What Homosexuals Won't Tell You: Exposing Common Falsehoods
If you clicked on this article you're either interested in finding out the truth or will write this off as just another homophobic article by a religious nut-job, either way I thank you for stopping by.
You can't go 10 minutes without being slapped in the face with homosexual images repeated articles about homosexual 'marriage' or another 'famous' person coming out. Why? What does it all mean?
Before you go on I encourage you to click the link below read it and come back the article will make more sense:
WELCOME BACK! After reading that article you might a little surprise by how quickly the homosexuals who wrote the book put their plan into action. Some of you probably thought you chose to support the homosexual agenda of your own free will, now you realize you've been brainwashed. Scary huh?
In this article we are going to expose the common falsehoods put out by the homosexual lobby. Let's get started:
Lie #1 People are born homosexual.
This is the biggest lie put out by homosexuals, you'll often hear "Why would I choose to be hated" or "Did you choose to be straight?" or another spin of the two. When you look closer you'll see, it's a lie.
“After many years of intense research, a genetic component to homosexual desires has not been discovered. Twin studies show that identical twins do not consistently have the same sexual orientation. In fact, genetics probably explains very little about homosexual desires. How would a homosexual “gene” be passed on? Homosexuals don’t pass on anything because they don’t reproduce. The human genome project found no such gene. Then figure out how such a destructive and non productive gene would survive through thousands of generations. Second, the “born-that-way” claim is an argument from design” since God designed me with these desires, I ought to act on them.” But the people who say this overlook something more obvious they were also born with a specific gender. This raises the question: Why are you following your desires but not your gender? After all, we’re not sure if your desires were designed or the result of your upbringing, but we are certain that your anatomy is designed. So why not follow your anatomy rather than your desires? Ignoring your desires may be uncomfortable, but ignoring the natural design of your body is often fatal.Even IF desires are not a choice, sexual behavior always is. So even if a person honestly believes that he’s been born with homosexual desires, he is certainly capable of controlling his sexual behavior. If you claim that he is not—that sexual behavior is somehow uncontrollable—then you have made the absurd contention that no one can be morally responsible for any sexual crime, including rape, incest, and child molestation.” "IF you are born with a genetic predisposition to alcohol, does that mean God wants you to be an alcoholic? If someone has a genetic attraction to children, does that mean God wants you to be a pedophile? (According to pedophiles it does!) What homosexual activist would say that a genetic predisposition to anger justifies gay-bashing? (Born gay? What if the gay basher was born mean?) " Frank Turek
In fact homosexuals have tried anything and everything in order to try and 'prove' they are born homosexual. No 'scientific' study perform by homosexuals or homosexual advocates has made through the scientific method and has never been repeated, which leads us to believe homosexuals knowingly manipulate studies to come out as inclusive than they publish the very incoclusive study as absolute fact.
“If homosexual orientation were completely genetic, one would expect that it would not change over the course of one's life. For females, sexual preference does seem to change over time. A 5-year study of lesbians found that over a quarter of these women relinquished their lesbian/bisexual identities during this period: half reclaimed heterosexual identities and half gave up all identity labels. In a survey of young minority women (16-23 years of age), half of the participants changed their sexual identities more than once during the two-year survey period. In another study of subjects who were recruited from organizations that serve lesbian/gay/bisexual youths (ages 14 to 21 years) in New York City, the percentage that changed from a lesbian/gay/bisexual orientation to a heterosexual orientation was 5% over the period of just 12 months (the length of the survey). Other studies have confirmed that sexual orientation is not fixed in all individuals, but can change over time, especially in women. A recent example of an orientation change occurred with The Advocate's "Person of the Year" for 2005. Kerry Pacer was the youngest gay advocate, chosen for her initiation of a "gay-straight alliance" at White County High School in Cleveland, Georgia. However, four years later, she is raising her one year old daughter, along with the baby's father. Obviously, for at least some individuals, being gay or straight is something they can choose.
The growing number of former, recovered homosexual persons clearly establishes the fact that homosexuality is not an immutable characteristic, such as race or gender. Thus, there is no rational basis for setting aside centuries of legal precedent, religious teachings and good social order in order to give a preferential place in society to homosexual behavior.
See more ex homosexuals here
So no people are not born homosexual. The bible says we are born under a sin nature and a strong urge to rebel against our Creator, and that is manifested in many different ways(sins) homosexuality is one of them.
Sources: Rosario M., E.W. Schrimshaw, J. Hunter, and L. Braun. 2006. Sexual identity development among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: consistency and change over time. J Sex Res.43: 46-58. Kinnish, K.K., Strassberg, D.S., Turner, C.W., 2005. Sex differences in the flexibility of sexual orientation: a multidimensional retrospective assessment. Archives of Sexual Behavior 34, 173–183. Whoops! Lesbian 'Person of the Year' in Gay Press Goes Straight With Baby by Tim Graham.
Lie #2 There is no homosexual agenda.
If you read the first link you now know how big of a lie that is. Homosexuals want absolute moral approve for their behavior.
The homosexual agenda includes desensitizing the public: "The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights.....To desensitize the public is to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally, we would have straights register differences in sexual preferences the way they register different tastes for ice cream or sports games....At least in the beginning, we are seeking public desensitization and nothing more. We do not need and cannot expect a full 'appreciation' or 'understanding' of homosexuality from the average American. You can forget about trying to persuade the masses that homosexuality is a good thing. But if only you can get them to think that it is just another thing...then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won".
Part of the homosexual agenda is to get the public to affirm their filthy lifestyle, as one homosexual admitted in the October 1987 homosexual rally on Washington: "We are no longer seeking just a right to privacy and a protection from wrong. We also have a right -- as heterosexual Americans already have -- to see government and society affirm our lives".
Part of the homosexual agenda is to turn people from Christianity: "The teaching that only male-female sexual activity within the bounds and constraints of marriage is the only acceptable form should be reason enough for any homosexual to denounce the Christian religion".
"Writing in their 1989 gay manifesto, After the Ball, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, Ph.D., offered the homosexual community the following strategy: “In the early stages of the campaign, the public should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexualbehavior itself. Instead, the imagery of sex per se should be downplayed, and the issue of gay rights reduced, as far as possible, to an abstract social question"
"Notice that homosexual activists cleverly avoid the real issue. When speaking of homosexuality, they always talk about rights rather than acts. They know they won’t win if they describe the acts that they want us to endorse through government-backed same-sex marriage. Since a majority of Americans find such acts unnatural, immoral, and repulsive, and have NO benefits to society. Homosexual activists hide the real truth about what they do behind the word “rights” because no one can be against that. This language manipulation extends to other terms they use (such as “gay” and “pride”) and is a common propaganda technique used by radical abortion rights proponents as well. It’s too difficult to advocate child dismemberment, so partial-birth abortion advocates talk about “choice.” We should ask the manipulators the following: “A right to choose what?” and “A right to do what?” They won’t call it what it is because the naked truth would hurt their case with most Americans."
Since those words were penned in the late 80s, gay activists have been extremely successful at instituting Kirk and Madsen’s advise. In large part, the legitimization of homosexuality has been achieved through efforts that conceal the realities of homosexual sex behind the rhetoric of civil rights, such as the enactment of special rights laws, “safe” school initiatives, and the positive portrayal of gays and lesbians in the media. The message the public consistently hears is that homosexuality is normal, and that homosexual acts are one aspect of the myriad of ways that human beings relate sexually.
Yes THE BIGGEST LIE in the homosexual agenda is "our behaviors are not different from yours,"
Let's look deeper into "normal" behaviors of homosexuals.
Anal Sex. Although it is certainly not exclusive to homosexuals, anal sex has a long history of association with male homosexual activity, and is considered one of the highest risk sexual behaviors for both men and women. According to the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA), “a significant percentage of MSMs—as many as one in three—have some incidence of unprotected anal sex.”
According to a 2000-2002 study of HIV-positive MSM in 16 states, 30 percent of sexually active MSM reported engaging exclusively in oral sex, and 13 percent reported engaging exclusively in anal sex at their last sexual encounter, while 55 percent reported both behaviors. Overall, 40 percent reported insertive anal intercourse at their last sexual encounter.
Multiple Partners. Homosexuality is also associated with a higher number of lifetime sexual partners, which puts both men and women at an increased risk of disease. A 1995 Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance found that gay, lesbian, and bisexual orientation was associated with having sexual intercourse before age 13, having four or more sexual partners in a lifetime, and experiencing sexual contact against their will.
MSM enrolled in a study published in the American Journal of Public Health in 2003 reported a median number of seven male sex partners over the previous six months, with 42.2 percent reporting 10 or more male partners. A 1997 study of young gay and bisexual men found that 91 percent reported an average of 43 male sexual partners in their lifetime.
Barebacking. A June 2006 article in the homosexual newspaper, The Washington Blade, examined the popularity of “barebacking” (anal sex without a condom) among some MSM. Barebacking is popular at gay circuit parties, which are weekend-long dance events for gay and bisexual men, where drugs and sex are prevalent. One study of MSM attending gay circuit-parties published in 2005 found that 29 percent reported multiple sexual partners over the weekend, with 47 percent of these reporting anal sex without a condom. A six-city study of homosexual men published in the American Journal of Public Healthin 2003 found that 48.0 percent reported unprotected receptive anal sex, and 54.9 percent reported unprotected insertive anal sex.
Bug chasing. Another disturbing phenomenon among some MSM involves HIV-negative MSM who actively seek HIV infection by engaging in high-risk sexual activities with infected male partners. A 2003 Rolling Stone article brought national attention to “bug-chasing,” which the article described as “an intricate underground world that has sprouted, driven almost completely by the Internet, in which men who want to be infected with HIV get together with those willing to infect them.” Carlos, a “bug chaser” who claimed to have had several hundred sexual partners and said he regularly had sex with three or four HIV-positive men a week, told Rolling Stone, “I know what the risks are…But I think it turns the other guy on to know that I’m negative and that they’re bringing me into the brotherhood. That gets me off, too.”
Party Drugs. The use of various party drugs, such as methamphetamine (or “crystal meth”), is also on the rise among some MSM. Crystal meth is a highly addictive drug that affects the central nervous system and can be smoked, snorted, orally ingested, injected or used rectally. Meth use among MSM is such a growing problem that in 2006, the GLMA conducted its own study of the issue, concluding that “approximately 10 to 20 percent of gay men” reported meth use in the past six months, which is at least 10 times higher than the rate among the general population. The GLMA study found that 36 percent of MSM attending circuit parties reported using meth, as well as 28 percent of MSM ages 15-22 in major urban areas. According to the CDC, drugs like meth “may be used to decrease social inhibitions and enhance sexual experiences” and “are strongly associated with risky sexual practices among MSM.”
It is generally assumed that female homosexuality is less risky than male homosexuality. Although it is true that MSM experience significantly more physical health risks than women who onlyhave sex with women, lesbians are not immune to STDs and experience other health concerns that are worthy of note.
STDs. According to the CDC, there is little data available on the risk of STD transmission during female-to-female sexual activity.[xl] This may be due in part to the fact that the majority of lesbians have also had sex with men, which greatly increases their STD risk. The CDC reports that 53 percent to 99 percent of lesbians have had sex with men and “might continue to” have sex with men in the future. Compounding the risk is the fact that some lesbians who have sex with men also engage in other high-risk behaviors, such as sex with MSM, injection drug use, and exchange of sex for drugs or money
Lesbians who only have sex with other women are still at risk for certain STDs. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), “lesbian women can transmit STDs to each other through skin-to-skin contact, mucosa contact, vaginal fluids, and menstrual blood,” as well as through the sharing of sex toys. Common STDs that can be passed between lesbians include: Bacterial vaginosis (BV); HPV, Trichomoniasis, Herpes; and syphilis. BV is more common in lesbian and bisexual women than in heterosexual women.
"Cancer Risks. Certain cancers are more common among lesbians, specifically breast cancer and various gynecological cancers (uterine, cervical, endometrial and ovarian). According to the DHHS, factors that may increase the cancer risk among lesbians include: the fact that lesbians are generally less likely to bear children, and higher rates of alcohol use and obesity among lesbians."
"Although homosexuality is presented to society as a healthy—and sometimes even superior—alternative to heterosexuality, the truth is that homosexual behavior represents a serious threat to individual and public health. Homosexuality, particularly among males, is associated with dangerous behaviors and increased rates of disease ranging from certain cancers to a long list of STDs, including HIV/AIDS. As recent studies show, many homosexuals continue to engage in high-risk behaviors that ignore the very real consequences to their health and the health of others. The public deserves honest information about the sexual realities of the homosexual lifestyle and the serious health risks that come with it."
Alysse ElHage is the a senior research associate with the North Carolina Family Policy Council.
Sources: "The Overhauling of Straight America." Guide Magazine. November, 1987. United States Congressional Record, June 29, 1989, Advocate, 1985. Freeman, Geoffery, “Bug Chasers: The men who long to be HIV+,” Rolling Stone magazine, February 6, 2003. GLMA, Breaking the Grip: Treating Crystal Methamphetamine Addiction Among Gay and Bisexual Men, November 2006, pg. i (executive summary). CDC, “HIV/AIDS Among Men Who Have Sex With Men,” CDC HIV/AIDS Fact Sheet, May 2007.Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Health: Findings and Concerns,” Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, Vol. 4, no. 3 (2000), pg.114. CDC, “High-Risk Sexual Behavior by HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men—16 sites, United States, 2000-2002,” MMWR Weekly, v. 53, no. 38, pgs. 891-894 (Oct. 2004). R. Garofalo et al., “The Association Between Health Risk Behaviors and Sexual Orientation Among a School-based Sample of Adolescents,” Pediatrics, 101 (1998): pgs. 895-902. Cited in: Meeker, Meg, MD. Epidemic: How Teen Sex is Killing Our Kids, pg. 153. Koblin, et. al., “High-Risk Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Six U.S. Cities: Baseline Data from the EXPLORE Study,” American Journal of Public Health, June 2003, vol. 93, no. 6, pg. 928. Seage, George, Kenneth Mayer MD), et. al., “HIV and Hepatitis B Infection and Risk Behavior in Young Gay and Bisexual Men,” Public Health Reports, v. 112 (2) March-April 1997, pg. 161. Meeker, Meg, MD, “High-Risk Sex,” Epidemic: How Teen Sex is Killing Our Kids, Regnery Publishing, Washington, DC: 2002, pgs. 152.Klamecki, Bernard J. “Medical Perspective of the Homosexual Issue,” The Crisis of Homosexuality, Ed. J. Isamu Yamamoto, Christianity Today Publisher, 1990. See also: Medical Institute for Sexual Health, Health Implications Associated with Homosexuality, A Monograph, 1999, pg. 57.Op. Cit. Medical Institute, pg. 55-56. GLMA, “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Health: Findings and Concerns,” Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, Vol. 4, no. 3 (2000), pg.111. American Cancer Society, “What are the risks of anal cancer,” All About Anal Cancer, www.cancer.org. GLMA, “Ten Things Gay Men Should Discuss With Their Health Care Providers,” at www.glma.org.http://www.ncfamily.org/FNC/0707S3.html
Matthew Shepard and Harvey milk were 'gay' martyrs and hate crime against homosexuals are high.
Victims homosexuals must play victim in order persuade straight America to their cause. Now I'm not saying the people NEVER harm homosexuals, but you see is nowhere near reality.
FBI statistics show that there are actually very few "hate crimes" committed against homosexuals in the United States. Yet homosexuals claim they need federal legislation passed to protect them from what they maintain is an epidemic of hate against them.
According to the FBI, in 1999 there were only 1,317 hate crimes directed against homosexuals and many of these were simple assault or intimidation. "Name-calling" rates equally with an assault in hate crime statistics.
Investigative reporter Fred Dickey, writing in the Los Angeles Times Magazine, October 22, 2000, describes the reality of hate crimes in "The Perversion of Hate: Laws Against Hate Crimes Are An Idea Gone Sour. Prosecutors Apply Them Unfairly and the List of 'Special Victims' Keeps Growing." According to Dickey, news reports in 1999 in Los Angeles screamed that the city's hate crimes had risen by 11.7% from 1998. The implication was that the city was experiencing an epidemic of hate crimes. But Dickey points out that in Los Angeles County, an area with 10 million people, there were only 859 hate crimes committed. Most of these were gang related and only 98 resulted in felony charges. This is hardly an epidemic.
Plus According to (U.S. Department of Justice, “Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence”, Office of Justice Programs, July, 2000. Hate crimes against homosexuals are committed by other homosexuals. Newsweek reported 50% of the calls to a hot line to report "queer bashing" involved domestic violence (i.e., homosexuals beating up other homosexuals).Same sex relationships are far more likely to involve abuse and violence. And this data is supported by other surveys and studies. The Bureau of Justice reports that women in traditional heterosexual marriages experience far lower rates of violence than women in any other type of relationship. (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, “Intimate Partner Violence”, U.S. Department of Justice, May, 2000). Over and over again, studies reveal that homosexual and lesbian relationships are far more violent than traditional marital relationships. Judge John Martaugh, chief magistrate of the New York City Criminal Court has said, "Homosexuals account for half the murders in large cities"
"In one study, researchers found that 90% of surveyed lesbians said they had suffered verbal abuse and 31% said they had experienced physical abuse from their same sex partner. (Lettie L. Lockhart et al., “Letting out the Secret: Violence in Lesbian Relationships”, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 9, 1994). Another survey found that more than 50% of lesbians reported that they had been abused by their female partner. (Gwat Yong Lie and Sabrina Gentlewarrier, “Intimate Violence in Lesbian Relationships: Discussion of Survey Findings and Practice Implications”, Journal of Social Service Research 15, 1991). Additional studies confirm this level of abuse within lesbian relationships. One such study revealed that 54% of lesbian couples report 10 or more incidents of abuse, and 74% reported that the abuse grew worse over time. (William C. Nichols, et al, editors, “Handbook of Family Development and Intervention”, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2000). And male homosexual couples report similar abuse. One study found that gay men experience nearly two times the amount of violence (in the context of their relationships) than tradition heterosexual couples. (D. Island and P. Letellier, “Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them: Battered Gay Men and Domestic Violence”, New York, Haworth Press, 1991). These studies simply reveal the truth of the matter. Homosexual relationships are far more violent that heterosexual relationships, based on a number of different parameters and measurements"
Hate crimes legislation is fundamentally unfair to victims. It deems some victims more important than others. It violates the fundamental constitutional principle of equal protection under the law.
Hate crimes legislation can, and indeed has been used, to criminalize thought.
Hate crimes legislation can, and has been used, to criminalize religious belief. The Bible is already being targeted in Canada as a "hateful" book.
Hate crimes legislation as applied to "homosexual persons" is excessive on many fronts.
The following information was provided by the Family Research Council (FRC), who gathered the information from FBI crime statistics."
Of every 20,000 murders, 4 were declared "hate crimes" against homosexuals (0.02%)
Of every 20,000 aggravated assaults, 4 are "hate crimes" against homosexuals (0.02%)
Of every 20,000 robberies, 2 are "hate crimes" against homosexuals (0.01%)
Of every 80,000 rapes, less than 1 is a "hate crime" against homosexuals (0.00123%)
The evidence for an epidemic of crimes against homosexual persons is non-existent, a part of the "noble victim" image which has been so successfully used to soften American attitudes toward homosexual behavior.
Homosexual persons already have the same legal protections as all other Americans.
Physical assault, murder, etc. are already crimes.
"Regardless of what Californians may or may not believe about GLTB rights, Harvey Milk was a painfully poor person to teach unsuspecting school kids to honor. The real Harvey Milk was a guy with a bad temper, who freely had sex with teenagers and, according to his biographer, “had a penchant for young waifs with substance abuse problems.” The movie about Harvey Milk also conveniently leaves out the fact that Milk was a big supporter of Jim Jones – that same Jim Jones, leader of Peoples Temple, who led over 900 people to their poisoned Kool-Aid deaths in Guyana merely nine days before Milk was slain."
According to Daniel J Flynn in City Journal:
“Milk occasionally spoke at Jones’s San Francisco–based headquarters, promoted Jones through his newspaper columns, and defended the Peoples Temple from its growing legion of critics. Jones provided conscripted ‘volunteers’ for Milk’s campaigns to distribute leaflets by the tens of thousands. Milk returned the favor by abusing his position of public trust on behalf of Jones’s criminal endeavors.”
The truth about Shepard:
Homosexuals 'marriage' are just like interracial marriage. Homosexual is the new black.
I have to say as a black woman married to a white man this lie upsets me the most.
“The analogy is not valid. Laws against interracial marriage served only to preserve a social system of racial segregation. This was an unworthy goal, irrelevant to the fundamental nature of marriage.
For a black woman to marry a white man does not change the definition of marriage, the basic requirement for which is one man and one woman. Allowing two men or two women to marry would change that fundamental definition. Banning the "marriage" of same-sex couples is therefore essential to preserve the nature and purpose of marriage itself.
“Race is irrelevant to marriage—gender is essential to it. Nothing is wrong with interracial marriages because men and women are designed for one another, regardless of their racial backgrounds.”
“Furthermore, interracial marriage was opposed without any valid grounds. Opponents hid their prejudice with false speculation about birth defects and the like. Since all racial groups interbreed, such problems do not exist. In other words, there really is no such thing as interracial marriage because there is only one race—the human race. Inter-ethnic marriage poses no physical problems. However, same-sex couples don’t breed at all, and their unions are often unhealthy.”
Ironically, it’s not conservatives, but same-sex marriage proponents who are reasoning like racists. Instead of asking the state to recognize the preexisting institution of marriage, homosexuals are asking the state to define marriage. Well, that is exactly the line of reasoning racists used in their effort to prevent interracial marriage. Racists wanted the state to define marriage as only between same-race couples, instead of having the state recognize what marriage already was—the procreative union of a man and a woman regardless of their racial/ethnic background.
While racists and homosexuals may want to alter the legal definition of marriage, they cannot alter the laws of nature that helped produce the recognition of legal marriage in the first place. The comparison of homosexuality to race is completely invalid. Skin color is benign, but sexual behavior is not. Having a certain skin color does not hurt anyone, but homosexual behavior can and does hurt others. Furthermore, sexual behavior is always a choice; race never is. You will find many former homosexuals, but you will never find a former African-American.
Second, homosexuality is not an identity or class; it’s a behavior. Homosexuals are not a class of people any more than heterosexuals are a class of people. We are males and females, not gays and straights. In other words, we are males and females by anatomy, but gays and straights by behavior.
Why not classify people by their desires as homosexual activists demand? Because if we start to classify people by what they desire to do sexually, then why not give people with all sexual desires special marriage rights? On what grounds should we say that same-sex marriage is fine but not marriage involving polygamy, incest, or bestiality?
“But those behaviors are harmful!” you say. Exactly, and so is homosexual behavior. So why is it legitimate to carve out a special case for homosexuality but not for those other behaviors?
To equate sexual preferences with skin color is demeaning to African-Americans and people of any color
, including white, who certainly do not morally equate the practice of sodomy with the color of their skin. This is not a civil rights issue, skin color has no correlation to sexual behavior. Humans are heterosexual by inherent design regardless of how some individuals wish to express their sexuality. This simple truth cannot be legislated away.
I find it offensive that homosexuals would equate being black with practicing sodomy. Look up Ota Benga, James Byrd, or the history of slavery. Homosexuals, atheist, and bible skeptics forget that Christians were the ones who helped abolish slavery.
Homosexuals have NOT been forced into servitude as a matter of law.
Homosexuals have NOT been denied medical treatment at a heterosexual only hospital as a matter of law.
Homosexuals have NOT been segregated in school bathrooms, water fountains as a matter of law.
Homosexuals have NOT been bought and sold a property of a matter of law.
Homosexuals have NOT been hunted, captured decapitated or placed in zoos as a matter of law.
Homosexuals have NOT been denied housing as a matter of law.
Homosexuals have NOT been denied service at a restaurant as a matter of law.
Homosexuals have NOT been forced to sit at the back of a bus as a matter of law.
Homosexuals have NOT been denied education as a matter of law.
Homosexuals have NOT been denied employment as a matter of law.
In fact, The average yearly income of a homosexual is $55,430.00 (most of which is disposable because no children to take care of!). The average of the general population is $32,144.00. The average of blacks is $12,166.00
49.0% of homosexuals hold professional/managerial positions. 15.9% of the general population hold such positions.
“Special protection legislation has always been reserved for classes of people who display immutable characteristics, which they cannot change, such as race, gender, or national origin. The criteria is based on "being" not on "behavior."
Homosexual persons are the first group to demand special laws because of their "behavior" -- i.e. having sex with partners of the same sex. "Behavior" is the only distinguishing characteristic which defines homosexual persons as a group.
Homosexual persons, whose primary identifying characteristic is their sexual behavior, have repeatedly been found by the courts not to be deserving of special legal protections,because of the moral, health and social issues involved.
People who engage in homosexual behavior have the same rights as other citizens, but should not be given additional rights based on their willingness to perform peculiar–and medically dangerous–sex acts. .
Don’t compare your sin to my skin.
Blacks were banned from buses, stores, restaurants, schools and housing because of an immutable trait or just being black, homosexuals were banned from giving blood for their behaviors see the difference if you don’t you’re homosexual.
Why Homosexual Behavior Is More like Consensual Incest and Polyamory than Race or Gender
Marriage is about the KIDS,
Lie# 5 The American Psychiatric Association is an unbiased organization that says homosexuality is good healthy and normal and should encouraged, and they removed homosexuality from the mental disorder list for good reason.
Let us remember why homosexuality was first considered a mental illness. Because of the repulsive and extremely abnormal behavior starting from anal sex to playing and ingesting fecal matter. Also the addictive nature of the homosexuals were like that of drug addicts and or alcoholics. Plus the mental health issues from deep depression and suicides primarily associated with their partners and break ups. The rabid promiscuity of homosexuals was also taken into account when determining the mental status. Please look it up yourself.
Over the past few years, the APA has done several flip flops on its position on pedophilia as a mental disorder. According to Linda Ames Nicolosi with the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), the APA's DSM-III maintained that merely acting upon sexual urges against children is sufficient to earn a diagnosis of pedophilia. However, in the DSM-IV, the APA changed the definition. It claimed that only if a person experienced significant stress or social impairment, would his sexual attraction to children be considered pedophilia. In other words, if the person felt no remorse for molesting kids, he wasn't really a pedophile.
Is this really questionable how the APA wants to define what is and isn't a mental disorder? If a person doesn't feel bad about his behavior, then he's normal. Using this definition, one could say that a person who feels no emotional discomfort from having sex with dead people or animals is perfectly normal.
Homosexuals, pedophiles and ALL other paraphilias are based on feelings not facts and deviated for the what society and humankind was based on. The only difference is homosexuals are more aggressive and forced their destructive perversion on everyone. Pedophilia is not far behind
Wanting justification for their perversion homosexuals harassed pressured and outright bullied the APA to removal homosexuality from the list. Even though the core reason why it was first place on the list had not changed and in some cases doubled. So the APA concluded if they don’t feel bad about is not a mental illness. Now apply to any other cases. Then homosexuals started the name game changing definitions solely based on feelings not facts.
“Homosexuality was considered a mental illness for thousands of years and still is. It was only in 1973 that the APA was convinced, under fierce pressure from the homosexual movement, to remove it from the list of mental illnesses. It will make a return to that list eventually.
“Homosexuals got homosexuality removed from the list of mental illnesses in the early 70s by storming the annual American Psychiatric Association (APA) conference on successive years. "Guerrilla theater tactics and more straight-forward shouting matches characterized their presence" No conflicting or new evidence was presented just homosexual bullying. Since homosexuality has been removed from the APA list of mental illnesses, so has pedophilia (except when the adult feels "subjective distress")”
Bayer, R. Homosexuality and American Psychiatry
After seeing the "normal" behaviors of homosexuals why would any logical person want to encourage children to experiment with it?
The APA has has no credibility on this issue they have caved to political correctness and homosexual bullying.
Thankfully they're still a lot of professional who affirm that homosexuality had no scientific reason to be removed from the mental disorder list and that homosexuality is abnormal and should not be encouraged.
There are several article from doctors and other professional please check out their work.
The "Trojan Couch":
How the Mental Health Associations Misrepresent Science
"Destructive Trends in Mental Health: The Well-Intentioned Path to Harm"
When Activism Masquerades as Science:
Potential Consequences of Recent APA Resolutions
By A. Dean Byrd, Ph. D., MBA, MPH
Homosexuality and Pedophilia have nothing in common.
Homosexuals try to distance themselves from pedophilia, but the common trends are undeniable.
Homosexuals say they born homosexual and can‘t change(even though this a big lie put by homosexuals, but has no conclusive basis in fact) PLUS There are thousand of ex homosexual testimonies available. PFOX, P4CM ex homosexual are just two sites)
Pedophiles says they’re born pedophiles
Homosexuals got their perversion removed from the mental disorder list, by force
Pedophiles are now fighting to get pedophilia removed completely from the disorder list just like homosexuals.
In mid-May, 2003, members of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) met in San Francisco and listened to a psychiatrist argue for the declassification of pedophilia, fetishism, transvestism, voyeurism, and sadomasochism from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). They've succeed!
According to pedophiles they believe it is in fact a sexual orientation. These people actually see children as the object of their lust. Just like homosexuals see people of the same sex as an object of lust. If a homosexual is born a homosexual, a pedophile is born a pedophile. Homosexual claim this when comparing themselves to heterosexuals. It is their orientation and there is no successful therapy to alter that orientation. Says homosexuals and pedophiles. So don’t lump yourself up with hetros you are better categorized with pedophiles there are many more similarities.
Classifying it as a "sexual orientation" serves to remove a stigma and normalize the behavior. "I can't help it, I was born this way!" The same argument we hear from homosexuals and pedophiles.
Homosexuals demanded the law be changed to remove sodomy
Pedophiles are now demanding to change the law of consent.
During the late 1950s to early 1990s, several pedophile membership organizations advocated age of consent reform to lower or abolish age of consent laws, and for the acceptance of pedophilia as a sexual orientation rather psychological disorder
Since we now see children having sex much younger due to liberal indoctrination in public schools pedophiles just might get their way.
33% of homosexuals ADMIT to minor/adult sex
There is a notable homosexual group, consisting of thousands of members, known as the North American Man and Boy Love Association ( NAMBLA). This is a child molesting homosexual group whose cry is "SEX BEFORE 8 BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE." This group can be seen marching in most major homosexual parades across the United States.
Homosexuals commit more than 33% of all reported child molestations in the United States, which, assuming homosexuals make up 2% of the population, means that 1 in 20 homosexuals is a child molestor, while 1 in 490 heterosexuals is a child molestor.
73% of all homosexuals have had sex with boys under 19 years of age.
Many homosexuals admit that they are pedophiles: "The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality"
Because homosexuals can't reproduce naturally, they resort to recruiting children. Homosexuals can be heard chanting "TEN PERCENT IS NOT ENOUGH, RECRUIT, RECRUIT, RECRUIT" in their homosexual parades. A group called the "Lesbian Avengers" prides itself on trying to recruit young girls. They print "WE RECRUIT" on their literature. Some other homosexuals aren't as overt about this, but rather try to infiltrate society and get into positions where they will have access to the malleable minds of young children (e.g., the clergy, teachers, Boy Scout leaders, etc.) (8). See the DC Lesbian Avengers web page, and DC Lesbian Avengers Press Release, where they threaten to recruit little boys and girls. Also, see AFA Action Alert.
Still don't think they are after our children:
We shall sodomize your sons,
emblems of your feeble masculinity,
of your shallow dreams and vulgar lives.
We shall seduce him in your schools,
in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums,
in your locker rooms, sports arenas,
seminiaries, truck stops, male clubs,
and in your Houses of Congress.
Wherever men are with men together,
your sons shall become our minions
and do our bidding.
They will be re-cast in OUR image.
They will come to crave and adore us.
All laws banning homosexuality will be revoked.
If you dare cry "homo", "fairy", or "queer" at us,
we will stab you in your cowardly hearts.
All churches who condemn us will be closed.
Our only gods are handsome young men.
We shall be victorious because we are
fueled with the ferocious
bitterness of the oppressed.
We too, are capable of firing guns
and manning the barricades
of ultimate revolution.
Michael Swift, Gay Community News, 2/15/87
Sources: Seligman, M. (1993). What you can change and what you can't, page 235. New York: Fawcett Columbine. Jenkins, Philip (2006). Decade of Nightmares: The End of the Sixties and the Making of Eighties America. Oxford University Press. p. 120. Spiegel, Josef (2003). Sexual Abuse of Males: The Sam Model of Theory and Practice. Routledge. pp. 5, p9. "The Case for Abolishing the Age of Consent Laws," an editorial from NAMBLA News (1980), reproduced in We Are Everywhere: A Historical Sourcebook of Gay and Lesbian Politics. Ed. by Mark Blasius and Shane Phelan. London: Routledge, 1997. pgs. 459-67. Family Research Institute, Lincoln, NE, Jay and Young. The Gay Report. Summit Books, 1979, p. 275,) Psychological Reports, 1986, 58, pp. 327-37. Science Magazine, 18 July 1993, p. 322. Kaifetz, J. "Homosexual Rights Are Concern for Some," Post-Tribune, 18 December 1992.
Homosexuals always lie about numbers ALWAYS. The Kinsey study of 1948, which homosexuals often cite to say that 10% of the population is homosexual, actually says that only 4% of the population is. This study involved a disproportionate number of people who had been in jail for sex crimes (hardly a random sample of the population). Kinsey also did perverse studies involving young boys and pedophiles. Current research shows that the true percentage of homosexuals is in the 1-2% range. 2.9 being the absolute highest. Which should really make you think. Why is every other TV show been taken over by homosexuals?
STDS Homosexuals are afraid of the true numbers of their STDS rate, because that would hurt their overall agenda.
Homosexuals account for 3-4% of all gonorrhea cases, 60% of all syphilis cases, and 17% of all hospital admissions (other than for STDs) in the United States . They make up only 1-2% of the population.
Homosexuals live unhealthy lifestyles, and have historically accounted for the bulk of syphilis, gonorrhea, Hepatitis B, the "gay bowel syndrome" (which attacks the intestinal tract), tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus .
73% of psychiatrists say homosexuals are less happy than the average person, and of those psychiatrists, 70% say that the unhappiness is NOT due to social stigmatization .
Gay websites, medical journals, psychological journals, and Centers for Disease Control all conclude that homosexual behavior results in greater risk for the following: (Gay websites included.)
AIDS, Hepatitis A, B & C; many kinds of sexually transmitted diseases; anal cancer & other cancers; higher rates of alcohol dependence; tobacco use at 50% higher rates; eating disorders; high rates of psychiatric illnesses, including depression, drug abuse, and suicide attempts; debilitating health; and reduced life span (up to 20 years). The Archives of Internal Medicine found that homosexuals acquired syphilis at a rate ten times that of heterosexuals.
One study concludes that 56% of AIDS is found in 2% of the population,
As of June 2001, 64% of men with AIDS were men who have had sex with men. Bisexual men become a bridge for transmission of all these diseases to women and the rest of the population according to Center For Disease Control. In one CDC study 17% of homosexual men had sex with men and women. Seven percent were HIV positive.
Promiscuity and health problems listed above lead to exorbitant costs for the taxpayer. This could be the straw that breaks the back of the insurance industry and social security. Every HIV-positive patient needs only to find a partner to receive the same coverage as offered to an employee. It is estimated by some analysts that an initial threefold increase in premiums can be anticipated. James Dobson
Taxpayers through Medicaid foot the bill for at least 50 percent of all people diagnosed with AIDS, 90% of children with Aids, and 70% of women with AIDS. New York Medicaid accounted for 70% of state AIDS related funding. This does not include other health problems homosexuals have to a much greater degree than the rest of the population.
The lifetime cost for treating a person with HIV from infection until death is estimated at $154,402. The average total lifetime charges for care of children with HIV infection is estimated at $491,936. The annual expense for treating a case of advanced AIDS is $34,000.
Total HIV/AIDS expenditures in New York state increased more than 304 percent from 1987 to 1994. In 1993, 40,351 persons in New York with HIV/AIDS received medical treatment through Medicaid, at an average per patient cost of $26,800.
According to Centers for Disease Control there was statistic of a 14% increase of HIV-AIDS among homosexual men in the United States between 1999 and 2001.
Many states now are exploring initiatives to expand Medicaid coverage to people with HIV before they develop AIDS.
Corporate Resource Council Executives say that many companies can expect the cost of health care for domestic partners to be significantly HIGHER than or heterosexual. In one study in 2001 involving 700,000 employees the health-care costs as a percent of premiums paid was 17.1 percent HIGHER for same sex couples than for heterosexual couples .
The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) cut in half its coverage of health insurance premiums for domestic partners of its employees, calling the premiums "prohibitively expensive" while demanding other corporations offer this coverage.
http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/hivcosts.htm; http://www.aidschicago.org/pdf/prevention_value.pdf.; http://www.narth.com/docs/risks.html; http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=\Culture\archive\200303\CUL20030319a.html; http://www.corporateresourcecouncil.org/white_papers/Hidden_Costs.pdf ;http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/hivaids/4-aids94.pdf
This is part 1 of a 3 part series stay tuned.