We are all slaves and there is no freedom - PART 3
A proposal for a New Politico-Economic System
Past and Present Enslavement – Historical Facts
….continued from PART 2
Originally, some additions to the ranks of the privileged were permitted by the rulers because they were indispensable in providing the military muscle necessary to permit the Barons to keep the occupied obediently in line, but they, the additions, were usually imported from abroad. For example, to keep their British colony in line, the Norman and French rulers imported French muscle and turned them into nobles.
However, because the descendants of the barons were not always the most intelligent or the most frugal financial managers, a number of them began to squander their fortunes. Wars of expansion were costly and gradually the bankers began to take over. The Rothschild family began to make themselves indispensable during the Napoleonic wars and they were eventually firmly established in the privileged ruling class. They are now so powerful that they have joined the ranks of “The Controllers” and govern our lives to a considerable degree.
It is well worth watching the following video which can give you an idea of the extent our lives are ruled. Do not be sidetracked by the race of Rothschild as it has nothing to do with the problem. Remember that the same race has give us over 140 Nobel prize winners who were instrumental in making a better world.
The Rothschild Controllers
When the locals were sufficiently brainwashed into believing that they were actually free and that their kings and queens were not really foreigners taking advantage of them but were somehow converted into being ‘English’ by some mysterious act of God, the rulers began to ennoble gifted personalities from the ranks of the locals who might perpetuate the rulers’ reign. Lord Nelson and Alfred, Lord Tennyson are classic examples. The brilliant poetry of Lord Tennyson was very much pro royalty and this earned him a Baronetcy. The talented Sir Arthur Conan Doyle served his masters well with his pamphlet The War in South Africa: It’s Cause and Conduct and was knighted. The genius of Charles Dickens was ignored by the ruling class, because his books were too close to the mark by far.
In the case of modern “democracies”, for ‘Royalty’ please read ‘Ruling Class’. Even though you may not have official royalty in your own country, the behaviour described here is directly related to the behaviour of your own ruling class.
The monarch reserves the right for himself to ‘ennoble’, which is a powerful tool of bribery of some individuals . (In Democracies this is translated into getting cushy jobs with grandiose titles - like ‘Ambassador’ - for life or prestigious long term employment at tax payer expense). In the beginning the titles that were given to those with manpower behind them were hereditary because important allies with their own manpower, who would also risk their lives defending the monarch’s interests, had to be seduced with sufficient bribes for the purpose. People with only their own muscle and skill to contribute were usually ‘knighted’.
In modern times, when the slaves are not required to risk their lives on a daily basis, hereditary titles can be done away with unless it is for the monarch’s own children. In consequence, ‘life’ peerages or knighthoods are now given to those who have the ear of large numbers of people who can promote the interest of the ruling class, like actors, politicians and comedians, but most importantly to those who can be of daily practical use to the monarch or the ruling party.
As stated previously, by knighting the commissioner of police immediately upon appointment, the commissioner is brought within the sphere of influence of the palace. The same applies to judges and other civil servants in positions of power. This ensures that any family members and persons of interest to the palace are kept out of the public eye in case of indiscretions which might involve the police or the courts. Newspaper editors are likewise kept in line by promises of ‘ennoblement’. Result: they battle between themselves on who will shout the loudest in favour of Royalty. When news barons are caught by their competitors in acts which are too outrageous to be ignored, they lose any chance of ennoblement and are then free to turn on the royals, since they then have nothing to lose.
Today, how much does royalty care for its ‘subjects’ in these times of extreme financial distress?
The following are from British newspaper headings or articles which, however, always appear to die away without a whimper. I ask my British friends to note that the following are not my own creations, but actual news items reported in the media over the recent past:
· The Queen (Note: the wealthiest woman in Europe), asked ministers for a poverty hand-out to help heat her palaces but was advised against this because it was feared it would be a public relations disaster
· Corruption probes launched into Duke of York's £15m home deal. Sunninghill was sold for £15million in 2007, despite having languished on the market for more than five years with a £12million price tag.
· Prince Charles's gets a 12% pay-rise from the taxpayer... despite income from his own business rising to £18m
· Camilla's sister enjoys a £170,000 royal pay day to refurbish Charles' holiday cottages
· Business as usual for Airmiles Andy: He's still costing a fortune... even though he's quit as trade envoy
· Prince Andrew clocked up £378,000 bill on flights in his last few months as a controversial global ambassador for UK trade and industry
· Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall's private jet for tour of Middle East, South Africa and Tanzania cost taxpayers £460,387
· Prince Harry's jubilee tour on behalf of the Queen in March cost £107,098
· But accounts show that Royal Family cost Britain just 52p per head which amounts to £32.3million, up £200,000 on previous year
· Airmiles Andy gets ready for The Open: Prince takes £3,000 helicopter flight on golfing treat to play championship course
· The Queen's hidden cousins: They were banished to an asylum in 1941 and left neglected now an intriguing documentary reveals all
Who are these individuals and why do they hold their own people in so much contempt?
All British rulers have either laid a claim to some kind of connection to William the Conqueror as direct descendants - or through French Dukes who married female descendants of William - or in the case of the German House of Hanover, through a distant relationship to the Scottish throne which had become connected to William through marriage (but the latter instance is somewhat vague to me).
In fact, the first two kings from the House of Hanover were born in Germany and could barely speak a few words of English, but the Barons knew that any internal struggle for the throne could lead to another destructive War of the Roses, so they imported a puppet.
Not a single English King or Queen appears to have had a drop of English blood in his or her veins. Welsh and Scottish blood yes, but English, no. Even the Tudor King Henry VIII was descended from a wealthy Welshman who had married the French widow of Henry V, a woman descended from William the Conqueror.
Yet the people of England have been convinced that their Rulers are English and that it is the people’s patriotic duty to die for its Ruling Class as it wages wars in order to acquire additional wealth.
The rulers of other countries are also using similar tactics from different perspectives in order to brainwash their youth into fighting in wars whose exclusive purpose is the increasing of the wealth of their ruling class.
THE FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY
…. Continued in Part 4
From PART 2
SilverGenes on a similar subject: