What Did You Think of the CA Democrat Senators Feinstein and Harris Questioning of Judge Kavanaugh? Featured [F1 231]
Jeff Flake the Second RINO senator from Arizona wants to delay the full senate confirmation for a week
Flake is a very vocal anti Trumper, and he is not seeking reelection. But he was not loyal to his voters by acting like a democrat. If the voters of Arizona wanted a democrat they would have voted for one.
- There is nothing to be gained by an FBI investigation. According to Ford there were only three people in the bedroom where the alleged assault occurred. And unless Kavanaugh or Judge confesses there can only be at best hearsay. Because no one else was in the room, and there is no physical evidence to corroborate Ford's accusation.
- This Flake move is just a delay to allow more of the democrat smear talk to continue. We will have a week of democrats making all sorts of stories with the purpose of trying to get the vote against Kavanaugh.
- After Ford's letter, her Washington Post interview, and her testimony in congress, we still don't know anything beyond her whole recollection of the assault.
- She remembers only Kavanaugh and Judge in a closed bedroom and she is the only one of the three that remembers any assault. The other two know nothing of this party or this incident.
- This is the basis of throwing out decades of Kavanaugh's work as an attorney and a judge.
- The FBI investigation couldn't even investigate Hillary Clinton with all of the evidence against her. With all that has been found in the FBI and DOJ investigation of top management and the emails indicating their intention and actions to frame Trump and then try to impeach president Trump. Can we trust them not to tip the scale against Trump and his SC nominee?
CA senator Dianne Feinstein is the creator of this US version of the Spanish Inquisition
Judge Kavanaugh was not proven guilty in the Ford Kavanaugh hearing
Calling the senate judiciary on accusations by Dr. Christine Blasely Ford against Judge Kavanaugh a Hearing is giving it legitimacy it didn't earn.
This so called hearing would bring us back to the Spanish Inquisition before we had the protections against wild and unsubstantiated charges brought against us, and you were guilty and would stay that way.
I don't know why Dr. Christing Blasely Ford came to the hearing yesterday. She didn't add anything to her letter to her congresswoman. Her witnesses couldn't and didn't corroborate here story that it was Kavanaugh 36 years ago.
The point is that the democrats intentionally made a circus of the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings. Had senator Feinstein turned over the letter from Ford to her committee she could have kept Ford's name secret. This would have allowed the committee to stay within congressional protocol and handle this accusation discreetly and most importantly during the confirmation.
When senator Feinstein was asked how the letter was leaked to the press, she denied that it was her or her staff. Yet, only Ford's lawyers, the CA congresswoman, and Feinstein knew about the letter. Feinstein said that the press hounded her? Really how did the press even know her name much less anything else about her. This smacks of political deception keeping that letter for several weeks, and then have it leaked. Then there is the continued mantra from the democrats demanding the Kavanaugh the accused to demand that the WH order the FBI to investigate the accusations.
FBI Investigations and their Reliablity
Going back to 1991, senator Joe Biden regarding the Clarence Thomas SC nominee, he said that the FBI investigation is unreliable. It only looks at the he said, and she said and that has already been done by the senate judiciary committee.
What is credibility without corroboration or evidence? There is no statute of limitations for sexual assault in Maryland and the proper venue isn't the FBI, it is the local Maryland police. To substantiate her claim against judge Kavanaugh, Ford should have filed a criminal assault with the Maryland police. She didn't do that, instead she took the political low road. Filing a criminal assault with the local police would have made her accusations against judge Kavanaugh more credible.
As it stands, all we could get out of yesterday's Ford testimony is that she believes it happened, but she is the only one privy to that. None of her witnesses corroborated that it happened. Even in 2012, when she went to the psychiatrist, she didn't name the boys.
It wasn't until Kavanaugh got on the list of possible SC nominees that she started telling the story to some people. She is a well known anti Trumper, and her actions and inaction make her less than a credible accuser.
The democrats wanted to at the minimum use this accusation to delay the confirmation vote, and at best force Kavanaugh to resign. But the accusation remains unsubstantiated, with no details on date, time, place or how she got to the party, and back home again. There is no testimony on who threw this party, how she knew about this party, or if she came with anyone to the party. Did she know anyone at the party. These and other questions are unanswered, and yet this accusation is supposed to undo judge Kavanaugh's record as an attorney, an a judge for decades.
The democrat senators were focusing on president Trump and making him their monologue. In their statements, they spewed out lies about the president as if they were gospel. They demanded that the accused promise to demand an FBI investigation, and they want to ensure that he wouldn't overturn Roe v Wade.
Judge Kavanaugh answered properly that he was bound only to the constitution, and that his record tells all.
Attacks by democrat senators
Senator Bloomenthal used a latin phrase, meaning False in False out. He was using it against judge Kavanaugh, but it squarely fits the accusation. The accusation after all this time still doesn't have the veracity, substance, facts or any evidence to support the charges made against Kavanaugh.
Ford's accusation can be summarized as Kavanaugh and Mark Judge assaulted me at a party sometimes in the early 1980s.
She doesn't know date, time or location of this party. She can't name anyone at the party, even who threw the party or for what occasion. None of her clothes were removed, none of the boys clothes were removed, and no one saw them. Pretty compelling isn't it.
She doesn't know how she got there, and whether she came alone. She doesn't know how she got home, and did she go home alone. We don't know her state of sobriety, or anything else. She told no one, including her parents, and her best friend. We also don't know how many of these parties that she attended in the early 1980s.
While all this could be technically true, the only thing that she is sure of is that it was Kavanaugh and Mark Judge. Everything else is blank.
When people say the believe her, all they really can say is that they believe she believes it. It is like that person that sees that UFO that no one else saw.