread, but it looks to me, you have the strength, confidence and intelligence to handle it. BRAVO! Please take a bow! Have a good evening. Peace, Paula

  • tsadjatko profile image

    TSAD 7 months ago from maybe (the guy or girl) next door

    Thumbs up on this Carolyn.

    What everybody seems to be missing is that Hilliary belongs in prison and she should be doing her whining behind bars. It is a farce that she can claim she was robbed of anything except a jail sentence.

    As the Times tells it, the Justice Department and the FBI knew that to charge Clinton with a crime, it would not be enough to prove she had been “sloppy or careless”; instead, and I quote,

    “they needed evidence showing that she knowingly received classified information or set up her server for that purpose.”

    This claim is specious on multiple levels (thank you once again media for lying in your reporting).

    Subsection (f) of the pertinent statute (the Espionage Act, codified at Section 793 of Title 18, U.S. Code) makes it a felony to mishandle classified information “through gross negligence” — i.e., proving Clinton was sloppy or careless (or “extremely careless,” to use Comey’s own description) could have been sufficient.

    But beyond that, Clinton willfully set up a private network for the systematic handling of her State Department-related communications, in violation of federal record-keeping requirements of which she was well aware, and under circumstances in which she (a former senator who served for years on the intelligence Armed Services committee) was a sophisticated longtime consumer of classified information. She was keenly aware that her responsibilities as secretary of state would heavily involve classified information — whether it was “marked” classified or “born classified” because of the subject matter. It is irrelevant whether Clinton’s purpose was to transmit or store classified information on the private, non-secure server; prosecutors are not required to prove motive. Patently, Hillary Clinton was well aware of (a) the highly classified subject matter of communications that would inevitably be passing through the private e-mail system she set up for State Department business, in violation of statutes and government rules; (b) the fact that e-mails are stored on servers; (c) the fact that the communications facilities and devices used by State Department officials are routinely targeted in cyberattacks by foreign intelligence services and other hostile actors; and (d) the rules for the proper handling of classified information (and potential penalties for mishandling it). Consequently, her mishandling of classified information was knowing and intentional, as well as grossly negligent.

    MANY REASONABLE PROSECUTORS WOULD SALIVATE AT the prospect of TAKING SUCH A CASE TO COURT, especially if they knew that Clinton was going to run with a “lack of intent” defense.

    Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447318/james...

    Or for another trust worthy legal opinion you can read this article:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/437493/hilla...

    Another point is you can't trust anything the NY Times says as far as Hilliary goes. Their headline should be "Lock Her Up!"

    Not she didn't mean to do it.