ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Where is King Trump Taking America?

Updated on May 22, 2019

In case you have not heard, America has a king. We no longer have a president that represents ALL people, we have a king that represents his business and family first, his 40% base supporters, second, and lastly, his subjects, Americans.

Like many Americans in 2016, I gave Trump my vote because of Clinton. Right or wrong, this decision has turned into a nightmare for all of us. I hoped Trump would change things to a modest degree but not this.

Trump's DNA

It is clear that despite his actual age, he still acts like a macho jerk or asshole when faced with real opposition, whether its calling people names, lying about the truth, refusing to cooperate, and thinking he actually IS above the law because he wants to be a king. This part of his personality was well hidden back in 2016, although, there were clues.

Because Trump truly admires monarch rule, he hopes to emulate this following in the footsteps of Putin or Xi. The danger with this staunch position and narcissistic belief is what is happening now. Trump is challenging the U.S. Congress' oversight as stated in the U.S. Constitution.

There are three equal branches of government. Trump is doing his best by just saying No. Congress has won two federal court cases about what they want from Trump, each one is being appealed by Trump. He conduct acts of obstruction all the time by instructing those under subpoena NOT to cooperate and NOT appear. Who knows what else he is doing in secret?

The Danger

These actions by Trump are setting a precedence for future U.S. presidents. How will the Republicans react if a Democrat is president and follows the same pattern, or another Republican? Trump refuses to even work with Congress on other issues, such as, energy or infrastructure, as long as Congress is investigating his presidency. With out the Congress, nothing will get done as Trump wants before 2020.

Trump cannot be allowed to act as a king, or a man above the law. The three branches of government were designed to prevent this and Trump is challenging the U.S. Constitution, which can only end one way: Trump will lose.

Trump's Cover-up

Although the Mueller report did clear Trump of collusion with Russia based upon the evidence found (this is not to say it did not happen), it clearly did not vindicate Trump of wrongdoing with regards to obstruction with some 10 known accounts where conclusions vary. Trump clearly obstructs all the time without even thinking about it because his mindset is akin to a king or mafia boss. This may worked before he was elected for business, but not as POTUS.

The Trump cover-up is there. His actions speak volumes. His attacks upon those making accusations. His disregarding the subpoenas from the Congress. His instructions to those under subpoena NOT to cooperate or go to the hearing under the disguise of some legality term that was waived long ago. His declaration stating that he will not work with Congress on anything until they stop investigating for impeachment.

The real question is: what is Trump hiding and so terrified to go to all these lengths to hide them, to challenge those seeking the truth? My guess is that there will be many questionable business activities and ethics before 2016. They will be criminal to some degree and may involve money laundering via Deutsche Bank, which Trump has tried to prevent releasing his financial records. This bank had to pay $10 million in fines when it lost a U.S case for many questionable business irregularities. It is the same bank that gave Trump $2 Billion in loans when no other bank would because Trump had lost over $1 billion in the 90s.

Plenty of suspicions abound because the more Trump tries to prevent the truth in coming out, the more the average person and even Trump supporters will ask: Why? If you truly are innocent of wrongdoing, there is nothing to hide. We all know that to be true.

King Trump is taking America down a dark, ugly, path that will rise to the U.S. Supreme Court to decide. Congress will not wait that long to impeach, should they fail, one can hear Trump vindicate himself. But it will be because his Republican Senate was too chicken to impeach their own, not because they think Trump is truly innocent, that would too far from the truth.

If Trump is re-elected, America is doomed.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      11 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

    • Dean Traylor profile image

      Dean Traylor 

      11 days ago from Southern California

      Is somebody from the OC having an tantrum, again?

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      11 days ago from Syracuse, NY

      Where I'm from, we call those days pro-Constitution, pro-humanity, and anti-gullible.

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      11 days ago from Southern Georgia

      "Well, I never..." (Shill flounces away) :P

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      11 days ago

      end of discussion

      Have a great anti Trump day, anti American and pro illegal aliens life.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      12 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      “Eric Boehm is a reporter for Watchdog.org, a national network of investigative reporters covering waste, fraud and abuse in government. Watchdog.org is a project of the nonprofit Franklin Center for Government & Public Integrity.”

      Not anti trump at all. Anti gvt corruption.

      So, since you dismiss my link, I’ll dismiss yours.

      I don’t know why you trump people have this attitude of “do what I say, not what I do.”

      A debate is not saying “I dont like your information, here’s mine instead”

      You did not at all mention the harm trump tariffs would do to the auto industry, instead swerved the convo to China.

      Sad.

      And here is dumbos latest trick

      https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/trump-administr...

      3 more people died in our “care” In the last 3 days.....

      As many people on social media are commenting, “it didn’t start with gas chambers, it started like this”

      Steven Miller is behind all of this......the tariffs and the child abuse. (reportedly/allegedly/DUH)

      WEST WING XENOPHOBE STEPHEN MILLER BEHIND TRUMP’S MEXICO TARIFFS

      https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/05/stephen-mi...

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      12 days ago

      Leslie

      Thanks for your comment on tariffs.

      I had a difficult time trying to find any reporting of this that wasn't from an Anti Trumper organization.

      So, I found the actual quote from president Trump.

      "“Their [sic] is no reason for the U.S. Consumer to pay the Tariffs, which take effect on China today,” Trump said, adding that the tariffs could be avoided entirely if “you by [sic] from a non-Tariffed Country, or you buy the product inside the USA (the best idea).”"

      China is far more susceptible to losing the tariff war because they have some many products and products that they are doing to expand their markets. Then are even trying to make a new Silk Route so that they will be able to sell the products that they make.

      Recently, their stock market had to be shutdown

      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-29...

      "Warning Signs Are Flashing in China's Stock Market After Surge

      Bloomberg News

      April 29, 2019, 2:00 PM PDT Updated on April 30, 2019, 12:44 AM PDT "

      Mexico

      "Mr. Trump said in a Twitter post on Thursday evening that he would impose a 5 percent tariff on Mexican imports on June 10, and ratchet it up to 25 percent by October if the immigration issues were not resolved. If the tariffs materialize, consumers could feel them almost immediately, most likely starting with the price of fresh fruits and vegetables — a competitive market with slim margins where distributors would have little choice but to pass on costs."

      I live in CA and I buy fruits and vegetable from CA, not from Mexico. The jobs that the US lost was because the companies that were in the US moved out, and now we are reliant on other countries for products that we used make here.

      When you take sides against the US and president Trump you are aiding those countries, not ours.

      With all of the hundreds of billions of dollars that the media keep posting about the tariffs, would putting up president Trumps border wall for a mere $35 billion be a worthy compromise?

      We spend more than that yearly for all the illegal aliens, for free education, free medical, welfare, prisons, and jails just to name a few.

      Meanwhile, they are sending the money that they make here back to Mexico and Central America. Mexico doesn't allow people from Central America to stay in their country, but they will let them in for 30 days to get into the US across the open borders.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      12 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      “If Trump goes through his with threats to raise tariffs to 25 percent on all Chinese and Mexican imports, the Tax Foundation says, federal tax revenue would increase by $241 billion—about 1.24 percent of GDP. That would be the biggest tax increase since the Johnson administration, according to Treasury data.

      The automotive sector would likely be hardest hit. Last year, American companies imported more than $115 billion worth of cars and car parts from Mexico. Thanks to decades of mostly tariff-free trade between the two countries, many automakers have supply chains sprawling freely from one side of the Rio Grande to the other. As Bloomberg demonstrated in a useful 2017 infographic, a single car seat might zig-zag across the border several times before being installed in a sedan built in South Carolina or a truck in Michigan.

      "The auto sector—and the 10 million American jobs it supports—relies upon the North American supply chain and cross border commerce to remain globally competitive," says David Schwietert, interim president and CEO of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, in a statement about the proposed tariffs. "Any barrier to the flow of commerce across the U.S.-Mexico border will have a cascading effect—harming U.S. consumers, threatening American jobs and investment, curtailing the economic progress that the administration is working to reignite, and potentially stalling efforts to ratify the agreement in Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. Congress."

      https://reason.com/2019/06/03/trumps-tariffs-on-me...

      ******

      Of course, any thinking person can see why he’s doing this. Since Obama saved the auto industry, Tump has to hurt it.

      https://youtu.be/E8OVmhpjPKI

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      12 days ago

      Leslie

      Who are you talking to in this very cryptic manner?

      You need more words to give some sort of context!

      No comment on the tariffs from you?

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      13 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      “imagine what Republicans would say if we had a black president who shuttled 6 family members & his wife with him on a taxpayer funded state visit to the UK.”

      They maligned Obama when Michelle’s mom went with them on vacation. But Trump’s kids? Oh sure, no poblem. America will pick up the tab. Just because.....

      You know, it’s white people. I mean, he golfs every weekend, and didnt you malign Obama for much less? Oh yeah, you did.

      It’s just sickening and glaringly obvious. And to be honest, if a woman were president, they'd do the same.

      But let’s keep the electoral college, so white male supremacy reigns supreme.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      13 days ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Steve King says Mexicans have calves like cantaloupes. Trump says they’re rapists and murderers.....well, maybe some can be good people. (How very superior of him)

      Anyone who supports Trump and talks about Mexicans can be assumed to be a racist. That’s the ship you’re sailing on. Until you get off....sink with it.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      13 days ago

      Who do you think the Mexican tariff that starts at 5% and goes to 25% for not helping the US keeping the mass flow of illegal immigrants crossing our open border?

      Here is a peak.

      If I didn't CP then you would ask for the source, so this cuts out the middle.

      "ByManuel Suárez-Mier

      Just as the new president of Mexico, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, also known as AMLO, was about to be inaugurated six months ago, I wrote in this space about the costs that his misguided and rash decisions had already imposed on the country even before he formally took the oath of office.

      After a half a year on the job, there is no doubt that he is persevering in installing a personal fiefdom, imposing broad government control of the economy, obliterating independent institutions and relentlessly attacking the press, the checks and balances that allow democracy to function. His tenure will lead the country to complete disaster."

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Hillary Clinton: “Iran, if you’re listening, I’d love to see trump’s tax returns....”

      Republicans: Lock Her Up

      You: She’s a monster.

      Trump: “Russia, if you’re listening, I’d love to find those missing emails....”

      Me: Lock Him Up

      You: What’s the big deal? Everybody does it.

      Eternity: “You’re making bad choices, Brad.”

      The End

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      Do you really think blah is an answer or even a question.

      Continue this dance as a solo.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Blah blah blah.

      What would you republicans do if hillary asked Iran for help taking down trump?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      This isn't working. You make statements, i answer the statements and they you make new statements that are stream of consciousness.

      For example

      "Hillary was the winner in all the exit polls...even the swing states. You figure it out.

      She got 2.8 million more votes than trump.

      The election was rigged. Trump had it right, but assbackwards.

      And you can easily tell."

      -------------

      How was it rigged, and why isn't the one that had 2.8 million votes more than the other candidate not the one that rigged it?

      ------------

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Forgot to mention global warming......majority believe it’s real......and love our planet.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Blah blah blah......one track mind, no one home.

      https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-fea...

      Hillary was the winner in all the exit polls...even the swing states. You figure it out.

      She got 2.8 million more votes than trump.

      The election was rigged. Trump had it right, but assbackwards.

      And you can easily tell.

      The majority of Americans want gun control, legal abortion, equality for gays and trans, the end to police brutality, the end to private prisons, are horrified by the concentration camps at the border, did not want arm sales to Saudi Arabia to bomb more kids in Yemen (pro life),want a livable wage and want rich people to pay more in taxes, not get a tax cut.

      His policies are hurting the majority. There is no way a majority want him as prez. So you tell me why we are ruled by a minority of rich white religios?

      It’s not a conspiracy, it’s a plan. And you know Ivanka applied for a trademark for voting machines....wonder why? Parscale is going to spend one billion on social media smear campaigns.....why? If he’s so popular why the need to destroy to win?

      If you can’t see what’s going on, too bad. Your minority of racists and bigots will rue the day you allowed that clown to steal our presidency.

      And ask a millennial.....how they feel about the attack on women, transgender, lgbtq....ask them if they want to go fight another war in Iran....keep bombing Yemen.....have business interests running gvt.

      No way.

      You are on the losing end of history, and the only way you win is by cheating. Period, end of story.

      I will give trump a high-five, though. He laid into Russia, Syria and Iran for bombing Idlib. Good going on that.

      Otherwise, impeach the bum.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      It is a constitutional requirement. It applies to anyone that wants to be president. Does Obama have a special privilege to bypass the constitution?

      Calling someone a racist is racist when you don't have proof.

      I would say you and the democrats would even bring down the country and the government to do it. Because that is what is happening.

      Hate all you want but don't act on that hate because then it can be criminal.

      I don't like what Hillary and Obama have done to the country, and continue to do it even as private citizens. Going around the world thrashing America and its president.

      President Trump was right when he said he got himself elected. He campaigned all over the country, but Hillary didn't do that in 2016, and she didn't have a press conference.

      And why is it that I answered every item in your comment but you don't respond, you ignore it.

      It is really hard to understand you grammar, not a slam just a comment. When you don't address the comment, who are you talking too?

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      "none of the 50 states asks for birth certificates or long-term residency documents to prove that a candidate qualifies for a spot on the ballot"

      I guess there was something different about Obama, huh?

      Yeah. Ill say it: it was racism. Trump's a racist. You are all would rather have a racist and a bigot than hillary.

      So when i say ill do everything i can to get him out of there, what can you say?

      Nothing. Those who live in hate-filled glass houses should stop throwing stones.

      "Im allowed to to hate, you're not": every trumper.

      And yes, you hate Hillary and Obama. So get off your high horses.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Did anyone see that interview with Jared?

      B:

      ??

      --------------------

      "Was Birtherism racist?"

      B:

      What is Britherism? How can that be racist?

      If you are talking about Obama and asking him to clarify his citizenship, then it is not racist. It is a requirement for eligibility for being president.

      --------------------

      "Was banniing Muslims religious bigotry?"

      B:

      You could use a lot more words to describe what it is that you are writing about.

      Once again, your style of writing makes it vague, ambiguous and has no reference to make it understandable.

      --------------------

      All he could say is "hes there now and doing great things"

      B:

      Once again, your style of writing makes it vague, ambiguous and has no reference to make it understandable.

      -------------------

      Well i can answer. Yes and yes. And add his "women should be punished for abortion"

      B:

      Once again, your style of writing makes it vague, ambiguous and has no reference to make it understandable.

      ------------------

      This interview goes to all his voters as well.

      B:

      Once again, your style of writing makes it vague, ambiguous and has no reference to make it understandable.

      -----------------

      And like evangelicals, i guess your answer is "Monica's blue dress"

      But hillary.

      But Bill.

      Excuses everything. Even racism and bigotry.

      And only 30% of America thinks hes doing great things. Most of us are horrified.

      B:

      Once again, your style of writing makes it vague, ambiguous and has no reference to make it understandable.

      I hate to keep doing this, but there is nothing about which can be commented.

      ---------------------

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Ole C & P is hard at it this morning. He must get paid by the word the way he posts such long and meaningless BS. Whoever's paying him is getting ripped off, no doubt! LOL!

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      JOC

      12 hours ago from Syracuse, NY

      What you did, was repost right-wing conspiracy theories that you pawn off as facts. Nothing dazzling about that.

      B:

      You don't give any specifics, and your comment is vague, ambiguous, and meaningless

      ---------------------------------------

      JOC

      12 hours ago from Syracuse, NY

      Since when did incorrectly commenting about the frequency of how often Leslie and I post hubs remain on topic exactly? Again, your hypocrisy is amazing.

      B:

      Again, I have no specifics, and this comment is just words with no meaning.

      -------------------------------------

      These two comments were not on subject either.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Did anyone see that interview with Jared?

      "Was Birtherism racist?"

      "Was banniing Muslims religious bigotry?"

      All he could say is "hes there now and doing great things"

      Well i can answer. Yes and yes. And add his "women should be punished for abortion"

      This interview goes to all his voters as well.

      And like evangelicals, i guess your answer is "Monica's blue dress"

      But hillary.

      But Bill.

      Excuses everything. Even racism and bigotry.

      And only 30% of America thinks hes doing great things. Most of us are horrified.

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      2 weeks ago from Syracuse, NY

      What you did, was repost right-wing conspiracy theories that you pawn off as facts. Nothing dazzling about that.

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      2 weeks ago from Syracuse, NY

      Since when did incorrectly commenting about the frequency of how often Leslie and I post hubs remain on topic exactly? Again, your hypocrisy is amazing.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      JOC

      While you are trying to find those comments, I have made a number of comments here that you might try to dazzle us with?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      JOC

      I probably just ignored you.

      Refresh my memory.

      I really thought that you were the smartest one on the left, but now you are at parity with them.

      Just another of your diversions to interject your wit in order to avoid the subject.

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      2 weeks ago from Syracuse, NY

      Really Brad, go back and read the comments. I called you out on two of your false claims and you just ran for the hills. No admission, just incorrect information. It was nicely hypocritical of you to whine about others not replying to your comments while completely ignoring being proven wrong with mine.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      JOC

      You didn't comment on the subject, you just went for the attack.

      The problem with the left is they make accusations without facts.

      They repeat them and believe they have become facts.

      You have not mentioned or describe any falsehoods.

      Bye

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      2 weeks ago from Syracuse, NY

      Oh, you really got me with that one. I'm sure people appreciate my humor over your falsehoods.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      JOC

      Are you auditioning for the comedy club, you add nothing to the discussion.

      Get a day job.

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      2 weeks ago from Syracuse, NY

      The copy and paste ability is amazing.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      PerryA

      This is your idea of facts.

      -------------------------------

      perrya

      2 hours ago

      Brad tries to suck you into the weeds for the sake of confusion with just arguments from his POV. I saw this long ago and simply refused to argue for the sake of arguing. For him, it is against his soul to say anything bad about Trump.

      lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen

      5 hours ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Also Himmler, "accuse others of that which you are guilty."

      Mind f*ck, 101.

      "Big bad meany dems going after poor trump"

      Meanwhile. "Lock her up" "benhazi got her numbers down"

      Actual crimes with trump, people. Deal with it.

      Hes part of international organized crime.

      Dean Traylor profile image

      Dean Traylor

      12 hours ago from Southern California

      Valent, he's using a classic tactic called the gish gallop (wrote a hub about it). Ive had to deal with him numerous times.

      Valeant profile image

      JOC

      13 hours ago from Syracuse, NY

      Brad runs the same m.o., he floods the comments sections with right-wing falsehoods, bouncing around from multiple topics that are usually easily dispelled, but that he won't believe anyway. Then, when he's written a post that's so long because he has no outside hobbies aside from trolling message boards, that it would take an hour to correct with the real facts, he accuses people of ignoring him. I've given him the constructive criticism of limiting his posts to a few topics to ensure responses, but he clearly fails to understand how annoying his posting style truly is.

    • perrya profile imageAUTHOR

      perrya 

      2 weeks ago

      Brad tries to suck you into the weeds for the sake of confusion with just arguments from his POV. I saw this long ago and simply refused to argue for the sake of arguing. For him, it is against his soul to say anything bad about Trump.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Also Himmler, "accuse others of that which you are guilty."

      Mind f*ck, 101.

      "Big bad meany dems going after poor trump"

      Meanwhile. "Lock her up" "benhazi got her numbers down"

      Actual crimes with trump, people. Deal with it.

      Hes part of international organized crime.

    • Dean Traylor profile image

      Dean Traylor 

      2 weeks ago from Southern California

      Valent, he's using a classic tactic called the gish gallop (wrote a hub about it). Ive had to deal with him numerous times.

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      2 weeks ago from Syracuse, NY

      Brad runs the same m.o., he floods the comments sections with right-wing falsehoods, bouncing around from multiple topics that are usually easily dispelled, but that he won't believe anyway. Then, when he's written a post that's so long because he has no outside hobbies aside from trolling message boards, that it would take an hour to correct with the real facts, he accuses people of ignoring him. I've given him the constructive criticism of limiting his posts to a few topics to ensure responses, but he clearly fails to understand how annoying his posting style truly is.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      PerryA

      You didn't answer my detailed comments and your article is devoid of facts, and it is filled with baseless accusations that are vague, ambiguous and only understandable if you are on the left.

      I wanted to discuss this article, but you can't manage the comments.

      Bye.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      When you catch up answering my comments then I will answer, until then just keep ranting.

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Are you paid to post here, Brad?

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Another non answer. Yawn, what else’s is new?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie and PerryA

      Does this answer my comments, no.

      You don't want to discuss this hub.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      And you don’t answer. If it was Hillary doing the things trump does, what would you do?

      And in case you are deaf, dumb and blind, I’ll give u the scenario:

      Hillary: “Russia, if you’re listening, id like to see trump’s tax returns....”

      148 meeting took place between Hillary’s team and Russians.

      It was discovered that Russia hacked the rnc and stole trumps emails.

      Hillary announced she would like help finding them.

      Voila, trump’s emails are released.

      Hillary is called in to meet w special prosecutor.. She declines, sends her lawyers notes instead.

      Hillary tells her lawyer and all her staff not to answer subpoenas. “Ignore the House of Representatives, do what I say.”

      Hillary gets a letter from a woman applying for AG, who states that Hillary can never do any wrong...boing! You’re hired!

      Hillary writes a fake cover story for Chelsea meeting with a Russian spy. When offered dirt on trump, Chelsea says, “I love it!”

      Hillary has had a 30 yr relationship with Russia, but denies having anything to do with them.

      Hillary was fined 25 million for fraud, 10 million for money laundering, but hey, she tells it like it is. “Knock the crap out of em, will ya?”

      Hillary gives Chelsea and her husband security clearances, even though they were deemed a security risk.

      Need I go on?

      What pray tell, would you republicans do?

    • perrya profile imageAUTHOR

      perrya 

      2 weeks ago

      Trump acts like a king, acting on his own hunch, not consulting real experienced people, for example, the tariff on mexico, all advisers were against it, That is an action of a monarch.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      Your link to Time Mag doesn't answer my question to PerryA, wny he calls Trump a King.

      And Time Mag is the same mag that put Hillary Clinton as Madam President on election night. That shows how biased the mag is against Trump.

      As for you other

      "Amy Siskind - Activist, Feminist, Author Defender of democracy, activist for women's rights, and advocate for the LGBTQ+ community, Amy Siskind is best known as the author of The Weekly List and as President of The New Agenda, a non-profit dedicated to the advancement of women." enough is enough!

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      The king and his imperial court

      @Amy_Siskind

      - Barr was a no-show for Congress, but he suffered no consequences.

      - Mnuchin refuses to obey the law and turn over Trump’s taxes to Congress, but he suffered no consequences.

      - Trump stonewalls and obstructs Congress, but he suffered no consequences.

      ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!”

      ********

      @joangreeneaz

      “This is called justice inequality. We must treat them like the common criminals they are. The second they are late for their scheduled meeting is the second they are handcuffed and perp walked to jail. Time we got tough on white collar crime & those who don't follow the law.”

      ******

      Pretend it’s Hillary.....you can do it!

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      PerryA

      You never told me why Trump is a King?

    • perrya profile imageAUTHOR

      perrya 

      2 weeks ago

      As to the tariff on Mexico, Trump is using shock tactics to get them to a table for real discussions. Mexico could do more for sure, perhaps we should send them aid with provisions it only be used to hire more policemen on their side of the border to block illegal crossings, but the corruption there is bad. So many things are now made in Mexico and then imported , so, things will get more expensive from cars to food. If Mexico does nothing or not enough, Trump could expand tariffs to 25%. That will not only hurt Americans but mexicans. Trump's strong handed approach to negotiations only works for awhile. Trump is just being driven by his base, he cares less about anyone who is not a Trumper.

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      LOL! Brad is just as honest as his avatar, Leslie. We all know that. Try asking him if he's employed by a political group like Lady Love was and see him scamper off..

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Lol. Lets have Biden ask Iran for help

      ...like hacking the rnc, or finding trumps tax returns.

      Bet everybody would call it collusion, then.

      And Clinton was impeached because he lied about an affair.

      Trump lied, too. But he didnt have to be under oath.

      He didn't even have to face Mueller! His lawyers answered questions for him.

      Enough with the kid gloves. And enough obstructing.

      We want everyone involved before congress.

      If they are so innocent, they should have no problem telling the truth.

      Its really that simple.

      This is all of our country, not 30%

      Man up, trumpflakes!

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      PerryA

      Continuing from my previous comment.

      This is literally a case of identity transference by Fired FBI director James Comey last year.

      "In his first media interview since being fired in May 2017, former FBI director James Comey said he believes President Trump is "morally unfit" to be president.

      B:

      This is the FBI director that obstructed justice by twice during the Hillary Clinton email investigation cheated for her. He directed a sham and biased investigation in favor of Hillary.

      -----------------------------------------------

      Comey made the statement in an interview with George Stephanopoulos that aired Sunday night on ABC's 20/20. "A person who sees moral equivalence in Charlottesville, who talks about and treats women like they're pieces of meat,

      B:

      What is his reference here? A single private conversation in 2005 with Bill Bush that NBC released in 2016. Did NBC get flak for trying to influence the election against Trump? This was a conversation, a guy thing, it was not an action.

      --------------------------------------------------

      who lies constantly about matters big and small and insists the American people believe it, that person's not fit to be president of the United States, on moral grounds."

      B:

      This is a baseless vague, and ambiguous false accusation. It is an emotional rant without any proof. The media and the left have created this idea about president Trump. What they can't do is challenge his performance and accomplishments. Did he think that Obama, GW Bush and Bill Clinton were on a moral ground?

      ----------------------------------------------------

      Comey also told Stephanopoulos he can not say for certain whether Mr. Trump is compromised by the Russians. "It always struck me and still strikes me as unlikely, and I would have been able to say with high confidence about any other president I dealt with, but I can't. It's possible," he said. "

      B:

      Well, now after the Mueller report a year after Comey made that statement we all know that Comey was lying. Comey failed his own moral ground, and he was unfit to be FBI director.

      ----------------------------------------------------

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      PerryA

      Your comment doesn't have any facts to support it.

      The Russians didn't have any effect on the results of the election. And how can Hillary get 3 million more votes than Trump and you say Trump got the influence.

      Bill and Hillary had a very lucrative relationship with Russia and Putin. Bill Clinton even received $500,000 from Russia for doing one speech. And that is more than three times what the alleged 13 Russians had to influence the election.

      You are just repeating all the democrat propaganda.

      And president Trump was correct when he said the who influenced the election in his favor was himself and not the Russians or anyone else.

      He worked hard campaigning all those critical states that MSNBC and CNN and their analysts said he couldn't get. Meanwhile in 2016, Hillary Clinton didn't do much campaigning and had maybe one press conference.

      Obstruction is only in the mind of Mueller, and he has no real evidence to indict, much less prove beyond a reasonable doubt to convict. Until then, Mueller is ridiculing the core of American Criminal Law that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Mueller should actually be reviewed for violating Ethics.

      His obstruction cases are so weak, that a thousand Former prosecutors had to help him by writing a letter saying that Trump could be convicted of obstruction. The only value of that letter was propaganda and to give the democrats political advantage.

      You keep avoiding the arguments I have made against your accusations. Repeating your baseless accusations is how democrats have changed a lie into a what they call a truth.

      Once again, just because these former prosecutors worked under both democrat and republican administrations is not the same as saying they weren't biased.

      Also, once again, there is no legal value to that letter.

      As far as the 13 Russians Mueller indicted they have plead not guilty, so neither Mueller nor the democrats can use it as a proof they influenced the election. There is still the presumption of innocence and there is no court verdict of guilty.

      Until, there is a guilty verdict, the Russian influence is just an opinion of Mueller. That is the way the criminal law works in the US at least til today.

      For once, I would like to see some actual refuting of my comments not just glossed over by rhetoric and propaganda, or ignored.

      If there are arguable points make them.

    • perrya profile imageAUTHOR

      perrya 

      2 weeks ago

      The Mueller report found no collusion between Russia and Trump but that Russia pretty much had its own campaign to be pro-trump because of Putins great dislike of Clinton. In this light, the Russian influence was to use social media and other to turn voters against Clinton. When Trump was notified of this he said "Great" etc. Some might think there was some agreement between them. It is hard to prove the russian attempts got Trump elected, which is impossible to believe. Trump won because of a great discontent between two candidates. Now, it is possible Mueller simply did not find collusion but there was, maybe we might know years from now. Obstruction is much more substantiated and proven.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      My 2 worst are “I’ll be happy to release my tax returns if I get elected” and “Obama was born in Kenya”

      Or could be the Uranium one lie he still spouts. He said 3 million votes were illegal. He said his inauguration crowd was the biggest ever. He said he would be too busy to golf.

      Oh yeah, “I’m a stable genius”.....lie or delusion?

      I actually feel sorry for him. I think he has a problem, like dyslexia or something. He doesn’t read, can’t spell and it’s like something he’s had all his life but can’t admit.

      Cause daddy made them all be perfect. Or daddy favored his brother, trump was a trouble maker.

      And now he’s beholden to Putin, Saudi Arabia....and he’s selling us out.

      Look what he’s destroyed already. Farmers.....it’s over for them in the Midwest. And who got that soybean market? Russia.

      He’s backing fossil fuels, which is already a done deal through most of the world.

      He’s ruined our relationship with our allies and the intelligence agencies we share info with.

      And how does this benefit us? I think we better start asking who’s benefitting from him. Because now tariffs on Mexico.....more taxes on regular Americans, while the top eschelon gets tax breaks.....

      Who benefits from drilling on our public lands? I mean, how dare they!

      And if not for Obama, the Arctic would be Putin’s next plunder.

      Not to mention, the sustained, methological attack on our democracy by cyberwar.

      And trump and McConnell refuse to do anything about it.

      This Mueller report is total devastation for Trump. And he hired Barr to make it go away, but it’s not.

      There is no doubt now, they must impeach. And criminal prosecution will follow.

      For his whole family.

      And just btw, if we had the gop’s immigration ideas back then,trump’s family would never be let in. A brothel owner and a maid.....gop and trump would snub their nose at them.

      Jong Un just executed people because the summit failed.....and he is now our ally.

      The holding camps for people coming to America, escaping horrors WE engendered!

      Oh no, it’s going to end.

      ******

      And I remember Lady Love....was rumored she worked for the Heritage Foundation....used to always ask me “why do you hate America?”

      Sound familiar?

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Yes you do, Brad. Point by point to your last comment to me.

      You cannot indict a sitting president, Brad.. You know tha,t so do not play dumb. That is, if you're really playing.....

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Randy

      I don't have any reference to answer your sentence fragments.

      You didn't read my last comment, and you didn't reply to it.

      For example

      "And no, Trump was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Michael Cohen case. He lied, dude!

      B:

      Are you sure that Cohen isn't the liar?

      Unindicted is a meaningless term.

      Dude, all I have is your opinion. I don't need to prove it, you own it."

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      You didn't answer why Trump is trying to divert funds already directed to other projects, Brad? And still working on it is BS.

      Are you saying you are smarter or more able to convict Cohen than the courts, Brad? Are you an attorney?

      Re the tariffs ,I didn't see your answer.Do me a favor and reiterate.

      If you want to nitpick spelling mistakes, then we can do that as well..

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Randy

      "Yes Brad, it was a lie when trump said Mexico would pay for the wall, if not why was he so pissed as to try and move money from other congressionally approved projects to built the wall?

      B:

      Why is that a lie? And why are the democrats working so hard to prevent him from getting the wall?

      As far as I can see, he is still working on it. And in the meantime, he has been refused from getting any help for the democrats.

      --------------------------------------------

      And no, Trump was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Michael Cohen case. He lied, dude!

      B:

      Are you sure that Cohen isn't the liar?

      Unindicted is a meaningless term.

      Dude, all I have is your opinion. I don't need to prove it, you own it.

      -------------------------------------------

      Re the tariffs, you didn't deny Trump lied when he said American consumers didn't pay for them. Another lie from your avatar.

      B:

      I already answered it.

      ---------------------------------

      And as for your last line. You answered none of them concisely and that's your MO as usual. Care to re-respond to the lies?"

      B:

      This statement is vague, ambiguous and has no references. How should I respond to when I answered them. Where didn't I answer them. And did you mean to use "concisely"?

      It is up to you to make an argument to challenge my answer, but in no way did you prove a lie.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      JOC

      The first time I hit the link, I wound up on a 404,

      I tried it again and this is the first part of the link page.

      The point again is that economics changes by whomever views it. This is a lot different than a lie, it is a difference of opinion.

      What I find difficult is to find a piece that just gives what Trump has done, without some bias or tone in the writing.

      I find it also interesting that president Trump did things very different that Obama, and yet they say that it was the Obama economy, and at the same time they say they Trump is doing everything wrong. Yet, the economy is doing better?

      ---------------

      From the link

      ----------------

      The United States Economy and Politics in 2019: The return to a bipolar world

      Joseph Trevisani FXStreet

      The change of control in the House of Representatives after the November election which will give the Democrats legislative power for the first time in four years promises to complicate the political picture in 2019 and 2020.

      Economic trends in the US at year-end appeared vibrant but with a number of potentially damaging developments in the global environment and domestic politics that could inhibit or thwart continued success.

      We will look at the political changes first, assess the state of the US economy as reflected in statistics then ascertain the likely impact of domestic and global conditions on the US economy and Federal Reserve policy.

      US Politics: Elections have consequences

      The Democratic victory in the House will become a major distraction for the Trump administration. With certainty, various House Committees will open investigations into the President, members of his administration and his family. Whether the inquiries are justified is a political question and irrelevant. They and the subpoenas they will issue are legal and will have to be answered by the administration. This will be a burden on its time and impede the functioning of the executive. From a political perspective that is one of their main purposes.

      If the House decides to draw up Articles of Impeachment and provokes a Senate trial this will further drain the resources of the Trump administration. The potential for the President to be convicted in a Senate trial and removed from office is very small. The bar for conviction is a two-thirds majority of the 100 member Senate. There will be 53 Republicans, the President’s party in the upper house in 2019

      The Democratic and Republican agendas will find little common ground in the House next year where all budget bills must originate. It will be a major challenge for the leadership of both parties simply to pass the necessary budget bills to fund the operations of the government.

      ------------------------

      As for lgbtq

      I can't find any current news about it.

      "where does Trump stand with the lgbtq community today 2019"

      go me 2017 info?

      What do you think he lied and didn't do?

      The 3% rise is not something he controls, should he? How?

      ---------------------------------

      As far as Healthcare, aren't we still really on Obamacare today?

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Yes Brad, it was a lie when trump said Mexico would pay for the wall, if not why was he so pissed as to try and move money from other congressionally approved projects to built the wall?

      And no, Trump was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Michael Cohen case. He lied, dude!

      Re the tariffs, you didn't deny Trump lied when he said American consumers didn't pay for them. Another lie from your avatar.

      And as for your last line. You answered none of them concisely and that's your MO as usual. Care to re-respond to the lies?

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      2 weeks ago from Syracuse, NY

      So what policies has Trump used to be the best friend to the LGBT community exactly? Your article, which I am highly suspicious of the way they discounted one year without doing so for the previous year, doesn't really deny the point that was made, that Trump lied about being pro-LGBT.

      Same goes for Medicare and Medicaid. Your article clearly notes how Obama's cuts were reinvested into the system in various ways through the ACA. What policies has Trump brought forth that have made healthcare in America better?

      Your last link has a clickthrough that's likely a virus. So I avoided reading it.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Randy

      Finally found the subject:)

      How are these lies?

      "Or "Mexico will pay for the wall, I promise!

      B:

      https://www.factcheck.org/2018/12/is-mexico-paying...

      Is it a lie, did he give up on it, and is the wall up yet so it isn't a lie. No wall no lie.

      ---------------------------------------

      Or "I didn't know anything about the payoff to Stormy Daniels."

      B:

      Avenetti and Stormy Daniels today, who is the liar?

      There is no proof. Therefore no lie.

      And actually we could look at the timing of the Daniels accusations and it would smell like blackmail. Did you expect Trump to make that accusation as part of his campaign.

      There was no facts to even prove Daniels story, and her book went no where, and Avenetti got her money.

      -------------------------------------------

      Or "American consumers are not paying for the tariffs."

      B:

      So what, are you happy with a trade balance where China sends their products here, while we are lucky to export 25% of products to China?

      Which is more important?

      In 2050 China will replace the US as the biggest economy. I am sure they enjoy your support to keep the trade imbalance in their favor.

      ------------------------------------------------

      That enough, I got thousands of 'em, Brad Love. :P"

      And i got answers for them!

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      JOC

      https://thefederalist.com/2018/01/31/reported-spik...

      https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20190315/fact-che...

      https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/united-states-ec...

      JOC

      Thanks for staying on subject, And my point is that Trump didn't lie, as the speculation on the results is dependent on who is saying it.

      It is nothing like a lie, when bias from Trump haters write the record, they spin it their way.

      California is a prophecy of how a democrat run country economy would look like if it went national.

      Thanks

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Or "Mexico will pay for the wall, I promise!

      Or "I didn't know anything about the payoff to Stormy Daniels."

      Or "American consumers are not paying for the tariffs."

      That enough, I got thousands of 'em, Brad Love. :P

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      2 weeks ago from Syracuse, NY

      I'll take the lie that he'd be the best friend to the LGBT community. There was a 3% rise in hate crimes against that community as he's promoted anti-LGBT policies since the moment he was elected.

      Maybe we should go with the lie that he wouldn't touch medicare or medicaid, then his proposed budgets aimed to cut both. Those would have real-world consequences.

      But the big one is that those tax cuts would be rocket fuel to the economy. The devastating non-partisan report clearly notes that they have done no such thing while providing rocket fuel to the national debt and deficit.

      https://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2019/05/29/Brutal-N...

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Brad reminds me of a paid political troll on the forums shortly after Obama was elected. She was extremely frustrating to debate because she always avoided answering a straight question put to her.

      When I figured out her game and asked her if she was working for a political party, she once again gave me the runaround. Other's on the forums caught on and they too put the pressure on her.

      She suddenly disappeared along with her account. If the poster was indeed a she in the first place. This why I don't trust anyone on this site who's afraid to let their identity be known. They could be like the troll "Lady Love" like I described, or even a criminal looking for entertainment.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      It is all your opinion, but what Trump said was factual and true, and his backtracking was not important. You lost the message.

      I took all your comments, and I took the time and the effort to answer all of them. You didn't like my answers but you couldn't argue against them.

      The left makes everything the Trump says, a lie. Yet, they weren't lies, they are just the way he talks.

      Tell us what is the most important Lie he has made that adversely affected you, the country or Americans?

      Apparently, you have 9,000 to choose from. Which one will you pick?

      I am not a fan of any Bush, Obama, although I didn't have a problem with Bill Clinton. He like Carter was benign.

    • Valeant profile image

      JOC 

      2 weeks ago from Syracuse, NY

      Leslie literally summarized what Trump wrote, then it was Trump who backtracked when he realized how it sounded and said the exact opposite. And yet Brad cannot face the reality that Trump is contradicting himself daily and likely doesn't even realize it. His rant today was all lies, that is a fact.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      I don’t need to. I already know. Anyone who is negative on trump hates America and is a worthless human being. (Clue: it was the same with Bush)

      Of course, you wonderful people were just oh so patriotic for being negative on OUR pick Obama.

      But of course.

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      That you're smarter than the 1000 prosecutors? You sound like your avatar! LOL!

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      It is you that doesn't even read my comments, because if you did you wouldn't make these comments.

      Did you read what I said about those prosecutors?

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Simply your misguided opinion....nothing more.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Yah. 1,000 prosecutors make baseless statements like trump committed obstruction of justice, but YOU know better.

      I don’t owe you a thing. You never accept any answer unless it’s your own view of things. You are in the minority on Dump. Get used to it.

      Trump lies like he breathes air. If he ever told the truth, no one would believe him.

      Soooooooooo sick of it.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      You didn't answer my comments, I waste my time trying to discuss anything with you because you can't stick to the comment.

      I gave you the whole president Trump comment and you have no facts and just keep giving the old party line.

      And your writing is cryptic, vague and ambiguous.

      The point is that you keep moving the target while not answering with any facts.

      When people make these baseless accusations they are just making an emotional response. It proves nothing.

      Once again, there is no proof that Russia did anything that changed the election results, and NO American helped them. Rod Rosentein!

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Trump told a slew of lies in that rant this morning, Ho hum, simply another day in the life of a cretin...

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Lol! Helped the other side? How, by spreading malignant lies like Hillary is deathly ill, runs a paedophile operation and the pope supports trump?

      Get real. Trump asked Russia for help, they delivered. And Putin himself said he wanted trump to win.

      Dont you remember trump’s pal roger stone? “Podesta’s time in the barrel”?

      Hacking the dnc was a crime. Russia did it for trump. The fact you don’t care speaks to your integrity and lack of patriotism, imo.

    • perrya profile imageAUTHOR

      perrya 

      2 weeks ago

      Ken- yes, wall street journal is great for sure, but the trashy shows on Fox are Hannity and the Five, can't stand either for there stupid opinions, Shepard is fine, he tried to just give the facts. I do miss O'Reilly, he was pro Trump but often gave a balanced take on both sides. Dana is fairly balanced.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      When you quote something please give the whole contect.

      "“Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax,” the president tweeted. “And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.”

      “It was a crime that didn’t exist,” Trump continued. “So now the Dems and their partner, the Fake News Media, say he fought back against this phony crime that didn’t exist, this horrendous false accusation, and he shouldn’t fight back, he should just sit back and take it. Could this be Obstruction? No, Mueller didn’t find Obstruction either. Presidential Harassment!”

      Speaking to reporters on the South Lawn, the president backed off his assertion that Moscow’s meddling helped him win.

      “No, Russia did not get me elected,” Trump said. “You know who got me elected? You know who got me elected? I got me elected.”

      “Russia didn’t help me at all,” he continued. "Russia, if anything, I think, helped the other side.”"

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      “...I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.” — President Donald Trump, May 30, 2019

      ****

      Freudian slip.

      Oh trump, you’re slip is showing.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      I’m sorry, but this lady said she gets her news from conservative news stations, and from what she knows, trump is completely exonerated.

      This is not true. In fact, mueller said they COULDNT exonerate him!

      He will face justice when he gets out of there, and then what?

      Who will they blame then? More deep state?

      Hillary still?

      This can not end well.

      We cannot live in a country where there are 2 versions of the truth.

      Facts and alternative facts.

      It’s psychotic.

    • Ken Burgess profile image

      Ken Burgess 

      2 weeks ago from Florida

      It depends on your perspective perrya, I find the BBC to be the most biased and 'liberal' of the bunch... discounting CNN & MSNBC of course.

      In general they all report, or fail to report, on the same things.

      If you want a larger idea of things going on in the world, you have to step out of the 'mainstream' news sources that do nothing but spoon feed selected (and mostly useless) information to their viewers.

      To get 'news' that is more relevant and revealing, one has to read the Wall St. Journal, the Economist, and a variety of foreign based news sources to see what is going on in the world.

      I learn more from sitting down and reading one Wall St. Journal than I could from flicking back and forth from CNN to Fox all week long. The 'news' these sites put out is mostly opinion and of a very small selection of ongoings in the world.

    • perrya profile imageAUTHOR

      perrya 

      2 weeks ago

      The news outlets I watch vary from CNN, Fox, MSNBC, BBC. They all report the same news in slightly different manner when it comes to Trump. CNN\MSNBC are more critical for sure, more disbelieving as we should be with this guy, Fox tends is prone to be favorable to Trump, depending on the newscaster. BBC just reports the facts

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Brad, no doubt there were several investigations into Trump's taxes. Any conman expects such...….

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Wow....!

      "I was surprised to hear there was anything negative in the Mueller report about President Trump. I get most of my news from conservative outlets." -- Trump voter interviewed after the Amash town hall

      They are 100% brainwashed!

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      LOL!

      Benghazi was 954 days. And then they moved on to e mails. That’s a lot longer than 1 year.

      Mueller took 22 months.

      And you don’t believe Napolitano, so why do I have to believe a known propaganda outlet? I told you, I don’t bother to read that junk.

      Hillary was the victim in all this.

      Her emails were stolen and released.

      Her accounts were hacked.

      Her presidency was stolen from her.

      Figures you blame her. Age old story.

      Impeach for losing the public trust, and to cleanse the office.

      And then get to the criminal part. Or leave it til he’s gone. Either way, he’s toast.

      ******

      I heard Mueller speak on my way home.....how weird was that? He was stammering, not able to pronounce words....what was going on?

      One thing is clear, though......dems you must impeach. I don’t care what your political calculations are, none of them is worth letting him off the hook.

      If he’s not impeachable, than what’s impeachment for?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      PerryA

      From your article, "If Trump is re-elected, America is doomed."

      Do you have any substance to make that accusation? Any details on how it is doomed, why it is doomed? And how would any Democrat Presidential candidate do something better than Trump is doing today?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Randy

      The IRS was investigating Trump during the Obama era.

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      The head of IRS was hand picked by Trump? Why do you think he's trying so hard not to follow the law. He "shall" turn the returns over to the HWM committee. Can't be any more implicit...So duh!

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      PerryA

      That is just a diversionary statement and it has no merit.

      Why should Trump have his "business records" investigated by democrats, or anyone but the IRS. The IRS has been investigating Trump and his businesses but yet have filed any criminal charges. So, why don't the democrats just move on.

      And I challenge you to make your title accurate. How is Trump a King and what examples do you have other than this biased non factual title?

      When Bill Clinton private citizen got $500,000 from the Russians did anyone investigate his business, NO!

    • perrya profile imageAUTHOR

      perrya 

      2 weeks ago

      When Pelosi said the word "cover-up", to most Americans it resonates because why is Trump so determine to not allow his business records from banks and accountants, or his taxes, from being released? A guilty man acts in this way, we all know that to be true. As to obstructs, that remains to be seen and it depends on you is looking.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      And once again you avoid arguing against my specific points and go into your shotgun rant that has no details just running all over the place.

      Facts are facts, and CNN and MSNBC are crap with no facts.

      So if you can't refute the facts on Judicial Watch then you don't have any arguments.

      Bill Clinton lied, and he actually committed a sex act in the Oval Office but he remained as president.

      Comey obstructed justice twice with Hillary and he wasn't our guy

      Look at the Hillary Clinton investigation which lasted less than a year, compared to Trump's 5 investigations lasting over 3 years, and zero evidence found.

      Hillary's investigation by the FBI didn't put her under oath, and the FBI gave all of her people immunity without them giving any testimony. Hillary Clinton's interview with the FBI was under oath, and it wasn't recorded.

      Trump was exonerated by Mueller and that ends the investigation. It is Mueller along with Comey who should be investigated, not Trump..Mueller should have started the investigation back where the Russian Trump accusation started and that was with the Hillary investigation.

      Impeachment for what?

      judge Napolitano is not correct.

      What honeymoon, the democrats publically boasted they would resist the president and they started the impeachment talk from the beginning.

      You have an irrational obsession with all things Trump.

    • lovemychris profile image

      Leslie McCowen 

      2 weeks ago from Cape Cod, USA

      Judicial watch is rightwing propaganda. I stopped reading that crap years ago.

      And dems are not against the law.

      Bill Clinton was impeached.

      Hillary Clinton was subject to multiple investigations under your guys.

      11 hrs of grilling by gowdy and chaffetts.

      I want trump to be held accountable in the same way.

      He should have faced Mueller.

      He should face impeachment hearings.

      You want to give him a pass.

      This reverse investigation trump has ordered is straight from the nazi/putin/despot playbook.

      If judge Napolitano can say it, its ovah for dump.

      Justin Amash, my hero.

      Even Steve King said trump should not have insulted Biden on foreign soil, while praising jong un. Steve King!

      The honeymoon phase is over for trump. We're about to discuss divorce.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      PerryA

      "Trump's Cover-up

      Although the Mueller report did clear Trump of collusion with Russia based upon the evidence found (this is not to say it did not happen), it clearly did not vindicate Trump of wrongdoing with regards to obstruction with some 10 known accounts where conclusions vary. Trump clearly obstructs all the time without even thinking about it because his mindset is akin to a king or mafia boss. This may worked before he was elected for business, but not as POTUS."

      Trump did no criminal act, and he was completely exonerated on the Trump Russia and every American was exonerated as Rod Rosenstein said when Mueller indicted but never convicted 13 Russians, that no American was involved, and there was no interference with the election.

      The link I gave to judicial watch shows the contrast to Trump's investigation and how Hillary lied, actually did criminal acts, but Comey covered them up.

      We have the investigative report of how Gross Negligence was changed to Extremely Careless by Comey.. Once again, it started with Hillary but Mueller didn't go back in his investigation to the beginning.

      Is it OK for only democrats to be Above the Law?

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      "Some kid punched him in the stomach, then when a teacher came around, the kid threw himself on the ground and said “Bobbie hit me”

      That’s trump and Putin"

      Why should we believe your kid?

      That is not Trump or Putin that is a democrat.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      Did you even read my link?

      https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-rel...

      It answers the questions, you haven 't answered.

      "NOYFOB

      4 hours ago

      Perry A

      The Hillary investigation was the catalyst that sparked the Russian Trump influence the election, and that is where the Mueller investigation should have begun.

      What is the point? Justice!

      And should Hillary Clinton and the democrats be Above the Law?

      Disregarding my the link in my previous comment?

      Randy Godwin

      5 hours ago from Southern Georgia

      The right continues to use Hillary as a shield against anything bad for Trump. You'd think SHE was once POTUS or trying to be again. And Trump and Kim agree Biden's a dumbass. LOL!"

    • Randy Godwin profile image

      Randy Godwin 

      2 weeks ago from Southern Georgia

      Like you ever answer questions, Brad! I answered 9 you put to me and left without me having a chance to ask mine. As I said, you don't want to answer questions, simply prate....

      And you don't think my name is real? LOL! coming from you that's almost ridiculous. Give me your number and I'll give you a call. Ask GA, he has my number.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      I could easily refute your link, but I won't until you answer my comments seriously.

    • bradmasterOCcal profile image

      NOYFOB 

      2 weeks ago

      Leslie

      You and Randy if that is his name don't answer just mock and then you want me to answer a link.

      Not going to happen until you take the subject serious and stop trying to divert it.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)