ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Trump’s Supreme Court: A Generation of Conservatism

Updated on May 20, 2016

This week, Donald Trump put out his list of people that he would consider for the Supreme Court. According to most accounts they are all strong conservatives that would appear to have an easy time passing through a Republican Senate. While Trump was able to calm some fears on the Right that he might try and nominate someone unqualified, everyone on the left should be scared, very scared.

One of the key components of Trump’s nominees was the relative youth of the justices. A Supreme Court justice can serve for life so if you appoint someone in the early 50’s they should be on the court for 30+ years. With the balance of power in the hands of whoever a President Trump picks the selection to replace Justice Scalia could have ramifications for decades to come. While I will not pretend to be an expert on the Justice’s that Trump is looking to nominate, it seems that pundits agree that they are all strong conservative choices more in line with Scalia then they would be with Justice Kennedy, a slightly right of center justice who is often the swing vote on the court.

This list is also important because there is a strong likelihood the next President will not only nominate a justice to replace Scalia, but will also get to replace Justice Breyer, Ginsberg and Kennedy. Within the next 8 years, two other justices will also turn 70. This means that a Republican President would be able to completely reshape the court into one of the most conservative courts in history. If you thought Citizens United was bad get ready. Gay Marriage outlawed, Abortions banned, equal rights gone, torture why not!

In the immediate future, a Trump nominee would have important cases before them right away. These would include a ruling on President Obama’s immigration orders, whether or not unions can require dues collection from public sector employees and whether or not states can set health standards that are so high they effectively ban abortions in the state. Within just the first few months, a new justice could overturn many important issues that the Obama administration has worked on for the last eight years.

What would a Hillary Court look like?

Would a Hillary court look different than Obama’s? If Clinton is to win, she will get to make the nomination very early in her term. A lot of what will happen with her nominees will depend on who controls the Senate. If the Democrats take back the Senate, look for a more liberal nominee. This will be her best shot to change the makeup of the court and she is not going to want to play it safe with a justice who may spend the next 8 years jumping from side to side on issues that are important to her. This nominee would probably be the ones that liberals were hoping Obama would nominate before he announced Merrick Garland. An interesting pick here could be if she decided to nominate the former constitutional law professor and outgoing President, Barack Obama. It would the ultimate F-you to the Senate to put Obama on the court, with a liberal majority to shoot down every lawsuit that Republicans bring before the court. While it is unlikely, one former President was named to the court after he left office.

If the Democrats don’t win back the Senate, Clinton will be in more of a bind. She will need to pick a moderate who can get through the Senate and there will be enourmous pressure on her to pick someone who is more conservative. If this is the case, she may take the easy way out and just stick with Garland. He will have spent 11 months being vetted and Clinton may be able to fast track his appointment to break up the gridlock of have a split court for nearly a year. He would definitely be a solid pick, but his age will limit his time on the court and will limit his legacy on the court. She could also decide to take a younger moderate. Obama was considering a few, although he must have thought that as a lame duck President the Senate would not approve someone who would sit on the court for decades to come.

The simple fact is that the country is at a great crossroads. The future of the country not only lies in the next President but in who they select for the Supreme Court. Will it be a staunch Conservative in the vein of Trump or will it be a moderate that is good for business? Will Clinton select a flaming liberal who will replace Ruth Bader Ginsberg as the left darling or will she be forced to select the next Kennedy who will spend the next decade jumping from side to side? The great thing about politics is we will find out in November.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • lions44 profile image

      CJ Kelly 

      2 years ago from Auburn, WA

      Although the Senate is in GOP hands, there are a lot of pro-choice Senators on the Republican side like Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. Many others are moderates with slim majorities in their home states (think John McCain). Also, one of Trump biggest advocates, Roger Stone, has a wife who found Republicans for Choice (not sure if she is still involved). So a Trump victory does not guarantee a strict Conservative majority on the Court. I still have my doubts about his conservative bona fides anyway.

      If I'm Mitch McConnell, I get Garland through now. The alternative if there is a Clinton victory could be much worse.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)