ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

We Aren't Leaving Iraq

Updated on August 10, 2010

President Obama Extends Pull-Out Time to 19 Months

The New York Times revealed today (2/25/09) that President Obama has extended the amount of time it will take for US forces to pull out to 19 months, originally his campaign promise guaranteed 16 months.

Obama has said that this current timeframe will continue unless "things get hot" on the ground in Iraq, implying that more time may be required to get the majority of US forces out of Iraq.

Sources at the State Department declared that "tens of thousands" of soldiers will stay in Iraq to safeguard Iraq and US interests in the area.

So we aren't getting out of Iraq, huh?

I completely called this one. I said we would never leave Iraq, just like Germany, Japan and South Korea. I just didn't seem like the United States to completely pull out of an area that it has experienced conflict in. It seems that tens of thousands of troops will be stationed in western Iraq in-case they are required to quell violence within, or outside the country.

It sounds kind of tyrannical that we will stay there, but it does make sense. The sense is solidified after key figures within the Iraqi Government have requested to keep a US presense in Iraq. Of course, these statement were private and eventually leaked to the US media. Iraqi Government officials deny this, and say the US must leave. Many spectators believe this is because the US presence in Iraq is unpopular, and a Iraqi government official seeking election would be a dead man if found to be supporting the US.

It all makes sense now.

IED In Iraq

Spc. Barber somehow evaded an IED when it detonated near their vehicle.
Spc. Barber somehow evaded an IED when it detonated near their vehicle.

Life Becoming Easier, Though Power Plays Still Exist

The United States and Iraqi forces seem to have done a decent job in quelling some of the violence in Iraq. Military casualties are down, as are civilian casualties. IEDs, small-arms attacks and suicide bombing are still occuring within the Baghdad Metropolitan area and Mosul. Mortar and rocket attacks on US bases and Iraqi police stations are down, but still occur.

Morale is slightly higher now than a year ago in Iraq, although Morale is sagging in the north near Mosul. Power Vacuums are beginning to be sealed as border control is becoming better with Iran (where most arms seem to come in from), and elections are beginning to hold more value--thus increasing their popularity with the people.

Shia and Sunni tensions are still extremely high, yet Kurdish deaths are down and are largely unaffected by the ethnic and religious tensions raging across the country. US and Iraqi forces have proven to be no match for centuries old religious tension.

Mass Terminations Within Iraq Government

The New York Times also revealed today that up to 62,000 firings have occured due to public servants failing loyalty tests in Iraq.  Whether these "tests" are arbitrary garbage, writen exams, literacy tests or merely feuds with certain peoples (kurds, shia, etc.), is unknown.

IEDs Still a Threat

IEDs and hidden munitions still pose a problem for Iraq's security.
IEDs and hidden munitions still pose a problem for Iraq's security.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      C. C. Riter 8 years ago

      Not surprising to me at all.

    • JamaGenee profile image

      Joanna McKenna 8 years ago from Central Oklahoma

      We never should've been there. But we are and it defies common sense that we're having such a hard time getting out. How 'bout a reverse invasion? Just pick a day (like we did for the INvasion in '03) and just *leave*. 'Bye... See ya... Next stop: Fort Riley USA.

    • profile image

      whastzis 8 years ago

      Isn't it strange that wars have always been because of "your" method" of religion is different from "my" way?

      Who decided that the US would be the policeman of our world? Was that the Bush something-or-other Doctrine?

    • profile image

      RN4072 8 years ago

      I'm not PRO War, but I think we have to stay until things stabilize a bit more. We can't take out existing government and leave warring factions fighting to fill the void. The country would probably end up with a leader more vile than Sadam.

    Click to Rate This Article