We are all slaves and there is no freedom - PART 4
A proposal for a New Politico-Economic System
Past and Present Enslavement – Historical Facts
….continued from PART 3
THE FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY
It is incredible how the establishment brainwashes us in directions which are designed to ensure the perpetuation of their own trouble free existence.
What may be the remains of King Richard III appears to have been found recently under a car park near where the battle of Bosworth took place. A ‘Mail-Online’ journalist wrote a passionate article about how Richard III should be buried with honours as the last Plantagenet king and therefore “the last truly English king” to have ruled England. He was making the point that monarchs after the Plantagenet family were not really of English blood, referring of course to the Welsh/French origins of the Tudors and the German/German origins of the current monarch.
But was the Plantagenet line of English blood? Regrettably it was not - and the falsification of history for the masses continues unabated.
The first Plantagenet king of England was Henry II who was the Count of Anjou, Count of Maine, Duke of Normandy, Duke of Aquitaine (by marriage) and Count of Nantes. He was born in Le Mans, France of French parents. His wife was Eleanor, the daughter of the Duke of Aquitaine, born in France and an ex queen of France (her marriage to the French king was annulled), a Duchess in her own right. She was also born in France of French parents.
Neither the royal couple nor their children spoke English and, in fairness to other migrants, they were as English as a first generation Pakistani chapatti bakers in Golders Green are English.
Their most famous child is King Richard I, better known as Richard the Lion Heart, who lived in France under the protection of the king of France from Age 14. At the insistence of his mother, he was given her family title of Duke of Aquitaine at age 16, where he resided. He became king of England in 1189 and remained so for ten years until his death, but during this period he spent less than eight months in England. He never learned to speak English.
We are all brainwashed by historians, poets and playwrights whose very existence depended on their ability to manipulate history to suit the preference of whatever monarch they served at the time. Who among us has not watched at least one Robin Hood movie version and saw the Plantagenet “English” King Richard the Lion Heart, walk on the set and save the day for Robin Hood? No doubt you see my point.
The bloody Hundred Years' War was a series of conflicts waged from 1337 to 1453 between Frenchmen using the plebs of England and France to fight for the conflicting financial interests of their masters. There was nothing patriotic about the whole hundred year bloodshed other than the spin used by the kings of both countries to convince their subjects to die for them.
We were the slaves of these people then, we are the slaves of their bankers now and they are trying to enslave our children through falsification of history, even through children’s stories. The following is from a website purporting to teach children history:
“Since the time of Edward the Confessor in the 1000s AD, the kings of England had been getting more and more powerful. That was pretty much okay as long as the kings were good kings, like William the Conqueror”.
In other words, our children are taught that a bloody butcher like William the Conqueror was a good king!
THE MAGNA CARTA
When anything is profusely praised by the establishment and its lackeys, be very careful and look into it with the greatest reservations.
Therefore, when LORD Denning describes the Magna Carta as "the greatest constitutional document of all times – the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot", then read the document again carefully. If you have read the previous articles in this series, would it surprise you to read that a LORD Woolf described the Magna Carta as "the first of a series of instruments that now are recognised as having a special constitutional status" ?
This document is more or less presented to the plebs as if it had been drafted by gifted liberals who favoured a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties, for the benefit of the plebs.
Considering that the Romans had something similar, the truth is that the Magna Carta was very simply a document designed to EXCLUSIVELY protect the rights of the Barons who drafted it, from the greed of the monarch. It was not intended to protect the people at large because the Barons did not give a fig for the people at large. It is the self-serving document that a lawyer can draft to protect his clients in a dispute.
Brainwashing begins early. The following is an extract from the same website referred to above, purporting to teach history to children:
“King John ……. first he lost almost all of the English land in France (sic). Then he made everyone who owned land in England pay extra taxes…. So the rich men of England - the earls, the dukes, and the counts - decided to try to get back some of the power from the king. They wrote a letter (Latin "carta") saying that everyone (sic) in England would have certain rights …. “
We were the slaves of these people then, we are now the slaves of their bankers and they are trying to ensure the future enslavement of our children.
THE CLASS SYSTEM
I could go on for ever, but I think that the point has been made.
Part 5 will be titled:
A proposal for a New Politico-Economic System
An interesting read: http://www.helenhollick.net/culpa1.html
SilverGenes on a similar subject: